Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The Government needs to do something

251 replies

Noneverever · 11/09/2026 19:56

yay, UK government.

Let’s just do nothing as the world edges itself towards annihilation driven solely by billionaire men hawking for more money.

10% chance we’ll all be dead in 3.5 yrs. Something needs to be done. Now

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3eq7kl5l00o

A hand on a phone displaying several AI apps including ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, DeepSeek and Gemini

UK government rejects 'kill switch' idea for dangerous AI

The Cabinet Office, which leads on AI safety, says the UK "cannot simply turn AI off".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3eq7kl5l00o

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 11:28

Noneverever · 12/09/2026 12:32

I did read the article. I know that a kill switch is not the solution. But it shows an intent and gives a message to other countries that the UK is concerned and wants regulation. An AI expert literally said that within the article, so have you read it?

I’ve read it now, it doesn’t mention China?

Winter2020 · 13/09/2026 11:27

Kf37elrif · 13/09/2026 11:18

So you think Russian AI switching off all our access to tech whilst they keep theirs very much up and running isn’t a threat? Our entire NHS and military is reliant on US technology.

Yes it's a threat. It's not the same as killing us all though is it.

Winter2020 · 13/09/2026 11:25

Kf37elrif · 13/09/2026 11:21

And if Russian wants to send swarms of jet propelled drones over our way that can seek out all human movement as are being used in Ukraine what do you think food and energy security will do?

Also how do you develop energy or even food security when it’s all reliant on US software and tech systems?

Farmers can grow crops and raise livestock without any need for US software. I'm sure the same could be true for drilling for oil or generating solar energy.

Yes we need military security too of course. And I disagree with Andy Burnham that national security can't be at the expense of social security!

straighttalker99 · 13/09/2026 11:25

The Gov can't even stop the boats. Behave.

Kf37elrif · 13/09/2026 11:24

Yupyh · 13/09/2026 11:23

Me? What did I say wrong? I use it for work and it's helped a lot

And you’re not reading or aware of any of the dangers beyond things being easier for you at work?

Yupyh · 13/09/2026 11:23

Kf37elrif · 13/09/2026 11:18

Because that post is beyond naive.

Me? What did I say wrong? I use it for work and it's helped a lot

Kf37elrif · 13/09/2026 11:21

Winter2020 · 13/09/2026 11:18

I'd start with food security and energy security. Whether it's war, terrorism or AI we are always going to be better off if we are capable of providing the food and energy needs of our population.

That would require government subsidies and policies to make producing food pay and allow north sea oil etc.

Edited

And if Russian wants to send swarms of jet propelled drones over our way that can seek out all human movement as are being used in Ukraine what do you think food and energy security will do?

Also how do you develop energy or even food security when it’s all reliant on US software and tech systems?

OneLilacHedgehog · 13/09/2026 11:19

The government encourage their own staff to use AI

chirrupybird · 13/09/2026 11:19

Noneverever · 13/09/2026 10:32

I despair. Has anyone actually read the essay. There is something that can be done. A sensible thought through plan from the CEO of Anthropic. Trump has rejected it.

Also, Y2K didn’t happen because the world addressed it and fixed the computing issue. Without that it would have ffs

You don't think that everyone who actually worked with computers hadn't already fixed Y2K as a matter of course well in advance. All of my programs were future proofed for 2000 (and tested), it was generally just one line of programming to allow for 19xx and 20xx. No one had to tell us there was a potential problem, the World didn't fix it, it wasn't really a problem at all just an item on the to do list.

Kf37elrif · 13/09/2026 11:18

Yupyh · 13/09/2026 11:16

Why are you laughing?

Because that post is beyond naive.

Winter2020 · 13/09/2026 11:18

Kf37elrif · 13/09/2026 11:08

We should be developing our own tech and reducing reliance on the USA . Studies show that 88% of publicly listed UK firms and 94% of software companies rely on US platforms for critical infrastructure. Government bodies continue to use major US suppliers, exemplified by controversial NHS and Ministry of Defence contracts.

Europe however is actively working to reduce its reliance on American technology through new policy measures and government shifts.Leaders in the European Union (EU) view heavy dependence on a few U.S. companies-such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google-as a major security risk.

We just focus on immigrants arriving on boats whilst we let Russians come and go as they please. We should be developing our own tech and working closely with the EU but Nige and co would rather strut around in balaclavas at ferry ports and put a stop to any kind of UK EU partnership whilst Russia manipulates them from behind keyboards.

Meanwhile Trump, Putin and China want to carve the world into 3 with USA getting the whole of America, Putin Europe and China the rest.

We’re fucked basically and I would love to know what the OP expects any uk government to do as priority always seems to be to keep Reform voters happy- and little else( which suits Putin, Trump and co no end).

Chuck AI in the mix and I think you start to realise how fucked we really are and how we’re being continually manipulated to be in this shitty position.

Edited

I'd start with food security and energy security. Whether it's war, terrorism or AI we are always going to be better off if we are capable of providing the food and energy needs of our population.

That would require government subsidies and policies to make producing food pay and allow north sea oil etc.

