Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why do so many mums ditch their childfree friends?

287 replies

Sishirunak70 · Yesterday 08:19

Especially when those friends are accommodating, take an interest in your child/children and willing to work around you?
Why do you now only associate with other Mums and think that they 'just won't get it?'

Why do you let them disappear from your life since you became a mother? Whilst I understand it's hard, it's not impossible.
There are far too many martyrs around who believe they're the only person to have ever given birth, everything must now revolve around them and that nobody else can ever be tired or busy, except for them.

OP posts:
Longtimelurker1980 · Yesterday 13:07

Sishirunak70 · Yesterday 08:19

Especially when those friends are accommodating, take an interest in your child/children and willing to work around you?
Why do you now only associate with other Mums and think that they 'just won't get it?'

Why do you let them disappear from your life since you became a mother? Whilst I understand it's hard, it's not impossible.
There are far too many martyrs around who believe they're the only person to have ever given birth, everything must now revolve around them and that nobody else can ever be tired or busy, except for them.

I can’t speak for everyone, obviously, as all relationships will be different. However, when I got married and pregnant shortly thereafter, two of my best friends were in their early 30s and still single. It was quite difficult to juggle chats about terrible dates with very small kids on little sleep, time and space. Personally, they weren’t helpful when they visited, they didn’t seem awfully interested in me or my kids and had zero understanding about why I might not now want to go out late night dancing (to be fair I still don’t, think i had outgrown that by then and kids were the trigger but not the reason). I felt like our lives had little in common. They presumably felt like I was buried in my babies and very boring. I’m sure both things are true. I made loads of new friends through kids stuff and at the time they were great to share similar experiences with as they were going through the same thing at the same time whereas my single friends were not. Some of those have stuck as lifelong friends as we share an awful
lot more in common than reproduction.

we drifted apart and that’s ok. We had less and less in common over time and I didn’t have the bandwidth to keep up the effort with people who seemed so disinterested in what I was doing and so keen for me to be the fun party friend that I was when I was younger. I’d changed and therefore so did our friendship.

FirmSnake · Yesterday 13:07

Fupoffyagrasshole · Yesterday 13:05

Don’t get this at all - it only takes one adult to put kids to bed so I go out at least 3 evenings a week even working full time and having little kids - can see childfree friends or friends who have kids and also escape any time Really 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️ unless your a single parent I don’t get why you can’t do similar

But how do you have the energy for that? 😂

Yetone · Yesterday 13:05

Timeforachange26 · Yesterday 12:53

She's offered to go to a soft play with them so the kid would be occupied anyway. What's the difference?

With a group of Mums who had their eye on their children.

Fupoffyagrasshole · Yesterday 13:05

Zov · Yesterday 10:52

Yes exactly. Sorry, but with the best will in the world, a childless/childfree woman is not as busy or tired and worn out as a woman with children. In the majority of cases anyway. And especially if the mum works - even part time. She will be far busier and more worn out and frazzled than a childless/childfree woman.

Don’t get this at all - it only takes one adult to put kids to bed so I go out at least 3 evenings a week even working full time and having little kids - can see childfree friends or friends who have kids and also escape any time Really 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️ unless your a single parent I don’t get why you can’t do similar

Timeforachange26 · Yesterday 13:02

takealettermsjones · Yesterday 10:39

I think this is a really good example of why parents often socialise with other parents only. If the host in this scenario were a parent of children of similar age, they would be far less likely to be bothered about any of this and would probably appreciate the fact that it's not just them!

Well I certainly wouldn't have tolerated it even when my own kids were a similar age.

Mind you I didn't do " mum" friends. I certainly didn't want to talk about bloody kids ( including my own) when socializing.strangely I managed to keep my child free friends. In fact most of my friends remained child free and I remained friends with then until they died. One of my best school friends did have kids but I think we maybe met each others kids 6 times ( all in 30s now) as always met up without them and relished our freedom to chat about other stuff instead

I

Princessconsuelabananahammock9 · Yesterday 12:59

Overthebow · Yesterday 12:53

They’re just stating fact though aren’t they? For them, they’ve never known real love until they had children. It’s what they’ve experienced. Maybe it wouldn’t be the same for you, but for them it is. It’s the same for me too, the love I feel for my children is completely different to any other love I’ve experienced, they are my children.

Telling someone they don’t know what real love is sounds so condescending.

I had people say that to me while going through infertility and I still don’t understand the point.

