Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

FOUR out of FIVE new jobs went to foreigners in the past decade, new report reveals

415 replies

OpenScroller · 14/10/2026 16:48

Four in five jobs created over the past decade have been taken by migrants.

Of the 3.7million new roles recorded under the PAYE system since 2014, just 734,000 were taken by UK nationals, a think-tank has found.

EU citizens accounted for 408,000 jobs, while the vast majority – 2.5million – went to migrants from the rest of the world, the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) said, with most of the surge coming since the pandemic.

The think-tank warned that while employers gained 'unprecedented access to overseas labour', taxpayers have been forced to absorb the cost of millions of Britons being 'written off' and left on benefits.

As the number of migrant workers soared by 2.1million from 2020, the number of people receiving out-of-work benefits across the UK rose by 2.3million.

More than one in four (29 per cent) of the jobs that went to migrant workers from outside Europe were in health and social work.

So much for British jobs for British people!

Do we think this is due to Brits being 'too lazy to work' or because of a combination of employers wanting to pay lower wages and offer worse working conditions to migrants/preferring to employ migrants/not wanting to invest in training Brits/diversity hire tick boxes etc.

https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/CSJ-State_of_Dependency.pdf

https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/CSJ-State_of_Dependency.pdf

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Persephonia1966 · 14/10/2026 18:01

PyongyangKipperbang · 14/10/2026 17:50

My apologies, I didnt make clear that they were not recruited from abroad. All the applicants have the right to work and live in the UK but are immigrants.

Are you not worried your son in law could be sailing close to the wind if he is chatting away about the personal details of all the people he is involved in recruiting? General statistical information is usually ok (e.g 80% of applicants were overseas) but it sounds like he is getting into lots of quite detailed discussions about this. If it gets down to individuals or where he reckons an individual really comes from etc then that is potentially a breach of GDPR.

friedaklein · 14/10/2026 18:01

Travelban · 14/10/2026 18:00

Interesting thread
As a "foreigner" well I have lived here for 30 years but I don't have a British passport yet, so I will be "counted" as that. I can say though, having just found a new job after a full professional career spanning 30 years, that most if not ALL the jobs I went for (100 plus) said "no sponsorship/had to have right to work already", so not sure which jobs were filled. It would be interesting to see a breakdown - could it be jobs that UK citizens don't want to do?
I have certainly competed fairly and squarely with British Citizens whilst facing racial, gender and age discrimination to boot. So no preferential treatment there at all.

Segue, but I would really advise you to get your British passport. If you want to.
Bad times are coming.

Chocolateteapot8 · 14/10/2026 18:01

friedaklein · 14/10/2026 17:01

They both work AND claim benefits, thus taking British jobs and draining the economy. The sly muggles!

This isn't true. They don't get a visa (sponsorship Skilled 2 visa) unless they are earning a certain amount from an employer.

The infrastructure sector is on its absolute arse as there is so much work, with no one qualified to do it. All our good engineers are retiring. And we can't get enough sponsorship spots to fill the void!

Marycontrarygarden · 14/10/2026 18:01

OpenScroller · 14/10/2026 16:58

Yes, quite amazing that there's all the shouting about young people not being in work and claiming benefits isn't it?

Now we know why.

Edited

Yes, it's definitely the immigrants that are the reason why Brian is living at home with mummy and Daddy playing PlayStation instead of actually getting off his arse. FFS.

Monty36 · 14/10/2026 18:01

friedaklein · 14/10/2026 17:58

Can I just say that new immigrants are not allowed to claim ANY benefits until they get an ILR. Which takes 5 years. They also pay a whopping nhs surcharge of £1200 per year, or thereabouts.

Edited

Two years if you are here under a marriage visa.

PumpkinSeasonIsHere · 14/10/2026 18:00

FlyingCatGirl · 14/10/2026 17:59

What benefit? Single men or women working for a living aren't entitled to any benefit! British men and women who are single and working aren't entitled to anything much less anyone who has been here and not paid anything in for at least 5 year! Don't race-bait, it's pathetic!

