Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Children being allowed to go to the toilet at school

493 replies

Whatanerve · 23/10/2026 19:33

What is your opinion on children being allowed to go to the toilet during lesson time at school?

Dd is 11 and recently stated year 7.

The toilets are locked during lesson time. The teachers do not let them leave class to go. If they do have to go in an emergency they get a negative log, even if they have a toilet pass it’s still logged.

Dd has always had a sensitive digestive system and will often need to poo multiple times a day, sometimes she’s have to hold it in and then end up constipated. She also gets desperate for a wee especially around her totm.

She said the queues are often too long to go at break so she’s having to hold it in all lesson, she’s getting stressed and upset.

I spoke to the school about a toilet pass but they have said you must provide medical evidence.

She doesn’t have a diagnosed medical condition though, she just needs to go a lot.

I have severe IBS and an overactive bladder but I wasn’t diagnose until I was in my thirties.

Aibu to take her to the doctors? The trouble is I don’t know if there is anything medically wrong and I don’t want her out on tablets, also she feels embarrasses to say she gets a dodgy stomach she’s self conscious like most kids would be.

But it feels like pushing for a medical diagnosis is the only way to get her the support she needs.

OP posts:
riceuten · 25/10/2026 19:25

Former teacher here. I am sympathetic to anyone with any kind of digestive complaint - adult or child - and recognise time is of the essence when an attack hits.

But control around toilet breaks and classroom absence is not solely predicated around that. To ignore the fact that - given the chance - some pupils will (mis)use the toilet for nefarious purposes, fag breaks and classroom avoidance - is naïve. If a teacher (or teachers in general) are informed of a condition or an ailment, then of course they will be sympathetic. But then you hit the issue of pupils asking why can SHE go to the toilet but not me ? Do you then inform said pupil that the other pupil has a digestive complaint ?

There is no right answer here.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 25/10/2026 19:12

cityliving99 · 25/10/2026 19:05

SEN pupils often have time out/ reset cards.
Plenty of these pupils spend most of the day walking round school, refusing to engage with their TA. And yes, a lot escape to the bathrooms.

Disregulated kids being followed around by their TAs are not the ones trashing the toilets to the tune of three to eight grand a pop with their mates, having made excuses that they're really, really desperate to go to the toilet ten minutes into the start of the lesson at exactly the same time their friends are doing exactly the same thing with their teachers.

Why do people seem to want to blame the worst behaviour upon the more vulnerable kids rather than anybody else?

likelysuspect · 25/10/2026 19:10

DaisyJohnson · 25/10/2026 18:43

Most schools add all children with behavioural issues to the SEN register BECAUSE of their behaviour. It usually gets added under SEMH or similar. Therefore, 100% of children with behavioural problems will be logged as SEND because the fact that they have behavioural problems is enough to put them on the register.

Parents would be the first to complain if they werent considered as having SEN, but regardless, the children I work with who do have challenging behaviour which is distructivbe twithin school are either already with an EhCP, or in the process for one, or need one or are on the pathway for assessment for SEN.

Lots and lots of exclusions with lots of schools unable to meet need but often unable to find an alternative, plodding on, unable to fully permanently exclude, PRU places have all been used up, round and round it goes

I just dont know why there is such a desire (on here) to ignore what teachers and professionals are working with every day and seemingly pretend any non SEN child is more likely to be destructive than a child with SEN. That isnt the case.

cityliving99 · 25/10/2026 19:05

NeverDropYourMooncup · 25/10/2026 18:27

Bollocks.

It's not the kids with SEND that are the issue, no matter how much parents would like to claim that it is.

SEN pupils often have time out/ reset cards.
Plenty of these pupils spend most of the day walking round school, refusing to engage with their TA. And yes, a lot escape to the bathrooms.

DaisyJohnson · 25/10/2026 18:43

likelysuspect · 25/10/2026 18:36

Im a statutory front line worker for children and families and I see this day in and day out unfortunately.

Most schools add all children with behavioural issues to the SEN register BECAUSE of their behaviour. It usually gets added under SEMH or similar. Therefore, 100% of children with behavioural problems will be logged as SEND because the fact that they have behavioural problems is enough to put them on the register.

likelysuspect · 25/10/2026 18:36

NeverDropYourMooncup · 25/10/2026 18:27

Bollocks.

It's not the kids with SEND that are the issue, no matter how much parents would like to claim that it is.

Im a statutory front line worker for children and families and I see this day in and day out unfortunately.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 25/10/2026 18:27

likelysuspect · 25/10/2026 16:33

Im sorry but this is absolute nonsense. The vast vast majority of challenging behaviour is from pupils with SEN of some sort. Both in mainstream but also (obviously) within specialist settings.

Bollocks.

It's not the kids with SEND that are the issue, no matter how much parents would like to claim that it is.

MrsHamlet · 25/10/2026 18:25

Denim4ever · 25/10/2026 15:42

A minority of kids might be the type who do this. They would be children with problems making themselves unsuitable for mainstream school.

