Please or to access all these features

Paid childcare

Discuss everything related to paid childcare here, including childminders, nannies, nurseries and au pairs.

childminder and force feeding ishoos

39 replies

cuppa · 03/12/2007 12:48

OK, dd3 goes to childminder. Generally she is excellent and dd very happy there.

BUT. dd is poor eater. Has poor appetite, often eats little, but does have tendancy to try to fill up on/prefer snacks (crackers, fruit) rather than proper meals. Trying to ensure she doesn't snack at expense of meals.

She has lunch at childminders 2x a week

Today, go to collect her after lunch (am in hurry), dd has 2 spoonfuls of pasta left. I think she was eating as I arrived (childminder on phone). She anyhow stopped when I arrived and I needed to go anyway. Childminder finishes call and insists dd finishes plate (other mindees long gone upstairs playing.

I don't want to undermine cm, as I know it's hard to have 1 rule for 1 kid and other rule for the rest, BUT, I don't want to creat battle round food, dd was really crying she didn't want to finish, CM telling her (in kind but firm tones) she mustn't be stubborn, she had to finish, just cos I turn up she can't just stop etc etc. But like I said, I don't want dd sitting weeping over her dinner and creating possibly more food problems than we already have. I don't feel happy with being forced to clear your plate and to sit there forever till you do.
OTOH, how can I insist cm has different rule for my kid than for the others? Plus I acknowledge maybe dd does eat better for her and she's such a crap eater cos of me in the 1st place.

She is due to go again tomorrow and I feel I should discuss but don't know what to say.

Any ideas? Sorry for ramble.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
BoysAreLikeReindeer · 04/12/2007 12:08

Thank you for the update, cuppa.

Glad you managed to sort things out, it sounds like you handled it very well

maximummummy · 04/12/2007 12:00

really glad everything is sorted out now

cuppa · 04/12/2007 09:46

Morning, well, update. took dd this morning. She was in a really bad mood all morning and didn't want to go to CM, tho this could have just be morning grumpiness. Went to CM and she asked dd why she was so grumpy and if it was to do with the lunch problems so she brought it up and asked to speak with dd about it, and I was in hurry to take other dd to doc, so asked if I could speak quickly about it.

She explained that if a child really doesn't like something they don't have to eat it, but if they do they have to eat a reasonable amount. Not quite sure due to time why it came to her being forced to finish every last mouthful. She did say it wasn't about the food per se yesterday, but a power struggle with dd saying she didn't have to do something CM wanted just cos I'd arrived (am slightly on this point as the battle had clearly been going on since a long time before I arrived)

anyway, I explained our policay about giving food, up to her if she eats it, no alternatives and at end of meal plates taken away without fuss, keeping meals stress free and low key and that this was docs advice. She was very positive and supportive and didn't say, as I feared my was is xxx but said what I'd said made sense and that she would explain to this other kids if this meant her meal time treament was different. I asked her to keep any battles and power struggles away from and separate from food and the table, and she agreed, so I was very happy with her response and that the situation is now resolved.

In every other way I've been 100% happy with CM and how she interacts with dd, so am very relieved she took on board what I had to say, and feel confident it's now sorted. Thanks for your support and advice.

Just have to hope at some point dd starts to bloody eat.

OP posts:
maximummummy · 03/12/2007 21:11

cuppa - this is bang out of order i'm sorry you are having probs. with your c/m - this kind of action is just setting your daughter up for an eating disorder in my opinion - i am a childminder and would never ever treat a child in this way even if it was how the mother wanted it - your childminder should be looking after your dd the way you want - it is hard to juggle several different childcare regimes but it is possible - if she can't care for your dd the way you want you must go elsewhere

VictorianSqualor · 03/12/2007 21:02

bigshopper, I won't allow snacks unless I feel the ate enough dinner, but mine have bath and bed within an hour or so after dinner anyway so I don't really get asked for snacks then.

If they are still hungry after a decent amount of a meal is eaten then I offer fruit normally and they choose their own lunches froma selection of things so I don't really have a problem with it, I honestly think that keeping them at the table is plenty, and just refusing snacks in place of dinner.

It is normally enough with fussy eaters too, keep serving things up, eventually they'll eat them, the problem is when food becomes a battle.

