Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Selling inherited house when sibling living in it

438 replies

Dutchhouse14 · 16/10/2026 11:50

Our DM passed away a few months ago and her will divides everything equally between me and my 2 siblings.
Im the sole executor.
Dsis ,mid 50s, has always lived at home, never moved out. Towards the end of mums life she became her carer.
She works limited hours although she has increased these with overtime since mum passed away but full time contracts are non existent in her sector.
Shes used to pay a small amount of housekeeping but this stopped when she was made redundant from full time work about 10 years ago.
DMs house is in a bad state of repair, none of us can afford to maintain it . Me and my other sibling want to sell.
But DSis is resisting ,not replying to texts, avoiding phones calls, went out when estates agents came round for valuations etc
She has limited income and savings but could get a small mortgage and with proceeds of sale she could get a 1 bed flat.
My other sibling agrees we need to sell but doesn't want to upset dsis and is generally very good at avoidance! They are happy to give Dsis a much bigger share ie 50% I would prefer 40% which i think is realistic for dsis to buy somewhere.
So ive become the wicked witch of the West in Dsis eyes and shes taking it all out on me, well basically stopped talking to me.
WIBU to put the house on the market?
Probate has been granted.
Anyone know what the legal situation is?
I dont want to fall out with Dsis, I love her, but she seems filled with resentment for me and frankly has said some very hurtful things.
Ive always been there for her but shes never ever reciprocated or supported me when ive needed it.
Although I live with DH and DC, the money would really help my future, my pension etc and I dont want to give my share to Dsis, which is what I think she really wants as shes used to being in charge of DMs money , always lived here so I think basically considers everything as hers.
Just dont know how to move things forward or if im being unreasonable selling the house and wanting my share

OP posts:
theearthsayshello · 16/10/2026 17:03

Sell it. Give her only her share. Not unreasonable, not at all.

kiwiane · 16/10/2026 16:58

As executor I wouldn’t offer any more than her share - stick to the will. I think you’ll need to use a solicitor due to her lack of engagement and that is money that will need to come out of the estate.
The house may not sell for years and costs may escalate, she may not be able to buy anywhere but could rent; that’s not your problem at this stage, don’t make it harder for yourself by trying to resolve her issues ahead of the sale.

sittingonabeach · 16/10/2026 16:55

Negroany · 16/10/2026 16:52

That's not what those forms were, you being "happy" is not a legal requirement.

A pp was right when they said the house would (most likely) need to be sold with vacant possession. Which was more likely what you were signing for.

That's what I meant

sittingonabeach · 16/10/2026 16:54

MandemChickenShop · 16/10/2026 16:52

mum died a few months ago, and already trying to evict the sister and cash in, and posting on Mumsnet to get some encouragement along the way. Grim

Edited

She's the executor, she has to follow the will. It's her legal duty

dandelionfluffy · 16/10/2026 16:53

GarlicEverything · 16/10/2026 16:50

Unlikely to have been £1,500 a week.

If the sister lived rent free for 10 years but the mother was in need of round the clock care for say 3 years then that's £1500 per month not per week

MandemChickenShop · 16/10/2026 16:52

mum died a few months ago, and already trying to evict the sister and cash in, and posting on Mumsnet to get some encouragement along the way. Grim

Negroany · 16/10/2026 16:52

sittingonabeach · 16/10/2026 15:57

When my parents sold their home that I was still living in (I had no legal ownership to it) I had to sign documentation to say I was happy for them to sell it

That's not what those forms were, you being "happy" is not a legal requirement.

A pp was right when they said the house would (most likely) need to be sold with vacant possession. Which was more likely what you were signing for.

GarlicEverything · 16/10/2026 16:50

Lurker85 · 16/10/2026 12:57

But given the cost of rent/houses, how much did her mom save her by housing her and paying the bills all her life?

Unlikely to have been £1,500 a week.

Negroany · 16/10/2026 16:47

BePeachNewt · 16/10/2026 16:14

OP said probate is settled, so there is no estate or executor role anymore. There is only a house that three people own equally.

Only if the estate has been wound up and the house transferred I to their names. And why would the have done that without this being sorted out?

"Probate settled" is not the same as "estate wound up".

Topseyt123 · 16/10/2026 16:47

MandemChickenShop · 16/10/2026 16:35

just let her have the house , you don't need it

Edited

Good god, there's always one. Stupid post.

SamphiretheTervosaur · 16/10/2026 16:45

Blankscreen · 16/10/2026 12:12

You need legal advice your sister may have an overriding right of occupation which will need to be considered.

You mean proprietary estoppel? That only applies if she was promised she would get the house and relied upon it

OP is the executor and has a legal obligation to carry out the terms of the will. She must do so without delay. Get probate done and sell the house on the market

She may also be legally obliged to charge her sister market rate rent...

Either way, she needs some legal advice

Another2Cats · 16/10/2026 16:41

SirenScream · 16/10/2026 12:38

My priority would be to ascertain the likelihood of the sister being able to successfully challenge the will.

