Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think many Mumsnet posters seem to be high earners?

288 replies

Jane143 · 15/09/2026 13:01

AIBU to think that the majority of people on MN seem to be high earners? As a guide, income over £60k? Most people I know in real life earn closer to average wage which I think is around £35k

OP posts:
Sunbringer · 16/09/2026 08:56

The majority of parents over 35 in London will earn over £60k. There are 10 million people in London making it doubly as populous as Scotland and 3 times as populous as Wales. So that’s a lot of well off people likely to be on Mumsnet.

Even NHS workers are better off because they get the Hight Cost Area uptick. Now obviously the money doesn’t go as far. But that’s not what you asked.

PenelopePinkerton · 16/09/2026 09:12

Utterpool · 15/09/2026 22:19

Easy to call it “fun” when you don’t need the land to make a living.

I’ve retired so much of what I do from now on will be for my entertainment. The land is relatively easily managed and my choice of crops and animals is also based on ease of management. This time next year I will be totally self sufficient for food, water and power. I’m happy with the way I have chosen to live. It wouldn’t have been possible without being a high earner though.

Cvf36 · 16/09/2026 09:52

RampantIvy · 16/09/2026 08:39

Indeed, but you have implied that people who aren't high earners haven't worked hard at school. Other posters have also said this higher up the thread.

There are many on MN who are incredibly envious of high earners and demand they to be taxed more.

CandyCrushLevel14809 · 16/09/2026 11:19

Sunbringer · 16/09/2026 08:56

The majority of parents over 35 in London will earn over £60k. There are 10 million people in London making it doubly as populous as Scotland and 3 times as populous as Wales. So that’s a lot of well off people likely to be on Mumsnet.

Even NHS workers are better off because they get the Hight Cost Area uptick. Now obviously the money doesn’t go as far. But that’s not what you asked.

Edited

I very much doubt this is true. Or do you mean combined income?

JHound · 16/09/2026 11:21

Optimist2020 · 15/09/2026 13:04

I think there’s a broad range of posters on Mumsnet. A lot of the posters appear to be living in London and the South East were opportunities and salaries are higher.

Im 39 and earn around 80k but wouldn’t class myself as a high earner (Midlands).

But you are a high earner within the context of the UK. That puts you in about the 90th percentile (I think.)

CandyCrushLevel14809 · 16/09/2026 11:23

JHound · 16/09/2026 11:21

But you are a high earner within the context of the UK. That puts you in about the 90th percentile (I think.)

It's bizarre. I wonder what she does class herself as?

JHound · 16/09/2026 11:24

5128gap · 16/09/2026 06:57

Only 1% of women in the UK earns 100k or more. 2% earn over 70k. So high earning women should be extremely rare indeed on the site and the number claiming to be is at odds with that.
Some might mean their partners are high earners.

Where are those figures from?

I think MN skews middle class and older which may impact the numbers.

JHound · 16/09/2026 11:24

Squirrel437 · 15/09/2026 23:11

Women who earn 6 figures won’t be the ones putting up with abusive behaviour from their retard of a partner!

Don’t be so sure!

JHound · 16/09/2026 11:32

Sunbringer · 16/09/2026 08:56

The majority of parents over 35 in London will earn over £60k. There are 10 million people in London making it doubly as populous as Scotland and 3 times as populous as Wales. So that’s a lot of well off people likely to be on Mumsnet.

Even NHS workers are better off because they get the Hight Cost Area uptick. Now obviously the money doesn’t go as far. But that’s not what you asked.

Edited

You mean as a combined income?

NorthXNorthWest · 16/09/2026 11:32

JHound · 16/09/2026 11:24

Don’t be so sure!

This 100%. If you don't already know, a quick search will show you that neither money nor profile will protect a woman from emotional or physical abuse, regardless of how financially well off she is.

JHound · 16/09/2026 11:33

CandyCrushLevel14809 · 16/09/2026 11:23

It's bizarre. I wonder what she does class herself as?

She probably means her income does not afford a good life. I get it I am a high earner but still have to budget carefully and cannot be completely “carefree” with money. Does’t change the data and stats though on average incomes.

