Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to want JW leaders to be held accountable for blood transfusion deaths.

115 replies

Exjw1975 · 21/09/2026 20:12

On Friday Jehovahs Witnesses announced a u-turn on their ban on blood transfusions. Over the years thousands have died following this rule and the change came with no apology or acknowledgment of all the lives lost.

I was raised in this cult and we all carried cards saying we didn’t want a blood transfusion. It’s hard to explain to people who haven’t been raised in it the amount of brainwashing used by these high-control religions.

While the rule change is obviously a good thing for the existing JWs, I am so angry that there will be no accountability for the men who make these rules. They have blood on their hands.

OP posts:
Portakalkedi · 21/09/2026 22:43

I know some JWs and they seem like decent people, albeit with very rigid beliefs, but if they choose not to receive blood then their choice I suppose. As noted above, decisons about children will be overruled by doctors.

Bonnylassie · 21/09/2026 22:47

Me and my brother left on our 20s and we were talking on Friday about the mental gymnastics DM would need to do to explain this away. I know she wouldn't accept any form of blood despite this change.

We both have living wills because we can't trust her to make the decision she knows we would make if we became ill and our partners were also ill/dead as she will be out next of kin.

Honestly I think there should be more outrage internally but people will explain it away to themselves that Jehovah has seen fit to give us more guidance now and not 50 years ago because (insert whatever rubbish you want here).

Exjw1975 · 21/09/2026 22:49

HappyMuma · 21/09/2026 21:52

I’m not a JW but I’m related to a lot of people who are.
Who in the organisation would you expect to make the apology? The elders haven’t made these rules, they have followed the rules passed down to them. And if they are elders there’s no doubt they have been a JW for a long time, maybe even since childhood so it’s a completely normal thing for them to refuse blood, they don’t know any different!

‘The governing body’ 11 men at the top who issue their “new light “ from their media-centre headquarters in the US.

OP posts:
Exjw1975 · 21/09/2026 22:51

Bonnylassie · 21/09/2026 22:47

Me and my brother left on our 20s and we were talking on Friday about the mental gymnastics DM would need to do to explain this away. I know she wouldn't accept any form of blood despite this change.

We both have living wills because we can't trust her to make the decision she knows we would make if we became ill and our partners were also ill/dead as she will be out next of kin.

Honestly I think there should be more outrage internally but people will explain it away to themselves that Jehovah has seen fit to give us more guidance now and not 50 years ago because (insert whatever rubbish you want here).

They are taught to question nothing and will be gaslit. I’ve not been able to speak to my family about it yet because my parents will simply be ‘never mind, those that died will be resurrected in paradise’.

OP posts:
ErrolTheDragon · 21/09/2026 22:57

Ponoka7 · 21/09/2026 21:28

Absolutely, it's the only religion that brainwashes and doesn't necessarily have the best interests of its followers. As well as the only religion causing deaths. I can't think of any other religion that is as damaging, mass deaths, extreme control and rules, disadvantaging some of its members, as well as wider society.

How many wrongs do you think makes a right?Confused

ErrolTheDragon · 21/09/2026 23:02

Exjw1975 · 21/09/2026 21:54

Each area has a ‘hospital liaison committee’ elders that get involved when a JW is in hospital or if surgery is planned.

wtf?

BaronessBomburst · 22/09/2026 00:07

Yes, and in the Netherlands, for example, there is only one hospital which will carry out heart operations and other surgeries because they have a specialist team used to following the JW practices. I think its Amersfoort.

Awkwardisfunny · 22/09/2026 00:58

Not read up on this. Curious why you think it's the cult that should be blamed, rather than the people who allow cults to exist? Ban them all and problem solved. Shall we start prosecuting every Catholic priest who condemned homosexual people, unwed mothers... Yes. But also: no. They were allowed to do it so they did.

Spartak · 22/09/2026 02:17

I may have to bring this up with the JWs that either knock ony door or stand handing out leaflets at the end of my road.

I've had two lengthy cardiac surgeries, which involved multiple blood transfusions. I still struggle with the JWs knocking on my door, when they would have preferred me to have died.

Tiredmum93 · 22/09/2026 02:25

I’m an ex JW. It is clearly a cult. Brainwashed. Was there from six years old to 21. A lot of the rules have changed now. They can speak and convert disflelllwshiped now. And women can wear pants. Wtf

Bobbie12345678 · 22/09/2026 03:23

Exjw1975 · 21/09/2026 22:49

‘The governing body’ 11 men at the top who issue their “new light “ from their media-centre headquarters in the US.

Why would they be responsible for apologising? They presumably grew up with just the same brainwashing that you describe and believed in it. They are now doing something brave to try to rethink what they learnt and change it moving forwards. Shouldn’t you be thanking them rather than complaining about them?
If you need someone to blame doesn’t that have to go back generations and generations to the first leaders who banned it?

