Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Baby names

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Names spelled with diacritics

314 replies

Anonymousmember667 · 26/07/2025 08:40

Apologies if this has been discussed or answered before but I have a question if anyone knows the answer, or who to ask or has any experience please?

So some names have diacritics, usually the name originates from another language other than english. Maybe the most common ones being Seán, Siobhán, Chloé, Zoë, René, Beyoncé etc etc.

Say for example, the name Chloé, Are there any issues registering this name with the diacritic on the “e” in England; on the Birth Certificate, with the NHS, in the school system, with banks, on her passport, driving licence etc etc.

Most people wouldnt know but Its simple to press the alt gr button + the letter to get most of these diacritics on a keyboard or hold the button on an apple keyboard, but do government systems and organisations systems generally support diacritic names?

Is there a right or expectation for organisations to spell your name correctly in England? Doesn't GDPR say this?

Is she destined for a lifetime of her name being spelt wrong or is she allowed to be a Chloé with an “é” !?

Thanks for any advise or experience anyone has 🙏

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Thread gallery
7
GloriaMonday · 27/07/2025 13:49

OK.Smile Thanks.

Whatpatternisthis · 27/07/2025 13:05

@GloriaMonday It was for the benefit of others really. You gave an example of the spelling Chloé, but hadn’t mentioned that this spelling is the French one and so is not typically pronounced the same as Chloë.

It was just in case anyone is taking inspiration from this thread. We are in Baby names 😊

GloriaMonday · 27/07/2025 12:22

@Whatpatternisthis , Why are you telling me this? I was responding to @MrsTerryPratchett 's post.

@MrsTerryPratchett ,it's the name of a company.

@SilenceOfTheTimTams , the difference between Sïan and Siân is significant, as is between Séan, Seán and Sean.

niadainud · 27/07/2025 10:24

BellissimoGecko · 27/07/2025 09:38

Élysées

À
École
Été

AgathasAunt · 27/07/2025 10:18

I’m a Zoë. I use it where possible, but don’t stress about it where it isn’t. My parents actually used Zoé (search engines were not a thing in the 1960s, and they hadn’t checked it in a book). Neither diacritic is registered on my birth certificate. I opt for Zoë because that is how I pronounce it. Zo-ee, not Zo-ay.

I’ll also accept Sue (in Germany), Joe (from Chinese colleagues) and Mrs Cho (in Korea).

BellissimoGecko · 27/07/2025 09:38

AussieManque · 27/07/2025 00:43

Thanks for enlightening me, I based my comment on French where you never put accents on upper case letters, even if they do come with accents if written in lower case. Also I can't think of any French words with the accent on the first letter.

Élysées

Whatpatternisthis · 27/07/2025 09:30

@Daffodilsarefading
If you press down on a letter on the phone keyboard when typing — just for a second or two — a selection of accented forms will appear. You then choose the one you need.

Loads of Irish names have been anglicised so Shaun doesn’t really stand out for me. (Though it was only through MN that I learned that Shaun the Sheep is meant to be a pun. It doesn’t work in an Irish accent as shorn doesn’t sound like Shaun.)

Even surnames that are thought of as typically Irish, eg O’Sullivan, are anglicisations. The name is spelt and pronounced a bit differently in Irish (Ó Súilleabháin). In fact most Irish surnames today are anglicisations though some people do use the Irish forms and some use both forms regularly.

Daffodilsarefading · 27/07/2025 09:08

There are some quite rude people on here.
I’ve also learnt a few things. Such as why some people pronounce Zoe - sorry not sure how to add umlautes- as ZO. I assumed they were being over familiar. I did know about Sean being pronounced differently with the fada. Again, apologies as I don’t know how to add the fada on my phone.
What irritates me is people taking a name like Sean and spelling it as Shaun, I understand way back when someone would have only heard the pronunciation and never seen it written, but surely that isn’t the case now.

DiscoBob · 27/07/2025 08:52

I don't know what you think GDPR is but it's nothing to do with having 'rights' regarding name spellings.

Anonymousmember667 · 27/07/2025 08:44

TheWibble · 26/07/2025 23:33

I have Siân as a middle name. It's on my birth certificate, but any documentation issued since then has never had the circumflex above the 'a'. Passport, driving licence etc. The admin offices for these documents have told me that their systems can't register any diacritics in name spellings.

