Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Baby names

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

How can I break a naming tradition?

64 replies

MollieS · 05/04/2010 18:09

Hi everyone, can anybody help me with a predicament?...

My husband is Greek, though has lived in England for the past 15 years, where we now live together. We are trying for a baby and I'm feeling such anticipation over choosing a name - like anybody, naming my first child has been something I've thought about since I was little. However, there's a catch.

Traditionally, little Greeks are named after the grandparents on their father's side, a custom which seems to be nation-wide and not limited to how observant/family orientated you are. So, my husband's (non English speaking) parents expect our future son or daughter to be named after them. The trouble is that their names - Vasilios and Dorothea- seem very old-fashioned to me (I hope this doesn't offend anyone). I can't imagine calling my child either of these names, nor do I feel that these names would fit well into an English school and can't help but worry that my child would be teased by other children. The most I would be comfortable with is to use them as middle names.

My husband is sympathetic though currently as confused as I am over the situation. He feels a sense of obligation to his parents (made worse by the fact that he has chosen to settle in a country which is familiar to him but alien to them and also by the fact that I am not Greek, something they've never stated as being a problem but equally, something they had not anticipated). He says he could live with either of their names, but also likes other (Greek sounding) names that we've discussed that I also like and are similar to English names (Alexandra, Sophia etc).

Has anybody else been in a similar situation? I'd appreciate any advice - from Greek mums/partners or otherwise!

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
welshdeb · 06/04/2010 10:59

When my dad was born - he is 82 this year. His grandfather was the registrar. He didn't like the names my gps chose so inserted one he liked as his first name. He did the same for my aunt. So my dad instead of being frank gerald surname was named David Frank gerald surname. Neither my dad or his sister have never been known by these names and he has always been known as frank all his life.

bronze · 06/04/2010 10:38

My mum is another known by her middle name

Even on cheques it says (example) N. Lucy Bloggs

I have never heard anyone call her her first name. Very rarely they have called her Nicola Lucy

but never just the first name

MollieS · 06/04/2010 10:36

Picking up on what jollydiane says above about xyz traditions (and at the risk of sounding like I really conflict with my ILs - this isn't actually the case day to day!)....

What do people think about the 'to christen' or 'not to christen' situation? Similar to the naming conundrum is the fact that I'd be happier NOT to christen my children, whereas again, the traditional and expected thing to do according the dh's parents would be to christen. He is agnostic (read apathetic), I'm an athiest and his parents are Greek Orthodox. I don't object to celebrating festivals such as Easter with them. Indeed, I enjoy seeing their pleasure at the ritual of it and enjoy the atmosphere and bustle of it all despite the religious connotations that do not feature for me (the sights, smells and sounds of a Greek Orthodox church at Easter are certainly something to behold!). They know that I do not share their beliefs but appreciate this kind of participation. That is something I am more than prepared to uphold.

In this case, does it seem unreasonable to want to hold off christening my child?

This type of move is something I'd prefer for the child to choose for themselves when the time comes and when he or she will be old enough to engage in (simplistic or otherwise) conversations about God etc. Yes I'd prefer my baby to grow up believing in scientific evidence and evolution, and yes that might sway him or her one way or another, but I'd never outlaw a religious interest if it arose, Christian, Hindu, Islamic, Buddhist or other. This is why I feel it to be unfair to jump the gun and insist on a christening.
Whilst I know that at the end of the day it will be just one day in my baby's life that will not automatically lead to a life of unchosen religiosity, it goes against the grain.

What should I do?

NB for those who haven't read earlier posts - this isn't an urgent enquiry - dh and I are still trying for said baby as opposed to having to make any snap naming/christening decisions!

OP posts:
jollydiane · 05/04/2010 23:33

and yes I did break a naming tradition but lived to tell the tale.

jollydiane · 05/04/2010 23:29

Welcome to world of the grown ups. In this world you no longer have to do what you mum and dad want or your in-laws want you to do. It is your child your rules. Start as you mean to go on. Harsh but once the DC is born they will be in love with it and (should) forget this. What happens when it is the tradition that XYZ rule has to be followed?

and breathe.

cory · 05/04/2010 23:17

If going by Quattro's suggestion (which seems a good one to me), you would of course have to accept the risk that your dcs might actually decide they like being called Vassilios or Dorothea, because those names are cool. I very conscientiously started calling dd by an English version of her name, to make her transition into the outside world easier. 13 years later, and we are the only people who actually use this English name.

BridesheadRegardless · 05/04/2010 23:10

Lots of good suggestions for getting around it.

But just to say, Dorothea is gorgeous, and a name I've seena few ties on baby name threads recently so would not to regarded as weirdy. It fits the old fasioned names witha hint of class revival thats been goung on for awhile.

Vasilios not so easy, but perefectly fine, and Leo is a great name.

Quattrocento · 05/04/2010 23:09

I think you have to live with their first names being their grandparents.

