Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Christmas leave priority

1000 replies

putmeonthebackburner · 23/09/2026 14:23

We have had an email today stating that Christmas leave will be prioritised in the following way:

  1. people with children under 7
  2. people with grandchildren under 7
  3. people with children over 7
  4. people with grandchildren over 7
  5. everyone else

AIBU to think this is utterly ridiculous? I am my parents’ child, I would like to see them over Christmas. We only get the bank holiday days off and work on Christmas Eve so if I don’t get leave I won’t see family until the 26th.

It should be first come first served

OP posts:
Ultravox · 23/09/2026 22:13

As a parent of 3 and grandmother of 1 I’d like to say YANBU. It’s utterly ridiculous that personal circumstances should be taken into account on a public holiday. People have lives no matter if they have children or grandchildren! It should be strict turn taking.

Londonrach1 · 23/09/2026 22:12

Awful work. I'd leave and find a better place

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 22:11

BarGanza · 23/09/2026 22:07

The OP ‘s comments are a response to parents being dramatic and precious about it. You have been one of the worst on here implying that children who can’t spend all of Christmas Day with their working mothers are going to suffer and it’s oh so crap for them all.

The OP's comments have been very dramatic in their own right. Don't try and pin her posts too on parents. What are parents not responsible for in your world?

It's not dramatic to suggest it's crap for kids to miss out on Christmas morning with their parents. I have suggested it's traumatising or life wrecking but it's clearly far from ideal. I believe children should be prioritised at Christmas.

XenoBitch · 23/09/2026 22:10

BarGanza · 23/09/2026 22:05

Of course having kids is selfish. I had children because I wanted to. I had the urge and I really wanted to be a Mum. I didn’t do it for anyone else.

I’m laughing at the idea that all these selfless people are having children for the future of this country, to be the future noble taxpayers who are going to look after the elderly and keep the economy going. Nobody has children for that reason😂

That makes me laugh too. I mean, all the stuff in the press and by the GOV about NEETs. A lot of kids about now are not going to be contributing anything.
Unless parents should get priority for xmas leave if their kids are doing well at school. I would love to see the paperwork for that policy.

BarGanza · 23/09/2026 22:10

Montysmoon · 23/09/2026 22:03

You realise that Christmas is hugely commercialised and culturally focused on children; toys, kids films, Father Xmas, nativity plays. They are central to the day and so yes I expect it matters more to a 6 year old than a 36 year old. That’s not to say adults can’t also enjoy the day and want to spend it with family, but let’s not pretend it means the same to adults as it does to children.

And it doesn’t mean that children can’t be supported by loving parents to celebrate on a different day.

All these perfect little families spending Christmas Day together, are being facilitated by thousands of people around the country working to keep the water and power going, hospitals running and food supplies continuing. And of course some of them will be mums. You would do well to remember that rather than effectively saying that their kids are going to have an awful Christmas.

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 22:09

BarGanza · 23/09/2026 22:05

Of course having kids is selfish. I had children because I wanted to. I had the urge and I really wanted to be a Mum. I didn’t do it for anyone else.

I’m laughing at the idea that all these selfless people are having children for the future of this country, to be the future noble taxpayers who are going to look after the elderly and keep the economy going. Nobody has children for that reason😂

Has anyone suggested that this was people's motive for having children? I don't think they have. That doesn't mean that society shouldn't support them in having and raising children though because it's an outcome that society also needs.

Using a different analogy. I have a disabled relative that I help care for. I don't care for him for the good of society. I care for him because he is part of my family and I want to make sure he is ok. It makes obvious sense though for society to support me in doing this as it's also in the best interests of society that family members care for their vulnerable members.

BarGanza · 23/09/2026 22:07

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 22:03

That's a weird sentiment to apply to children with developing brains and understanding and not to apply to adults like OP. Why can't she understand that she is loved and that Christmas can still be celebrated without her needing Annual Leave exactly when she demands it? It's not just parents being dramatic about all of this is it?

The OP ‘s comments are a response to parents being dramatic and precious about it. You have been one of the worst on here implying that children who can’t spend all of Christmas Day with their working mothers are going to suffer and it’s oh so crap for them all.

