And honestly, if this were implemented, not only would it benefit women and children immensely, but it would pay for itself! This is how it's done in France, Denmark, many other countries: allowances allocated on a household basis. People complain about single mothers not working/ not working much but if they could work/ work more and take home the same that two parent families do for that same gross income earned, then they would!! So more tax revenue, more productivity.
I have seen the calculations of what we'd get in benefits if I didn't work and hadn't spent my 20s working 90 hour weeks to build a career and bought a house before having children. We'd have our rent paid and due to my DCs' disabilities we'd have over £3k per month on top of that. No childcare cost then and no mortgage, far more time with my children, not doing this damage to my own health, so we'd be far better off than now.
It is an absolute kick in the teeth! And economically makes no sense: surely the state should rather give me the same tax allowances as a couple with children but still get a large chunk of tax from me per month and me fund all of our living costs, rather than push my health over the edge and them then have to pay for everything? I really don't get it.
It does feel like it's just part of the vilification of single mothers so nobody cares, because there's no logic to it, so it means a lot to hear people like you @LadyWindermeresOnlyFans say that you're hearing us (single parents/ parents of disabled DC) and support the system being changed to be fair to us. Just want to be taxed the same as other households with the same income, that's all! I really don't think it's unreasonable. I hope others will think about it and also write to MPs etc to support this being changed.