Challenging the will isn't what is needed here. If the sister successfully challenges the will then that will mean that the mother essentially died intestate and she would still only get one third under the intestacy rules.

What you are likely thinking of is a claim under the Inheritance Act 1975 which allows a child (and other people) in England & Wales to make a claim if they haven't been left reasonable financial provision in a will.

That can be quite risky unless there is a very strong case.

Alternatively, the deceased mother may have said something like "Come and look after me and I will make sure that you are taken care off after I die and can live in the house as long as you want." but then failed to update her will to reflect that.

Now, if there is evidence that the mother said something like this and the sister then gave up her job to look after the mother for a long period of time then she may also have a claim anyway. This would simply be because the mother promised this and the sister then relied on that promise and gave up her job to look after the mother.

But, again, that can be a risk if there isn't strong evidence.

VoiceFromThePit · 16/10/2026 16:41

Your mum did the correct thing leaving it equally. She probably privately wanted your sister to pull her finger out and sort her life out.

If there was a way you could get a lawyer to simply take charge of all this for you that would be ideal, get the lawyer to put it onto the market and everything with your oversight if you stay as sole executor.

This way you get to let the lawyer be the bad guy not you, it’ll be much cheaper and fairer than giving away your share.

sittingonabeach · 16/10/2026 16:41

MandemChickenShop · 16/10/2026 16:35

just let her have the house , you don't need it

Edited

And how is the sister going to maintain it? She hasn't got any income. Will she then demand her siblings (who didn't get any inheritance) help fund repairs? Does she need a house the size of a family home?

LancashireButterPie · 16/10/2026 16:40

I think that communication is the key.
Sit down over a cup of tea and thrash it out.
Listen, really listen to each other.
Try to maintain your family bonds, a sibling is the longest relationship you are ever likely to have.

OldBore · 16/10/2026 16:39

Sister is being very unfair. It’s not your responsibility to provide for her. Give her a date and tell her to move on.

sittingonabeach · 16/10/2026 16:38

MandemChickenShop · 16/10/2026 16:35

just let her have the house , you don't need it

Edited

why?

OVienna · 16/10/2026 16:37

In addition, this is the key point: DMs house is in a bad state of repair, none of us can afford to maintain it.

I can see why the OP and her other sister are panicking.

Stressybetty · 16/10/2026 16:36

You definitely need legal advice and representation. This could get very very messy and toxic.

Topseyt123 · 16/10/2026 16:35

LadyLapsang · 16/10/2026 13:34

As a first step, has the ownership of the house been changed to the 3 siblings with the Land Registry? My advice would be to try some sort of mediation as there will be consequences for not sorting this out, CGT on sale for the 2 non-resident siblings if the value of the house increases from the probate value, Stamp Duty on the sale if you buy each other out, potential double / triple council tax etc.

Probate is needed before any change of ownership or sale is permitted. Until that has been granted nothing can happen and the property remains in the OP's mother's estate.

MandemChickenShop · 16/10/2026 16:35

just let her have the house , you don't need it

sittingonabeach · 16/10/2026 16:33

Hotdogsandfries · 16/10/2026 16:29

Your poor sibling.

Probably did ALL the care, has lost her Mum and is probably living alone for the first time in her life in the house where her Mum is now absent.

Awful.

But she must have had the chance to move out when younger. She hasn't been a carer all her life. She made different life choices than her siblings, living rent free, not helping to maintain the house she lived in. Why should she benefit financially?

user1471538283 · 16/10/2026 16:32

You need legal advice and I think you could force a sale. Whilst your sister lives there the house will continue to devalue as it falls into disrepair.

My bf's relatives are going to be in your position eventually. There's a relative in his 50s who has never left home, who's seen as a carer (but does no care), has only paid a pittance on rent for decades and doesn't get it that the house will be sold to be subdivided with his siblings and he'll have to move. We've had to step away because no one will listen and the relative hadn't even thought this might happen!

dandelionfluffy · 16/10/2026 16:31

LadyLapsang · 16/10/2026 13:34

As a first step, has the ownership of the house been changed to the 3 siblings with the Land Registry? My advice would be to try some sort of mediation as there will be consequences for not sorting this out, CGT on sale for the 2 non-resident siblings if the value of the house increases from the probate value, Stamp Duty on the sale if you buy each other out, potential double / triple council tax etc.

You can't do this without probate. The ownership is currently the mum's estate.

SamphiretheTervosaur · 16/10/2026 16:31

Gloriia · 16/10/2026 11:59

Your dm should've seen this was going to happen and left the whole thing to her dd living there as you and your other dsis have your own homes.

As she didn't all you can do is get legal advice and get it on the market if you dont want to let her carry on living there. Such a shame for everyone involved that it's come to this.

Sorry about your dm Flowers

She made a will. She left her house as she wanted to

Swipe left for the next trending thread