I also try to remember there are things I really cannot stand to eat, so they are allowed to totally refuse one or two things, just not everything, with DD it's butternut squash and with DS it's carbonara!

smeeinachristmastreeinnit · 03/12/2007 21:01

oh dear,poor dd.
i think being forced to finish everything is a bit much and not very kind atall.
can you suggest to cm to give smaller portions?

amidaiwish, r u serious? "is cm fat?"
why should that mean anything?? do all fat people force feed children?

bigshopper · 03/12/2007 20:56

I have mixed feelings too. I never insist my kids finish, as don't want food to be an issue, but have realised that half the time they just get bored 1/2 way through and go off to play, then they're back demanding yogurt and toast later on. The answer is probably to completely ban all snacks so if they're hungry they just have to eat the meal.

VictorianSqualor · 03/12/2007 20:53

cuppa, wanted to add I think you're doing the right thing, food should not be a battle, they eat or they don't, as NAB said children are much better at regulating what they eat.

VictorianSqualor · 03/12/2007 20:52

No-one should force children to clear their plate for the reasons I said earlier, if you're worried children will get down to play rther than be full, just don't let them leave the table til everyone has finished. If they are still hungry and have to sit at the table they will eat, if they are not they won't.

cuppa · 03/12/2007 16:25

Well, I've said earlier, we don't do that.
Meals at set times, snacks at set time, nothing in between and no treats/alternatives if food not eaten.
Ah well, will speak to her tomorrow. Fingers crossed.

OP posts:
tori32 · 03/12/2007 14:33

The trouble is that lots of the time children want to get down to play, not because they have had enough. Then you find they want to have snacks an hour later, which parents give thinking the poor dc will starve, which then decreases their appetite for the next meal iyswim.

NiftyNanny · 03/12/2007 14:27

Well, if you have something on Doctor's advice I'd say CM has to stick to that too!

Forcing becomes more about the mental battle than about the food and you don't want to build up associations there!

NiftyNanny · 03/12/2007 14:25

Ouch, this does sound like the CM's rule is a bit harsh then, if she makes them finish EVERYTHING, EVERY time. Blah. Poor DD!

It sounds a bit ridiculous to say a child has only eaten a little if she's finished everything on her plate and not been given any more. Then again, if she's given extra helpings after finishing the first lot and not finished THAT, and the CM makes her sit with it cold..... oh....

I read mary's blog at daycaredaze.wordpress.com and she has a post up recently about "I don't like pasta!" and how a child refused to eat, but now finishes it because it's that or nothing. Consistency is good, but a battle of wills isn't.

cuppa · 03/12/2007 14:25

Well I discussed this problem with the doctor as was concerned and she said we must provide healthy meals for dd, but dd is the one to eat it. If she doesn't eat if, don't make a big deal give a certain amount of time then take the food away, but offer no alternatives and nothing till next meal time. This is our policy at home, I try not to make a fuss, dd isn't allowed dessert or sweets or stuff in between. I'm reasonably satisfied we have the balance right at home.

Tori32, I appreciate CM maybe does have more success at getting food down her, but I hate the power and powerlessness thing of forcing someone to eat when they don't want to.

OP posts:
tori32 · 03/12/2007 14:23

Forgot to say it also depends how big her portion sizes are as to whether she should clear her plate. I cater for the amount my dd 22mths eats (good appetite) as all the other children are 2yrs.

NAB3littlemonkeys · 03/12/2007 14:21

I really don't think a child should be forced to eat everything on their plate. They regulate their food intake much better than adults do in general and tend to eat when they are hungry and stop when they are full. I agree you can't undermind the CM but you need to say to her you don't want that happening again.

tori32 · 03/12/2007 14:19

I think its about time you took a leaf out of the childminders book. If you had that approach at home then she would eat much better in all circumstances, thus not requiring a battle at each meal.
I had the same issues with a mother of a child I mind, whose dd now eats far better through taking my approach. i.e. no snacks between meals unless meal is eaten. Also, no pudding if first course not eaten.

