Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Baby names

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Are popular names really all that bad?

112 replies

QueSyrahSyrah · 18/05/2024 19:53

I see often on MN name choices being warned against as they're 'so popular' and 'everywhere' (but at the same time, don't go too far against the grain because nobody will be able to spell or pronounce it!).

I've just been reading a couple of articles about the 2022 ONS baby names report that was published the other day and from +/- 300,000 boys born in 2002 in England and Wales, about 4500 of them were the most popular Noah, so 1.5%.

Of +/- 300,000 girls, about 3000 were Olivia, so 1%.

Obviously there's variance from area to area and by demographic so the percentage will probably be a bit higher in some places than others, but 1-1.5% doesn't seem all that overwhelming common to me.

I've spent a lot of time stressing myself out that some of our favourite names are in the top 10, but based on the above information I've decided to let it go and use the name we love regardless of how close to the top of the list it is.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Duckies · 19/05/2024 08:02

BoleynMemories13 · 18/05/2024 20:44

I'm with you, such a small amount of kids get given the top names these days that I really don't think popularity is a massive issue. Days of 3+ kids in a class with the same name are all but hone now. If it happens, it's more fluke than inevitably and can happen to any name in or around the top 100, not just the top 20.

Parents to be remember the days of each class having 4 Sarahs, 3 Michaels, 2 Davids etc but it's really not like that now. You're more likely to have a class of Harlow, Wyatt, Xander, Ocean, Lyra, Everett, Jasper, Nova, Otis and Ophelia etc as everyone strives to be different these days (and those parents are likely to be far more pissed off at a duplication that parents of Olivia, Ivy, Noah, Archie, Amelia, George, Theo, Isla etc, who were probably half expecting that it could happen).

I only tend to mention popularity as a 'negative' on here if it's in response to someone who is considering something currently very popular, despite saying they want to avoid popular names, as I'd assume they had no idea and would appreciate me pointing it out. Personally though, I'd much rather pick something I love even if it was statistically high up.

I agree with this, nothing wrong with being popular but then people say they are going with e.g. Willow to be 'different' (fwiw I think it's lovely but no longer out of left field!)

Anyway, thanks ONS for keeping us right 😁

justasoul · 19/05/2024 08:00

DD has a name that has been top 20 for the last 25 years or so, but we had no idea - I had only been living in the UK for a couple of years, didn’t know any children, it didn’t occur to me to look at the ons list because I didn’t even know it existed, plus we picked a name that was not on our shortlist after she was born and we looked at her, so probably wouldn’t have known anyway. We love her name still. But, most importantly, she’s 15 and I asked her what it’s like having a very popular name. First she looked at me like she’s never given it any thought whatsoever, then said it’s absolutely fine and she doesn’t mind.

garlictwist · 19/05/2024 06:31

I'm 50 and my name is Megan which wasn't a very popular name when I was a child. I never met another one.

Now there are tons of Megans. There are another three in my office. I really like being Megan S. It feels a bit like being in a club. I don't see the issue in it.

SemperIdem · 19/05/2024 06:09

buolaoir · 18/05/2024 20:32

Not actually that likely to happen. There are 16,000 primary schools in England, so with only 3000 Olivia’s there are going to be many year groups without an Olivia in at all. In fact in my DC’s reception class I think there is only one top ten name. No Olivia’s, Amelia’s, Noah’s etc.

20 years ago the most popular name had about 10,000 uses each year, then even more than that the further back you go. Olivia wouldn’t even had made the top ten with 3000 uses back then.

Of course you can have name pockets, where you might get 3 in one class, but quite rare now days. And can happen in with any name. And some names blend so it feels like you hear them a lot. Eg there seem to be loads of short girls names ending in ‘a’. Mia, Maya, Isla, Ava etc

But if you like a name, I wouldn’t let being in the top 10 put you off now days.

Edited

There are 3 Amelia’s and an Emilia in my daughters school year of 40. It happens.

Beachs · 19/05/2024 06:02

Isabella/isabelle are extremely common. just in my office, 3 ladies who had babies within 6 months of each other all called their baby’s Isabella all with the nn Bella.

as someone who grew up with a popular name and being one of 5 in a class with the same name I was never giving my kids a popular name. Personally I think the top 30 names are mostly dreadful names anyway

lavenderlou · 19/05/2024 04:55

My DCs names have been top 10/20 for more than the last decade. Neither had another with the same name in their class at primary. There was never more than one other child with the same name in the whole school. My eldest is at secondary and there is one other with the same name in their year group. There seems to be so much variety if name choices now that duplicates are less likely. I'm a primary school teacher and rarely have duplicate names in the same class.

