There is very little evidence to link good rigorous debate online with people being harmed offline. If you think that mumsnet debate has led to the video you saw, what is the evidence to back that up?
I am a man who posts regularly on this board and I have deep concerns about women and girls being harmed - which is why I speak out to bring sense and reality into the online 'trans' debate because while there is complexity in the debate - the reality is that the people being harmed are women and children
- women and girls losing their separate spaces (loos / changing rooms / hospital wards / prison spaces / sports teams and clubs / etc.)
- women and girls being exposed to higher levels of violence e.g. in sports when a man joins a team of teenage girls in a contact sport, there is only one demographic which will suffer...
- women and girls being more vulnerable to those with nefarious intent - if we allow men into women's space (any men) then it becomes easier for those who have dodgy intent to take advantage - there is a reason that we see accurate stats on sex crimes by trans women matching those of men against women - they are men, and there will be a % with dodgy intent.
- children more generally (including boys) who are encouraged into a life path of damage to both mental and physical health - body mutilation from binders to surgery, hormones and false affirmation - all harm the child - it is already starting to be seen as one of the biggest child abuse scandals ever...
regarding suicide - this is an oft-stated 'fact' which needs asking - where are the figures coming from which support this?
The Office for National Statistics latest figures show an increased likelihood of suicide for LGB+ over heterosexual people... however
- the 'other sexuality' category (into which 'trans' would come) is lower than Lesbian / Gay / Bisexual.
- females have a statistically larger risk than males (yet in the 'trans' debate it appears to be the males / 'trans-women' who are identified at being at most risk - probably because those loudest in the debate are male and care less about the women!)
- the ONS states We cannot say from this descriptive analysis why rates of intentional self-harm and suicide for people who identify as LGB+ differ to those for people who identify as “Straight or Heterosexual”, and it is not possible to say whether sexual orientation is a causal risk factor for intentional self-harm or suicide. i.e. there is no direct causation able to be drawn.
So, while it is sad that anyone feels more suicidal - the reality is likely to sit somewhere in the space of understanding the full person. no-one is born with gender dysphoria, yet they may be born with other 'issues' such as autism where there is a statistical correlation with gender dysphoria - equally there are stats showing that there are much higher incidences of psychological / physical / sexual abuse in children who then go on in adolescence to think of themselves as 'trans'. It is not possible to isolate and state that 'trans' = higher suicide risk when you take into account that 'trans' very rarely happens in isolation of one or more co-morbidities which also have a statistical link to higher tendency towards suicide or self-harm.
There is a definite link esp. with adolescent girls between a frustration or upset around their body and 'trans' equally a feeling of a lack of power as a woman - all of which can and do come from sexual abuse / power abuse / physical abuse / psychological abuse in childhood...
what we do not see anywhere in the stats is a correlation between
- reasoned debate on mumsnet
- increased risk of suicide (in any group!)
Of course, as this is reasoned debate, there is naturally an expectation that you will want the opportunity to reply with all the evidence showing otherwise and linking suicide amongst 'trans' people with social media comment on mumsnet.
I for one, and many others no doubt, will look forward to it - it will be the first example of any such evidence...