BarGanza · 23/09/2026 22:05

Of course having kids is selfish. I had children because I wanted to. I had the urge and I really wanted to be a Mum. I didn’t do it for anyone else.

I’m laughing at the idea that all these selfless people are having children for the future of this country, to be the future noble taxpayers who are going to look after the elderly and keep the economy going. Nobody has children for that reason😂

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 22:03

BarGanza · 23/09/2026 21:58

Well, all kids are different, I guess. Many children don’t struggle as they are loved and prepared for the day by their parents. If the mother is going to make an emotional drama about it, then the kids will follow suit.

That's a weird sentiment to apply to children with developing brains and understanding and not to apply to adults like OP. Why can't she understand that she is loved and that Christmas can still be celebrated without her needing Annual Leave exactly when she demands it? It's not just parents being dramatic about all of this is it?

Montysmoon · 23/09/2026 22:03

BarGanza · 23/09/2026 21:58

Well, all kids are different, I guess. Many children don’t struggle as they are loved and prepared for the day by their parents. If the mother is going to make an emotional drama about it, then the kids will follow suit.

You realise that Christmas is hugely commercialised and culturally focused on children; toys, kids films, Father Xmas, nativity plays. They are central to the day and so yes I expect it matters more to a 6 year old than a 36 year old. That’s not to say adults can’t also enjoy the day and want to spend it with family, but let’s not pretend it means the same to adults as it does to children.

Colourfulfairylights · 23/09/2026 22:03

Teado · 23/09/2026 14:46

Perhaps they’ve done the grandparent thing to get around discrimination on the basis of age. A few posters have mentioned discrimination but I don’t see it against any other protected characteristic unless I’m missing something?

I disagree with the premise of allocating leave in this way don’t get me wrong, but I don’t know why posters are suggesting HR etc.

People may not have children due to health reasons so could be disability, could be discrimination on basis of age, a 20 year old is less likely to have children and certainly won't have grandchildren.

An older person is more likely to fit into any of the first 4 categories as they could have grandchildren or children depending on their age, someone younger will only fit into 2 categories max statistically speaking.

That's off the top of my head. Sexual orientation potentially, I don't know the stats but I would imagine straight ppl are more likely to have children or grandchildren.

I mean it's basically a HR nightmare and they are absolutely idiots to put it in writing.

feistyoneyouare · 23/09/2026 22:02

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 21:32

It's not one upmanship but intended to highlight that prioritising parents to spend Christmas with their children when they're young doesn't mean that those parents then won't miss out on Christmases with elderly relatives, last Christmases or be unable to travel to see family. Being a parent just adds another set of demands on adults at Christmas so even if they can tick off being with their kids on Christmas morning, they still will potentially miss out on seeing our wider family and parents etc. in fact this is often more likely because they have used their leave allocation on their kids.

So basically my point was all adults are or will be dealing with similar kinds of stuff. Being parents adds an additional set of demands on top of it all and responsibilities for small humans especially at Christmas. Even if they get the so called privilege, they might still find it harder to meet all the other demands that are placed on them at Christmas.

I understand your reasoning, but it doens't convince me that parents should get priority, so we'll have to agre to differ.

BarGanza · 23/09/2026 21:58

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 21:11

It's not about 'deserving' the day off. This kind of language is deliberately inflammatory but I think you know that. Do you think the person with the terminally ill parents 'deserves' the day off more than everyone else or that this is just the most compassionate thing to do? The same goes with kids. It is compassionate to understand that Christmas is very important to children and a key part of it is Christmas day itself. It has a significance which generally ebbs away as we get older.

To answer your question though, I would expect the team to use their judgement to decide who needed the day off more firstly. A single parent with no alternative childcare is a more obvious candidate than someone with a partner. I do think children's age comes into it. My kids are ageing out of Father Christmas etc so could stand to wait to celebrate Christmas in a way that they really would have struggled with a few years ago.

Well, all kids are different, I guess. Many children don’t struggle as they are loved and prepared for the day by their parents. If the mother is going to make an emotional drama about it, then the kids will follow suit.