Powwch · Yesterday 12:56

Slumgullion · Yesterday 11:14

What a psychotic thing to say. You drop your friends the moment they get pregnant, having decided in advance, on no evidence, that they are going to behave in a certain unpleasant, stereotyped way?

Be a much better friend.

I had one friend who, after I told her I was pregnant at 40 over a nice one-on-one lunch during which she expressed her congratulations, literally never responded to my attempts to contact her again. I then moved countries for a few years when still on maternity leave and only saw her again when we started working at the same place about twelve years later.

She apologised for going silent, said she'd always assumed I would stay childfree and had found it terribly hard when I switched categories in her head. Because she was in her fifties when I first met her, and had never talked about it, I'd had no idea that she would have loved children, but it had been too late once she found her life partner after two messy short marriages on another continent long before I'd known her.

Similarly, another apparently happily childfree friend whom I'd only known when he was in his fifties, ended up telling me he'd struggled with me getting pregnant at 40 because, again, unbeknownst to anyone who didn't know them at the time, he and his (much older) wife had wanted children, had unsuccessful very early IVF, and had then almost broken up over whether to adopt. This had happened many years before I got to know them and wasn't something they talked about easily.

I also have childfree friends who have never contemplated having a baby, obviously, or thought about it and decided it wasn't for them.

My point is that no one, whether they're a parent or not, is a one-note stereotype, and to behave as if they are is being a very poor friend.

I was really hurt when those two friends went silent on me, but I accepted that they had their reasons, even if I didn't know what they were till later. And I didn't pre-emptively ditch my other friends without children.

Yes I drop friends how instantly because of DECADES of things that have been said to me by either pregnant women or those with children. Both online and in person. I don’t want to be a better friend anymore. I’ve done that. I would have liked others to be a better friend to me in return over the years. And guess what? It never happened. But they have kids right so that’s FINE! They are exempt from being nice and we must be understanding at all times to those with children. I however should just accept any and every awful thing said to be over the years because I just DON’T UNDERSTAND!

I think the first thing a woman with a child said that I was a bit 🤨 about was when I was about 18. She was early 20s and had just had her first child. The conversation was about heaven/hell and the afterlife. There was about 8 of us at someone’s house. She said she was glad she had her child early as at least that meant she was now guaranteed to go to heaven as she’d “turned her life around” and god would understand and forgive her past behaviour now she was a mother. The rest of us though….. apparently the other way to be guaranteed to go to heaven was to have a child like her. We were all just selfish for wanting to enjoy our youth apparently.

Over the years it’s been a variation of the eye rolling if I’ve ever mentioned being tired or busy. God forbid I once just mentioned that I was irritated because I was woken up by fireworks at 2am and then again by builders next door at 6am. The reply I got was “seriously. You’re seriously going to complain about that when I’ve got 2 kids?”

At a dinner party once when a friend of a friend turned up last and the only seat left was next to me she said “can I swap with someone? I don’t really want to sit next to someone who doesn’t understand motherhood.”

Online there’s been various versions of “you don’t/will never know what true love is. You’re selfish as you’ve never had to put anyone else first. All parents are default non selfish just by having children apparently. Aren’t you worried about being lonely in old age? Who will look after you? I hope you’re not expecting your nieces to look after you. That would be so selfish.”

People on here think non parents should pay extra tax. Because of all the non selfish parents having kids to look after them. There was a thread yesterday about how parents should have priority EVERY YEAR for Christmas holidays at work. Non parents should just accept they need to work every Christmas. In fact I’ve been asked in real life why I would care about being off for Christmas as I don’t have a “real family” anyway. Need to tell my husband, siblings, parents, nieces and nephews that they don’t count as real family.

My in laws always expect my husband and I to stay at family gatherings to clean up. None of the other siblings have to because “they have kids so they are tired/need to get home/do enough cleaning up already.”

A friend once said to be “how would you have a kid anyway? You and your husband are always staying up late and sleeping in at weekends and going out to various non child friendly things. A kid wouldn’t exactly fit in with your lifestyle would it??” Well…. The reason we do those things is because, we can. Should I start setting an alarm at 5am for no reason at weekends? Going and sitting at soft play? Is that what parents did before they became parents? Or did they adjust their life accordingly when it happened?

