To be disappointed Dolly Parton supported biological men using women's toilets?

So a derail then!

This is the extra irony on FWR. Anyone who supports trans must be a man of course. That's the instant accusation and you'll see posters who you know to be make accusing others of being men 😂

My core position is what is the problem with women wanting their rights to sex spaces and services upheld?

Or are you just putting a shoe on your feel fits? Because you seem to be taking comments about those who are anti trans for issues other than women's rights very personally despite the caveat that there are genuinely women who support this issue who are feminists.

I didn’t describe as any of those things.

Can people please stop making up things and then using these made up points as arguments against me.

It’s almost funny because FWR is full of TRAs cruising by to rile women up. I’d never describe it as being solely women or solely feminist.

What exactly is your core position on this thread ? Because you flew in without RTFT and your core position seems to be being stroppy at people's posts without being able to disprove or argue anyone's points. Oh and derailing.

Posters are literally making up crap to attack other with.

Never said they shouldn't be on there, but if you describe it as a board of women that's incorrect and if you describe it as a board of feminists that's also incorrect. When people are accurately describing transphobic behaviour on FWR you can't say "oh you have a problem with women's rights" when there's plenty of contributors who are anti women's rights on there.

What exactly is your core position on this thread ? Because you flew in without RTFT and your core position seems to be being stroppy at people's posts without being able to disprove or argue anyone's points. Oh and derailing.

I do find these kind of posts fascinating, because you are using every trick in the book to try and discredit/shut me up because you ultimately cannot argue against my core position.

I do not recall seeing any posts about murders. But you’re saying that I shouldn’t be disagreeing with any posts before disagreeing with that one? I mean, what?

I get that a lot people loved her music, her charity work: I still do. But does that mean nothing she did can be criticised even mildly?
I'm not saying this negates her music or her philanthropy.

If it's perfectly adequate adult behaviour what exactly is the point for this thread and why did you paraglide in to attack someone for disagreeing with OP?

And once again, what is the problem with women wanting their sex based rights protected?
for the second time, nothing when it's genuine and encompassing. You're getting so offended by the term bedfellows when no one is asking you to wear that shoe unless it fits. If you regularly go around calling out mens sexist comments on this issue, then you aren't who I'm talking about. I don't think you do though, or at least you haven't demonstrated it here.

I didn’t make any claims about transwomen and murder.

I know you didn't but it was called out as GC misinformation around the time you flew in to take some sort of issue with people's posts here. Do you take no issue with misinformation?

I’m not really sure where this ‘no men should be on FWR’ is coming from. MN has always been open to both sexes.

Any posters breaking site guidelines should obviously be dealt with.

I’m not really sure where this ‘no men should be on FWR’ is coming from. MN has always been open to both sexes.

Any posters breaking site guidelines should obviously be dealt with.

It’s lazy to think AI but… AI. Now you’re responsible for pulling up Linehan on whatever it is he seems to be doing. Do better.

All this talk about ‘bedfellows’ is ridiculous though. What would make anyone a ‘bedfellow’? People agree on some topics but not others, this is perfectly standard adult behaviour.

I also happen to agree with Hitler’s opinions on animal rights (he was a big advocate). Would that make me a bedfellow of his?

I didn’t make any claims about transwomen and murder. Once again, can I remind you I am only responsible for my own posts, not other people’s.

And once again, what is the problem with women wanting their sex based rights protected?

I’m not really sure where this ‘no men should be on FWR’ is coming from. MN has always been open to both sexes.

Any posters breaking site guidelines should obviously be dealt with.

What I know is that I've seen one poster I know for sure is male and I have seen him attack several women for disagreeing with him, including blatant name calling which I've personally reported and had deleted. I also know that several women in FWR fawn over this man and support him when he attacks other women, just because he shares their PoV on one topic.

I've seen that, too.

IMO, until a woman who knows him offline could vouch for him, he should have never been made comfortable in that part of the site at all.

Posters are literally making up crap to attack other with.

I’m not even sure of the relevance of this as how could you possibly know if its the same poster?

I’m glad Mumsnet are dealing with personal attacks.

If "TIMs" are that bad and dangerous because they are men, GC men are just as bad and dangerous and untrustworthy because they are men. You should be equally suspicious of their motivations.

👏👏👏👏

Exactly. But they think men like Linehan deserve applause for...tweeting abuse at women who hold a different opinion 🫠

It’s so wild.

If "TIMs" are that bad and dangerous because they are men, GC men are just as bad and dangerous and untrustworthy because they are men. You should be equally suspicious of their motivations.

👏👏👏👏

Exactly. But they think men like Linehan deserve applause for...tweeting abuse at women who hold a different opinion 🫠

Oh well I've seen many many many more than 1 that are male and notably also declared themselves not feminist. Are you some sort of authority on FWR that you feel the need to take such offense at the suggestion there are male unfeminist posters? And not just FER, many other online spaces. Linehans misogyny on twitter? I suppose the female posters who are adamantly anti choice passed you by too. Somehow in your quest to protect women's rights some women on there never see or challenge those threats to women's rights, and the ones who do get accused of having a purity spiral.🤷🏻‍♀️