JenniferBooth · 23/09/2026 21:58

khaa2091 · 23/09/2026 21:17

I havent read the whole thread, but one of the issues is availabily of childcare. If you really have no family nearby finding someone prepared to take your small child can be very difficult.

ive seen lots of petitions on MN in the fifteen years ive been on here including tackling the useless CMS (which needs to happen cos they are fucking dire) Ive yet to see one petitioning for childcare to be available at Christmas I wonder why.

Whoisit101 · 23/09/2026 21:58

RubyHiker · 23/09/2026 20:51

Why are you blaming a mother for the failure of your workplace to get adequate maternity cover

I didnt blame the mother. I actually said it was her right to have as many children as she wants. You say it isn't the mother's responsibility to provide adequate maternity cover, rightly so, but it is equally not my responsibility to provide holiday cover for mothers as and when they want, at my expense, that too is the responsibility of the employer, not the childless employee.

As a side note probably the largest female employer in the UK the nhs doesn't provide maternity leave cover for their staff.

feistyoneyouare · 23/09/2026 21:57

feistyoneyouare · 23/09/2026 21:24

But I wasn’t claiming my needs trumped the needs of others. Some on this thread are doing exactly that, though.

Out of curiosity, though, your final sentence sounded very ‘top trumps’. If you really do consider all adults equal, why is it even relative that parents are doing ‘all that and more’, so to speak? It sounded an awful lot like one-upmanship to me.

*relevant, not relative, damn autocorrect

Icecreamisthebest · 23/09/2026 21:56

Given that most staff will have special people that they want to spend time with over the holidays and the policy relates to Christmas Eve, it would be much fairer to give priority to those who have to travel to be able to see those special people.

It’s all very well to say the OP can get up early on Christmas Day but what if she didn’t have a car and was reliant on public transport? Why can’t parents and grandparents who have their families close by simply be organised enough that they have done all their Christmas prep and don’t need Christmas Eve off?

What are you planning to do about it OP? It’s also very late in the year to introduce a policy like this. I’d be drafting an email politely pointing out the history of your leave requests over the year, how much leave you have not been able to use, the issues that this Christmas policy is causing you and ask for a reconsideration of the policy. Or alternatively that you are able to carry forward all your leave given your requests to use it during the year were rejected.

FrippEnos · 23/09/2026 21:55

Montysmoon · 23/09/2026 21:25

I’m sorry but this is quite ironic given you seem to be a pretty selfish person; ‘why doesn't anyone put me first??’ Society doesn’t care about the individual, it doesn’t care about you, me or Tom, Dick and Harry. What matters is collective society, and children are the basis of that. They are needed to keep humanity going. And at the rate we’re going humanity will die out as the replacement rate is falling. Would you prefer to be in a society like Japan where there are 2.5 elderly people for every 1 child, which is having a detrimental impact on not only the economy but also the health and happiness of their society (significant increase in feelings of isolation etc). You might not feel ‘seen’ in society and perhaps feel lesser-than mothers, but I would encourage you to think less about yourself and think more about the greater good.

The greater good

harvey korman GIF
Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 21:54

Whoisit101 · 23/09/2026 21:37

To answer your question...as I said, it was a small team relevant to the type of work we did , banding experience etc I picked up an almost entire extra caseload of patients. Don't know if you're aware that means, particularly in the nhs, that an already pressured nurse was doing double duty.

It was my choice to not have children, but I didnt not have children to always be able to accommodate those that did. Surely those that had children were aware they would have to make sacrifices themselves.

I did not say I never helped out at any other time, i did, but there is a limit of what is expected and in some cases demanded . Being expected to carry 2 caseloads over simultaneous maternity leaves ( nearly 3 years) i was exhausted. As a side note i had an elderly mother and aunt. But hey I didnt have children so what else have I to ddo with my life... isn't that the mentality !!

I have as much right to take time off at chosen times as the next person, if YOU have children its up to YOU to weigh up how that will work for YOU not EXPECT the childless others to cover for your choices.

I actually accommodated many colleagues over the years. The coming in late for school drop off, leaving early because something was up, the child is sick, the appointments etc all covered by myself and other colleagues. It was when I realised it was neither appreciated nor reciprocated, that my patience ran thin.
You talk about my 'bitterness' , when we had another mum join the team the feathers really began to fly about who was entitled to what, now that was when the 'bitterness' and demanding behaviour really came in to play, it actually refocused my colleague who started to see how easy she had had it with me!

