Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think banning fried eggs is a step too far?

337 replies

NameChanger2026 · 13/09/2026 23:24

Whilst I agree with most of this, what’s wrong with an egg in decent oil?

To think banning fried eggs is a step too far?
OP posts:
Brightcrow · 14/09/2026 13:59

bigfacthunter · 14/09/2026 09:29

Yeah I had a similar upbringing. We just got what we got!

I do have total respect for the fact that a lot of people, adults and children alike, might have a thing or two they just can’t stomach like mushrooms or fish with bones or whatever. But I constantly find myself in the company of kids who will literally only eat their favourite foods and nothing else.

I do ask my child for input into meal planning etc so maybe you’d eye roll a bit with me 😂 but it’s more to get her involved with food and nutrition, there’s no way she’s getting sausage and mash 7 nights a week and it wouldn’t even cross her mind that she could demand this.

I dont eye roll at you … getting involved in learning how to plan, ingredients, time needed, balance of nutrition is essential especially if it is no longer taught in schools 😊

Brightcrow · 14/09/2026 13:56

Strawberryfruitstarburst · 14/09/2026 09:22

We sometimes ask our child but he might say chilli, spaghetti Bol, cottage pie etc. what’s wrong with that?

If you trust your child not to demand McDonald’s for tea then nothing wrong with a choice.

Unless the child is learning to cook, in which case great as meal planning is part and parcel of it, I don’t know what’s to be gained by asking a child to plan dinner or whatever and I think it’s good to learn that sometimes you are just given food without choice like if you’re a guest. Or if school meals were fewer but better quality choices then the child’s expectations of having choice would be less.

Scarlettpixie · 14/09/2026 13:36

Isobel201 · 14/09/2026 13:30

I use olive oil that actually reduces colestoral.

Only in comparison to saturated fat or other (worse) oils. Whole food fats are better at lowering cholesterol than olive oil. No oil is better.

Isobel201 · 14/09/2026 13:30

I use olive oil that actually reduces colestoral.

Atlantic · 14/09/2026 13:26

TheCoatThatLaunched1000Emails · 14/09/2026 13:14

Cost. Oil is cheaper - and you can bet they use the cheapest oil that is fit for human consumption.

Also oil would allow a meal to potentially be the vegan option or the allergy friendly option depending on what else is in the food. I can see why they use it. A healthy oil would be best but more expensive, and the likelihood is it's a cheap one.

Scarlettpixie · 14/09/2026 13:24

If anyone is frying eggs en mass they are likely to be cheap eggs cooked in cheap oil. Kids don’t need to be eating fried anything in school. If you must have eggs, scrambled or poached is better.

TheCoatThatLaunched1000Emails · 14/09/2026 13:14

Campanulaceae · 14/09/2026 13:12

Why can't they use butter instead of oil?

Cost. Oil is cheaper - and you can bet they use the cheapest oil that is fit for human consumption.

Campanulaceae · 14/09/2026 13:12

Why can't they use butter instead of oil?

Brightcrow · 14/09/2026 13:11

HelpfulHelena · 14/09/2026 11:30

So this is the lunchtime hot food menu at dd secondary school: what is good about this!???

Jacket Potato /Toppings
Pasta Pot
Hot Wrap / Burrito
Burger
Hot Sub Roll
Filled Flatbread
Panini
Hot Pastries
Chicken Pot
Flavoured Corn Pot
Wedges
Soup Cup
Margherita Pizza
Topped Pizza
Loaded Wedges
Hash Browns
Samosa
Bacon/ Sausage Roll

Pretty terrible offering there IMO and why so much choice? I’m a bit shocked. Limit the choice and reduce cost as less waste for a starter. I don’t even know what a pasta pot is I’ll be honest!

I may be older and old school but they need to stop this pandering to choice and focus on nutrition but nice to eat dishes. I mean a good restaurant will often often a set menu with 2 or 3 choices which is enjoyable and good value. Good food can be really enjoyable.

Sahara123 · 14/09/2026 13:01

Brightonkebab · 14/09/2026 12:15

They’re not going to poach eggs in schools 😂

I’ve worked in schools for 20 years and I’ve never seen a fried egg, let alone a poached one !

