Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU? Billionaires donating £72 million to Reform

114 replies

Onegiantpupil · 13/09/2026 18:14

Just thinking of the now £72 million that 2 billionaires have donated to Reform

It has blown my mind a little. Not because they’ve given it to Reform. But that of all the positive things that could be done with that money, this is what they chose to do with it? Give it to a political party to help them win their next campaign?

And yes I’m not daft, it will be because Reform are likely to tax them less if they get into government than a Labour government would. But they’re billionaires! Even if a very left leaning Labour government got in, any taxes they impose are hardly going to make a material difference to their lives?

£72 million, might has well have took a match to it!

OP posts:
Rollingpinofdoom · 14/09/2026 14:41

Snazzysausage · 14/09/2026 14:09

No they won't have to return the money from a donor registered in the Cayman Islands because the retrospective date begins after that donation was received.

So it does seem odd, they were ok accepting a large donation from the Cayman Islands but as soon as Reform get a huge donation, they are very eager to enforce the rules. It just looks a bit er…. Odd.

EasternStandard · 14/09/2026 14:41

Theseagullwhisperer · 14/09/2026 14:37

But we can't bend our democracy in response to what 'reform voters' will or won't think. Applying the Rees Principles is standard for the kind of legislation which closes tax loopholes etc - for obvious reasons, because otherwise there is a big rush of money just before the legislation comes into force.

There are certain Reform voters who will always blindly defend anything and everything Reform do - that's up to them. But there are plenty of other voters who are sick of Reform's entitled whining - that's why Farage's personal favourability ratings have taken such an enormous plunge.

And the simple fact of the matter is, if we don't want big money to pollute our democracy, then we have to take action to stop it. As far as I'm concerned a cap on donations is long overdue.

If a cap gets applied it’ll need to be consistent, some would back Labour no matter what they do re the unions but hopefully they’d be outnumbered by the other parties who would be severely curtailed. Whilst Labour alone would carve out millions.

Sally2791 · 14/09/2026 14:46

MeNotYouJustMe · 13/09/2026 22:48

It’s not so much about taxing them less but about deregulating the markets so they can make more money. They’re greedy vile fuckers and Farage is an utter cunt but the pricks who vote for him don’t care cos he’ll “stop the boats”. He’ll also stop their benefits and access to healthcare but 🤷‍♀️

Totally agree. The average person who supports them are most likely to be shafted by reform!

Theseagullwhisperer · 14/09/2026 14:56

Rollingpinofdoom · 14/09/2026 12:52

But if you look at who donated to the Labour Party in 2024, they got £4 million of one individual donor firm. Why was no one up in arms about this? So if Labour do make this law retrospective, I assume they’ll be giving that back….

To take your question in good faith, the first thing to say is plenty of people - including plenty of Labour supporters - were up in arms about money being donated from a hedge fund registered in the Cayman Islands.

But even so, £4 million is a lot less than £72 million. The £72 million is completely unprecented in the history of our democracy. There is also a difference in that the Cayman Islands donation came via a registered corporate hedge fund entity. Reform's latest mega-donations come from wealthy individual entrepreneurs - who made thieir money in an unregulated industry whose name we can't even type, because it's deemed so likely to be spam.

Partly because of public anxiety over big money donations (I shared a link somewhere else on the thread about this) - like the one from the Cayman Islands - there was an independent review, led by a former civil servant. Labour - with cross party support - have put that review's reccomendation of a £100,000 annual cap on foreign-based donors into action. Despite Reform's victim complex, these rules apply equally to all political parties - as will the retrospective date of March 2026, because that is when the Rycroft report was published, giving all political parties fair warning - that is in line with the Rees Rules (the consitutional guidelines for how the UK should introduce retrospective legislation to counter tax avoidance etc).

If Reform's argument is genuinely that 'everyone else takes big money, we just take more of it from less regulated sources' then I really don't think that helps thier anti-establishment, party of the people image.

But as far as I'm concerned, enormous donations are wrong and bad for our democracy - whichever party they go to, and I'd like to see all donations capped somewhere around £1 million (or even lower).

Bloodysquirellls · 14/09/2026 15:19

Theseagullwhisperer · 14/09/2026 14:37

But we can't bend our democracy in response to what 'reform voters' will or won't think. Applying the Rees Principles is standard for the kind of legislation which closes tax loopholes etc - for obvious reasons, because otherwise there is a big rush of money just before the legislation comes into force.

There are certain Reform voters who will always blindly defend anything and everything Reform do - that's up to them. But there are plenty of other voters who are sick of Reform's entitled whining - that's why Farage's personal favourability ratings have taken such an enormous plunge.

