Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it’s crazy that National Minimum wage is £27k

663 replies

Butterflyfluff · 09/10/2026 20:08

Yet it’s not really enough to live on 😢

My first job paid £7.5k per year and I thought I was loaded! And I’m not ancient.

Now 2 people on NMW earn over £50k between them yet it’s really not enough these days.

OP posts:
Chewbecca · 10/10/2026 11:38

Junglejune · 10/10/2026 11:33

Yes all my friends who are pensioners - apart from one who got divorced in later life - have very nice lifestyles: long haul holidays, lots of mini breaks, nice cars, gym membership etc. They also still live in their massive four/five bedroom houses.

They are much better off than my son and DIL who both work full time in professional jobs but for charities; they live in a tiny flat and we’re in the SE.

Did those pensioners live in a tiny flat when they were in their 20s? (I did).

Junglejune · 10/10/2026 11:33

Boreded · 09/10/2026 21:29

That’s definitely going to be the way for people in my generation. But my experience has been that pensioners now have really healthy private pensions (unless only one working or previously self employed) and own their own homes. I appreciate that this isn’t the case for all, but for my generation and the one that comes after it, it doesn’t look good for us comparative to pensioners now.

Yes all my friends who are pensioners - apart from one who got divorced in later life - have very nice lifestyles: long haul holidays, lots of mini breaks, nice cars, gym membership etc. They also still live in their massive four/five bedroom houses.

They are much better off than my son and DIL who both work full time in professional jobs but for charities; they live in a tiny flat and we’re in the SE.

AllIwantForChrismasIsAKitchenAidStandMixer · 10/10/2026 11:28

ashamedchatbot · 10/10/2026 08:36

I work 35 hours per week, £26K before tax. My husband works 37.5 hours and earns £29K before tax. so £55K total income before tax, student loan (don’t get me started on the masters loan threshold…), and pension. So after tax a total of approx £3600

our mortgage is £1,100, which is quite high for our area (midlands). We have two children and another on the way. Our children each have sports and music tuition. Im not especially frugal with groceries - I do make nearly everything from scratch, but I buy lots of organic and local produce. We also pay £500 a month for a bank loan which purchased our two cars, which is a massive luxury and not a sensible financial choice. I’d hardly say we are struggling - far from it!! We have a holiday a year and I’m sensible with things like clothes, which are nearly always second hand. DH and I have very active social lives, but we just choose to do things that are free or cost very little. Our calendars are usually jam packed so we’re not suffering for it.

I agree that people seem to expect that they should be able to spend loads of money on holidays, clothes, and going out in a way that would have seemed absurd to previous generations. We live very well and happily on our salaries, and always have money to put away at the end of each month.

Something doesn’t add up here. £55k and an £1100 mortgage + £500 bank loan so £1600 gone.

Almost three children so childcare costs and maternity to factor in.

Bills must be at least £600/month so that’s £2200.

Food shop must be at least £400/month so £2600.

That leaves you with £500/month each for petrol, anything your children need, socialising. How on earth are you able to save?

Boreded · 10/10/2026 11:19

SomeoneIsWrongOnTheInternet · 10/10/2026 10:47

I don’t know whether it’s AI bollocks or the most entitled generation ever retiring, but it’s a statement of fact that the baby boomers are the richest generation ever and are far richer than anyone who came after. Gen X following are a split generation, the earliest born in the late 60s/ early 70s lived the same life as the boomers and those of us just a little older than millennials got the same life as they did. The key was whether you bought a house before or in the very first stages of that quadrupling in the first few years of the millennium - I was in my mid 20s then and from a shit background so had no chance. A lot depended on family support and inheritances, and now everything does. Minimum wage was driven up to enable London to have ‘key workers’, and now for the rest of the country it isn’t worth working hard at all.

https://fortune.com/2024/10/03/boomers-wealthiest-generation-millennials-biggest-losers/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/01/25/boomers-33-times-wealthy-gen-z-gettin-richer/

Edited

But the pensioners will still deny it, because they have less money than their last couple of years before retirement (obviously) they think that means they’re poor, especially those who are doing very well.

On what planet is my generation (in my 30s now) going to be able to retire and holiday multiple times a year, pay for private school for their grandkids, this generation will likely still be paying their mortgages into their 60s and 70s and barely scraping by.

