Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Baby names

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Original poster

Rose when you already have a Fred?

36 replies

wasabipeanut · 11/12/2009 21:37

Really love this as a first name - classic and beautiful IMO but suddenly had the thought this morning that when combined with DS's name - Fred, it isn't great.

Have a think if you haven't already twigged why.

Am I being over cautious? Would people associate it?

Everytime we think we have the girls name cracked it goes wrong again.

Alice will be the middle name btw.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Set a reminder
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
HSMM · 12/12/2009 22:43

Fred and Ginger

rosieroseanna · 12/12/2009 22:24

NO!!!!!

It's a bit like calling a girl Myra and a buy Hindley

Jujubean77 · 12/12/2009 21:40

Hell no

thelunar66 · 12/12/2009 21:39

NO NO NO

dingdong3 · 12/12/2009 21:35

I immediately thought no to the combination but interestingly my niece, who's 20, didn't know why I thought it was a bad idea. She had no idea who Fred and Rosemary West were..

TeaOneSugar · 12/12/2009 21:33

My Mother used to work in a maternity hospital and had to point out to a Mr and Mrs Brady that Ian might not be the best choice of name for their newborn - that was in the 80's.

BigusBumus · 12/12/2009 21:29

Crumplet, I know a Sam and Ella too. In Luton area... same ones????

oldwoman · 12/12/2009 21:28

No, you shouldn't use these 2 names together.

rusmum · 12/12/2009 21:26

Oh now get it!!! doh!!!

rusmum · 12/12/2009 21:25

why not??? I have a Ruby and Rose but now LOVE edie!!

MaggieAnFiaRua · 12/12/2009 21:16

I have to disagree with you Siambang/ Rosie would not be ok at a pinch!!

OP, if you like short names, Joy is lovely.

Slambang · 12/12/2009 18:31

Rosie would be OK at a pinch though

cece · 12/12/2009 18:28

NO! abosolutely not unless you want people talking about you for years to come! everytime they mention your dc's names.

darcymum · 12/12/2009 18:24

I wouldn't, but as they grow up would their friend and the people they know get the connection? Maybe not.

MaggieNollaig · 12/12/2009 18:13

no. on its own rose doesn't make me think of her, and on it's own fred doesn't make me think of fred west... but together? no way

doubleexpresso · 12/12/2009 17:59

Could try Rosie or Rosalie ??? But still a bit too West-ish. Sorry. Alice is lovely.

MamaLazarou · 12/12/2009 13:47

Fred and Rose - a vehement NO!!!

Paolosgirl · 12/12/2009 09:39

Sam and Ella got another snort into my cup of tea

SolidGoldpiginablanket · 12/12/2009 00:09

Dee and Sade? (second one named after the wanky wine bar chanteause of course)... Polly and Potter?

StayFrostyTheSnowMam · 11/12/2009 23:22

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

inveteratenamechanger · 11/12/2009 23:21

Sorry, no. They are nice names though. Just not together.

LaurieFairyonthetreeeatscake · 11/12/2009 23:14

I have no idea what Sam and Ella mean unless you mean salmonella if that don't think its too bad really...

but definitely wouldn't go for fred and rose.

LetThereBeRock · 11/12/2009 23:12

A definite no. Yes most people would think of Fred and Rose West.

Amapoleon · 11/12/2009 22:42

You could do Bonnie and Clyde

Crumplet · 11/12/2009 22:42

I have friend who has a Sam and Ella. Think thats worse. Its a non-forgettable issue...