Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

State pension

425 replies

blondeboobshell · 19/09/2026 06:50

There’s concerns the state pension won’t be an option in years to come or will be means tested. Iyo what age group need to start not counting on getting the state pension, people in there 50’s? 40’s? 30’s? Or younger?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
strawberrybubblegum · 23/09/2026 07:15

Differentforgirls · 23/09/2026 07:12

You replied to ME. I'll go back to ignoring you.

I like to challenge things which aren't true.

I've learnt that if you just roll your eyes and shrug - but politely don't say anything - then fantasy becomes a narrative that more and more people believe... and then I end up paying for whatever nonsense they believe.

Differentforgirls · 23/09/2026 07:12

strawberrybubblegum · 23/09/2026 07:09

Will do. You should too. Stuff that actually matters.

Edited

You replied to ME. I'll go back to ignoring you.

strawberrybubblegum · 23/09/2026 07:09

Differentforgirls · 23/09/2026 06:59

You concentrate on your own stuff. 👍

Will do. You should too. Stuff that actually matters.

Ionlymakejokestodistractmyself · 23/09/2026 07:08

blondeboobshell · 19/09/2026 10:17

I’m on my forties and concerned. I didn’t think about a pension in my twenties started paying in in my thirties in a local government pension but also had three pregnancies and several years of part time working. Hit my forties and realised dh pays more into his pension than I earn in a month and suddenly realised I was quite vulnerable. Now I pay 75% of my earnings in to an arc so I’m hoping on the next twenty years I can build an ok pot. But the state pension would obviously help massively

Wait - you pay 75% of your earnings into savings and your husband pays more than your monthly salary into his pension, and you're "concerned"?!

Oh please.

I can't even afford to put in an extra 10% into my pension. And I'm older than you.

Shuffletoesxtreme · 23/09/2026 07:04

NotAnotherScarf · 19/09/2026 07:44

Political suicide to pull it. Plus its a self funding scheme. Money paid in now via national insurance contributions pay for it.

They may change the funding model but will never ever drop it. The damage to the uks image as a top economy would be too great

It’s absolutely not a self funding scheme. it’s paid for by the current generation of workers. So today’s taxes are currently paying to keep the triple lock for today’s pensioners. Makes it very hard to justify taking it away from those who have contributed all their lives to other people’s pensions but then have to be told they won’t get their own.

Differentforgirls · 23/09/2026 06:59

strawberrybubblegum · 23/09/2026 06:20

I mean, personally, I don't really care.

There are only 5.5 million people in Scotland to 58.8 million in England, so the cost of the subsidy isn't all that high from each English person.

It's already actually London subsidising all other parts of England - as well as the other nations - from the £69k value produced per person, so a few people getting a bit extra doesn't matter too much.

But the myth of independence not only keeps wasting everyone's time (what happened to a referendum for a generation?) but if sheer repetition (until one year people are a bit more pissed off at life - which they displace onto the English) means Scotland does secede, that will waste absolutely enormous amounts of money and time. Brexit will be nothing compared to dismantling a 300 year union where we are utterly entangled.

If only Scottish people get to vote on secession, then only Scotland should be paying for it. I certainly don't want to.

When you consider the challenges the UK faces today (which all the nations in the UK face) there are frankly far more important things for us all to be focusing on.

Edited

You concentrate on your own stuff. 👍

strawberrybubblegum · 23/09/2026 06:20

I mean, personally, I don't really care.

There are only 5.5 million people in Scotland to 58.8 million in England, so the cost of the subsidy isn't all that high from each English person.

It's already actually London subsidising all other parts of England - as well as the other nations - from the £69k value produced per person, so a few people getting a bit extra doesn't matter too much.

But the myth of independence not only keeps wasting everyone's time (what happened to a referendum for a generation?) but if sheer repetition (until one year people are a bit more pissed off at life - which they displace onto the English) means Scotland does secede, that will waste absolutely enormous amounts of money and time. Brexit will be nothing compared to dismantling a 300 year union where we are utterly entangled.

If only Scottish people get to vote on secession, then only Scotland should be paying for it. I certainly don't want to.

When you consider the challenges the UK faces today (which all the nations in the UK face) there are frankly far more important things for us all to be focusing on.

strawberrybubblegum · 23/09/2026 05:59

Differentforgirls · 23/09/2026 04:38

You keep thinking that 🤣

Do you have different information?