My DC love their names. I was the only one in either my primary or secondary school with my name and I hated it because I was very shy and felt like it made me stand out.

Marplesyrup · 19/05/2024 04:12

bellocchild · 18/05/2024 20:39

It's always been a problem! I'm in my seventies and there 5 Susans and 3 Jennifers out of 60 in my year at secondary school. Also 2 Beverlys, 2 Penelopes, 3 Patricias, 2 Marys, and even 2 Brionys. We managed.

We had four Gillians in our class of twenty six at secondary school. Three of them had surnames that began with the final letters of the alphabet so as we were seated alphabetically at single desks, they were all in one row front to back. We thought it was quite cool as I remember and it didn’t seem to bother them.

arialllla · 19/05/2024 04:06

RogueFemale · 19/05/2024 00:21

What I find odd about the 2022 ONS list is that Muhammed is the #2 boy name but there is no equivalent girl name(s) at the top of the girl list.

Religion wasn't really founded on equality. I'm a Christian and Mary was only around to have the baby boy and become the man.

MinPinSins · 19/05/2024 03:34

RogueFemale · 19/05/2024 00:21

What I find odd about the 2022 ONS list is that Muhammed is the #2 boy name but there is no equivalent girl name(s) at the top of the girl list.

I'm not sure why that's odd? Culturally, a lot of Muslims use Muhammad as a boy's first name in honour of the prophet. A lot of these will actually call him something else - and some may even have multiple sons called Muhammad. There isn't really an equivalent for girls, so girls names are much more diverse - obviously Maryam and Fatima are particularly popular as the table shows.

RogueFemale · 19/05/2024 00:21

What I find odd about the 2022 ONS list is that Muhammed is the #2 boy name but there is no equivalent girl name(s) at the top of the girl list.

InheritedClock · 18/05/2024 23:45

InheritedClock · 18/05/2024 23:45

Yes, I was one of six girls of my name in a class of 30 throughout primary, and it was a name where there were always two or three others in all settings. It made me feel completely generic, not like an individual. To the point where I still remember the first time I automatically turned in the street when someone shouted my name, and by then I was in my 20s and living abroad where my name was unheard of.

I gave my son a name that fewer than three children born in his birth year had.

InheritedClock · 18/05/2024 23:45

Echobelly · 18/05/2024 22:16

I just wanted to avoid the kind of situation of being one of the 6 Katy/Katies in my year at school. We basically made a decision to avoid anything from most recent top ten of names, not that there were any names I really loved in those anyhow.

Yes, I was one of six girls of my name in a class of 30 throughout primary, and it was a name where there were always two or three others in all settings. It made me feel completely generic, not like an individual. To the point where I still remember the first time I automatically turned in the street when someone shouted my name, and by then I was in my 20s and living abroad where my name was unheard of.

Moreteaandchocolate · 18/05/2024 23:38

I don’t think it matters - it’s very random which names will double up in classes - my son has a top 5 name and is the only one in his school, whereas there are two boys in his class with the same name from outside the top 100!!

As previously mentioned, just watch for “hidden” popularity in the stats, eg all the different versions of Isabel / Isabelle / Isabella / Isobel actually make it much higher in the charts than it looks. Whereas a name like George looks high up in the charts but only has one spelling and no similar names, so is actually less likely to double up with something similar.

katebushh · 18/05/2024 23:13

I suppose if pressed I'd say I find it a bit basic bitch having a top of the list popular name but then realistically I tend not to think much about it because these things can be family oriented in terms of loved lost relatives or whatever.

buolaoir · 18/05/2024 23:05

I just went through the top 20, and in my child’s year group of about 50, only 5 children have a name in the top 20. None are duplicated. The only repeat name across the year group is ranked around 70 (and it’s used 3 times!). There are lots of short girls names ending in ‘a’ though.

TimPat · 18/05/2024 22:59

There were 208 boys with my sons name in Scotland in the year he was born, it was in the top 100 but not top 20.
Turns out 4 of those 208 are in his class in school!
He also went to nursery with a boy with the same name who ended up going to a different school.
It's total pot luck.

