Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think many Mumsnet posters seem to be high earners?

288 replies

Jane143 · 15/09/2026 13:01

AIBU to think that the majority of people on MN seem to be high earners? As a guide, income over £60k? Most people I know in real life earn closer to average wage which I think is around £35k

OP posts:
Backedoffhackedoff · 15/09/2026 19:18

XenoBitch · 15/09/2026 19:14

I see this a lot on here too. If you are a low earner, it is because you must have fucked about in school.
Without the people in the low earning jobs, the country would grind to a halt.

there is also a bit of a weird attitude to school and uni as if it’s all that dictates your future.

ive seen weirdly often “my husband is 52, a first from Oxford and 30 years experience and can’t get a job” what sort of 52 year old thinks an employer cares about their degree?!?

or I have 3 degrees and a PhD and only earn £32k - er, yeah well clearly you aren’t in a high paying role or discipline. Why would you earn any more than that?!

Mmmm19 · 15/09/2026 19:18

Jane143 · 15/09/2026 13:21

I cant imagine any job where someone would be worth £400,000! Even a top surgeon is surely on much less?

Top surgeon isn’t where the money is. My friend in finance I’m sure earns triple a senior doctor at least - and she’s not at a top/high pressure company but has been there over 15 yess

Emmylou22 · 15/09/2026 19:18

I wouldn't class £60k as a high income, as a single mother living in the south east! My mortgage payments are huge and I get no maintenance from my child's father. My friends in couples are much better off but as a single person, I'm not rich. I do find it amazing the number of posters who can afford £10k on a summer holiday 🤯

Username7258 · 15/09/2026 19:17

The more you earn the more flexibility, generally, because you're paid for holding risk more than just your time. Plenty of people will use that flexibility to fanny about on Mumsnet.

Fizbosshoes · 15/09/2026 19:17

SuePerblybuilt · 15/09/2026 19:10

What I have noticed since joining fairly recently, after seen a few threads regarding incomes of posters, is the odious belief that they put in extra effort at school or whatever, unlike the lower earners, who it is inferred, did not apply themselves.
Tell that to my friend, who earns a little over minimum wage, caring for young adults with disabilities. Blood, sweat and tears is certainly ‘effort’. Just one example. I despise arrogance.

Even if you read this thread, you'd think 100k jobs were ten a penny and achievable, or even available for everyone! (And thats its basically the average salary for London)

If you read any threads about people earning 6 figure (and then some) salaries its all because they worked hard, took risks, had drive, took opportunities.....but i think in many cases (not all!) there is an element of natural aptitude for something, potentially a private education, networking or chance/good fortune as well as being hard working and driven, but that is often left out.

Jane143 · 15/09/2026 19:15

Backedoffhackedoff · 15/09/2026 14:20

What’s worthwhile though? We live in a capitalist society and the market values (financially) some things more than others. Why should someone who earns more do anymore than people who are paid less do?

Nursing, teaching, caring, volunteering etc etc is all worthwhile

OP posts:
XenoBitch · 15/09/2026 19:14

SuePerblybuilt · 15/09/2026 19:10

What I have noticed since joining fairly recently, after seen a few threads regarding incomes of posters, is the odious belief that they put in extra effort at school or whatever, unlike the lower earners, who it is inferred, did not apply themselves.
Tell that to my friend, who earns a little over minimum wage, caring for young adults with disabilities. Blood, sweat and tears is certainly ‘effort’. Just one example. I despise arrogance.

I see this a lot on here too. If you are a low earner, it is because you must have fucked about in school.
Without the people in the low earning jobs, the country would grind to a halt.

SuePerblybuilt · 15/09/2026 19:10

What I have noticed since joining fairly recently, after seen a few threads regarding incomes of posters, is the odious belief that they put in extra effort at school or whatever, unlike the lower earners, who it is inferred, did not apply themselves.
Tell that to my friend, who earns a little over minimum wage, caring for young adults with disabilities. Blood, sweat and tears is certainly ‘effort’. Just one example. I despise arrogance.

Jane143 · 15/09/2026 19:09

croisette · 15/09/2026 13:49

Exactly who do you think is funding the country’s massive welfare bill?

All of us, including the low paid

OP posts:
Jane143 · 15/09/2026 19:07

PixellatedPixie · 15/09/2026 16:50

Pretty much every person in every investment bank in London who is at MD level earns around £400k so do most CEOs and CFOs of listed companies. There are tens of thousands of them in London.

Then almost everybody over 40 in London who works in Finance will be getting £100k. This is all publicly available data and you can ask ChatGPT if you don’t believe it! 😂

Just look at what a house costs in many areas of London. There are real people living there - it isn’t an illusion. 😂

Wow!!! I had no idea

OP posts:
Jane143 · 15/09/2026 19:07

ShallWeDance · 15/09/2026 18:19

Why not start a thread asking about income and charity instead of this hostility?

No hostility intended

OP posts:
PixellatedPixie · 15/09/2026 18:59

Utterpool · 15/09/2026 17:51

If there’s enough money in certain sectors to allow swathes of people to earn salaries over £100k plus or £several hundreds and more, it must be also be at least partially because there are sufficient numbers of employees in the same industry paid average or below salaries, including those so low that they need to be topped up by state benefits. Which effectively means state subsidy of profit. Unless you are your own company and have no need to rely on anyone else to make your high salary.

I have no issue with high salaries and good on those who can earn them! but the difference between the highest and lowest definitely does appear to have got wider.

That isn’t true. If a huge company decides to open a head office in London and brings in some American execs who all earn big salaries then they pay tax and pay for cleaners, taxis, restaurants and create jobs for people below them. That’s why countries what foreign investment. You have clearly never lived in a country like South Africa where of a foreign company leaves thousands of people are very badly affected.

