Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To absolutely hate this government, and what they are doing to our country? PART 2

934 replies

CoventryCity · 22/09/2026 10:14

A continuation of Thread 1.

Strong words but is is how I feel at this point in time. All of them make me feel physically sick. Why? Well many reasons.. Here are just two.

Eg. They won't release sex crime statistics of immigrants / asylum seekers. Why? Other European countries have done, and it is not pretty. Our gvt gives out a leaflet asking them not to rape the locals. Why? Our gvt has said they won't house asylum seekers next to schools and nurseries, why?

Eg. UK now spends more on benefits than it earns in income tax. Labour have increased this - not reduced it. Astonishing. As they say - "Who can we tax in order to pay benefits to others?" That's Labour's Welfare Secretary. He's describing the priorities of Labour MPs.

In the last financial year, the UK government brought in £331 billion in income tax — and spent even more, £333 billion, on welfare, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility's latest economic and fiscal outlook (obr.uk/efo/economic-and-fiscal-outlook-march-2026/#chapter-6).

Previous thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5580786-to-absolutely-hate-this-government-and-what-they-are-doing-to-our-country?page=40&reply=154902611&utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

Page 40 | To absolutely hate this government, and what they are doing to our country? | Mumsnet

To absolutely hate this government, and what they are doing to our country? Strong words but is is how I feel at this point in time. All of them make...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5580786-to-absolutely-hate-this-government-and-what-they-are-doing-to-our-country?page=40&reply=154902611

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 20:27

shecanbe · 23/09/2026 20:24

Babe. Leftie.

Yawn.

You are the one who has started 3 threads about this data.

So I'll ask again - what are you hopeful it might prove?

Simple question. No need for defensiveness.

Edited

Why does there have to be a hope as part of this.

The op has said what her reasoning is.

shecanbe · 23/09/2026 20:25

Fyi, I haven't voted Labour since the 90s - not that it's relevant.

shecanbe · 23/09/2026 20:24

Babe. Leftie.

Yawn.

You are the one who has started 3 threads about this data.

So I'll ask again - what are you hopeful it might prove?

Simple question. No need for defensiveness.

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 20:23

EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 20:21

It’s fine to want the data for this reason.

Typical idiotic Labour I suppose!

OP posts:
CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 20:22

Gtfto2024 · 23/09/2026 20:18

Babe.

Proving you can't back your posts so resort to patronising posters.

What?

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 20:21

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 20:03

No one’s talking about ‘proof’ or ‘prove’. Well except you babe. I certainly wasn’t. I’d just like the data Labour are suppressing. As I’ve stated many times. You’re doing mental gymnastics to suit your own mental model. Perhaps you’re projecting. I really couldn’t say.

It’s fine to want the data for this reason.

LuckyHazelFox · 23/09/2026 20:19

Gtfto2024 · 23/09/2026 20:18

Babe.

Proving you can't back your posts so resort to patronising posters.

Can you prove Antifa don't exist?

Gtfto2024 · 23/09/2026 20:18

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 20:03

No one’s talking about ‘proof’ or ‘prove’. Well except you babe. I certainly wasn’t. I’d just like the data Labour are suppressing. As I’ve stated many times. You’re doing mental gymnastics to suit your own mental model. Perhaps you’re projecting. I really couldn’t say.

Babe.

Proving you can't back your posts so resort to patronising posters.

LuckyHazelFox · 23/09/2026 20:04

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 20:01

I answered up thread. I can’t help you if you don’t understand or comprehend. It’s common with the leftie squad. See what you want to see, cognitive dissonance and all that.

Well said Cov x

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 20:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 20:03

shecanbe · 23/09/2026 19:52

I'm asking you what you hope this data will prove for you?

No one’s talking about ‘proof’ or ‘prove’. Well except you babe. I certainly wasn’t. I’d just like the data Labour are suppressing. As I’ve stated many times. You’re doing mental gymnastics to suit your own mental model. Perhaps you’re projecting. I really couldn’t say.

OP posts:
shecanbe · 23/09/2026 20:02

Ok, just one more time. Spell it out for us would you?