Utterpool · 16/09/2026 11:38

Didimum · 16/09/2026 08:05

While I don’t disagree with you that the salary pyramid is problematic. Almost all business have a pyramid structure to their staff – that’s the best way a business operates, vis-a-vis much fewer higher earning jobs, much more plentiful lower earning jobs.

The taxpayer ‘subsidies’ a business in myriad ways. Tax breaks, retail mark ups, innovation grants, capital allowances, employment allowance …

I appreciate that yes absolutely. I do t have actual stats but I think the difference between lowest and highest paid has widened (whereas low to middle reduced with min wage, NI, etc).

And yes government will decide what revenue they will give up for their policies etc. I have a bit of an issue for example when I constantly hear that pensions are unaffordable (or triple lock) when huge amounts of revenue could be increased by removing certain things. Choices that governments have but I think the low wage one is particularly bad as people generally go to work and whatever job it should be enough for basic living needs, but that money goes towards individual company profits. Reducing gaps I guess is what I’d be looking for more of.

CandyCrushLevel14809 · 16/09/2026 11:43

JHound · 16/09/2026 11:33

She probably means her income does not afford a good life. I get it I am a high earner but still have to budget carefully and cannot be completely “carefree” with money. Does’t change the data and stats though on average incomes.

Exactly. It's usually the way these thread go though.

Utterpool · 16/09/2026 11:45

NorthXNorthWest · 16/09/2026 08:32

But how is vilifying higher-earning employees helpful?

An employee who isn’t using tax avoidance schemes, receives no means-tested benefits and earns £60k or more is already making a substantial contribution through tax and NI. They are paying their way. Why should they pay more to subsidise lower-paying employers or those who could work but won’t?

I am pretty sure we can acknowledge that some workers are not paid enough without painting a target on the backs of those earning more than them, especially when they aren’t responsible for the pay disparity.

Seems reasonable to me that people should focus on why people are being paid less not attacking people who earn more than them. For the avoidance of doubt, I earn nowhere near six figures.

Well we agree on your last paragraph.

As for the rest, I did not vilify or metaphorically paint the backs of high earners, nor discuss taxing the example 60k a year person you refer to.

DryIce · 16/09/2026 11:52

CandyCrushLevel14809 · 16/09/2026 08:04

It IS a high earner. Those are the stats.
It’s irrelevant to then discuss your outgoings. For this thread anyway. 80K is a high earner. We all understand tax and cost of living.

I just don't agree with this - it is absolutely relevant where you live.

I am a reasonably high earner for where I live, but I would be significantly poorer if I lived in central Manhattan. I don't know why we can't make the same distinction between London and hull?

CremeDeMure · 16/09/2026 11:55

I earn over £100k and am married to a man who earns a lot more than that. I don't care who does or doesn't believe me. Its the Internet, I will never meet the disbelievers. I also regularly name change, so it would be easy for someone to think I am multiple different people if I have mentioned my income under different names.

I am also quietly quitting on my job because I am burned out but cannot afford to completely quit for another 6 months.

BiddyPopthe2nd · 16/09/2026 11:55

I see a broad mix of trying to rub two pennies together ranging up to clear affluence across the range of posts I see. I think it’s also likely an element of comparison to the average where posters actually live - so low income in a deprived area but managing fine can seem middle class, while well paid but with a load of debt/costs and in a wealthy area can seem poor. And there is also an element of the attitude of the poster - are they very “woe is me, I can’t get UberEats every night this week as I’m paying for the holidays next week, I’m always broke”, or are they “I actually enjoy frugal pursuits, cooking from scratch, growing my own and have a good community around me so I don’t feel poor”.

CandyCrushLevel14809 · 16/09/2026 12:00

DryIce · 16/09/2026 11:52

I just don't agree with this - it is absolutely relevant where you live.

I am a reasonably high earner for where I live, but I would be significantly poorer if I lived in central Manhattan. I don't know why we can't make the same distinction between London and hull?

I mean, it's not relevant to what OP asked. That's all.
She didn't say "relative to the cost of living where you live", she didn't ask about outgoings, she was just stating a bare fact.