Kf37elrif · 13/09/2026 11:18

Winter2020 · 13/09/2026 11:14

Because a pandemic could wipe us out but no electricity just means no electricity. The vast majority of people aren't going to die because there is no electric. Hell we could even survive without the internet and 24 hour news - we wouldn't all keel over.

Loss of banking systems would be very difficult. Might be worth having accounts with more than one bank group?

Yes a nuclear bomb could kill us all. We're always at risk of that from a number of people pressing the button though.

So you think Russian AI switching off all our access to tech whilst they keep theirs very much up and running isn’t a threat? Our entire NHS and military is reliant on US technology.

EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 11:17

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 13/09/2026 00:54

I don’t think the outcry is enough for the weight of the fact we’ve just been told we have a 10% chance of dying in the next 3 years….why aren’t people rioting

Probably because a lot of people are totally indifferent due to the fact the universe will continue on regardless of what happens to the human race. We've no divine right to exist in perpetuity, and it's only a matter of time before something does eradicate us. Might as well be self-inflicted 😂

Sounds a bit depressing. I can see adults might feel like this and be ready to go, but not for children.

Yupyh · 13/09/2026 11:16

Kf37elrif · 13/09/2026 11:12

😂

Why are you laughing?

JLou08 · 13/09/2026 11:14

About 25 years ago someone told me robots would take over the world. I thought they were joking at first and laughed, then I thought they were bonkers and argued there's no way it would happen. I think I was wrong.

Winter2020 · 13/09/2026 11:14

Noneverever · 13/09/2026 10:08

Take over the electricity grid and shut it down. Hack the water infrastructure and restrict access. Launch nuclear weapons. Bring down the banking system and therefore the world’s economy. And a million other scenarios we can’t contemplate, because it’s more clever than us.

I don’t really understand how people with no knowledge are arguing against the top AI experts with such certainty. It’s bizarre. If a top medic told you there would be a pandemic in the next 3 yrs that would wipe out humanity if we keep doing x, would you want to stop doing x or ignore him/her?

Because a pandemic could wipe us out but no electricity just means no electricity. The vast majority of people aren't going to die because there is no electric. Hell we could even survive without the internet and 24 hour news - we wouldn't all keel over.

Loss of banking systems would be very difficult. Might be worth having accounts with more than one bank group?

Yes a nuclear bomb could kill us all. We're always at risk of that from a number of people pressing the button though.

Kf37elrif · 13/09/2026 11:12

Yupyh · 13/09/2026 11:10

Why don't people like AI? Do you not like things being made easier to be done? Do you not like it easier for things to be done at work?

😂

Yupyh · 13/09/2026 11:10

Why don't people like AI? Do you not like things being made easier to be done? Do you not like it easier for things to be done at work?

researchers3 · 13/09/2026 11:10

PurpleAxe · 13/09/2026 03:25

I have been waiting for SkyNet my whole life.

No fate but what we make!

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 13/09/2026 11:10

All those smirking about how perhaps it’s time for us to go extinct. You do realise this death is likely to be prolonged and painful. Watching your children and loved ones starve to death or similar.

It would only be "prolonged and painful" if you stood by and let it be so. There are a multitude of ways you could expedite it yourself assuming it's a certainty anyway.

placemats · 13/09/2026 11:09

AI models are run and developed by psychopaths, those in the game who aren't are getting out because there's nothing they can do, except warn of the dangers and buy land to live on.

Crosswurd · 13/09/2026 11:09

Noneverever · 13/09/2026 10:44

so you haven’t read the article? Because Amodei explains how halting the pace won’t leave the US behind China specifically. And explores this in depth

US and China are famously the only 2 countries in the world!

Kf37elrif · 13/09/2026 11:08

We should be developing our own tech and reducing reliance on the USA . Studies show that 88% of publicly listed UK firms and 94% of software companies rely on US platforms for critical infrastructure. Government bodies continue to use major US suppliers, exemplified by controversial NHS and Ministry of Defence contracts.

Europe however is actively working to reduce its reliance on American technology through new policy measures and government shifts.Leaders in the European Union (EU) view heavy dependence on a few U.S. companies-such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google-as a major security risk.

We just focus on immigrants arriving on boats whilst we let Russians come and go as they please. We should be developing our own tech and working closely with the EU but Nige and co would rather strut around in balaclavas at ferry ports and put a stop to any kind of UK EU partnership whilst Russia manipulates them from behind keyboards.

Meanwhile Trump, Putin and China want to carve the world into 3 with USA getting the whole of America, Putin Europe and China the rest.

We’re fucked basically and I would love to know what the OP expects any uk government to do as priority always seems to be to keep Reform voters happy- and little else( which suits Putin, Trump and co no end).

Chuck AI in the mix and I think you start to realise how fucked we really are and how we’re being continually manipulated to be in this shitty position.

EmeraldRoulette · 13/09/2026 11:06

@Plung just realised you probably mean the driverless test vehicle but I don’t know which system they’re likely to be running

Vi6Green · 13/09/2026 11:03

The two AI developing companies that are farthest ahead want the industry to slow down the development..... sure they’re just concerned for safety and being responsible... Nothing to do with their competitors catching up whatsoever.

Swipe left for the next trending thread