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 20:01

BIossomtoes · 23/09/2026 19:48

And never will.

I answered up thread. I can’t help you if you don’t understand or comprehend. It’s common with the leftie squad. See what you want to see, cognitive dissonance and all that.

OP posts:
shecanbe · 23/09/2026 19:52

I'm asking you what you hope this data will prove for you?

EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 19:50

One other thing

The First-tier Tribunal is an official part of the UK justice and court system.

Hence the contempt of court if they don’t publish.

So no idea what the issue is with anyone’s posts.

5128gap · 23/09/2026 19:50

LakieLady · 23/09/2026 10:14

And many working UC claimants wouldn't be entitled to a penny in UC if they weren't paying exorbitant rents.

I'd love to know how much of the spending on UC goes to private landlords. My DNiece and my (step) DIL wouldn't be getting UC at all if they were in social housing instead of paying well in excess of £1k a month in rent.

And immigrants are only entitled to UC under very specific circumstances, one of which is being granted refugee status. Asylum seekers aren't entitled to benefits.

£14 billion a year in UC is paid to private landlords.

BIossomtoes · 23/09/2026 19:48

shecanbe · 23/09/2026 19:46

You haven't answered at all.

And never will.

shecanbe · 23/09/2026 19:46

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 19:32

Good lord what on earth are you incoherently twittering about? I’ve answered you. Stop obfuscating. It’s unbecoming.

You haven't answered at all.

EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 19:35

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 19:32

Good lord what on earth are you incoherently twittering about? I’ve answered you. Stop obfuscating. It’s unbecoming.

I mean it’s a simple process but ok. I think the pp needs more convo but it’s all there.

btw thanks this is for the other post

RedTagAlan · 23/09/2026 19:33

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 19:31

More obfuscation 🤷‍♀️

Yup. It appears @EasternStandard is doing that.

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 19:32

shecanbe · 23/09/2026 18:54

Do you only want data about crimes committed by men who are awaiting the outcome of asylum claims?

Or are you anxiously awaiting data about different ethnic / nationality groups living in the U.K. - because this is (I would imagine) virtually impossible, given how many people are of mixed heritage.

Good lord what on earth are you incoherently twittering about? I’ve answered you. Stop obfuscating. It’s unbecoming.

OP posts:
RedTagAlan · 23/09/2026 19:31

EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 19:22

I really don’t see the issue with the information or the confusion below.

If Labour lose the tribunal they’ll have 28 days to publish, if they don’t without an appeal they’re in contempt of court.

It’s simple enough to follow.

And you still do not tag me in answers to my posts.

As a matter of interest, why do you do that ?

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 19:31

EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 19:22

I really don’t see the issue with the information or the confusion below.

If Labour lose the tribunal they’ll have 28 days to publish, if they don’t without an appeal they’re in contempt of court.

It’s simple enough to follow.

More obfuscation 🤷‍♀️

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 19:22

I really don’t see the issue with the information or the confusion below.

If Labour lose the tribunal they’ll have 28 days to publish, if they don’t without an appeal they’re in contempt of court.

It’s simple enough to follow.

RedTagAlan · 23/09/2026 19:17

EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 19:02

Re below it’s the First-tier Tribunal which is the independent court body responsible for resolving disputes against decisions made by government regulatory bodies.

It’s all available for anyone who wants the information. If Labour lose they’ll have usually 28 days to publish, unless they appeal on a point of law.

This notice normally gives the government 28 calendar days to publish the masked data or face being held in contempt of court.

Is that a reply to my post above where I tagged you via the quote function?

But you do not tag/ quote me ?

And when you say, quote "It’s all available for anyone who wants the information", is that not just the same as saying "google it".

This is my thing on this thread. Go up to my first post here, and I am talking about whataboutisms and distraction techniques. And here you are saying, quote "Re below it’s the First-tier Tribunal which is the independent court body responsible for resolving disputes against decisions made by government regulatory bodies."...

But it is not below. The link you posted is ABOVE.

It is all calculated distraction. Or it certainly seems that way.