9 year old DS is behind with literacy, reading and writing. For specific reasons we have suspected that he might be dyslexic and have asked the school for support with looking into this.
They emailed today to let us know they're going to have him assessed for the programme to support children who speak French as a second language. It's not really French but for illustration purposes imagine we live in France and DH is French and I am British. The programme is designed to support children who have an immigrant background, which technically DS does and he is bilingual.
But DS has lived in France all his life. French is not his second language, it's actually his strongest language. I always say he has two first languages because he learned both from us as a baby, which is the academic definition of first language. But if he had a first and second, then English would be his second language. He has no trouble with French vocabulary or grammar.
I just don't think this applies to him and I really don't think it's the reason for his literacy difficulties. I'm not going to stop them assessing him for it if it could help, but I don't want this being pigeonholed as a bilingual immigrant problem if that's not it. Would I be unreasonable to ask why this has been suggested?