Witnesses · 10/10/2026 11:02

Constantrunner · 10/10/2026 10:58

My partner and I live on £21k a year, I still work full time and we have no mortgage. I saved the rest of my salary for retirement.
We have one car and a foreign holiday a year, eat out sometimes. I know housing costs are insane. But outside those some people do just spend a lot of money on day to day living that is not necessary.

Having no mortgage/housing costs puts you in an entirely different boat to other people. It's simply not even comparable. It's like saying you live on 21k but you and your partner don't need to eat to survive!

SomeoneIsWrongOnTheInternet · 10/10/2026 11:02

NotSmallButFunSize · 10/10/2026 09:10

My main gripe with the level of minimum wage is about other salaries in comparison!

I work in the NHS, am a band 4. MW has risen so much that band 1 has disappeared and band 2 now only has 1 pay point else it would be the same at band 3 (and is actually the same as the bottom of band 3, it's just that 3 can increase). It won't be long before band 2 gets removed too due to being below MW.

So my main issue is that every time MW increases, the differential between it and the other bands reduces, to the point where it's barely worth doing the job with more responsibility as you get less and less reward for taking it on! How long til it catches me up on band 4?

It's my biggest irritation with agenda for change scales and no doubt affects other public sector salaries too. We should all get an equivalent uplift when MW goes up, PLUS whatever raise we were going to get else what's the point in different bands??

There is a general trend now to ‘encourage’ band 2 health workers to become band 3. I reckon that is the plan, to eradicate band 2. I don’t know what’s happening on the kitchen/cleaner/ porter side.

What is extremely damned annoying is the way the unions in education and health fight every year to get a ‘fair’ (hah!) pay deal, it’s all over the media about these grasping nonworking shits in health wanting yet more money when they chose to work where they do, then… minimum wage goes up by that same amount a week later - quietly, with maybe a bit of a congratulatory note in media - and wipes that hard fought for uplift off.

Witnesses · 10/10/2026 11:00

It's not really 27k, becasue that's working just over 40 hours per week. You'll struggle to find a NMW job contracting you to 40 hours per week.

I'm contracted to 37.5 hours per week and earn less than 27k - even though I'm actually earning a little bit over the NMW per hour.

It's hard work living on this wage frankly, and although I've been on, or around the NMW all my life, this is definitely the time it's been hardest. Mostly that's due to housing costs and food costs. If I still lived alone I wouldn't cope - and I did used to manage living alone a few years ago.

Constantrunner · 10/10/2026 10:58

My partner and I live on £21k a year, I still work full time and we have no mortgage. I saved the rest of my salary for retirement.
We have one car and a foreign holiday a year, eat out sometimes. I know housing costs are insane. But outside those some people do just spend a lot of money on day to day living that is not necessary.

Pineneedlesandsnow · 10/10/2026 10:50

Waitingfordoggo · 09/10/2026 20:21

Agree @HardFuckingBird

Admittedly, the costs of energy and food have risen sharply in recent years and many people struggle with that, but I completely agree that expectations are often too high. We have become very spoilt over the past 30 years or so. When I was growing up, it was one second-hand car for the whole family, one holiday a year (and often UK holidays at that), hand-me-downs instead of new clothes. Going to a restaurant or even a cafe was a rare treat. The first time we had a takeaway I was 15 years old and I remember how exciting it was, how lucky I felt. We weren’t a poor family, my parents earnt fairly well, but we appreciated what we had. I don’t remember ever coveting what wealthier families had.

We didnt really know what others had did we unless we watched dynasty and Dallas.

Expectation was much lower and people built up gradually house hold items

SomeoneIsWrongOnTheInternet · 10/10/2026 10:47

rainingsnoring · 10/10/2026 05:00

Exactly. This in addition to all the things I said above.
It's dishonest to pretend that the average pensioners has the same outgoings as the average family with children or the average younger, working adult.
It's even worse than the poster on the first page pretending that she has a household income of 20k with children and lives a very comfortable life.

Some pensioners are poor for various reasons but they are, overall, much better off than the generations that followed them and certainly have much lower outgoings.