FirmSnake · 14/09/2026 12:52

Theunamedcat · 14/09/2026 09:24

When I was at school we were taught how to cook basic nutritional meals from scratch my children have not been taught this by the school they were supposed to make vegetable soup first ingredient tin of vegetable soup sliced bread for croutons basically they taught secondary school children how to open a tin of soup heat it up and make a few croutons then they had to bring it home in a tub

This is not helpful

I'm fortunate to work in a brilliant food room where we teach proper cookery. Unfortunately most schools just don't have the budget for it. It really should be a national priority in my opinion, students get so much of out it.
But it doesn't help that a significant chunk of kids are coming into year 7 without even the most basic kitchen skills. The first half of year 7 is just drilling into them to remember that knives are sharp and ovens are hot and teaching them how to wash up. So it really does need to start at home.

Another76543 · 14/09/2026 12:48

Blarn · 14/09/2026 10:21

It was about 40 years ago that Margaret Thatcher's government changed school meals and allowed contacts to be bidded for by private companies, who fought to provide the lowest cost meals to increase their own profits. The nutritional requirements were scrapped as well. To get back to the standards of the 70s would cost a lot of money - absolutley money well spent but where will it come from?

The main cost would probably come from setting up proper in house kitchens again. Ongoing, I’m not sure it would actually cost much more. Strip out private companies trying to maximise profit over quality. There’s an instant cost saving there. Secondly, stop so much choice. A previous poster showed the massive (low quality) choice. Offering one meal (with a veggie option) reduces waste. There’s another cost saving. I can’t believe that offering lots of pot noodles/pizza/sausage rolls etc works out much cheaper than, say, everyone being given pasta with a healthy veggie sauce.

ETA : it would also have the benefit of reducing packaging waste. Pre packaged UPFs in schools must be producing a ridiculous amount of rubbish.

Orangeyoucan · 14/09/2026 12:46

I think the Governments inaction over other issues is causing greater risk of harm to children than a fried egg to be honest 🤷‍♀️

Maddy70 · 14/09/2026 12:36

Everything is fine in moderation but if they're having fried eggs every day there are better alternatives. Poached , scrambled etc

RB68 · 14/09/2026 12:35

I have mixed feelings about this. As a kid we by rota had the same meal every two weeks (so a two week rota) we had protein, veg and carb on the plate - no pasta in those days to be honest but pasta is fine. It was always a hot meal unless summer and they replace one of the meals with a salad. They also need to look at nutrition as a whole rather than per meal - so maybe over the week. All pasta, bread and rice should be part wholemeal - some of the younger kids say reception should maybe be on white due to digestability for age. There should be crudites for all meals and fruit always available. There are plenty of options for dessert without saying "but must contain fruit" how about chocolate corgette cake and custard. I think they limit a decent cook by being so prescriptive.

Brightcrow · 14/09/2026 12:32

Blarn · 14/09/2026 10:21

It was about 40 years ago that Margaret Thatcher's government changed school meals and allowed contacts to be bidded for by private companies, who fought to provide the lowest cost meals to increase their own profits. The nutritional requirements were scrapped as well. To get back to the standards of the 70s would cost a lot of money - absolutley money well spent but where will it come from?

The brilliance (not) of many of Thatcher’s policies are really obvious today 😢

HelpfulHelena · 14/09/2026 12:30

The problem is dd’s school does offer two worthy alternatives per day. It is presenting unhealthy quick convenience upf crap alongside sensible food and then expecting TEENAGERS of all people to make the right choice.

What is the point fixing food in primary schools if secondary schools are allowed to sell this total crap?

I could of course ban my dd from buying it but ALL her friends eat it. So there is a lot of peer pressure. And additionally she has spent many years battling arfid so it is really hard for her to look at badly mass produced slop and think “i’ll eat that” whereas the upf crap is consistent - it’s a known quantity.

chaosmaker · 14/09/2026 12:27

Theunamedcat · 14/09/2026 09:24

When I was at school we were taught how to cook basic nutritional meals from scratch my children have not been taught this by the school they were supposed to make vegetable soup first ingredient tin of vegetable soup sliced bread for croutons basically they taught secondary school children how to open a tin of soup heat it up and make a few croutons then they had to bring it home in a tub

This is not helpful

Sounds like 'recipes' from US sites. There are a lot of opening different tins/packets and mixing them together.

PuzzledObserver · 14/09/2026 12:25

Ah, but what is a decent oil?

It’s a controversial topic.

On the odd occasion that I fry an egg, I use lard. But I mostly prefer them scrambled or as omelettes.

Jiggerypokesy · 14/09/2026 12:16

ThreadGuardDog · 14/09/2026 12:02

The point here is that a fried egg isn’t unhealthy so why is it disappointing. I suspect it’s more about the oil that foods are being fried in rather than the foods themselves because the school meals budget won’t allow for anything other than cheap quality.