As it happens, I’ve been trying to have a child for a decade. I’ve spent thousands and thousands on IVF. I’ve had multiple miscarriages. Yet the comments keep coming. Even from people that know. “Well everything happens for a reason. You obviously just weren’t meant to be a mother for some reason.” Cool. I’ll say that to someone with a disabled child should I? Well there’s obviously a reason your child is disabled. For whatever reason you obviously weren’t meant to have a fully abled child. I get told how “lucky” I am to have so much disposable income. Yup. That 50k credit card bill for IVF leaves me with SO MUCH spare money I just don’t know what to do with it all! I’m so lucky not to have the worry of kids. I should be thankful for my infertility! Having kids “isn’t all it’s cracked up to be! Haha” said by someone pregnant with their 4th.

So yeah maybe I am psychotic. I don’t really care at this point. The amount of things I’ve had said to me over the years i would rather just take the risk and drop friends instantly rather than have to keep smiling through the insensitive and sometimes terrible things they may say.

theneighbourgotmycake · Yesterday 12:55

beaglescurleduplikebagels · Yesterday 12:14

Of course it's not unrealistic and ridiculous - millions of children had/have childhoods were they never attend a single club or organised activity and somehow they all manage to survive perfectly well 😂

what you fail to understand ,and I do hope you don't have kids, is that being a parent means you want more than the bare minimum for your kids.

It's rather sad when adults have no hobbies, do no sport and no activities, but it's neglectful to do nothing for your children. Why bother having them in the first place if you are not interested?

Timeforachange26 · Yesterday 12:53

Yetone · Yesterday 08:32

I think you probably just don’t appreciate how busy they can be. If they meet another friend who has children then the children will have a play date and be occupied.

She's offered to go to a soft play with them so the kid would be occupied anyway. What's the difference?

Overthebow · Yesterday 12:53

Powwch · Yesterday 11:44

Projecting what? It’s literally what people with children say. That they never knew what real love was until they had children. I don’t have them. And I’ve never said it. So why is it me projecting anything when it’s being said TO me?

They’re just stating fact though aren’t they? For them, they’ve never known real love until they had children. It’s what they’ve experienced. Maybe it wouldn’t be the same for you, but for them it is. It’s the same for me too, the love I feel for my children is completely different to any other love I’ve experienced, they are my children.

Comeondoreen · Yesterday 12:52

I find these threads really odd - I can’t help but wonder if I inhabit an entirely different planet to some of you.

Being a mum to small children is a humongous part of my life and it takes up much of my time and energy - especially as one has special needs. So naturally, it comes up a lot if I’m catching up with friends. My child-free friends don’t have any particular interest in the topic of childrearing, but they want to hear about what’s going on in my life because they love me. In the same way, I don’t have any interest in HR but I want to hear about what’s important to my HR manager friend and what’s going on in her life - which includes her work - because I love her. Do some of you really just view friends as people who talk about things that align with your interests rather than unique people who you love and care about?

I also note that, for all of OP’s protestations that she is indeed very busy, I cannot imagine any of my child-free friends having the time or interest to sit and stew over whether I was more interested in my mum friends than them. They are lovely, caring, busy people with exciting and full lives - I cannot imagine have noticed how often I spend time with my mum friends, let alone be bothered about it!

I’m always surprised by how people on mumsnet don’t actually seem to care about their friends as people - they just view them as accompaniments to going places, doing things… weird.

Princessconsuelabananahammock9 · Yesterday 12:42

Screamingabdabz · Yesterday 08:54

I kept in touch with my childless friends but it was harder work to maintain. Things aren’t the same. You only want short visits because you don’t want to be away from your child for too long - plus you’re bone tired, and if you’re not with your child, you want to be asleep or slobbing on the sofa. So a quick coffee for an hour a month is often enough.

Secondly the chat isn’t quite on the same wavelength. They’re going on about some dumb bloke messing them about for the umpteenth time, or some trivial office gossip that one time would've been ultimately interesting but now that all sinks into insignificance. You fall in love with your child and you are obsessed with every aspect of their being - it’s hard to suppress that for any length of time to give a shiny shit about Emma-from-HR’s hen do drama.

As your child grows and maybe more babies come along, the sheer pressure of maintaining friendships outside of the incidental ones at toddler groups etc become so hard, something has to give.

Don’t take it personally, she’s going through a different season of life is all. Keep in touch and remember it all when you are in that position with a screaming child who has kept you up all night for a month and someone says ‘Any chance of a girls night out?’

Edited

i think seeing your friend’s issues as trivial because you have a kid is rather callous.