Don't you think thats really sad. I assume it doesn't consume you or you lose sleep over it mind!

Thats what I thought GDPR covered, things like this. That companies and organisations had a legal duty to store your information correctly and securely, i.e. the correct spelling of your name. And also, that you have a right to request them to rectify the incorrect information. I wonder has anyone with a diacritic name ever actually challenged any of these organisations.

OP posts:
AussieManque · 27/07/2025 00:43

Whatpatternisthis · 26/07/2025 14:16

Capital letters can certainly have an accent (called a fada) in Irish and Northern Ireland is part of the UK,
For example, the names Éabha, Úna, Órla, or Íde all have accents.

I’m not sure about Scottish Gaelic or Welsh but guessing that Scottish Gaelic at least is similar regarding accents on capitals.

Thanks for enlightening me, I based my comment on French where you never put accents on upper case letters, even if they do come with accents if written in lower case. Also I can't think of any French words with the accent on the first letter.

Whatpatternisthis · 27/07/2025 00:16

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 26/07/2025 23:52

I’m sorry, but it isn’t.

And anyway, even if I’m wrong, that’s how things stand and nothing bad seems to come of it.

Minority native languages within the UK are being ignored. People are being ignored. That’s something bad imho.

Unfortunately you are right when you say there probably isn’t much recourse for OP at the moment.

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 27/07/2025 00:07

ErrolTheDragon · 26/07/2025 23:55

You’re only right from a very limited perspective. The opposing view is valid from a broader one.

What’s the opposing view? That the loss of a diacritic is a misspelling? Yeah, ok. It is, if you want to be painfully literal. So what?

The OP asked about rules in the UK (actually “England”) for records of names that have diacritics and whether there’s recourse through the GDPR. I think we’ve established that there are no rules for exact reproduction and that data protection won’t help.

Whatpatternisthis · 27/07/2025 00:03

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 26/07/2025 23:49

Seriously? You’re trying to tell me that an official document or company record in the UK that records Sean rather than Seán is as wrong and likely to present problems as if it said Sien or Seen or Saen or Zean?

In any case much of the previous discussion was about whether Sean was a ‘proper’ anglicisation or not. That’s got nothing to do with (apparent) irritation about the absence of diacritics on forms and documents.

It depends. In the UK it mightn’t cause problems because people mostly think like you do and don’t see the difference, or alternatively they are forced to accept that systems aren’t set up for them.

On the other hand if I entered a word without the required accent into an online Irish language dictionary, it would most likely tell me the word isn’t recognised. Because it isn’t.

HotCrossBunplease · 27/07/2025 00:00

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 26/07/2025 22:33

Well, no. Any more than all the speakers of other languages that use diacritics don’t care about how the names are recorded.

If Jesus wept, he didn’t weep about fadas.

I think you’re pushing something that’s got nothing to do with alphabets and the form of names in records. As is mathanxiety, it seems.

Edited

I am not pushing anything. I am trying (banging my head against a brick wall) to explain to you why the existence of an official language with diacritic marks in the UK is relevant to the OP’s question. I have expressed no opinion as to what I think the UK government should or should not do. The only thing I object to is your facile “not relevant” and “so what?” comments.

ErrolTheDragon · 26/07/2025 23:55

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 26/07/2025 23:49

Seriously? You’re trying to tell me that an official document or company record in the UK that records Sean rather than Seán is as wrong and likely to present problems as if it said Sien or Seen or Saen or Zean?

In any case much of the previous discussion was about whether Sean was a ‘proper’ anglicisation or not. That’s got nothing to do with (apparent) irritation about the absence of diacritics on forms and documents.

You’re only right from a very limited perspective. The opposing view is valid from a broader one.

HotCrossBunplease · 26/07/2025 23:55

TheOriginalEmu · 26/07/2025 23:40

Well it’s only simple and easy if you don’t have a name that includes a diacritic. People don’t seem to appreciate that spelling Siân as Sian is like spelling Steve as Shteve or something. It changes the pronunciation and it’s really quite ignorant to just drop them because English doesn’t use them so then they don’t matter.