You're deluded if you believe this. All of these students are in mainstream.

fuckeditupbadly · 25/10/2026 18:25

No one is saying they are all hooligans. But those of us with experience of managing 1000+ teens all in one place at the same time have reluctantly had to take these steps to try and preserve working toilet facilities for all. Sorry if that upsets you. In reality, in lots of schools, most of us will absolutely let most kids pop quickly, especially girls, or will not discipline for being a few minutes late after break if there was a queue. In the ops case, there is a solution for her child's needs, she just hadn't taken it yet.

Pessismistic · 25/10/2026 18:11

fuckeditupbadly · 25/10/2026 17:06

And do you know the instances of vandalism and poor behaviour after that point? Did they publicise that info? Likely not. Why is that teaching is the one profession that everyone thinks they can comment on despite having no direct, current experience? What happened in times past or what it looks like from the view of a parent is not on a par with knowledge and experience of people who are dealing with this every single day right now. I dont have all the answers, every school has different factors but I'm damm sure I know the impact of the disruption a free for all policy causes inside and outside the classroom. My 30 years of continuous classroom practice actually DOES mean I and others like me know more.

Ok fucked up you win kids to be stopped from going the toilet because they are all hooligans.

DaisyJohnson · 25/10/2026 18:07

gardenflowergirl · 25/10/2026 12:02

I'm an ex teacher, this is how a brand new school building solved the toilet issues, a secondary academy.
The toilets were located off a corridor, no doors on the entrance, just a wide opening from the corridor with a view of rows of toilets, with floor to ceiling walls and doors, either side with a row of sinks back to back in the centre. And most importantly, video cameras recording activity in the central area. Students were not allowed to go into toilet cubicles together, the cameras monitored who went in and out, left row of toilets female, right row male. The other thing was there were no separate staff toilets, so staff would also go in there to use the facilities too. There were no mirrors. There were never any behaviour issues in the toilets as whatever happened in the communal area was captured by the security cameras. Students went to the toilet in class time if they needed to.
A design that prevented misbehaviour as there were video cameras all over the school.

This makes no difference in most schools. It doesn't prevent the problem, it just allows you to identify and punish the student who did it. Some students actively want to be excluded because when they are their parents pamper them, buy them treats and give them the days to play on their xbox. So a child who wants some time off school can revel in destroying a toilet block, knowing the school will have no choice but exclude them when they look at the cameras.

cityliving99 · 25/10/2026 17:47

cinnamonda · 25/10/2026 16:32

This is outrageous, the school is out of line with such inhumane rules. Can you please name the school so that we don’t send our future kids to this school!

That will be most schools.
looks like you are homeschooling.
All the best with that….

cityliving99 · 25/10/2026 17:45

fuckeditupbadly · 25/10/2026 17:06

And do you know the instances of vandalism and poor behaviour after that point? Did they publicise that info? Likely not. Why is that teaching is the one profession that everyone thinks they can comment on despite having no direct, current experience? What happened in times past or what it looks like from the view of a parent is not on a par with knowledge and experience of people who are dealing with this every single day right now. I dont have all the answers, every school has different factors but I'm damm sure I know the impact of the disruption a free for all policy causes inside and outside the classroom. My 30 years of continuous classroom practice actually DOES mean I and others like me know more.

Totally agree.
No one questioned me when I was a Nursing sister. I am shocked that school staff get so much abuse from both pupils and parents.
Parents know nothing of the reality of day to day school life. And it’s got much much worse since Tik Tok and since Covid.
If certain parents were such experts, why are their kids so badly behaved at school?

fuckeditupbadly · 25/10/2026 17:06

Pessismistic · 25/10/2026 16:29

Your right I don’t know but I’m going off my own experience when my dc were at secondary school the toilets were locked then a new head teacher turned up and changed this policy for the kids own health. So just because you are a teacher doesn’t mean you know all the answers either.

And do you know the instances of vandalism and poor behaviour after that point? Did they publicise that info? Likely not. Why is that teaching is the one profession that everyone thinks they can comment on despite having no direct, current experience? What happened in times past or what it looks like from the view of a parent is not on a par with knowledge and experience of people who are dealing with this every single day right now. I dont have all the answers, every school has different factors but I'm damm sure I know the impact of the disruption a free for all policy causes inside and outside the classroom. My 30 years of continuous classroom practice actually DOES mean I and others like me know more.

likelysuspect · 25/10/2026 16:33

NeverDropYourMooncup · 25/10/2026 16:08

Strangely enough, it is almost never children with SEND that cause thousands of pounds worth of damage for the TikTok views. It is almost never children with SEND that film others in the toilets and share it online. It is almost never children with SEND who took all of the sanitary towels and stuck them to the walls, shoved them down the toilets and threw used ones out of the windows.

The overwhelmed children with SEND may have been found having locked themselves into a cubicle, but the only damage they were doing - and often as a reaction to the behaviour of children without SEND either around them or directly towards them - was to themselves.