And the simple fact of the matter is, if we don't want big money to pollute our democracy, then we have to take action to stop it. As far as I'm concerned a cap on donations is long overdue.

But they didn’t do it.

They are doing it now because Reforms got more money than them.

I am a strong believer that in life sometimes doing nothing is the best option. And you would be surprised how often that is effective.

Maeve0098 · 14/09/2026 15:21

Rollingpinofdoom · 14/09/2026 12:53

Why would people stand against billionaires? What crimes are billionaires committing?

😂

Rollingpinofdoom · 14/09/2026 15:36

Maeve0098 · 14/09/2026 15:21

😂

I mean warren buffet is a billionaire and he does a lot of good for charity. Bill gates set up the Gates foundation. Are you saying people automatically become evil when they’re a billionaire? Is it like when their bank account ticks over to 1 billion or is it a gradual process? 😃

Notonthestairs · 14/09/2026 15:38

Theseagullwhisperer · 14/09/2026 14:56

To take your question in good faith, the first thing to say is plenty of people - including plenty of Labour supporters - were up in arms about money being donated from a hedge fund registered in the Cayman Islands.

But even so, £4 million is a lot less than £72 million. The £72 million is completely unprecented in the history of our democracy. There is also a difference in that the Cayman Islands donation came via a registered corporate hedge fund entity. Reform's latest mega-donations come from wealthy individual entrepreneurs - who made thieir money in an unregulated industry whose name we can't even type, because it's deemed so likely to be spam.

Partly because of public anxiety over big money donations (I shared a link somewhere else on the thread about this) - like the one from the Cayman Islands - there was an independent review, led by a former civil servant. Labour - with cross party support - have put that review's reccomendation of a £100,000 annual cap on foreign-based donors into action. Despite Reform's victim complex, these rules apply equally to all political parties - as will the retrospective date of March 2026, because that is when the Rycroft report was published, giving all political parties fair warning - that is in line with the Rees Rules (the consitutional guidelines for how the UK should introduce retrospective legislation to counter tax avoidance etc).

If Reform's argument is genuinely that 'everyone else takes big money, we just take more of it from less regulated sources' then I really don't think that helps thier anti-establishment, party of the people image.

But as far as I'm concerned, enormous donations are wrong and bad for our democracy - whichever party they go to, and I'd like to see all donations capped somewhere around £1 million (or even lower).

Edited

I think £95 million in total from Delo & Harbourne to Reform UK (guarantors of the private limited company are Yusuf & Farage)

£72 million was just this weekend.

plus £5 million for Farage personally.
and £10 million to the Brexit party.

Fgfw · 14/09/2026 15:52

Rollingpinofdoom · 14/09/2026 15:36

I mean warren buffet is a billionaire and he does a lot of good for charity. Bill gates set up the Gates foundation. Are you saying people automatically become evil when they’re a billionaire? Is it like when their bank account ticks over to 1 billion or is it a gradual process? 😃

It's just jealousy that someone has more money than them

Rollingpinofdoom · 14/09/2026 15:53

Fgfw · 14/09/2026 15:52

It's just jealousy that someone has more money than them

That’s what I was thinking. Not all billionaires are evil. Not all those living in poverty are good. Maybe if we encouraged billionaires to do more good with their money instead of spending it on stupid stuff like space flights etc, the world would be a much nicer place.

Shedmistress · 14/09/2026 16:05

Was anyone up in arms when the pharma company that makes puberty blockers gave money to the Lib Dems?

Rollingpinofdoom · 14/09/2026 16:08

Shedmistress · 14/09/2026 16:05

Was anyone up in arms when the pharma company that makes puberty blockers gave money to the Lib Dems?

Yes. It seems MPs are very selective on what they are outraged about.

EasternStandard · 14/09/2026 16:13

Shedmistress · 14/09/2026 16:05

Was anyone up in arms when the pharma company that makes puberty blockers gave money to the Lib Dems?

Yes the Lib Dems defended that as Labour do union millions.

Snazzysausage · 14/09/2026 18:53

Rollingpinofdoom · 14/09/2026 14:41

So it does seem odd, they were ok accepting a large donation from the Cayman Islands but as soon as Reform get a huge donation, they are very eager to enforce the rules. It just looks a bit er…. Odd.

Quite. Make of that what you will.
I have since read that it's being suggested there is an clause written into ECHR law that stops an act done in good faith and following the current rules being retrospectively classed as unlawful. Who knows.

Zapx · 14/09/2026 20:41

Onegiantpupil · 13/09/2026 23:48

And while I’ve definitely got my views on Reform (there’re not positive) I would feel the same if a billionaire donated millions to Labour. They could actually do so much more with it.