I think you have misunderstood the post that you are quoting. I was replying to a suggestion that people should be forced to transliterate their names in a particular way if a system does not cater for diacritics. I was not commenting on whether it was right or wrong that the system should not allow them in the first place.

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 26/07/2025 23:52

TheOriginalEmu · 26/07/2025 23:49

Yes. It is. It absolutely is.

I’m sorry, but it isn’t.

And anyway, even if I’m wrong, that’s how things stand and nothing bad seems to come of it.

TheOriginalEmu · 26/07/2025 23:49

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 26/07/2025 23:30

Not having symbols on letters in some records of names is nothing like Bob/Bib/Bab/Boob. As you well know.

Yes. It is. It absolutely is.

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 26/07/2025 23:49

Whatpatternisthis · 26/07/2025 23:36

To someone who speaks the language it is pretty much exactly the same. That’s what you don’t seem to understand.

For example in Irish an á is not the same as an a.
As has been explained already by pp, Seán is not the same as sean in either pronunciation or meaning in Irish.

Edited

Seriously? You’re trying to tell me that an official document or company record in the UK that records Sean rather than Seán is as wrong and likely to present problems as if it said Sien or Seen or Saen or Zean?

In any case much of the previous discussion was about whether Sean was a ‘proper’ anglicisation or not. That’s got nothing to do with (apparent) irritation about the absence of diacritics on forms and documents.

TheOriginalEmu · 26/07/2025 23:40

HotCrossBunplease · 26/07/2025 17:33

I don’t think it would be possible to be that prescriptive given that names can be pretty much spelled however the parents choose. It’s simple and easy to say “only the 26 letters of the English alphabet allowed, with no diacritics”.

Well it’s only simple and easy if you don’t have a name that includes a diacritic. People don’t seem to appreciate that spelling Siân as Sian is like spelling Steve as Shteve or something. It changes the pronunciation and it’s really quite ignorant to just drop them because English doesn’t use them so then they don’t matter.

Whatpatternisthis · 26/07/2025 23:36

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 26/07/2025 23:30

Not having symbols on letters in some records of names is nothing like Bob/Bib/Bab/Boob. As you well know.

To someone who speaks the language it is pretty much exactly the same. That’s what you don’t seem to understand.

For example in Irish an á is not the same as an a.
As has been explained already by pp, Seán is not the same as sean in either pronunciation or meaning in Irish.

TheWibble · 26/07/2025 23:33

I have Siân as a middle name. It's on my birth certificate, but any documentation issued since then has never had the circumflex above the 'a'. Passport, driving licence etc. The admin offices for these documents have told me that their systems can't register any diacritics in name spellings.

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 26/07/2025 23:30

Whatpatternisthis · 26/07/2025 23:19

Are you being serious or joking? Not sure at this stage 😅

How can you think nobody cares whether their names are spelt as they should be?

Accents aren’t arbitrary squiggles. Leaving them out is like spelling a name with the wrong letter. It changes the pronunciation and can change the meaning at least in the original language. If your name was Bob you’d probably prefer it to be recorded as such in records, rather than as Bib or Bab or Boob.
If systems aren’t set up to do that people can be more or less bothered, but it’s not exactly ideal by any standard.

Not having symbols on letters in some records of names is nothing like Bob/Bib/Bab/Boob. As you well know.

Whatpatternisthis · 26/07/2025 23:19

SilenceOfTheTimTams · 26/07/2025 22:33

Well, no. Any more than all the speakers of other languages that use diacritics don’t care about how the names are recorded.

If Jesus wept, he didn’t weep about fadas.

I think you’re pushing something that’s got nothing to do with alphabets and the form of names in records. As is mathanxiety, it seems.

Edited

Are you being serious or joking? Not sure at this stage 😅

How can you think nobody cares whether their names are spelt as they should be?

Accents aren’t arbitrary squiggles. Leaving them out is like spelling a name with the wrong letter. It changes the pronunciation and can change the meaning at least in the original language. If your name was Bob you’d probably prefer it to be recorded as such in records, rather than as Bib or Bab or Boob.
If systems aren’t set up to do that people can be more or less bothered, but it’s not exactly ideal by any standard.

Swipe left for the next trending thread