Or just blind faith?

Differentforgirls · 23/09/2026 04:38

strawberrybubblegum · 22/09/2026 23:19

It's not just your higher taxes that fund it.

Total public spending in Scotland sits roughly £2,400 to £2,700 higher per person than the UK average. Only £300 per person comes from the extra revenue from higher taxes. The rest comes from redistribution of broader UK-wide tax revenues according to the Barnett formula.

And when I say redistribution of UK wide taxes, that means redistribution from England to Scotland (and the other nations).

GDP per person (how much is produced) is £40,537 in England compared to £39,421/ £41,612 for Scotland (depending on whether you include oil or not). Ie even with oil, it's not enough higher to justify the extra £2100-£2400 spending of central tax revenue per person in Scotland.

You're welcome.

Edited

You keep thinking that 🤣

MidnightMeltdown · 22/09/2026 23:28

ALovelyPinkUnicorn · 19/09/2026 06:53

Prob 40s. The state pension will be come like many other benefits, those who work will fund it, never receive it, and tough luck if they don’t have enough for themselves in private pension!

I doubt they’d means test it. People would just retire early, spend their pension on holidays, and then rely on the state.

strawberrybubblegum · 22/09/2026 23:23

Badbadbunny · 22/09/2026 23:07

Nic was increased under brown specifically to raise funds to increase the nhs budget.

nic funds approx 20% of the nhs budget.

It's become a general tax.
But historically it was insurance.

strawberrybubblegum · 22/09/2026 23:19

Differentforgirls · 22/09/2026 20:26

Or you could have a country like mine where everyone gets free prescriptions and all under 22s and 60+ get free travel. We pay a bit more tax but it’s well worth it.

Edited

It's not just your higher taxes that fund it.

Total public spending in Scotland sits roughly £2,400 to £2,700 higher per person than the UK average. Only £300 per person comes from the extra revenue from higher taxes. The rest comes from redistribution of broader UK-wide tax revenues according to the Barnett formula.

And when I say redistribution of UK wide taxes, that means redistribution from England to Scotland (and the other nations).

GDP per person (how much is produced) is £40,537 in England compared to £39,421/ £41,612 for Scotland (depending on whether you include oil or not). Ie even with oil, it's not enough higher to justify the extra £2100-£2400 spending of central tax revenue per person in Scotland.

You're welcome.

Badbadbunny · 22/09/2026 23:07

strawberrybubblegum · 22/09/2026 23:05

NI was introduced in 1911, and was intended as an insurance for workers.

The NHS was always intended to be needs-based and universal.

The way our Welfare system works is that you pay most taxes during your adult life, but that covers your use of state services at all times of your life, including childhood and old age.

  • You need schooling between the ages of 5-18.
  • You need healthcare at all times of your life, but mainly pre-school (GP visits), older age, and women 20-39 for maternity services.

All your ages are covered for all state services, although your contributions may be concentrated between ages 18-67 since that's the age you mostly work. The state is able to even out needs and contributions over everyone's lifespan!

But our universal health service has nothing to do with NI.

Nic was increased under brown specifically to raise funds to increase the nhs budget.

nic funds approx 20% of the nhs budget.

strawberrybubblegum · 22/09/2026 23:05

Badbadbunny · 22/09/2026 17:15

But part of NIC is to help fund the NHS which older people tend to need more than younger people, so it should continue to be paid.

NI was introduced in 1911, and was intended as an insurance for workers.

The NHS was always intended to be needs-based and universal.

The way our Welfare system works is that you pay most taxes during your adult life, but that covers your use of state services at all times of your life, including childhood and old age.

  • You need schooling between the ages of 5-18.
  • You need healthcare at all times of your life, but mainly pre-school (GP visits), older age, and women 20-39 for maternity services.

All your ages are covered for all state services, although your contributions may be concentrated between ages 18-67 since that's the age you mostly work. The state is able to even out needs and contributions over everyone's lifespan!

But our universal health service has nothing to do with NI.

Sunseekers · 22/09/2026 22:53

Differentforgirls · 22/09/2026 20:26

Or you could have a country like mine where everyone gets free prescriptions and all under 22s and 60+ get free travel. We pay a bit more tax but it’s well worth it.

