Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Baby names

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

William and Kate...bad idea?

29 replies

ongobongo · 17/04/2010 23:40

We already have a William but have always liked Kate (would be Katherine). Given possible strong royal connections is this a bad idea?

Our surname sounds a bit like Duncan. Do you think that it's a problem that the t of Kate would blend into the surname? Kate Duncan

Other options could be:

Helena Duncan
Connie Duncan
Julia Duncan
Nell Duncan
Nancy Duncan
Corinna Duncan
Eliza Duncan
Rosie Duncan (Rosalind)

Any other suggestions welcome!

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
birdofthenorth · 20/04/2010 11:13

Unfortunately I think if/ when the Royal wedding occurs and the country is awash with William and Kate fever (which will recurr whenever they have kids/ fall out/ get back together/ succeed to the thrown) you will feel odd having a William and a Kate.

I agree that Cate (from Caitlyn/ Cathrine) makes it much less obvious a connection.

From your other list I think Nell Duncan sounds gorgeous, and Rosalind/ Rosie Duncan is lovely too. Both good names for little girls and grown women (as is Kate/ Cate!).

Is your William known as William or Billy/ Will etc? If he's Billy then I think that dilutes the Royal reference too.

ongobongo · 20/04/2010 09:42

Sorry, in case of confusion, madamefreckle and me are one and the same. Cover blown!

OP posts:
madamefreckle · 20/04/2010 09:39

Grumblebee - Helena/Nell as a two-for-one is a definite front runner!

Although I really like Matilda/Tilly, I have a close friend who has used this name and don't think she'd like it if I did too!

jollster - I wouldn't snarl at Katrina! I really like it, but DH not so sure.

Eliza - I really REALLY like it, except I'm strangely obsessed with making up rhymes -
"Despise-her, miser, scheisse Elisa"

Or...positive rhymes, "Can't think of anyone nicer (tenuous) or wiser than Eliza" - At least you can put a positive spin on it!

StrictlyKatty · 20/04/2010 08:45

Lucy Duncan sounds really really good IMO.

Elizabeth Duncan is also lovely.

randomimposter · 19/04/2010 22:20

Forgot to say also LOVE Eliza.

randomimposter · 19/04/2010 22:20

Have a William.
LOVE Cate. Maybe Caitlin?
Or Katrina (my middle name before you snarl at it!).

You know I'd ignore all the royal connection sneers (and I am SO NOT a royalist!). Both lovely names and agree with the PP about... hardly Barack and Michelle!

NightLark · 19/04/2010 17:24

I have a Katherine (kate) and if I was ever to have another DS would love to call him William - great name. Royal connection would never have occured to me.

From your list I love Helena, Eliza and Rosalind - they were all on my list for my Katherine.

Lutyens · 19/04/2010 17:19

Just realised I know a William who's married to a Kate!

GrumbleBee · 19/04/2010 17:12

From your list: if you went for Helena, you could use Nell as a nn - two for the price of one!

Egwene · 19/04/2010 16:54

What about Tilly (Matilda) instead of Millie.

The Royal connection didnt occur to me either.

LouMacca · 19/04/2010 15:05

I agree with allyfe, couldn't see a problem from reading your title thread.

Wouldn't even consider not putting William and Kate together - royal connection didn't even enter my mind.

We have friends with children called Edward and Sophie and don't think the royalty thing has ever been mentioned.

allyfe · 19/04/2010 14:56

I read the title of your thread and couldn't work out why on earth it could be a problem.

I'd say that since your dd would be more often associated with her last name than her brother, it wouldn't be a problem. If she wanted to marry a William it may be more of an issue, but other wise I'd say if you love the name then go for it.

ongobongo · 19/04/2010 14:53

Really split opinions here... hmmm...what to do? I think Kitty is fine strictlykatty but a bit twee for me.

Other possibilities which we are now considering are:

Millie (Millicent) - which dp is v. keen on but I'm not sure about Millicent and wouldn't want just 'Millie' on the birth cert.

Lucy - which I really like but might be a bit on the popular side.

So, out of all of these, which do you like best?
Kate Duncan
Helena Duncan
Connie Duncan
Julia Duncan
Nell Duncan
Nancy Duncan
Corinna Duncan
Eliza Duncan
Rosie Duncan (Rosalind)
Millie Duncan
Lucy Duncan

OP posts:
cumbria81 · 19/04/2010 09:41

It wouldn't occur to me to make the connection to be honest.

I suppose if they marry it would be like having two kids called Charles and Di. But at the moment I think the link is tenuous.

thesecondcoming · 19/04/2010 09:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

CakeandRoses · 19/04/2010 09:24

I actually had to do a double-take on the names before I realised the connection - although, obv this would become v obvious if they do marry!

Even so, your DC will be individuals with separate lives, friends etc (particularly as they get older), most people won't even know what their sibling is called.

Really, how often does one say the names of both DC to people one doesn't know already? Not enough to change what you call your children imo. People that see them both regularly (friends and family) are very unlikely to care a jot!

I guess it boils down to whether you'd find having to say the names of both of your DC to strangers would be too embarrasing for you to accept, in order to have the name of your choosing.

I'd personally go for it!

StrictlyKatty · 19/04/2010 09:14

William and Kate would make me think you were the type to make a banner and stand halfway down the Mall

Please God save yourself! What about Kitty?

PixieOnaLeaf · 18/04/2010 14:00

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

coll2010 · 18/04/2010 13:54

I think it would be fine. They are both very traditional names and I like them both.

As long as you don't mind people assuming you are a royalist I'd say go for it. I know of siblings in their 30's now called Andrew, Philip and Anne and everyone always assumed their parents were obsessed by the royal family. They weren't though just liked the names.

5DollarShake · 18/04/2010 09:54

I thought Royals as soon as I saw the thread title, I must admit.

I dunno - it's a personal judgement call, really.

I love both names, so can see why you're keen. But agree with notso - just call her Kate, not Katherine! Or if you must, then Catherine. Can still be shortened to Kate.

senua · 18/04/2010 08:20

What about Mary?

cosysocks · 18/04/2010 08:16

Well if you worry about that... DS is William named after my dad, and second name Henry named after my nana. Only when someone mentioned 'royal connection' did I get it oops oh and I'm kate!

CheerfulYank · 18/04/2010 07:56

I don't think of it but of course am American. They're such classic names that I think it works. If you had a Barack and Michelle that would be entirely different.

notso · 18/04/2010 00:26

I didn't think of it, Kate is brilliant but please don't spoil it with Katherine.

Also love Nell, Nancy, and Rosie.

muminthemiddle · 18/04/2010 00:20

William and Katharine/Catherine go well together.
I also agree with cat64 in that they are proper names so not obviously named after anyone (other than possibly family/friends).