Im sorry but this is absolute nonsense. The vast vast majority of challenging behaviour is from pupils with SEN of some sort. Both in mainstream but also (obviously) within specialist settings.

cinnamonda · 25/10/2026 16:32

This is outrageous, the school is out of line with such inhumane rules. Can you please name the school so that we don’t send our future kids to this school!

Pessismistic · 25/10/2026 16:29

fuckeditupbadly · 25/10/2026 15:06

But that's just it. You dont know how to prevent problems. Actually teachers DO know, but aren't given the funding or powers to do it. Again, tje issue is not that schools hate kids, are power mad or like to cause distress. We'd bloody love if all the students just went to toilet and came out again like normal people, but they don't. The reasons for that are, as a pp said, much much wider, societal and complex. And we can't just punish the villains because a) it doesn't stop them b) the ££££ damage is done c) we get push back from parents.

Your right I don’t know but I’m going off my own experience when my dc were at secondary school the toilets were locked then a new head teacher turned up and changed this policy for the kids own health. So just because you are a teacher doesn’t mean you know all the answers either.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 25/10/2026 16:08

Denim4ever · 25/10/2026 15:42

A minority of kids might be the type who do this. They would be children with problems making themselves unsuitable for mainstream school.

Strangely enough, it is almost never children with SEND that cause thousands of pounds worth of damage for the TikTok views. It is almost never children with SEND that film others in the toilets and share it online. It is almost never children with SEND who took all of the sanitary towels and stuck them to the walls, shoved them down the toilets and threw used ones out of the windows.

The overwhelmed children with SEND may have been found having locked themselves into a cubicle, but the only damage they were doing - and often as a reaction to the behaviour of children without SEND either around them or directly towards them - was to themselves.

NimbleMauveRobin · 25/10/2026 15:59

NimbleMauveRobin · 25/10/2026 15:58

As a classroom teacher I just want to get on with my work. I don't make the rules about toilet access. The high ups do that. I don't appreciate it when I have to argue with a child or a parent for enforcing those rules nor do I enjoy it when using my judgement I allow a child to go out and then have to justify that with a member of SLT who has found out that I disobeyed their directive. If you want to argue about this take it up with the SLT. Ordinary teachers have no time for these debates.

Oh and the same thing goes for uniform, coats on off lunch boxes water in classroom etc etc.

NimbleMauveRobin · 25/10/2026 15:58

As a classroom teacher I just want to get on with my work. I don't make the rules about toilet access. The high ups do that. I don't appreciate it when I have to argue with a child or a parent for enforcing those rules nor do I enjoy it when using my judgement I allow a child to go out and then have to justify that with a member of SLT who has found out that I disobeyed their directive. If you want to argue about this take it up with the SLT. Ordinary teachers have no time for these debates.

SuziQuinto · 25/10/2026 15:50

Denim4ever · 25/10/2026 15:42

A minority of kids might be the type who do this. They would be children with problems making themselves unsuitable for mainstream school.

No, they're in mainstream schools. As are the ones who vape.

Denim4ever · 25/10/2026 15:42

fuckeditupbadly · 25/10/2026 15:32

Again, adults at work not generally pissing on walls, shitting on seats, ripping cisterns off walls, ramming all sorts down the toilets...stop comparing. The two scenarios are totally different.

A minority of kids might be the type who do this. They would be children with problems making themselves unsuitable for mainstream school.

fuckeditupbadly · 25/10/2026 15:32

Denim4ever · 25/10/2026 15:08

Imagine if we treated people at work like this. We treating kids like they are criminals in prison.

Again, adults at work not generally pissing on walls, shitting on seats, ripping cisterns off walls, ramming all sorts down the toilets...stop comparing. The two scenarios are totally different.

SuziQuinto · 25/10/2026 15:20

Charel2girl5 · 25/10/2026 15:12

OP apologies if I am repeating what has already been said but I became furious before I got to the end of the first page.
I am a teacher and have never refused a request for a student to go to the toilet. The lack of toilets in secondary schools is outrageous considering most schools have between 1500 and 2000 students. I always write a note for kids noting the time and what classroom they are coming from. Saying no as an adult to a child that is obviously desperate for the loo is a health and safety risk in my opinion.
of course there are a few character who will take the pi** but they are few and far between.

Where I work, we don't have notes. It's a centralised system, each visit is logged - it's not a negative behaviour point, but to triangulate where there has been vandalism, vaping, bullying and assaults. The students know this, and incidents have reduced.
I always let students go if it seems genuine (especially girls) and then I tune out the 5 others immediately asking, and the parental emails accusing me of favouritism.
I don't believe I've ever been reported to the Ministry of Human Rights, though 😉

Charel2girl5 · 25/10/2026 15:12

OP apologies if I am repeating what has already been said but I became furious before I got to the end of the first page.
I am a teacher and have never refused a request for a student to go to the toilet. The lack of toilets in secondary schools is outrageous considering most schools have between 1500 and 2000 students. I always write a note for kids noting the time and what classroom they are coming from. Saying no as an adult to a child that is obviously desperate for the loo is a health and safety risk in my opinion.
of course there are a few character who will take the pi** but they are few and far between.