She was being facetious, I think it’s fair to say.

Travelban · 14/10/2026 18:00

Interesting thread
As a "foreigner" well I have lived here for 30 years but I don't have a British passport yet, so I will be "counted" as that. I can say though, having just found a new job after a full professional career spanning 30 years, that most if not ALL the jobs I went for (100 plus) said "no sponsorship/had to have right to work already", so not sure which jobs were filled. It would be interesting to see a breakdown - could it be jobs that UK citizens don't want to do?
I have certainly competed fairly and squarely with British Citizens whilst facing racial, gender and age discrimination to boot. So no preferential treatment there at all.

DorsetKnobBiscuit · 14/10/2026 17:59

Dragonscaledaisy · 14/10/2026 17:55

My original post referred specifically to MN.

Do you believe that billions are spent on influencing public opinion via social media but nobody wants to tap into the 8 million people on MN?

friedaklein · 14/10/2026 17:59

FlyingCatGirl · 14/10/2026 17:59

What benefit? Single men or women working for a living aren't entitled to any benefit! British men and women who are single and working aren't entitled to anything much less anyone who has been here and not paid anything in for at least 5 year! Don't race-bait, it's pathetic!

I am joking, you nutter! I am a brown immigrant married to another immigrant!

nomoreforks · 14/10/2026 17:59

I think a lot of the jobs created are jobs that are not long-term career type jobs. My DD is on a Gap year and is doing lots of different casual jobs and is earning a reasonable amount of money. None of these jobs would be suitable on a long-term basis as they are very casual and the hours are very variable and they also have no potential for promotion really. It suits DD as she is saving to travel. I had nannies ,from Eastern Europe ,when my kids were younger and they would work lots of different jobs and live in multiple occupancy flats (sharing rooms etc..). The idea would be to earn lots of money in the UK and save to buy a property back home. They all returned back home when their children were young. They were able to buy substantial properties after working and saving money. We need much more investment in our young people as I fear that lots will leave for opportunities abroad (if they are well-educated and have those opportunities).

PumpkinSeasonIsHere · 14/10/2026 17:59

Persephonia1966 · 14/10/2026 17:54

Also, not everyone can be a carer. The Philippines is interesting because they seem to have a whole cultural thing of nursing and care work being a really noble/valued profession to go into. "Nurses from the Philippines" is a stereotype the world over. I know that's partly because the wages you can earn overseas nursing is more but I don't think it's just that because it isn't just the Phillipines where that is the case. It would be interesting to look at how to make.caring and nursing more culturally valued here. It's. It just about the pay, though I think that can matter as well. The problem is the attitude of "make the unemployed NEETs just do caring" bandied about isnt exactly going to help with that. It suggests it is something the "feckless layabouts" should be doing as punishment.

As someone who has to have the district nurse (obviously a qualified nurse) visit weekly, I can’t think of anything worse than having an unwilling and underpaid person in my house to look after me!

You make some really interesting points.

I think (well it’s hardly a newsflash) that it’s very difficult to effect cultural change, and the UK remains such a sexist society. I don’t know where we’d begin trying to get more respect for traditionally women’s work.

ThisSassyHam · 14/10/2026 17:59

So we have these figures. But do they tell us what sectors these jobs are in? Did these jobs require specialist qualifications or at least university level education?

FlyingCatGirl · 14/10/2026 17:59

friedaklein · 14/10/2026 17:01

They both work AND claim benefits, thus taking British jobs and draining the economy. The sly muggles!

What benefit? Single men or women working for a living aren't entitled to any benefit! British men and women who are single and working aren't entitled to anything much less anyone who has been here and not paid anything in for at least 5 year! Don't race-bait, it's pathetic!

AndSoFinally · 14/10/2026 17:58

This sounds highly dubious. The total net immigration figure for the uk since 2014 is only about 3.4million people. So the vast majority of these “job-takers” (if the figures are even true) would have already been here, and would have competed for the job fair and square

friedaklein · 14/10/2026 17:58

PearPeer · 14/10/2026 17:53

S.