I don’t know whether it’s AI bollocks or the most entitled generation ever retiring, but it’s a statement of fact that the baby boomers are the richest generation ever and are far richer than anyone who came after. Gen X following are a split generation, the earliest born in the late 60s/ early 70s lived the same life as the boomers and those of us just a little older than millennials got the same life as they did. The key was whether you bought a house before or in the very first stages of that quadrupling in the first few years of the millennium - I was in my mid 20s then and from a shit background so had no chance. A lot depended on family support and inheritances, and now everything does. Minimum wage was driven up to enable London to have ‘key workers’, and now for the rest of the country it isn’t worth working hard at all.

https://fortune.com/2024/10/03/boomers-wealthiest-generation-millennials-biggest-losers/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/01/25/boomers-33-times-wealthy-gen-z-gettin-richer/

An older couple on a boat looking out to sea

Boomers are the wealthiest generation that’s ever lived, finds Allianz. Millennials are the ‘biggest losers’ thanks to economic crises | Fortune

“Even with the same savings behavior, no generation can match the wealth accumulation enjoyed by the baby boomers.”

https://fortune.com/2024/10/03/boomers-wealthiest-generation-millennials-biggest-losers/

WestwardHo1 · 10/10/2026 10:45

BigFrau · 10/10/2026 10:14

The idiots are the people who don't get the joke!

Ha fair enough. Early Saturday morning.

FirmSnake · 10/10/2026 10:40

Constantrunner · 10/10/2026 10:32

That is simply not true. The proportion of working age people without children who are in poverty is the same as the proportion of pensioners in poverty.
Of course overall wealth will be higher amongst pensioners as many have paid off their mortgages. And if you include pension pots that give say an annual pension of £5k a year, they appear wealthy, when their annual income is £17k.

It is true. Where are you getting your data from?
I'm not talking about overall wealth. This is incomes after housing costs. Of course pensioners are more likely to have paid off their mortgages, therefore they need less money to maintain the same lifestyle. Poverty in this country is measured on a relative basis - I have my thoughts about this as a methodology, but as it stands, there are factually fewer pensioners living in poverty.

Mapletreelane · 10/10/2026 10:39

HardFuckingBird · 09/10/2026 20:15

DH and I live off around £50k gross between us and we have a very comfortable lifestyle (we have two children in primary school). It's a perfectly reasonable household income in inexpensive areas (I realise it wouldn't go far in London or much of the south). In my area the problem is lifestyle creep. People's expectations are crazy compared to when we were children. When I was at school most families didn't have one foreign holiday a year, but now a lot of the families I know expect to be able to go away 3-4 times a year. Families often shared one old car - now most people I know have a luxury car per adult, often on PCP. Meals out used to be a rare treat - whereas now a lot of my colleagues feel entitled to coffees, lunches, takeaways and meals out every week.

Completely agree. I work with colleagues who are in their 30s who are always living month to month on pay and credit cards yet order in takeaways to work for breakfast and lunch, nails done every 3 weeks, 2 cars, loans for holidays. Kids have iphones at age 11. They're fab people but are so genuinely used to seeing this as normal patterns and not luxuries.

Imdunfer · 10/10/2026 10:36

IzzyGone · 10/10/2026 09:37

people make a living from lip fillers, coffee shops, and car washes, they aren't unemployed

Whilst that is of course true, that wasn't the point.

That money would have been spent on something else that also employed people if it wasn't spent on what many people would consider frivolities.

DdraigGoch · 10/10/2026 10:34

CherryKerry · 09/10/2026 20:56

The tax allowance has not increased for years, it should be around £15600 today.

It's the highest tax-free allowance in Europe. It was £6,475 in 2010 which would be worth £10,384 now so it is still higher in real terms than it was.

brownbootsandhats · 10/10/2026 10:33

Working age people with children experience higher rates of poverty

not those without children

its scary how the myth has taken hold

Dogsarethebestfriends · 10/10/2026 10:33

Papyrophile · 09/10/2026 22:41

It is, but it is also the only place with enough letting property close enough to where he works. It's also convenient for his housemate. When he finishes the apprenticeship, he will move.

It's also horrible as well. Bet he can't wait to move.

Constantrunner · 10/10/2026 10:32

FirmSnake · 10/10/2026 10:24

Working age people without children are more likely to be in poverty than a pensioner is. We're not talking about the richest people, we are talking about the poorest ones. Working people should not be poorer than people that don't work.

That is simply not true. The proportion of working age people without children who are in poverty is the same as the proportion of pensioners in poverty.
Of course overall wealth will be higher amongst pensioners as many have paid off their mortgages. And if you include pension pots that give say an annual pension of £5k a year, they appear wealthy, when their annual income is £17k.

boredsmored · 10/10/2026 10:25

Boreded · 10/10/2026 09:19

Obviously, but comparatively this pensioner generation is wealthier than the working. Nobody is denying that a small number of pensioners are poor

You can’t say that on here!