JaneGrint · 18/05/2024 22:50

I wouldn’t be put off a name I loved because it’s a popular one.

Theres a much wider pool of names used these days than 30 plus years ago, so compared with their parents generation, a child born now with a top 10 name is much less likely to meet a peer sharing their name.

Of course you do still get clusters of children with the same name, but it’s not all that easy to predict which names are going to crop up in your DC’s school etc.

My DC1 has a top 10 name, but the only 2 children in his class at primary school that shared a name had a name that was ranked around 125 in the baby name statistics for that birth year. He’s now at secondary school, and he’s the only child in his whole year group with that particular top 10 first name.

IamnotwhouthinkIam · 18/05/2024 22:49

Nope, I don’t think there is anything wrong with even the most popular of names now in terms of numbers. This isn’t the 80’s anymore when there could be 3 or 4 Sarah’s or 3 or 4 Christopher’s in a class. Now the number one name will still likely be the only one in a class - maybe 2 at most. And that’s assuming your child will even care - certainly with the some of the kids I know, they are happy about it as it means they fit in with their peers 🤣

BUT I think the popularity thing sometimes gets pointed out because so many names are quite similar. Not everyone realises that by the time you add all the spelling variants and commonplace diminutives for a name together ( plus maybe soundalikes or one letter difference names) that the name they thought wasn’t that popular actually has bigger numbers than some of the top names and it could be a shock for some parents who thought they were choosing something more unusual.🤷‍♀️

I also think some people use “too popular” when what they actually mean is too trendy and that’s the reason they dislike the name 🤔 Noah and George are both very popular for example - but one is more likely to stand the test of time in terms of not being able to guess the age of the man. Noah stands out as more popular in their minds because all the ones they’ve met have been their kids friends - not like Uncle George or Next door Neighbour George.

WhereIsMyLight · 18/05/2024 22:31

I get what you’re saying about the stats but there are definitely pockets of names, which means a name would be more likely in that area. Our small nursery class of about 15 has two sets of duplicate names. Both names are top 20 but out of the top 10. Plus two sets of names that sound very similar - Leo/Theo.

It matters to some parents because they grew up being one of 3/4 Rachel/Jessica/Jordan/Daniel and they don’t want that for their kids. If it matters to you, speak to your midwife about names she’s seen that year. That’ll give you an indication of what is happening in your area and if your area is full of Octavia, Phoebe, Clementine, Persephone then an Olivia should be fine.

Echobelly · 18/05/2024 22:16

I just wanted to avoid the kind of situation of being one of the 6 Katy/Katies in my year at school. We basically made a decision to avoid anything from most recent top ten of names, not that there were any names I really loved in those anyhow.

modgepodge · 18/05/2024 22:16

It’s just completely unpredictable within a class/school too. My daughters year group (60) has loads of double names: 2 Olivias (of course) but also 2 lunas, 2 Stanleys and 2 girls called robin (not Robyn!) and my daughter’s name is top 100 but nowhere near top 10 and there are 2 of her name too!!

so you could pick a more unusual name and yet still end up not being the only one in a class.

OneWildNightWithJBJ · 18/05/2024 22:15

The popular names in my area tend to be the more unusual names. I don’t think you can tell which names will be most common in your DC’s class.

My kids both have names that were in the top ten for the years they were born, but they were the only ones in their year at primary school and I think possibly one other at their large secondary.

Pick names you love.

PitterPatter3 · 18/05/2024 22:14

@Cattenberg Funnily enough I almost used Kylie as an example there. Born circa 1989.

Librarybooker · 18/05/2024 22:13

Depends on the era. I’m 60, the Tracy, Debra, Sharon, Julie dominance was too much. Likewise my neighbour (6 years younger) married a Darren with sister Karen and best friend Wayne.

I’m not sure if anything has been similar to that era. With the possible exception of how many Hannah’s there used to be circa 1988-2002.

But ultimately it’s best to just choose a name you like and live with it if it’s popular

CharlieBoo · 18/05/2024 22:12

I personally find that some names loose their sparkle when there’s numerous children that you know with that name. Couple of examples.. there are 3 Lily’s in dd’s dance school. When dd tells me something about one of the Lily’s, in order to differentiate them, they are referred to as pretty Lily, tall Lily and blonde Lily.

Two Isla’s.. big Isla, little Isla (I also know two baby Isla’s)

Two Jack’s in dd’s primary class, known as Jack B and Jack T.