Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To struggle to believe this person is being left routinely passing out and unconscious for hours?

161 replies

frequentlybaffuckled · 21/09/2026 16:29

Put it all in to not drip feed.

They do apparently often have Bradycardia. They also clearly are disabled. They have been around medical care and hospitals a lot, and clearly have both health and general anxiety. They eat poorly and self care and MH are not good.
Visibly drained, pale, thin, unwell, low energy, unable to walk without aids.
I feel bad for questioning them at all.

Their life has fallen apart and it's clear general professionals around them aren't really doing a lot partly because the person makes it hard work.

I've been doing lots to get them out of the mess, into better situations and it's been working. Practicality wise we're almost over a huge life changing line.

I'm now hitting a wall both with my own pissed off suspicions that they may feel weak, wobbly and sleep a great deal but are capable of being woken by an alarm, rather than be, literally, as they claim, suddenly collapsing without warning, (always in a bed or chair, never in a public place or in front of friends) at any time, and being literally unconscious for hours.

And, with the fact that is now being used as a reason to not to turn up to important appointments or agreed times to do things for them that they have asked for, which messes up my life.

They are outraged at me proposing they still have to take responsibility and practical answers: IE Wont lend me a shed key so a delivery can happen regardless. But insistent they may be unconscious and expect the delivery driver to return as many times as it takes, and me to come to help, for them to get their goods. (made up example close to realities)
Or I arrive with someone and materials to do a hard five hour job (free) and they aren't there because 'They where unconscious' for the first three hours, so I'll 'have to do a little and come back another day.'
They are claiming this is their disability and I need to recognize I'm discriminating against them if I don't accept it and work around this not yet diagnosed awful condition. They rarely even say sorry. 'As it isn't their fault.'

They have said their conditions are complex and have mentioned neurological, complex, bradycardia, ELS, and it's been confirmed they have over 20 diagnoses. (I question how many might be non serious type)

Would Dr's really be leaving someone living alone, collapsing all over the place and literally unconscious for hours? (they are 'difficult' and the sort of person wards seem very keen not to keep)

Or am I being an ignorant rotten ablest bitch here and need to listen to them and believe and center them?

OP posts:
andweallsingalong · 24/09/2026 04:48

Sorry if this has already been said, but what was their childhood like? You don't have to answer, especially if they are a sibling.

I'm thinking potentially personality disorder and self sabotaging due to low self worth along with on one level enjoying the attention and value they feel when looked after. Not believing, understanding or having faith that life could be better if they took the help on offer to improve their situation/worrying that if it worked everyone would disappear and they would be unloved.

I would prioritise mental health appointments, but not be surprised if traditional approaches fail. Maybe ask about DBT.

HoppingPavlova · 24/09/2026 04:31

Whether they suffer anything they claim they do or not, it’s all a red herring. You can suffer from any or all of that, yet still need to be reasonable and make reasonable arrangements if requesting people do things for you, be it paid or unpaid. That’s the issue. If you believe you may be unconscious for a period of time (whether or not that’s valid), then you need to provide alternative forms of access for people who are doing things, pre-arranged at your request/agreement. If this is not facilitated then the person, illness or not, is being unreasonable and the consequence is that people don’t do things for them.

Clonakilla · 24/09/2026 03:14

frequentlybaffuckled · 21/09/2026 17:28

@BluebellBeth I've asked for definition, originally assuming they might be using dramatic license, and they're saying totally unconscious unable to defend themselves or know if something was done to them, or be woken by alarm, phone call, or banging on the door.

People certainly can be unconscious for a variety of reasons and for some people it does happen a number of times.

It would be unusual for the regular loss of consciousness to never result in an injury.

frequentlybaffuckled · 24/09/2026 03:07

frequentlybaffuckled · 21/09/2026 16:29

Put it all in to not drip feed.

They do apparently often have Bradycardia. They also clearly are disabled. They have been around medical care and hospitals a lot, and clearly have both health and general anxiety. They eat poorly and self care and MH are not good.
Visibly drained, pale, thin, unwell, low energy, unable to walk without aids.
I feel bad for questioning them at all.