I have a son with complex special needs which takes up most of my life.

When I’m with any friend childfree or not, I don’t judge their problems as less than mine.

If anything I’m thrilled to not be talking about myself and my son, and happy to be seen as a human separate from motherhood.

MrsShawnHatosy · Yesterday 12:31

Redpaisley · Yesterday 12:19

I agree about the reasons you gave but disagree about advice that op should remain in touch. Everyone has priorities in life, you are obsessed with your child ( your words) but that doesn’t mean for someone like op her issues are not important. So if you trivialise what feels important to your childfree friend and you dont want to hear about what’s happening in their life best is to not continue one sided friendship.

This in spades.

Redpaisley · Yesterday 12:19

Screamingabdabz · Yesterday 08:54

I kept in touch with my childless friends but it was harder work to maintain. Things aren’t the same. You only want short visits because you don’t want to be away from your child for too long - plus you’re bone tired, and if you’re not with your child, you want to be asleep or slobbing on the sofa. So a quick coffee for an hour a month is often enough.

Secondly the chat isn’t quite on the same wavelength. They’re going on about some dumb bloke messing them about for the umpteenth time, or some trivial office gossip that one time would've been ultimately interesting but now that all sinks into insignificance. You fall in love with your child and you are obsessed with every aspect of their being - it’s hard to suppress that for any length of time to give a shiny shit about Emma-from-HR’s hen do drama.

As your child grows and maybe more babies come along, the sheer pressure of maintaining friendships outside of the incidental ones at toddler groups etc become so hard, something has to give.

Don’t take it personally, she’s going through a different season of life is all. Keep in touch and remember it all when you are in that position with a screaming child who has kept you up all night for a month and someone says ‘Any chance of a girls night out?’

Edited

I agree about the reasons you gave but disagree about advice that op should remain in touch. Everyone has priorities in life, you are obsessed with your child ( your words) but that doesn’t mean for someone like op her issues are not important. So if you trivialise what feels important to your childfree friend and you dont want to hear about what’s happening in their life best is to not continue one sided friendship.

cubistqueen · Yesterday 12:17

YourOliveBalonz · Yesterday 09:32

In truth, when they hang out with other mum friends, I think the friendship angle is secondary to what is actually happening and that’s the parenting. It’s basically parenting with some chat, not a friendship with children happening to be there.

It was nice of you to arrange a soft play meet up, to accommodate them, but they might not think to contact you to make plans because the thinking is not ‘what friend would I like to see’ but ‘what can I do with the kids and who else might want to do it’ (and their friends with kids are coming at it from same angle).

It’s also excruciatingly dull after the first couple of months of mat leave. I was desperate to get back to normal conversation but all the mum friends from baby groups etc wanted to do was talk about babies. My childfree friends kept me sane in those times and ever since, but then I didn’t expect my world and theirs to revolve around my kids and I certainly did not expect them to go away and accept me not contacting them for years. 20 odd years on the mum friends are forgotten and the other friends including my childfree ones are still around. And the idea that my childfree doctor friend was less busy than I was (or ever been) is hilarious.

beaglescurleduplikebagels · Yesterday 12:14

theneighbourgotmycake · Yesterday 12:09

you are recommending taking the kids to kick a ball in the park instead of joining clubs.

It's just a ridiculous and unrealistic suggestion.

You are trying to pretend parents are martyrs because they are being normal parents, it's a bit silly.

Of course it's not unrealistic and ridiculous - millions of children had/have childhoods were they never attend a single club or organised activity and somehow they all manage to survive perfectly well 😂

Thelonelyshrew · Yesterday 12:11

You are definitely not being unreasonable OP. It’s pathetic really. I have a friend whom I’ve had for years. She’s doesn’t have kids but I have never stopped seeing her or doing things with her. She was always happy to do things with my kids and of course without.

I don’t understand why you’re getting the responses you are, I can only assume it’s from people being “guilty” of doing what you have described.

FirmSnake · Yesterday 12:11

beaglescurleduplikebagels · Yesterday 12:05

The point was more that the park (or whatever) can be flexible and fit around other things, but if your child has to be somewhere at 9am every Saturday then you're making an additional job for yourself.

Not really. Lots of kids do better with routine, structure and regular exercise in my opinion. Our lives are easier if we know what is happening, and I don't think that is unusual.