Exjw1975 · 22/09/2026 04:00

Bobbie12345678 · 22/09/2026 03:23

Why would they be responsible for apologising? They presumably grew up with just the same brainwashing that you describe and believed in it. They are now doing something brave to try to rethink what they learnt and change it moving forwards. Shouldn’t you be thanking them rather than complaining about them?
If you need someone to blame doesn’t that have to go back generations and generations to the first leaders who banned it?

Sadly their motives aren’t due to them being brave. They are concerned about legal action being taken in Japan. The rule change is simply to prevent them being dissolved in Japan. The rule change was never about saving lives. It was to protect their finances.

OP posts:
Exjw1975 · 22/09/2026 04:02

Tiredmum93 · 22/09/2026 02:25

I’m an ex JW. It is clearly a cult. Brainwashed. Was there from six years old to 21. A lot of the rules have changed now. They can speak and convert disflelllwshiped now. And women can wear pants. Wtf

Yes, women are allowed to wear trousers and men can have beards! 😱

OP posts:
LauritaEvita · 22/09/2026 07:23

hardshoulderr · 21/09/2026 20:32

I think it's a strange thing to worry about

Really?! You can’t see why she would care about this?

EricTheHalfASleeve · 22/09/2026 07:29

Previously if a JW accepted a blood transfusion & their church found out they would be excommunicated- thrown out of the church & ostracised by the JW community. It's horrific. The u-turn shows what utter balderdash their cult is. They won't apologise for deaths as that might open them up to legal action.

Horrace · 22/09/2026 07:41

HappyMuma · 21/09/2026 21:52

I’m not a JW but I’m related to a lot of people who are.
Who in the organisation would you expect to make the apology? The elders haven’t made these rules, they have followed the rules passed down to them. And if they are elders there’s no doubt they have been a JW for a long time, maybe even since childhood so it’s a completely normal thing for them to refuse blood, they don’t know any different!

The Governing Body should apologise

HowardTJMoon · 22/09/2026 07:41

EricTheHalfASleeve · 22/09/2026 07:29

Previously if a JW accepted a blood transfusion & their church found out they would be excommunicated- thrown out of the church & ostracised by the JW community. It's horrific. The u-turn shows what utter balderdash their cult is. They won't apologise for deaths as that might open them up to legal action.

Revisionism happens in every religion. The Church of England used to condone slavery, for instance.

Banoffeepie29 · 22/09/2026 07:54

HowardTJMoon · 22/09/2026 07:41

Revisionism happens in every religion. The Church of England used to condone slavery, for instance.

And they have acknowledged and apologised for their role in slavery. The governing body of Jehovah's Witnesses have never apolgised for anything! Not their million dollar payouts to child abuse victims (in fact, they have actively denied this and called it apostate lies), not the people who have lost their lives due to the blood doctrine, not the suicides caused by their shunning policy which they have also now become more lenient on. In modern terms, The church of England is nothing like JWs. People who weren't raised in this organisation will struggle to understand the level of control this organisation has, very similar to Mormons, Scientologist etc. Not your typical Christian church.

Banoffeepie29 · 22/09/2026 07:57

Portakalkedi · 21/09/2026 22:43

I know some JWs and they seem like decent people, albeit with very rigid beliefs, but if they choose not to receive blood then their choice I suppose. As noted above, decisons about children will be overruled by doctors.

They are nice people on the doors, but their leadership sure isn't nice. Many of us who have been raised in this organisation are understandably angry and bitter about changes like these, especially without any formal apology or acknowledgement. It is absolutely a brainwashing cult.

tsmainsqueeze · 22/09/2026 08:01

hardshoulderr · 21/09/2026 20:32

I think it's a strange thing to worry about

This is very dismissive of the op and their obviously upsetting experience of growing up as a jw.

Winterizcoming · 22/09/2026 08:01

ErrolTheDragon · 21/09/2026 23:02

wtf?

Yep. I’ve got very close friends who are JWs. When the elderly man needed a heart bypass the JW elders took turns in always being with him at the hospital. He had originally said he would have the surgery, but it had to be abandoned due to his beliefs about blood transfusions. He’s dead now.

Nutmuncher · 22/09/2026 08:03

hardshoulderr · 21/09/2026 20:32

I think it's a strange thing to worry about

Unless you have lived in the cult of Jehovahs Witnesses then I suggest you educate yourself on how strange it would be to NOT worry about this.

They are responsible for so much damage whether it’s the blood stance, shunning or rife SA cover ups - it is a toxic malignant religious group that unfortunately lures in victims with their holier than thou facade.

It would be an unrecoverable international scandal if the true figure of avoidable deaths were ever published.

Horrace · 22/09/2026 08:05

@Exjw1975 did you watch the video where it was announced on JW.org?
I watched it last night. There is no reasoning behind it. Just complete waffle. But they will all blindly accept it including my parents. They wont question the absolute U turn.

Winterizcoming · 22/09/2026 08:09

It is a dangerous cult. Imagine the fear you live in, worrying about what will happen after death and whether you’ve done enough.

Dollymylove · 22/09/2026 08:11

A man in my neighbourhood was a JW. He had an accident on his moped. He refused transfusion and died leaving a young family

Swipe left for the next trending thread