Edited

Free dental check ups and eye tests too.

Differentforgirls · 22/09/2026 20:26

Cucurella · 22/09/2026 19:30

When I think about it now that I’m 60 I get free prescriptions and free - mostly - travel (I live in London). I think benefits like this should now be linked to SP
age. I love having both, especially the travel, but people don’t need them if they’re working or have a pension big enough to retire early.

However I’d only be happy to accept those changes if they were part of an overall review of benefits that affected all recipients, not just targeting older people.

Or you could have a country like mine where everyone gets free prescriptions and all under 22s and 60+ get free travel. We pay a bit more tax but it’s well worth it.

Jaropickles · 22/09/2026 19:56

@XenoBitch

It does not matter if the 120 year old is mobile or bed bound

Someone will have to pay for our elderly in the future

XenoBitch · 22/09/2026 19:35

Jaropickles · 22/09/2026 19:31

The oldest living person is currently 117

AI has the potential to improve medecine quicker than previously. Some people could possibly live longer & healthier 120 + ?

Plus greater use of robots & robotic aids

I would anticipate some future changes related to pensions & social care.

However I do not believe that state pensions will be abolished

They might be 117, but are they sat in a chair in a care home?
Or are they out and about doing the same activates as someone 2/3rds of their age?
My money is on the former

Jaropickles · 22/09/2026 19:31

The oldest living person is currently 117

AI has the potential to improve medecine quicker than previously. Some people could possibly live longer & healthier 120 + ?

Plus greater use of robots & robotic aids

I would anticipate some future changes related to pensions & social care.

However I do not believe that state pensions will be abolished

Cucurella · 22/09/2026 19:30

XenoBitch · 22/09/2026 18:50

Not true.
If you earn over a certain amount, you don't get CT support. That amount is well under MNW. Same with prescriptions (folks in England pay, not Wales or Scotland, some health conditions mean you get free scripts, and if none of the above apply... you can pay about £10pm to cover them anyway). Off the top of my head, earning over £900pm renders you not eligible for council tax support or free prescriptions.
The speeds you get with cheap broadband is shite (and for my supplier, is only £2pm cheaper anyway).
Not everyone needs glasses.
Water companies have their own criteria. Mine caps the rates if you are on benefits. I am on UC, but use well under that cap anyway, so it does not apply.

When I think about it now that I’m 60 I get free prescriptions and free - mostly - travel (I live in London). I think benefits like this should now be linked to SP
age. I love having both, especially the travel, but people don’t need them if they’re working or have a pension big enough to retire early.

However I’d only be happy to accept those changes if they were part of an overall review of benefits that affected all recipients, not just targeting older people.

XenoBitch · 22/09/2026 18:50

strawberrybubblegum · 22/09/2026 05:56

Council tax is also reduced, and free prescriptions and glasses.

Gas and electricity no longer have social tarifs, but water and broadband do.

Not true.
If you earn over a certain amount, you don't get CT support. That amount is well under MNW. Same with prescriptions (folks in England pay, not Wales or Scotland, some health conditions mean you get free scripts, and if none of the above apply... you can pay about £10pm to cover them anyway). Off the top of my head, earning over £900pm renders you not eligible for council tax support or free prescriptions.
The speeds you get with cheap broadband is shite (and for my supplier, is only £2pm cheaper anyway).
Not everyone needs glasses.
Water companies have their own criteria. Mine caps the rates if you are on benefits. I am on UC, but use well under that cap anyway, so it does not apply.

Differentforgirls · 22/09/2026 18:01

BIossomtoes · 22/09/2026 12:03

Our kids have managed it, they’re not special.

Same as ours!

Differentforgirls · 22/09/2026 18:00

Withoutwings · 22/09/2026 17:54

You don’t pay Ni if you work after state retirement age or on any pension income you receive state or private.

What I posted was that I stopped paying it when I retired 7 years before state retirement age.

Withoutwings · 22/09/2026 17:54

Withoutwings · 22/09/2026 17:52

State retirement age.

You don’t pay Ni if you work after state retirement age or on any pension income you receive state or private.

Withoutwings · 22/09/2026 17:52

Differentforgirls · 22/09/2026 17:45

Over 67s? I’ve not paid it for 2.5 years. Retired at 60.

State retirement age.