SodaPopBop · Yesterday 12:09

MrsShawnHatosy · Yesterday 11:27

Having children is a choice too. It hasn’t been forced on you.

Nope, not always. There are women who didn’t choose to have a child who are still mothers. Not that it’s relevant to what I actually said.

Is not having children is always a choice, too?

Iocanepowder · Yesterday 12:09

Sorry op I have found the opposite. I lost a couple of childfree friends after having kids as they no longer wanted to meet up with me.

theneighbourgotmycake · Yesterday 12:09

beaglescurleduplikebagels · Yesterday 12:07

I don't really see the point in continuing this discussion as you're just turning everything I say into hyperbole and acting as though I've said things I haven't.

you are recommending taking the kids to kick a ball in the park instead of joining clubs.

It's just a ridiculous and unrealistic suggestion.

You are trying to pretend parents are martyrs because they are being normal parents, it's a bit silly.

beaglescurleduplikebagels · Yesterday 12:07

theneighbourgotmycake · Yesterday 12:05

You are contradicting yourself.

If you don't refuse to take your kids to a sport, then.. you do take them?
And it involves training, competitions, and weekends? You can't do a half-arsed effort to take them twice a month when you feel like it?

YOU join a class or a club, you go once or several times a week, regularly.

so you take them to the park at weekends or for the odd kick-about after school huh? what's the point of that? 😂They want to be with their friends and in a team, they want to learn the skills, the rules, practice?

but there are ways of doing that that don't involve hours of driving
People shouldn't have kids if they are only ready to be involved in the least inconvenient way for them.

Many kids even have weekend sport tours, competitions abroad, decent parent are happy for them, not resentful!

Children don't need to go to multiple activities every week.
they deserve to have that chance though, sad if they don't.

I don't really see the point in continuing this discussion as you're just turning everything I say into hyperbole and acting as though I've said things I haven't.

beaglescurleduplikebagels · Yesterday 12:05

FirmSnake · Yesterday 12:03

But fewer activities doesn't equal more free time... My kids need exercise and looking after on a Saturday morning either way. In fact, at least if they're at a club I can faff around on my phone for an hour. I'm not less busy if I take them to the park instead am I?

The point was more that the park (or whatever) can be flexible and fit around other things, but if your child has to be somewhere at 9am every Saturday then you're making an additional job for yourself.

theneighbourgotmycake · Yesterday 12:05

beaglescurleduplikebagels · Yesterday 11:57

Nobody said anything about "refusing to take your kids to a sport" though Confused

But there's a huge difference between your kid liking football so you take them to the park at weekends or for the odd kick-about after school, and spending hours every single week taking them to football games. The former is normal parenting, the latter is a choice.

Children don't need to go to multiple activities every week. Yes, they need exercise. Yes, they need a parent to encourage their interests. Yes, they need to try new things - but there are ways of doing that that don't involve hours of driving and shuttling them about here, there and everywhere every weekend.

You are contradicting yourself.

If you don't refuse to take your kids to a sport, then.. you do take them?
And it involves training, competitions, and weekends? You can't do a half-arsed effort to take them twice a month when you feel like it?

YOU join a class or a club, you go once or several times a week, regularly.

so you take them to the park at weekends or for the odd kick-about after school huh? what's the point of that? 😂They want to be with their friends and in a team, they want to learn the skills, the rules, practice?

but there are ways of doing that that don't involve hours of driving
People shouldn't have kids if they are only ready to be involved in the least inconvenient way for them.

Many kids even have weekend sport tours, competitions abroad, decent parent are happy for them, not resentful!

Children don't need to go to multiple activities every week.
they deserve to have that chance though, sad if they don't.

FirmSnake · Yesterday 12:03

beaglescurleduplikebagels · Yesterday 11:57

Nobody said anything about "refusing to take your kids to a sport" though Confused

But there's a huge difference between your kid liking football so you take them to the park at weekends or for the odd kick-about after school, and spending hours every single week taking them to football games. The former is normal parenting, the latter is a choice.

Children don't need to go to multiple activities every week. Yes, they need exercise. Yes, they need a parent to encourage their interests. Yes, they need to try new things - but there are ways of doing that that don't involve hours of driving and shuttling them about here, there and everywhere every weekend.

But fewer activities doesn't equal more free time... My kids need exercise and looking after on a Saturday morning either way. In fact, at least if they're at a club I can faff around on my phone for an hour. I'm not less busy if I take them to the park instead am I?

Swipe left for the next trending thread