Their life has fallen apart and it's clear general professionals around them aren't really doing a lot partly because the person makes it hard work.

I've been doing lots to get them out of the mess, into better situations and it's been working. Practicality wise we're almost over a huge life changing line.

I'm now hitting a wall both with my own pissed off suspicions that they may feel weak, wobbly and sleep a great deal but are capable of being woken by an alarm, rather than be, literally, as they claim, suddenly collapsing without warning, (always in a bed or chair, never in a public place or in front of friends) at any time, and being literally unconscious for hours.

And, with the fact that is now being used as a reason to not to turn up to important appointments or agreed times to do things for them that they have asked for, which messes up my life.

They are outraged at me proposing they still have to take responsibility and practical answers: IE Wont lend me a shed key so a delivery can happen regardless. But insistent they may be unconscious and expect the delivery driver to return as many times as it takes, and me to come to help, for them to get their goods. (made up example close to realities)
Or I arrive with someone and materials to do a hard five hour job (free) and they aren't there because 'They where unconscious' for the first three hours, so I'll 'have to do a little and come back another day.'
They are claiming this is their disability and I need to recognize I'm discriminating against them if I don't accept it and work around this not yet diagnosed awful condition. They rarely even say sorry. 'As it isn't their fault.'

They have said their conditions are complex and have mentioned neurological, complex, bradycardia, ELS, and it's been confirmed they have over 20 diagnoses. (I question how many might be non serious type)

Would Dr's really be leaving someone living alone, collapsing all over the place and literally unconscious for hours? (they are 'difficult' and the sort of person wards seem very keen not to keep)

Or am I being an ignorant rotten ablest bitch here and need to listen to them and believe and center them?

@Foodwench66 No they wont be forced into a facility, they will be left on the streets at the mercy of weather and predators, as having a right to make bad choices and having been declared intentionally homeless through choice.

Then eventually they will either be attacked badly enough, or hospitalized through medical need, that intervention starts again. But their health is worse, rules harder and what they can have, less.

It's a cycle designed for people with addiction issues with the expectation that they will seek treatment, and learn from experience if they live long enough.
If they don't the problem has sorted itself out.

I may be unreasonable, but I believe the SW should be trying to prevent them going round this cycle again and again. But I don't know.

@LHP118 They have been told. They aren't hearing.
Saying yes enables them in one direction.
Saying no enables them in another.

My original clumsy question was trying to 'risk assess' if I was wrong to be sticking to saying no to them.

OP posts:
frequentlybaffuckled · 24/09/2026 02:50

I withdrew my message. This is a precis of it.

What works in psychology theory, doesn't always in real life. I have done all the listening and believing before trying to get on with practical stuff. They have had huge amounts of my time listening, in order to become comfortable enough for me to even start thinking of doing the simplest of tasks they have asked for.
It works for them but is never enough.

I cant give them seven hours listening, then for the last hour 'start papering a room' and also be packed up and left. Come back in three days and do the same all over again. Nothing gets done. Then the depression is blamed on no one finished 'papering the room.'

I can't fill my car with equipment, them not turn up, and have to take it all away and unload it so it doesn't get stolen. Then reload it all again as many times as it suits them.

The questioning and potential disbelief from me, isn't kind of me, or my finest moment, but is actually only recent and their behaviors all pre- date it.

I use the word hysteria to describe a state where someone has screamed and shouted and cried so much they are now continuously choking, unable to breathe, shaking, unable to see, and are going to blackout as a result of being uncontrollably upset.
Is there is a kinder word to describe this?

I may well be 'triggering' all sorts of things, but anything that results in tears or additional stress requires a lot of sleeping it off. They are genuinely easily exhausted especially by stress. (But they insist on engaging in things that will make them cry a lot, and stress them terribly)

time is running out for them because the LA has come to the end of the road.
I'm all sorts of not great things, but no one else is prepared to do anything anymore, and I have previously too.

They trust no one, because everyone always leaves.

I am their NOK and duty SW calls their SW who calls me to go check.
I am now refusing. So now no checks happen when concerns get raised.
Yes they have had alarms supplied at each address. It isn't CM poisoning.