FirmSnake · 10/10/2026 10:24

Constantrunner · 10/10/2026 10:21

Everyone is at their poorest when you have dependent children. Children are expensive. It's always been the case ever since child labour was abolished.
The person you are replying to stated that percentage of working adults and pensioners in poverty is the same.

For most people, the day you retire is the richest you ever are, unless you get a big inheritance. Because usually even the poorest have saved something for retirement. My father had £12000 when he retired, and £800 when he died. He had never had such big savings before.

Most people live for about 15 years after retirement

Working age people without children are more likely to be in poverty than a pensioner is. We're not talking about the richest people, we are talking about the poorest ones. Working people should not be poorer than people that don't work.

Constantrunner · 10/10/2026 10:21

FirmSnake · 10/10/2026 09:55

What is untrue? That poster is right. There are comparatively fewer pensioners in poverty than working age people and children.

Everyone is at their poorest when you have dependent children. Children are expensive. It's always been the case ever since child labour was abolished.
The person you are replying to stated that percentage of working adults and pensioners in poverty is the same.

For most people, the day you retire is the richest you ever are, unless you get a big inheritance. Because usually even the poorest have saved something for retirement. My father had £12000 when he retired, and £800 when he died. He had never had such big savings before.

Most people live for about 15 years after retirement

CucumberSummer · 10/10/2026 10:21

intrepidpanda · 09/10/2026 20:39

He is a tradesman
He earns £12, 570

As BigFrau says above...

all those posts ago, 🙄
Intrepidpanda was making a joke!!!
🙄😂

BigFrau · 10/10/2026 10:14

WestwardHo1 · 10/10/2026 09:41

Oh stop! You must think people are idiots.

The idiots are the people who don't get the joke!

Bjorkdidit · 10/10/2026 10:14

sunshinestar1986 · 10/10/2026 09:40

Just 14 years ago, a 2 bed on my area was £600
Now it's nearly £1200
Now a bedroom in shared accommodation is £600 a month
That's ridiculous

But NMW has more than doubled in the same time period so that matches up.

ShutupLwren · 10/10/2026 10:09

DP earns 29k in managerial role but in care sector full time.
I’m a carer to one of our children. We get UC & child benefit and I get approx 330 monthly for carers allowance. Our son’s DLA goes on things he needs, an abundance of bedding and towels, certain branded foods, we use that money to try new things that might help him or keep him safe. So specialist equipment.
With DPs wages and the UC we get less than what I would working full time on NMW but we are frugal.
All clothes and coats are second hand. We unfortunately have to replace lots of things such as beds and sofas due to DC. (He rocks or flings himself on things) the only things I buy from new is technology that would require a warranty.
My son damages our property (thankfully we don’t rent we have a mortgage) with his outbursts or behaviour so we’ve had him flood bathrooms repeatedly or put giant holes in the walls (we have one hole that looks like a cartoon character tried to run through it, like loony tunes) so when I do have some spare money and time I’m considering learning to plaster, but not for a long time yet.

We don’t have much but we’re happy and we have 3 meals a day and a family who adore one another.
I donate all our clothes that are still in good condition (when I buy from vinted it’s usually m&s or next as they wash terrific) and all the uniforms go to clothing banks.
DP donates food to food banks once a month and I have a DS who collects sanitary products and donates them. He’s very fucked off about period poverty.
I used to cook meals for the homeless with my sons school but I’m time poor currently, I do visit my old place of work and sit with the elderly residents that don’t have visitors at least once a month and take in some shower gels for the residents who don’t have families, often its staff on who’ll be toiletries for residents.
I appreciate that a lot of my income that leads my family to live without imminent fear of my kids being hungry or having no roof over their heads is made up of benefits and the stress of a disabled DC is enough without worrying about being able to keep a job when you’re not able to work, I am grateful. I do what I can to relieve the pressure for others. DP uses club card points and buys half price toys this time of year for toy appeals, I’m collecting Christmas jumpers and PJs for my DCs schools (I collect all year round) so if the school notices kids without Xmas jumpers or their parents are struggling, the school can email and offer them.
We do what we can to help others. We are very lucky.
We used to be able to afford holidays in the UK during the 6 weeks but our mortgage payments went up a couple of years ago so now we take them term time, it’s better for our DC anyway because it’s quieter.