If you earn 60K you are classified as a high earner - that cannot be disputed.
I am probably taking things too literally and of course the thread has, as expected, moved onto exactly what you're talking about.

Even though someone is a high earner, they may not feel like it. That doesn't mean they can start saying they don't earn much.

Minasama · 16/09/2026 12:06

I think Mumsnet was originally middle-class London/London suburbs and you had netmums for a broader demographic. Mumsnet has widened out a lot now but there are still “yummy mummies” on here, along with professional/corporate mums.

I quite like that about the site since it offers a broader perspective. I’m also on the Family Lowdown FB site and I would say that although I’ve learned a lot from it, a lot of posters seems “less educated.”

I earn six figures but low six figures rather than high six figures.

Minasama · 16/09/2026 12:13

Fizbosshoes · 15/09/2026 18:59

I think much of the disconnect comes from some people believing that high earners are a different species. In reality there really isn’t that much difference between someone earning 50k and someone earning 250k. I’ve earned below the lower limit and above the upper limit of that range but was still the same person throughout. I’d argue my lifestyle didn’t even change that much either.

Im not sure this can be entirely true, for example on 50k (unless you had a high earning partner) would be nigh on impossible to send kids to private school. A 5k holiday would be 10% of your gross income, Paying 1k for a mortgage would be more than a third of your take home pay etc

Someone on 250k would likely either live in a more expensive house/area or have a lot more disposable income for extras such as holidays, hobbies, eating out etc
And i think (in some cases) its comments like that, which people can be bemused by. Even taking into account the higher tax brackets and losing personal allowance someone on 250k is likely to take home 3-4x as much as someone on 50k....and thus have more choices for just about anything.

While I am very much the same person, earning more than £50K (but much less than £250K) enabled me to buy a house of the size I want in the location I want, and to have a couple of foreign trips a year plus nice meals out on a frequent basis. Also I have a car that I enjoy very much and don’t have to make most decisions based on whether I can afford them, more whether I like / want to do them.
None of this would have been possible on £50K. Money makes a very big difference, although good health/mobility makes the biggest one.

RampantIvy · 16/09/2026 12:26

I am also quietly quitting on my job because I am burned out

And that is why I never progressed to the dizzy heights of a 6 figure salary because I didn't want the pressure and responsibility that goes along with it. I had other reasons as well, but that was a major factor.

I also see a lot of posts from women who are trapped in abusive relationships because they can't afford to leave.

And loads of posts from people who have lived in rented accommodation for a long time without a hope to buy their own home.

SummerAsh · 16/09/2026 12:33

I earn £400k, with another £400kk bonus if I’m lucky! I don’t see myself as a high earner. My boss earns £1m+, and compared to Elon, I’m a pauper! I’m just a working class gal who’s done ok.

Besides the cost of living crisis means I often have nothing at the end of the month with credit cards aplenty!… especially as it’s kind of expected in my world that your children will go to private school, you wouldn’t be seen dead without wear designer labels (esp shoes and handbags) and you would look out of place turning up in a mid-range car that’s not relatively new (pre-2025).

Cvf36 · 16/09/2026 12:35

SummerAsh · 16/09/2026 12:33

I earn £400k, with another £400kk bonus if I’m lucky! I don’t see myself as a high earner. My boss earns £1m+, and compared to Elon, I’m a pauper! I’m just a working class gal who’s done ok.

Besides the cost of living crisis means I often have nothing at the end of the month with credit cards aplenty!… especially as it’s kind of expected in my world that your children will go to private school, you wouldn’t be seen dead without wear designer labels (esp shoes and handbags) and you would look out of place turning up in a mid-range car that’s not relatively new (pre-2025).

Edited

Sarcasm?

RampantIvy · 16/09/2026 12:38

Cvf36 · 16/09/2026 12:35

Sarcasm?

Definitely 😁

SummerAsh · 16/09/2026 12:41

Cvf36 · 16/09/2026 12:35

Sarcasm?

Believe me, you feel like a crappy failure turning up to a party in 4-year old Range Rover SE, when everyone else is driving brand new Range Rover SV Ultras!