OP posts:
LHP118 · 23/09/2026 22:20

The thing is they might well have all these diagnoses. But, they have to have reasonable adjustments, not impossible ones. It's about them accepting practical solutions such as a key safe or a parcel box to accommodate and safeguard their life. So, if they collapse and need urgent medical help no one will know or be able to access them to check. The difference in urgent medical help being available to them when they need it may mean they're lying in a pool of blood dying a slow, painful death, at worst, or with a broken leg at best, for hours and days.

They have to be told and it's tough love based on risk assessment. Nothing less and nothing more. And you? You've got to draw boundaries and use some tough love on yourself. You've enabled them.

Foodwench66 · 23/09/2026 15:53

"There have been many crisis's. Letting them entirely fail means watching a frail disabled person free fall on to the streets, and go with whoever will take them home and look after them. You can imagine some of what happens next, and then when something awful enough happens, someone intervenes and the cycle starts over with them even more damaged, but not learning. This is the closest to 'magically getting it together' they have ever managed, sliding down further each time.
I have raised if they should be in assisted living, but they don't Yet qualify.
There are positive sides to them as well, but they're rarely seen these days.
What they are on the brink of, could be a basis for a new future if they can get over the line."

Perhaps then they will be forced into a facility though. Is there a version of adult protective services where you are?

frequentlybaffuckled · 22/09/2026 22:19

This reply has been withdrawn

Post withdrawn at author's request

Bluedenimdoglover · 22/09/2026 21:29

You aren't qualified to deal with this to be able to help this person to a satisfactory outcome. Sounds as if they have mental health issues. I can't see what else you could do if they are not in a position to work with you. Don't let this drag you down, too.

ThreadGuardDog · 22/09/2026 21:21

Weeellokthen · 22/09/2026 13:57

"Confirmed" what diagnosis? An mri and ct scan confirmed a fibro diagnosis? 🤔

No. It confirmed a diagnosis of FND. You brought up fibromyalgia, not me. You were suggesting that if FND is difficult to diagnose and treat it was similar to fibromyalgia, when in fact it’s nothing like it. It’s often misdiagnosed and was in my friends’ case until she was admitted to hospital after a seizure and referred to a neurologist who did the necessary tests.

Runrabbitrunrabitrunrunrun · 22/09/2026 20:41

My MIL was like this, she has a heart condition and has 'episodes' that result in her being taken to hospital. She refused to have a key safe and so wouldn't ring and ambulance but phone my DH to get him to race 15 mins up the road and phone an ambulance on the way. I'm sure she just liked being an inconvenience to her kids and having them at her beck and call. Refused to have grab rails after a hip replacement, didn't want carers and when they did come it wasn't early enough so one of her kids had to go round even hough they both work. Would phone up to complain about pain and then say she didn't want the kids to go up there... obviously she did, otherwise why call them. In my opinion it's attention seeking and control

Foodwench66 · 22/09/2026 20:11

I would not continue to help unless they did their part. There are professionals that can help them. I would give them my perimeters in which I'm willing to assist and if they don't like it then they can call someone else.
Perhaps whatever your version of social, services is....Call them and let them know.
What would they do if they didn't know you?
I have experienced this with a friend, and I had to do that. They were mad at me for a good while but we are still friends many years later when they realized I helped them by not enabling them anymore. People will magically get it together when they have no other choice.

And Sometimes it will take a crisis and letting them fail. Sadly. I know it's hard though, really I do. All you can really do is let them know what you can and will do and under what terms.

BeddysMum · 22/09/2026 18:38

Both things can be true at once.
They may genuinely struggle as they say, AND they are an unreasonable diva who is very difficult to help.
I have dealt with a person or two like that; they had genuine problems but ended up alienating most people by being awkward and fussy for no good reason.
I imagine there is some psychology behind that behaviour, but that's not for me to diagnose!