Lord Sainsbury has donated millions to Labour over the years. Something like 12 million quid. We were okay with it then though… because it wasn’t Reform…

Edited for terrible maths

Onegiantpupil · 14/09/2026 21:00

Zapx · 14/09/2026 20:41

Lord Sainsbury has donated millions to Labour over the years. Something like 12 million quid. We were okay with it then though… because it wasn’t Reform…

Edited for terrible maths

Edited

To be clear, I wasn’t aware of that so no, ‘we weren’t okay with it then’

I think that regardless of which party it is, billionaires donating £30+ million a pop to a political party feels like a colossal waste of money

I just think of how many in the UK are struggling financially yet a billionaire swans in and casually gives millions a
to a political party.

Yeah they can do what they like with their money, but I still can’t get my head around why anyone would choose to spend it like that

OP posts:
Spiffingdarling88 · 14/09/2026 21:01

Onegiantpupil · 14/09/2026 21:00

To be clear, I wasn’t aware of that so no, ‘we weren’t okay with it then’

I think that regardless of which party it is, billionaires donating £30+ million a pop to a political party feels like a colossal waste of money

I just think of how many in the UK are struggling financially yet a billionaire swans in and casually gives millions a
to a political party.

Yeah they can do what they like with their money, but I still can’t get my head around why anyone would choose to spend it like that

Maybe they are hoping the UK will stop going to shit 🤔

Fgfw · 14/09/2026 21:07

Rollingpinofdoom · 14/09/2026 15:53

That’s what I was thinking. Not all billionaires are evil. Not all those living in poverty are good. Maybe if we encouraged billionaires to do more good with their money instead of spending it on stupid stuff like space flights etc, the world would be a much nicer place.

Space exploration is cool

SomeoneIsWrongOnTheInternet · 14/09/2026 21:25

It is just sickening that so few have so much, and it is terrible to watch the destruction of all the values I knew that defined the western world. Democracy, justice, law, fairness, equality, basic decency. It’s all dead. Everything has been sold. We have all been sold.

Fgfw · 14/09/2026 21:26

SomeoneIsWrongOnTheInternet · 14/09/2026 21:25

It is just sickening that so few have so much, and it is terrible to watch the destruction of all the values I knew that defined the western world. Democracy, justice, law, fairness, equality, basic decency. It’s all dead. Everything has been sold. We have all been sold.

We still live in a democracy. What's so wrong about the UK?

SomeoneIsWrongOnTheInternet · 14/09/2026 21:31

It is up for sale. Brexit was a prime example of just how much money matters now, how much of modern policy choices it buys. So is the whole trans rights / male activist debacle. You think these billionaires are offering philanthropy and improved lives along the lines of the Victorian Rowntree family or Carnegie?

Britain a democracy? How many other policies of the last 30 years have we been given a real choice about? Even under its own rules, it’s classed as a minimal democracy. Every 5 years a choice of red and blue ties offering very similar policies gets put to a multiply-Gerry mandered electorate. We have no local democracy worth the name, no choices, and most of us are now just serfs. We are losing rights, especially if we’re female.

Fgfw · 14/09/2026 21:40

We are a parliamentary democracy

SomeoneIsWrongOnTheInternet · 14/09/2026 21:42

We are up for sale to anyone who offers money. Have you not heard any of the complaints from MPs themselves about how ineffective Parliament is?

Fgfw · 14/09/2026 21:43

I think people should be free to donate to reform. As you are feeling to donate to labour, the green, the lib dems or the Tories.

SomeoneIsWrongOnTheInternet · 14/09/2026 21:47

Free to donate billions in exchange for laws that favour their interests?

I can hardly equal the donation of billions. Hell I can remember when the - original -Green Party, the ones who were interested in the environment rather than Palestinians and misogyny, sent me a letter complaining that I was not doing my bit because I couldn’t afford a regular donation of £50 a month! At the time I couldn’t have spared £5 a month, thanks to the shift to the rentier economy and being a bit younger than the baby boomers who sent the letter.

((Which is how that party became the corrupted mess it is now. Ditto, the rest of the slow degradation of this entire country, with all the family silver sold off to foreigners.))

Therefore I have no power at all, unequal to that wielded by the billionaires, thus demonstrating the undermined principles at the heart of democracy - equality, law, justice.

I’ll remind you that the British Empire called itself a democracy too, and that it was ‘the mother of all Parliaments’ . Sure, all those serf miners had just as much right to influence the British Parliament as Lord Salisbury or whatever. They had rights to gather too and not be cut down in the street at Peterloo.