Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

Was your third labour quicker than your second, especially at 39?

51 replies

Historian0111101000 · 31/05/2026 20:45

We’re thinking of having our third baby and I’ll be 39 at the time of delivery.

I’ve had two previous natural births with no complications. First was an induction, second started on its own. Both pregnancies were straightforward and births went fine overall.

What I’m a bit worried about this time is how fast my second labour was. It was about 5 hours total. I went into hospital when contractions started, and by the time I was 5cm they were about to offer an epidural—but I went from 5cm to fully dilated in about 20 minutes after they broke my waters. The pain was absolutely intense and things escalated really quickly.

I genuinely think if I’d followed NHS advice and stayed at home longer I would have ended up giving birth on the kitchen floor, because I didn’t really feel much until I was already quite far along.

So I’m just wondering—if your third labour was your fastest, how did it compare to your second? Did it end up even quicker, and did you have any complications because of the speed?

Any experiences would be really helpful.

OP posts:
purpleflurple · 31/05/2026 21:06

my second labour was pretty quick. I went from 4cm to delivering in an hour. Spent a couple of hours at home debating whether I was in labour before heading in.

My third labour was a planned home birth because I was worried about giving birth in the car. In total, my third labour was about 3 hours from when the midwife arrived to delivery but it was so calm staying at home. Zero stitches or complications!