disturbia · 22/09/2026 15:43

FullLondonEye · 22/09/2026 11:11

I think all you can do is give ultimatums. As in 'if you don't give me the key to the shed then I can't ensure your package is delivered', and then you have to stick to it, regardless of their apparent distress. While it may not be all their fault a certain amount of personal responsibility is required where possible, but while others enable this person to get out of helping herself then she won't. I know it's not that easy - I have a situation where I've declared I'm going to stop enabling someone close to me, and that they'll have to sink until they're forced to swim. Ultimately I do still help them though, on the basis that the lower they fall, the more work it'll be for me when I inevitably have to pick up the pieces! 😥

Everyone reaches their point of critical mass though. You have to work out where yours is and not pass it. I think the fact that this person has admitted they are partly at fault during the tougher conversations means you know it's not all on the health services. You know they themselves are a significant part of the problem, no matter how much help and support you do or don't get. You can't let them drag you down with you so you're just going to have to hold the line more firmly when it's something you know they can and should do.

Agree..with FullLondonEye also you could call the Duty Worker in Adult Social Care and explain your concerns then ask for a welfare visit. They will check their file but may not be able to tell you anything as you are not NOK or have POA. You don't need to have family's consent to make a call to them and could remain anonymous. Then step away a bit for your own sake. Just a thought have they got a carbon monoxide alarm in their home in case gas is leaking and knocking them out?

Morecoffeewanted · 22/09/2026 15:13

I think that it would have been helpful if you had included this in your original post

When I've been really hard hearted and read the riot act, that putting aside that this is the 'reason' they still have to let me make vital stuff happen around it, they end up so distraught and exhausted that I've eventually had to stop, as they are so emotionally distraught it becomes hysteria (but pulse is genuinely surprisingly low) and have cried to the point they can no longer make sense. This is definitely real and results in days of exhaustion and sleeping.

Others have also done this. Both short, sharp no emotion and and walk away, and long drawn out 'you have to make it possible' no one can help if you don't.

It does sound as if the disbelief and questioning you brought here is something they may have picked up on and is very upsetting to them. They may be very sensitive and picked it up from your behaviour. Trust may be a big issue in their life.

The use of the word hysteria is very revealing in your post. If they read this how would they feel? Having days of sleeping and exhaustion after you have "read the riot act" to them sounds like you are inadvertently triggering something very deep and hurtful.

There's obviously more to this. It could be a form of post traumatic stress caused by the lack of medical care and being disbelieved.

It sounds as if the priority for this person is to be able to talk about the passing out and for you to listen to them and believe them before you get on to the practical stuff.

You know from previous posts that yes, medical problems can be missed and that the medical system can let people down. There may be no simple solution and sometimes just being a listener is what is needed. Show them you believe them.

Then you can move onto the practical things like the shed with the trust that you will hear them and understand and listen and in their own timeframe.

Tropius · 22/09/2026 14:21

I haven’t read the full thread but I fully agree with some previous posts - there are 2 issues here. It is sadly very possible that they are that unwell and being left with no help. But not accepting simple accommodations such as giving up a shed key seems unreasonable. It does depend on the reasons though, and there may be something more behind that ‘no’ - a previous incident that’s scared them?

Weeellokthen · 22/09/2026 13:57

ThreadGuardDog · 22/09/2026 08:02

I suggest you look it up. Nothing like fibromyalgia, no. My friend has been diagnosed with it recently after having horrible symptoms for the last few months ending with a seizure, after which she was referred to a neurologist. MRI and CT confirmed the diagnosis, she’s lost her driving licence and her job as a result.

"Confirmed" what diagnosis? An mri and ct scan confirmed a fibro diagnosis? 🤔

FullLondonEye · 22/09/2026 11:11

I think all you can do is give ultimatums. As in 'if you don't give me the key to the shed then I can't ensure your package is delivered', and then you have to stick to it, regardless of their apparent distress. While it may not be all their fault a certain amount of personal responsibility is required where possible, but while others enable this person to get out of helping herself then she won't. I know it's not that easy - I have a situation where I've declared I'm going to stop enabling someone close to me, and that they'll have to sink until they're forced to swim. Ultimately I do still help them though, on the basis that the lower they fall, the more work it'll be for me when I inevitably have to pick up the pieces! 😥

Everyone reaches their point of critical mass though. You have to work out where yours is and not pass it. I think the fact that this person has admitted they are partly at fault during the tougher conversations means you know it's not all on the health services. You know they themselves are a significant part of the problem, no matter how much help and support you do or don't get. You can't let them drag you down with you so you're just going to have to hold the line more firmly when it's something you know they can and should do.

frequentlybaffuckled · 22/09/2026 11:01

@FullLondonEye yes to all of what you wrote. Especially the last paragraph. There have been so, so, many conversations. The thing they stick with as unshakeable is the passing out stuff, and that they are living in terror from it and why doesn't anyone care or do anything about this?