Try reading my post again.

It’s what the OP is focusing on that’s disappointing. And the usual whijgefest when any attempt is made to make food healthier. Meanwhile we have more burger bars, chicken shops and cake places than you can shake a stick at and that’s apparently just fine.

Brightonkebab · 14/09/2026 12:15

Wetblanket78 · 13/09/2026 23:30

Nothing wrong with poaching eggs instead. I prefer poached to fried.

They’re not going to poach eggs in schools 😂

mochimoons · 14/09/2026 12:14

CandidStork · 14/09/2026 07:06

I don’t think this goes far enough personally. Eating habits in the UK need a total overhaul. No need for chips, cakes, cereals or fried food at all. Plenty of notes we could and should take from European, especially Scandinavian neighbours. Boiled or scrambled eggs, fish, chia puddings, overnight oats, soups, vegetables, cottage cheese, hummus, rye bread, Greek yoghurt with fruit, frozen yoghurt or frozen bananas as desserts etc. Whole foods rather than processed, fried, sugary rubbish. In homes as well as schools ideally, but schools, where they are at the habit forming age, and so influenced by what the children around them consume is so crucial, I think.

I agree, I've seen with a lot of kids of people I know that they are feeding them small portions of basically whatever they eat (which includes loads of fruit and veg) and then they go to school and don't want anything but chicken nuggets or sausages. If they get used to eating junk at school then they will expect it at home.

What is the point of frying an egg when you can boil or poach it just as easily and not use oil. It's obviously better not to feed children extra (probably shit quality) oil. Why's it even up for debate 😂

Another76543 · 14/09/2026 12:08

Kirbert2 · 14/09/2026 12:02

I'm assuming packed lunches would be allowed for medical reasons?

I don’t know of anyone having packed lunch for any reason. Dietary requirements/allergies are obviously catered for. At the schools we’ve been at, lunch is included in the fees (it’s not listed separately).

ObelixtheGaul · 14/09/2026 12:03

Another76543 · 14/09/2026 10:42

Yes, because diets and exercise levels have changed since then. Skinny kids in the 70s haven’t suddenly become obese because they had a bit of sponge and custard as a child. We are moving less, eating more, and increasingly relying on UPF. The problem with obesity is now across all age groups.

I do agree, but we do tend to think that UPF is a recent thing when it really isn't.
The 70s and 80s were full of UPF, mostly a hangover from the war. Proper dairy ice-cream was virtually non-existent. Dream topping, Angel delight, etc, all mass produced cheap chemical crap.
Ever since this industrial revolution, cheap food, particularly sweet stuff has had rubbish in it. It's actually far more regulated now than it was, particularly E-numbers.

Go back even earlier and unscrupulous Victorians were bleaching flour to make it whiter and putting sawdust in it to bulk it out.
I dread to think what they put in the substitute stuff my parents ate during rationing. What does it take to make powdered eggs?

In our house, we had powdered soup, custard powder, gravy granules. All highly processed.
The difference was that we ALSO had vegetables with tea every night with the exception of fish and chips Friday, always cooked from fresh, even though my mother worked full time, because despite the popular MN myth, plenty of families had both parents working. All right, she tended to boil the veg to death, but at least we had it. We might have burgers but always alongside green veg and potatoes.

It didn't matter that we ate a couple of shop bought biscuits (which have been around for about two centuries) in the evening, or had green's cheesecake mix for dessert on a Sunday, because most of our main meal food was veg, meat and potatoes. Cheap cuts, granted, but not covered in breadcrumbs and sugary marinades.

My mum was what was called a 'plain cook'. Meat and three veg. Veg was cheaper then. Ready meals were expensive things. Packet cakes were expensive things. Treats.

The good stuff has got more expensive and the crap has got cheaper. We have way more sedentary kids as well.

ThreadGuardDog · 14/09/2026 12:02

Jiggerypokesy · 14/09/2026 11:58

It’s so disappointing this is your take from this. It’s all about healthy eating and your issue is about fried eggs. Why not praise them for the fact they’re trying to address a really serious issue of young people’s heath, obesity is a serious and growing issue and bowel cancer is increasing for younger and younger people.

That’s way, way more of an issue than fried eggs at school, but as usual people who like to moan are focussing on irrelevances.

The point here is that a fried egg isn’t unhealthy so why is it disappointing. I suspect it’s more about the oil that foods are being fried in rather than the foods themselves because the school meals budget won’t allow for anything other than cheap quality.