SweetSnowflake · 03/12/2007 14:18

right, this isnt on, your dd is at a cm, not a detention centre, you both know your dd eats little, why force food down her, she obv has a small appetite(and im not condecending, ive been there my dd is the same!), i would say to cm that as long as shes eating 'something' you dont mind if she doesnt eat it all and dont want her to be sat being made to eat something she doesnt want, tell her to follow the no dessert rule and at home, she will have to wait until next mealtime, but this is really wrong and will send totally wrong signals to your dd!

cuppa · 03/12/2007 14:13

Thing is, I was 10 minutes late, not at all early, and dd must've been at the table nuring this cold bloody pasta for at least 40 minutes, if not an hour. And she still wouldn't allow her to leave. At least it shows she's consistent

NN I've already, even just last week spoken to CM about her poor appetite and she's agreed to monitor closely/reduce morning snacks to ensure she's hungry at lunch time. She has reported back that she's eaten very little, but dunno if this is just cos she's had very little put on her plate.

BTW, I have witnessed this a couple of times before with dd, where I've turned up and she's still being forced to sit and clear her plate, so now I have to say something, esp as CM clearly pissed off with me for not allowing her to stay and eat her manky stone cold pasta

OP posts:
SweetSnowflake · 03/12/2007 14:09

as aparent i would be fuming!
as a cm i think she was out of line and put your dd through unnesasary upset, yes your dd will have been crying cos you were there and she wanted to go with you(had this LOADS of times), but cm should know this and either should have fed her earlier(or were you early collecting?) or understood your dd would lose interest, yes shes trying to get nutricious food into you dd but at what cost?!

i would ask cm to give dd lunch a litle earlier so you dont 'clash' in times and tell her that as long as your dd is eating 'some' of these lovely meals she prepares, you dont feel the need to finish everything on the palte as your dd is not used to big / bigger meals anyway, its a gradual thing..good luck

LOONEYplayingachristmasTUNEy · 03/12/2007 14:02

(at CM, not you) - I've got one baby STILL in her highchair after an hour and half but not because I'm insisting - it's because she loves her grub and is only just finished - she was busy squeezing orange and making a mess on the tray then chewing it, who am I to stop her If however she's taking ages and parents turn up early and they want to go, it's quick wipe and in the highchair if that's what parents want. My only rule is to not allow those who haven't bothered with their main course to have dessert after as otherwise they'd just always end up with dessert and not trying the other food. I have one who went through a phase of pulling the filling out of a sandwich or something and then wanting to leave the table. I'd try and encourage a little more by saying about the fruit/yoghurt (which she loves) but if she insisted she's finished, that's fine, she can go hungry (if she is hungry) until snack time later!

Your poor dd and poor you

BoysAreLikeReindeer · 03/12/2007 14:01

Aw cuppa, you have had a horrid experience

Sorry I was not much help

NiftyNanny · 03/12/2007 13:59

Have you asked her whether your child usually finishes all of her portion? It does sound as though she just wanted to go home with you. Children are rarely perfectly consistent and predictable - this might have been one off day!

Being with other children might have encouraged her to eat up in the past and the CM could reassure you that she doesn't need much fussing most days.

If the rule is there for everyone, but your daughter takes longer / doesn't have a huge appetite, then ask the CM whether she thinks a smaller portion might be appropriate - that way, your daughter can play by the same rules as everyone else, and perhaps have an extra half a banana or something later if she is hungry. If she has a small appetite, that way she won't really be replacing meals with snacks, rather, spreading out the day's nutritional needs in portions that feel comfortable to her.

I agree with you, that making someone eat when they're not hungry isn't a great way to go about things, but on the other hand the CM probably doesn't want to let her get grouchy and hungry so might have tried giving her a bigger mid morning snack. You could do the opposite of my other suggestion and cut back on the fruit and cracker snacks, leaving her hungry when it is meal time. I suppose you can guess which your daughter is most likely to respond well to!

cuppa · 03/12/2007 13:52

BoysAreLikeReindeer, ok, she wasn't pinning dd down with a tube down her throat, and dd was probably crying (more) because I was there, but the fact is that she insisted dd cleared her plate and was not allowed to leave the table till she'd cleared her plate, and she made it very clear she needent be so stubborn and she wasn't allowed to leave till she'd eaten every bit. CM even asked me to go and she'd deliver dd later so dd could stay indefinately till she'd finished, but I said I had to take her. We managed to cajole one more spoonful down her then I took her, and could tell cm was pissed off that I took her with some food left on her plate

OP posts:
BeeWiseMen · 03/12/2007 13:28

your child - oops