When I've been really hard hearted and read the riot act, that putting aside that this is the 'reason' they still have to let me make vital stuff happen around it, they end up so distraught and exhausted that I've eventually had to stop, as they are so emotionally distraught it becomes hysteria (but pulse is genuinely surprisingly low) and have cried to the point they can no longer make sense. This is definitely real and results in days of exhaustion and sleeping.

Others have also done this. Both short, sharp no emotion and and walk away, and long drawn out 'you have to make it possible' no one can help if you don't.

It hasn't solved or changed anything other than them admitting they are hard to work with and are often also causing situations to happen. They accept and admit all that reasonably freely, but not with the 'I passed out and was unconscious' situation. They say this is worsening disability on top of what was already serious, and accept me questioning it, but not solutions to work around it, as it is their 'medical situation that we are all not believing.'
I've gone down the 'it isn't about believing, it's about getting you where it can be safely explored route' which was working well, until the first important time they didn't show due to 'passed out and unconscious.' They where clearly confused when I finally got them. I told them 'well that's that gone then' and they cant accept that can be true 'in the circumstances.

I've also drawn a line and walked away frequently in the past. Things got worse .
I do think there's "opposing concepts can be true at the same time" just unsure of which ones are which.

Have to go, but thanks to everyone who posted.

OP posts:
frequentlybaffuckled · 22/09/2026 10:20

@Catza I think it probably isn't generally actual total refusing. There has been some trying then rejecting carer services that haven't worked well.

I think agreeing to things but 'circumstances' then preventing on all sides, is likely to be closer, and taking up huge amounts of time to move forward by an easily lost inch, and generally everyone finding them difficult and draining.

@ThreadGuardDog Definitely not private care. If they really are 'passing out and being unconscious' for long periods, yes, there's a safeguarding issue being ignored by Dr's among others, which is what made me ask a clumsy question in the title.
They did end up in hospital, but where pushed through and out really fast (I think they where very resource heavy) with OT and GP to follow up, but by then home and GP gone.
SW suggested (to me and person) that I should help sort out some of it, so I started doing that.

@Mouldemort Thank you. I understand. It doesn't fully answer your question but I'm official NOK that gets informed, and do care about them.

@cestlavielife I doubt it. Certainly not officially. I know what you and everyone else is saying about drawing lines. I already did that which is part of why they are where they are.
I used the 'equivalent of refused a key to a shed' analogy to explain the 'unreasonableness' of how they think, when I was trying to find ways of getting around the failing to turn up at vital moments due to 'medical reasons.'

Refusing 'deliveries' right now will be what casts them completely adrift of entitlement to further basic provision, instead of pushing them over the line to an arranged (at their request) safer better situation where the things they need to happen could be navigated from.

I don't think I can just abandon them at this point while they still do have right to that provision. l think I need to use the valuable insights posters have given me to try and look at, and do things differently, before I leave them run themselves out of the right to what is still left.

OP posts:
FullLondonEye · 22/09/2026 10:16

Honestly it's impossible to know what's going on here because any of the things you fear could be true - she could be falling through the cracks in care or she could equally be a complete piss-taker who wants the world to revolve around her.

I work in a medical capacity and have seen cases where a patient has had serious diagnoses missed and been horrified - but on getting to know them better I can completely understand how this has happened because they are so incredibly difficult to work with and the doctors just can't get straight answers to any questions.

Equally a relative by marriage was disabled due to an accident and got an awful lot of support and sympathy for that but genuinely didn't deserve it. This was someone objectively awful who not only made zero effort to help himself but actually actively made his own situation worse and lied endlessly to anyone around him - and yet because 'oh poor Dickhead is in a wheelchair', no-one was allowed to question any of it.

