Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU? Billionaires donating £72 million to Reform

114 replies

Onegiantpupil · 13/09/2026 18:14

Just thinking of the now £72 million that 2 billionaires have donated to Reform

It has blown my mind a little. Not because they’ve given it to Reform. But that of all the positive things that could be done with that money, this is what they chose to do with it? Give it to a political party to help them win their next campaign?

And yes I’m not daft, it will be because Reform are likely to tax them less if they get into government than a Labour government would. But they’re billionaires! Even if a very left leaning Labour government got in, any taxes they impose are hardly going to make a material difference to their lives?

£72 million, might has well have took a match to it!

OP posts:
Bloodysquirellls · 14/09/2026 09:25

Billionaires being billionaires and we could spend that money on something else is a different problem though.

Our problem - the controllable problem is party donations.

Do we want to be like America where elections are bought - no

Is the above even a sensible question now with the rise of AI - probably not. An individual could spend that themselves now campaigning independently to support a party without sending it direct.

Can we limit total party donations?
Yes

What are you going to set the total limit at?
The amount the established parties are raising? - bit rich
Is that fair? - probably not

Does a new party need more to establish initially than an existing one - probably.

Do we want to stop any other new party from ever existing?
No

Can we put restrictions on single donation value?
Yes

Is that fair? Probably not

Should we restrict overseas donations?
Yes I think we should

Are these overseas donations?
These are British born British citizens so I don’t think so no

And on the point of unions - it is a valid point. Most people in unions join to be in a union. They don’t join to fund labour. If that was the aim they would donate direct.

So that’s what I mean about I have been thinking about this a lot.

I don’t like it. The primary reason I don’t like it is because it’s Reform. But it is incredible we have someone seriously challenging the 2 party system and we don’t want to cut our nose to spite our face by essentially banning any other yet-to-exist party from ever being in that position.

So the solution. Labour and conservatives be better. Lib Dem’s and green be better. Reform be better!

If the parties could all sort their lives out this would be less of an issue.

Onegiantpupil · 13/09/2026 23:48

And while I’ve definitely got my views on Reform (there’re not positive) I would feel the same if a billionaire donated millions to Labour. They could actually do so much more with it.

OP posts:
Onegiantpupil · 13/09/2026 23:42

BeLimeExpert · 13/09/2026 22:53

Is it any different to unions donating to Labour? All as bad as each other…

It is a little different in the sense that workers can choose to join a union and pay subs so I guess that money at least comes from people who know what they’re signing up to, but in general I wouldn’t be happy if a billionaire donated £30 million to Labour either.

If I was a billionaire I’d like to think I would try and do some good with all the money and not use it to prop up a political party just to make me even richer

£72 million would fund 2000 nurses for year, or 1000 police.

it is just depressing to think about

OP posts:
SabrinaThwaite · 13/09/2026 23:40

I’m struggling to see how having a fuck ton of money is going to magic up reasonable, sensible, astute, articulate and (most importantly) electable candidates for Reform for the next election.

Thecatspantaloons · 13/09/2026 23:38

It just screams of corruption. They'll probably release the Tate's if/when they get banged up/ elected into power.

FKAT · 13/09/2026 23:37

Are Dale Vince and Suneil Setiya allowed to donate to Labour? What about the pharmaceutical company that donated to the Lib Dems?

Spiffingdarling88 · 13/09/2026 23:34

What about the donors who give to Labour and get much more back in contracts?

The billionaires have stated why they have given vast amounts and that was to bypass Labour bringing in future rules. They were originally going to give 1 million a month up to the general election.

Crispynoodle · 13/09/2026 23:31

YANBU

oldmacdonald1 · 13/09/2026 23:07

BeLimeExpert · 13/09/2026 22:53

Is it any different to unions donating to Labour? All as bad as each other…

Comparing unions to crypto billionaires – that’s hilarious.

connie26 · 13/09/2026 23:01

Well, the country is going downhill fast, so hopefully kicking Labour out will be the positive effect of donating so much money.

BeLimeExpert · 13/09/2026 22:53

Is it any different to unions donating to Labour? All as bad as each other…

Bloodysquirellls · 13/09/2026 22:51

Been thinking about this a lot today.

I think I have covered pretty much every emotion and the conclusion is inconclusive 😶

MeNotYouJustMe · 13/09/2026 22:48

It’s not so much about taxing them less but about deregulating the markets so they can make more money. They’re greedy vile fuckers and Farage is an utter cunt but the pricks who vote for him don’t care cos he’ll “stop the boats”. He’ll also stop their benefits and access to healthcare but 🤷‍♀️

Heide27 · 13/09/2026 22:46

I agree. It’s disgusting and morally redundant. I am so sick of these self-serving greedy billionaires who could make the world a better place but choose not to.

Swipe left for the next trending thread