If you don't think mothers are supported in the workplace that is not my childless fault...that is a management or policy problem and not something that I or any other childless person needs to fix. As far as i can see in healthcare there are many child friendly policies, amended working times, flexible hours, good maternity leave and managers falling over themselves to accommodate them for fear of being accused of breaking these policies. One colleague even got out of a fraudulent situation because he was stressed due to having 4 children under 5. I would have been out of a job.

Sounds like maternity leave was badly handled by management which isn't the pregnant woman's fault. What was she supposed to do? Never have a baby because the NHS can't or won't cover her work appropriately?

I have as much right to take time off at chosen times as the next person, if YOU have children its up to YOU to weigh up how that will work for YOU not EXPECT the childless others to cover for your choices
I don't think this is realistic, in the same way that it's not realistic to expect anyone with caring responsibilities to never impact their work. Kids get sick and can't go to childcare. You have to have time off to birth the baby and recover from the process. You can't stay behind and cover extra shifts/work if the child care setting is closing. We have to make allowances as a society for this. We can't expect people to work as if they don't have children but then parent as if they don't work. It's too much!

Children exist in society, in the same way that disabled and elderly people do To some extent people without young children or other caring responsibilities do need to support those with them for society to function. No, it won't always be strictly fair but equally being child free has a whole host of documented benefits including being wealthier than your parent equivalents, having lower levels of stress and even having lower levels of cardiac risk. Parents aren't exactly skipping in the daisies with all these alleged benefits they get from bringing much needed children into the world. In many ways they are taking the financial and health hit for you.

Periperi2025 · 23/09/2026 21:54

I've voted YABU, because if your getting the bank holidays off at christmas and every christmas you don't really have too much to complain about. But annual leave should be done fairly and not based on ability or choice to have children, whether at christmas or any other time of the year.

SandyHappyPerson · 23/09/2026 21:49

I genuinely don't understand why they have bought in the policy though, none of the staff are working Christmas Day, Boxing day, Sunday 27th or Monday the 28th.. so why prioritise people with kids for the rest of it? The people with kids will already be at home for the main bit, as will all the child free people.. they've all got plenty of time to see their families, as it's 4 days off for everyone!

What's the point of it?

NotABlessedFruit · 23/09/2026 21:47

You might not feel ‘seen’ in society and perhaps feel lesser-than mothers, but I would encourage you to think less about yourself and think more about the greater good.

Thruthfully, if you don't think about yourself, who else will? No one.
Dad but true.

Maybe there should be accessible childcare at all times so everyone can do their work parts....

ExpectMore · 23/09/2026 21:45

Peonysandponies · 23/09/2026 21:29

Fortunately the law doesn’t agree with you and your beliefs cannot be enforced in an employment setting.

Fortunately the law evolves and can be changed to better reflect the wants and needs of society.

I doubt a Childress and utterly bitter Sandra who can’t organise herself to visit herself on Christmas Day despite having ample travel time’s needs will ever get recognised as have any priority need of leave…

RockyFraggles · 23/09/2026 21:41

Have you tried speaking to your employers about this generally or raising the issue in a suitable forum? You come across rather petulant in your posts and it makes me wonder if you have actually tried to discuss and change things rather than just get pissed off that you can't have leave.

You come across like you are stamping your feet and saying 'its not fair' and coming up with all sorts of barriers to why you can't be with your family. If you really wanted to be you would travel to see them on Christmas Eve after work.

That said I do think the policy on booking Christmas Eve is fair but what have you done to try to change it?

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 21:40

AmazonAntiqueStore · 23/09/2026 21:37

I do wonder whether prioritising grandparents would be potentially illegal, though - definitely age discrimination and I’d struggle to see that it could be objectively justified.

I'm not sure that's true as arguably including grandparents could stop claims of age discrimination. If you didn't include them then anyone that's too old to be a parent to young children couldn't qualify. This way, everyone in the workforce could be eligible as you could be a parent or grandparent if you're 18-80 years of age.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.