The idea that having a hierarchy where senior management earn more than those below them is bad for those below them is ridiculous. I know people who have worked as PAs for bankers in London earning upwards of £60k and they only had to go into the office twice a week and were only working for about 5 hours some days. When the MD they covered was on work trips abroad there was literally nothing to do.

Fizbosshoes · 15/09/2026 18:59

Timeless4 · 15/09/2026 17:24

It’s mainly confirmation bias. You won’t get an average spread of circumstances being discussed in response to a specific question or set of circumstances.

I earn an extremely high salary so will on occasions comment on threads about issues relating to being in such a position. I’ll never comment on UC or benefits threads as I don’t know anything about it.

I think much of the disconnect comes from some people believing that high earners are a different species. In reality there really isn’t that much difference between someone earning 50k and someone earning 250k. I’ve earned below the lower limit and above the upper limit of that range but was still the same person throughout. I’d argue my lifestyle didn’t even change that much either.

I think much of the disconnect comes from some people believing that high earners are a different species. In reality there really isn’t that much difference between someone earning 50k and someone earning 250k. I’ve earned below the lower limit and above the upper limit of that range but was still the same person throughout. I’d argue my lifestyle didn’t even change that much either.

Im not sure this can be entirely true, for example on 50k (unless you had a high earning partner) would be nigh on impossible to send kids to private school. A 5k holiday would be 10% of your gross income, Paying 1k for a mortgage would be more than a third of your take home pay etc

Someone on 250k would likely either live in a more expensive house/area or have a lot more disposable income for extras such as holidays, hobbies, eating out etc
And i think (in some cases) its comments like that, which people can be bemused by. Even taking into account the higher tax brackets and losing personal allowance someone on 250k is likely to take home 3-4x as much as someone on 50k....and thus have more choices for just about anything.

XenoBitch · 15/09/2026 18:59

I see a mix on here... from people on £150k and people on benefits. However, I do notice the high earner threads more because they are more humble bragging. One that stuck out to me was OP on £100k+ and saying they were having to cancel Netflix.

Dontlletmedownbruce · 15/09/2026 18:58

I'm a low earner in a caring profession and part time. I'm above min wage but when you take into account the lower hours I'm equivalent annually of less than min wage. Dh is a high earner, 250k approx. I hate saying 'my husband is a high earner' cos it makes me sound a bit silly but we are collectively a high income couple. I suspect if someone stalked me here they would accuse me of being a liar because on some threads I'm talking about the frustrations of my low status work and on others about city breaks or bathroom renovations. Throw in my ND kids and it's MN bingo. But I assure you I am very real.

catcherwatcher · 15/09/2026 18:57

I think you have to split MN users into two categories - those who are here to read and scroll and those who are actively willing to post and tell you how much they earn. When a person is so willing to post their income and lifestyle on a message board, you’ve kinda got to ask why.

PoppadomPreachImInTroubleDeep · 15/09/2026 18:53

Thesillysocks · 15/09/2026 13:30

In finance you see many salaries above that (200k fix + 200k bonus)

This. My husband is in finance and has a structure similar to this. I earn probably just about average in my line of work/area!

Iloveeverycat · 15/09/2026 18:52

A lot of posters say they are going to or have given their kids deposits for a house and paying their kids uni rent or fees. Anyone who can afford to do that must be a high earner as they must have a lot of savings to be able to do that.

GrandmasCat · 15/09/2026 18:48

Jane143 · 15/09/2026 13:01

AIBU to think that the majority of people on MN seem to be high earners? As a guide, income over £60k? Most people I know in real life earn closer to average wage which I think is around £35k

Nah, they are just the ones who have more free time to waste online 😉

Dragonscaledaisy · 15/09/2026 18:44

Mumsnet largely represents the average middle in every way.

Utterpool · 15/09/2026 18:41

PenelopePinkerton · 15/09/2026 17:14

I’ve just retired and was on 400k. I’m 51 and pensions will kick in at 55 and 60. I have more than enough savings to cover the time in between. I bought a small farm last year and I’m going to play at being a farmer and enjoy living rurally😂.

You’re joking about the farm … surely?

MasterBeth · 15/09/2026 18:27

Zippedydoobaah · 15/09/2026 17:19

I'd be happy to buy the book of a 14 year old mum who got thrown onto the streets and made £100k+, and I'd rightly champion them. I'd be expecting to hear more than "I just worked really hard" though. On that thread these numerous posters were asked how they had managed, what qualifications they had got and what position they now held. None of them had answers to any of these questions, which led me to believe it might not be true.

If people were just making it up, why wouldn't they just make up their qualifications or their jobs?

Evaka · 15/09/2026 18:21

PenelopePinkerton · 15/09/2026 17:14

I’ve just retired and was on 400k. I’m 51 and pensions will kick in at 55 and 60. I have more than enough savings to cover the time in between. I bought a small farm last year and I’m going to play at being a farmer and enjoy living rurally😂.

Marry me

ShallWeDance · 15/09/2026 18:19

Jane143 · 15/09/2026 13:35

Do they actually do anything worthwhile in their lives though to justify this obscene amount of money? Charity donations etc?

Why not start a thread asking about income and charity instead of this hostility?

Evaka · 15/09/2026 18:18

Probably because higher earners have more time to fanny about online. Also depends loads on where you are in the country. Average salaries vary by region so you might know lots of comfortable families on average income and I know lots of people on double or triple that in london who feel skint cos their london mortgage is 3k and their nursery fees are 2k a month.