Of course you also have the fact that two opposing concepts can be true at the same time and there's a chance what's going on with your relative is a mixture of all the things you fear. Are you not able to have an honest conversation with this person where you point out that 'because unconscious' isn't the answer to every question and that actually there are things they can do to help themself? Have you pointed out that you and others have finite capacity for practical help and indeed for compassion when that person seems set on self-sabotage?

cestlavielife · 22/09/2026 09:56

It is about capacity as was said
Have tgey had a mental capacity asessment?

if she’s deemed to have mental capacity, she can’t be forced to do anything against her will.

In any case op. Report your concerns to their gp.
Set your boundaries. Do not take on more than you can manage. If they wont put a shed key in a locksafe then stop deliveries.

Mouldemort · 22/09/2026 09:50

frequentlybaffuckled · 21/09/2026 21:59

@Mouldemort I don't mean to be rude but I have said a couple of times that I wont be saying.
It is someone I care about and have an obligation to and there's few others in their life at any level.

Then the answers will not be very useful without knowing the nature of the obligation. If it’s a neighbour, friend, husband or brother the answer will vary.

ThreadGuardDog · 22/09/2026 09:45

frequentlybaffuckled · 22/09/2026 09:33

I assume they must have had a care assessment to have a social worker and key workers, and they at one point had carers.

But as basic things have fallen away ie: someone supposed to cook food, but there was no food to cook, so carer stopped coming to do that because person hadn't or couldn't, organize or pay for food.

OT assessment happened after being in hospital - grab rails didn't happen as no home to fit them in by the time the report was finalized.

Carers (who tbf there where issues on all sides with) dropped away when the place they provided services at did. Lost Gp when no catchment address any more. etc.

I may be unreasonable but it has seemed like the the person is just overseen failing and falling in a predictable downward spiral. But, I don't know the story from the workers end, and have struggled with the 'I passed out and was unconscious' so "of course" 'offers' or 'one chance only appointments' should just be remade and everybody should accept the reasons, and apparently that it may be the same next time.

Shocked disbelief that those circumstances don't make it happen and anger when I've tried to make paths round it. So maybe that's why workers appear to have passively accepted things getting worse under their watch.

If she’s had carers in the past that does mean that a care assessment has been carried out at some point, unless she has the means to employ private care. But the rest is really odd because if care services were involved then all of the things you’ve mentioned here are safeguarding issues and should/would have been reported. Care doesn’t just stop without recourse to the authorities providing it.

It sounds very difficult, but maybe the best thing you can do is report the situation to social services as a safeguarding issue and let them investigate. Problem is, if she has capacity and refuses to engage with support services nobody can force her, even it’s to her own detriment. In my experience these cases usually end up the same way - with hospitalisation after a fall or accident, which results in a major rethink on support.

ThreadGuardDog · 22/09/2026 09:34

Catza · 22/09/2026 08:23

They wouldn't have got a social worker without a care act assessment, I imagine.
I feel the issue here is that the person is rejecting support. This may be not letting community OT enter premises to assess for assistive equipment or, as OP alluded to, not turning up for appointments to discuss housing (they may well have been offered to be rehoused somewhere more suitable).
I know cases like that all too well and, with the best will in the world, social and health services can't help because the person is refusing to engage with anything offered. I am working with someone in a desperate situation currently and they refused care act assesment altogether because they they don't want strangers in the house despite not managing basic tasks at all due to complex health needs. I can't force them so my only option is to alert their GP and step away. I can't even complete a safeguarding referral because there is insufficient immediate risk and I don't have their consent to refer.

A social worker would be the one to carry out a care assessment l agree, but the outcome of that wouldn’t be to ‘allocate’ a social worker, it would be to arrange a care package. OP hasn’t confirmed that. But l agree, if this lady has capacity then she can’t be forced to engage with support services and the whole thing becomes much more difficult. If there hasn’t been a care assessment so far, OP could make a request herself if she feels there’s a safeguarding issue. Either that, or if she knows the persons’ GP she could maybe alert them to what’s going on. At some point l think OP is going to have to step away as the person seems too difficult.