Please or to access all these features

Paid childcare

Discuss everything related to paid childcare here, including childminders, nannies, nurseries and au pairs.

Is this just not on?

32 replies

littleanimal · 14/02/2012 22:18

DD (4) and DS (2) currently go to a day-care nursery on the 3 days a week that I work. However the days are very long (8-6 at nursery plus commute) and we're thinking of changing to a nanny. Both kids could go to a local pre-school for 3 hours every morning. We would need the nanny to take them there and then pick them up afterwards and look after them for the rest of the day. This would be a much more expensive option than the current nursery. Would it be completely unreasonable to pay only half-pay for the 3 hours each day that the nanny would not have the kids to look after?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
ChippingInNeedsCoffee · 14/02/2012 22:33

Well - you have options... :)

Some people advertise for 'split shift' or 'wrap around care' - it's possible to get a nanny to do that, but they are also likely to take another job when it comes up.

You could do as you suggested and offer to pay half - but only if you don't expect her to do anything at your house during those hours.

Or you could do what most people do and pay her for all the hours. She could then prepare meals for the children to put in the freezer (for you to use on other days & her to use on her days), do the childrens' laundry, keep their rooms clean & tidy, change their beds etc.

If you only pay her half or nothing, you can't expect her to have them if they are ill or for any other reason they can't go to nursery.

Could you do drop offs and just employ an afternoon nanny?

When is your eldest going to school? Remember you will need to sort out holiday care then too.

What about a childminder instead - it's cheaper.

littleanimal · 14/02/2012 22:29

Yes I meant give her half the hourly rate for each of the 3 hours that she isn't doing anything.

OP posts:
AgentProvocateur · 14/02/2012 22:28

Great minds, MaureenMLove Wink

AgentProvocateur · 14/02/2012 22:26

Sorry - I didn't read your post properly. Did you mean half pay for the three hours? I thought you meant pay her for half a day because the DC were in nursery.

I think that would maybe be ok.

MaureenMLove · 14/02/2012 22:25

Oh, spooky! Both said almost exactly the same and exactly the same time! Grin

MaureenMLove · 14/02/2012 22:24

Not really, because you are preventing the nanny from earning any money for the 3 hours that she hasn't got any children to look after. She needs to be on call, so she could do anything else.

I think you'd be hard pushed to find a nannie to do that.

AgentProvocateur · 14/02/2012 22:24

Yes, unreasonable, I think. It's not like she could get another job in these three hours. And presumably she'd be "on call" if your DC were sick and needed to be collected early.