Lennon or Frank?

32 replies

BoyMamaPending12 · 09/06/2025 18:09

Which do you prefer?
which is more popular in your area? Or any similar suggestions please!

OP posts:

Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Icedcaramelfrappe · 09/06/2025 18:23

Frank but Francis on the birth certificate

BashfulClam · 09/06/2025 18:22

Both are absolutely awful!

Tygertiger · 09/06/2025 18:21

Lennon is a surname, not a first name. And is only ever going to make people think of John. I’m a huge Beatles fan but I wouldn’t saddle my child with a name that will make everyone they meet instantly think of one. Frank is much better. Or if you’re also a diehard fan, there’s nothing wrong with John (or Paul, or George, or Richard) and then you’ll know where the name came from but it’s not immediately obvious to the world.

Gffbjjgfddbjkkm · 09/06/2025 18:20

Both awful, but Lennon really is terrible.

TomatoSandwiches · 09/06/2025 18:18

Lennon is a try hard name, Frank is better.

frostedshreddie · 09/06/2025 18:15

Frank 🫶🏻

Ddakji · 09/06/2025 18:11

Don’t like either but Lennon was a bit of an arsehole (and isn’t this the name of another arsehole’s son, Liam Gallagher?) so Frank.

Unflip

1 2

Swipe left for the next trending thread