Obviously they can be very positive, but I do think what you are witnessing is true and part of a wider societal change.
Go back through history and the positive/negative balance of relationships was clearer for a woman. having a man meant:
Money, Safety from other men, can have children, Safety and future for children, Physical ability/strength, Legal rights/protections that women couldn't have etc.
Obviously there were huge risks, he could be violent, a drunk, useless etc. but in general there was still necessary practical needs that only a man could give.
You'd put up with the bad, because you had no choice. You needed a man. (just hope he is a good one...)
Now though, we have outsourced a lot of those to other areas.
Safety = police,
money = both sexes can work,
Children = not needed for future care, not shamed for not having them
Elderly care/support = government
Heavy lifting = Pay others
So what is the point of men in the lives of women?
Before it was both love/companionship + practical advantages. but now it is just love/companionship. If a man isn't giving you that, they are fairly useless to you in modern society.
Unfortunately from my perspective, I think that this message hasn't quite gotten through to many men yet, who haven't quite realized that their previously held practical roles of being the provider, working, bringing in the food, fixing the house etc. are not enough any more, and that just doing these won't keep their relationships alive, if they also have a fair few negative traits alongside.
I think this goes somewhat to explaining why an increasing number of women are questioning whether (outside of childbirth) men improve their lives... and it also goes somewhat to questioning why a lot of men are struggling for any "purpose" in their lives.