Can I just say that new immigrants are not allowed to claim ANY benefits until they get an ILR. Which takes 5 years. They also pay a whopping nhs surcharge of £1200 per year, or thereabouts.

Douglasmummy · 14/10/2026 17:57

Anyahyacinth · 14/10/2026 17:44

….why though is an immigrant more attractive to employ than a UK citizen? There needs to be a reason to explain your theory?

Because they are already trained so employers don't have to bother spending time training up 18 year olds, because someone else in another country has done that. And all the reasons the person I quoted stated. That if your visa is dependent on your job employers can get you to do what they like. There are also places who basically applied to be sponsors as part of visa scams. We have a hugely inefficient system for work ( and student) visas where people know full well they can just do what they like and the chances of them being caught are minimal.

bababamama · 14/10/2026 17:57

heard This discussed on more or less and was completely discredited.

OffTheMap · 14/10/2026 17:56

Does this include the thousands of seasonal workers picking fruit and veg?

fando · 14/10/2026 17:55

Do we know the salaries for these jobs?

DorsetKnobBiscuit · 14/10/2026 17:55

Dragonscaledaisy · 14/10/2026 17:50

Well any mention of the 'right' has people literally frothing. Let's rephrase that to a forum largely full of Labour supporters.

"Mumsnet does not have a single, fixed political stance, though it has traditionally leaned center-left or "woolly liberal" among its core demographic"

Dragonscaledaisy · 14/10/2026 17:55

DorsetKnobBiscuit · 14/10/2026 17:52

Do you really believe nobody tries to influence opinion via social media?

If so, whey did Reform UK spend £380,000 on social media adverts between August 1 and September 25, 2026?

If you were going to spend money trying to win votes would you spend it all on people who already vote for you or people who don't?

My original post referred specifically to MN.

Donsyb · 14/10/2026 17:55

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 14/10/2026 17:13

This is Iain Duncan Smith’s baby. You would expect right wing views.

I think new roles is probably not what they are. Many will be taking the place of retired workers. It does suggest the Brits are not wanting the roles or are too expensive and need a lot more training. The obvious employment area is health and if we want a semi functioning health service, should we not have employed them? The 1 million neets almost certainly could not do these roles.

As a lot of the roles are care work, according to the post, then a lot of those maybe new roles, as the need for care roles is increasing a the population ages.

Of course, those are the kind of roles the Brits don’t want to do. My friends dad had 3 carers barcode he passed away recently, none were British.

Monty36 · 14/10/2026 17:54

Parker231 · 14/10/2026 17:53

Why didn’t British workers apply for the jobs. Employers want the best regardless of where the candidates were born.

Employers who recruit an overseas worker do not have to advertise it to prove they could not find someone already here to do it.

Persephonia1966 · 14/10/2026 17:54

PumpkinSeasonIsHere · 14/10/2026 17:47

I’m guessing, ok?
Some employers from overseas might prefer to employ people with the same language/from the same culture
Unscrupulous employers might prefer people who are more vulnerable (ie would have to move if they can’t keep their job)
There has always been a shortage of carers as it’s hard, poorly paid, thankless work - there probably is a legitimate shortage of
locals to do it

Also, not everyone can be a carer. The Philippines is interesting because they seem to have a whole cultural thing of nursing and care work being a really noble/valued profession to go into. "Nurses from the Philippines" is a stereotype the world over. I know that's partly because the wages you can earn overseas nursing is more but I don't think it's just that because it isn't just the Phillipines where that is the case. It would be interesting to look at how to make.caring and nursing more culturally valued here. It's. It just about the pay, though I think that can matter as well. The problem is the attitude of "make the unemployed NEETs just do caring" bandied about isnt exactly going to help with that. It suggests it is something the "feckless layabouts" should be doing as punishment.

Emilesgran · 14/10/2026 17:54

Parker231 · 14/10/2026 17:53

Why didn’t British workers apply for the jobs. Employers want the best regardless of where the candidates were born.

Or the lowest paid?

Swipe left for the next trending thread