From what I know about Greek families (cousin married to a Greek chap and had exactly the same issue - so couldn't not post) it would cause absolutely massive offence. And being Greek, the fall-outs are tremendous and titanic.

For example - cousin managed to cause a massive rift by failing to deliver sugared almonds to an uncle on the day of the wedding. Much drama.

But seriously, you simply can't not have those names. Can't you have an English middle name and call them by their English middle names?

SE13Mummy · 05/04/2010 23:02

Have a look on nameberry - you can look up names by origin or meaning etc. so perhaps you could see if there are any other names with the same meanings that you like?

FWIW I don't think a Vasilios would be ridiculed at school; I've taught children called Ainus (pr. anus!) and Gniple (pr. nipple) and they've not been teased any more than anyone else.

bruffin · 05/04/2010 20:17

I am half cypriot and named the anglican version of my greek cypriot grandmother's name (Christine/Christalla)

My welsh grandmother's name is Dorothy and my greek nan wanted my youngest sister to be named after her. Apparently Theodora was acceptable as a version of Dorothy. She was called Melanie instead

I would go with having the name as a middle name.

We all have names that are anglified versions of greek names.

LilQueenie · 05/04/2010 20:15

Its your child you should be able to choose the name. I thought there might a problem with names as OH has a family name but we arent using it. In fact the first name he chose was MY Dads name not his dads. Suits me as I always wanted that name anyway. If you chose a name to suit the family then its not really your choice. I would pick a name you and your OH like.

MollieS · 05/04/2010 20:00

Yes peasandbeans, I believe that Vasilios is the Greek version of Basil. That is what DH says. I've also read that it is the Greek version of William and had considered that as a suggestion too...but I just don't feel it.

OP posts:
IngridFletcher · 05/04/2010 19:49

Dorothea is lovely. Lots of nickname possibilites. Dotty is very cute while they are small.

beanlet · 05/04/2010 19:44

Leo is great as a nn for Vasilios. Dorothea also has lovely nns other than Thea (which I also really like) -- Dottie and Dolly. I'd go with the grandparents' names, then call them by nicknames. Either that, or grandparents' names first, and the names you will actually use as second names! Ticks all the boxes; family harmony retained.

peasandbeans · 05/04/2010 19:43

Is Vasilios the greek version of as Basil? I know a little (French) boy called Basile and I thought it was quite a sweet name.

MollieS · 05/04/2010 19:39

Well put SuziKettles. Thanks everyone for the advice!

OP posts:
SuziKettles · 05/04/2010 19:28

As previously suggested, just get your dh to explain that in the UK middle names are often used to pass on family names so you'll be using these to honour the grandparents.

That way you're mixing two traditions (sort of since technically the middle name thing isn't exactly a tradition). Hopefully they'll be as respectful of your alternative culture and see this as a good compromise.

NoseyNooNoo · 05/04/2010 19:26

Re: school registration, the form asks for their name and their 'known as' name.

DitaVonCheese · 05/04/2010 19:24

My bf's brother was known by his middle name at school and by his first name at home due to some complicated reason I can't quite remember (think it was because he had an extant family member with one of the names or something). AFAIK it didn't cause any problems for him, though it was very confusing for me (he was one of twins, so three names thrown into the mix was baffling ).

I don't think you would say "This is Vasillios but we call him Leo" would you, you'd just say his nn, or at least that's what I do with DD.

Personally I think middle names would be a good compromise and am another who loves Dorothea

cory · 05/04/2010 19:22

I gave mine Swedish, unpronouncable names, but that was because I wanted those names! And no, they've never been teased. But if it was solely for the sake of the family, I'd let them be middle name.

NoseyNooNoo · 05/04/2010 19:21

Why should the Greek tradition of naming a child after paternal grandparents over-rule the British tradition of picking a name of the parent's choosing?

MollieS · 05/04/2010 19:15

Interesting ideas. I think they'd understand the compromise, though they'd probably consider me to be basterdising the culture! What a minefield!

I very much like the names Leo and Thea. If I'm really picking holes in things in an attempt to cover every eventuality, then I'd say that the only problems would be that for Leo it is short for Leonidas in Greek and Thea is very much like Theo, the name of dh!

Changing tack slightly, does Leonidas sound too kitsch given the connection to the Greek story of Leonidas which was recently made into a Hollywood movie?

OP posts:
Undercovamutha · 05/04/2010 19:10

I love Dorothea, but if you don't then I think using them as a middle name is a great compromise. I do think having a family name as a middle name is a great way of keeping a tradition and culture alive.

FWIW, we agonised during pregnancy about whether to name the baby after my MIL who died shortly before I got pg. She had a very oldfashioned name - not in a good way either - but luckily I had a boy. Phew!

PandaG · 05/04/2010 19:07

friend of mine uses her middle name all the time, and has done from birth. IME school forms often have a space for 'known as', so you can make that clear.

CantSupinate · 05/04/2010 19:07

What about putting Leo/Thea on the birth certificate, and telling them that it's the result of mixing the 2 cultures? Would they understand that compromise or think it pointless?