Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To say my DS cant keep missing school because the school “cant cope”??

660 replies

Jacobator · 11/09/2026 13:19

Sorry this is long and probably doesnt make much sense but i am so fed up and dont really know if im being unreasonable anymore.

I have 2 boys, 12 and 9, both have additional needs although they are very different. DS2 has always been harder in school but usually he manages and we have never had anything like this before. Since going back this September he has apparently been having what they call explosive behaviour and he has now been sent home several times. One day they rang me before lunch and said i needed to collect him because he wasnt able to calm down and they didnt have the staff to keep him safe.

I did collect him because what else can i do, but then its happening again and again. Yesterday they rang and said basically they cant meet his needs at the moment. I said well what does that actually mean because he is supposed to be in school and not sitting at home with me because you dont have enough staff.

They keep saying they are not excluding him and that its a “temporary arrangement” while they look at what support he needs. Sorry but if my child is being told to stay at home because school cant cope with him, what exactly do they think an exclusion is??

I have asked about his support plan and whether they have actually done everything that is in it and i get lots of meetings and people saying they are concerned but nobody seems to actually have an answer. I dont want to keep having arguments with the school because obviously DS has to go there and i dont want things getting worse for him, but i also cant just accept him being kept home every time he has a meltdown.

DH thinks im making this harder than it needs to be and says we should look at specialist provision. I know he might be right but i dont want DS2 being put somewhere just because his current school doesnt want the bother. His brother is at the same school and they are very close, and DS2 already feels different enough without being taken away and told he needs a special school.

And before anyone says we should just pay for extra help, we actually do. Between therapy, assessments, things for school, transport and other bits we are spending over £2,000 a month at the moment. Yes i know thats a lot. We arent sitting on a pile of money, it is coming out of our savings and some of the things are because we have been told to get them privately because waiting lists are ridiculous. Im not saying that means the school owes us anything, just that its frustrating to constantly be told to get more support when we are already trying everything we can.

I am not pretending DS is easy. He can be very difficult when he is overwhelmed and i know the other children need to be safe too. But surely the answer cant just be send him home until he behaves normally? He cant learn how to manage school if he isnt actually allowed to be at school.

DH says im refusing to accept that he needs specialist help and maybe i am. I just feel like once we go down that road thats it, he gets labelled and everyone gives up trying to make mainstream work.

So AIBU to be pushing back on this and saying they cant keep sending him home because they “cant cope”? Or am i the one refusing to accept reality here?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
roaringdragon · 14/09/2026 14:14

Ablondiebutagoody · 14/09/2026 14:08

But they are the parents. For the class teacher its just a job and whilst everyone else tries to shift the responsibility onto someone else, its them who deals with it on a daily basis. I reached teacher burnout. Not the job I signed up for.

I am very disappointed that teachers as a group haven't made a stand against the situation, striking if necessary. Everyone is far too concerned with not appearing inclusive enough for that to happen though.

Edited

I didn’t say they aren’t the parents.

You said the parents aren’t left to deal with the SEN systems failure. They very much are, they very much deal with it on a daily basis, and you are clueless if you think otherwise.

Ablondiebutagoody · 14/09/2026 14:08

roaringdragon · 14/09/2026 13:59

If you genuinely think parents of DC with EHCPs aren’t left to pick up the pieces you are very mistaken.

Look at how many are forced to go down the SENDIST route.
Look at how many are left to complain to the LGO.
Look at how many are forced to pursue a pre-action letter.
Look at the number who feel they have to deregister and EHE.
Look at the number left picking up the pieces because the education system has broken their DC.
Look at the number of parents whose caring role has taken a physical &/or psychological toll on them. Sometimes to the point they reach parent carer burnout.
Look at the number of families with disabled DC who are living in poverty.

But they are the parents. For the class teacher its just a job and whilst everyone else tries to shift the responsibility onto someone else, its them who deals with it on a daily basis. I reached teacher burnout. Not the job I signed up for.

I am very disappointed that teachers as a group haven't made a stand against the situation, striking if necessary. Everyone is far too concerned with not appearing inclusive enough for that to happen though.

Kirbert2 · 14/09/2026 14:03

Araminta1004 · 14/09/2026 13:55

If there are sufficient state run special schools and state run hubs all regulated by the state and properly so, to a decent standard, I fail to see the problem.

Some of the for profit run specialist schools by private equity/foreign wealth funds are not sustainable for all children with SEND. The pie has to be shared out more fairly between all children with needs.

Because you have faith that they will properly run and to a decent standard. I don't.

LA's sometimes get it wrong and the fact that they may be able to do that in the future and parents won't have any rights to appeal their decisions is frightening.

roaringdragon · 14/09/2026 13:59

Ablondiebutagoody · 14/09/2026 13:45

It is always the class teacher who is left to deal with the shit show. Not the LA, the school or the parents. It's why I quit the profession.

If you genuinely think parents of DC with EHCPs aren’t left to pick up the pieces you are very mistaken.

Look at how many are forced to go down the SENDIST route.
Look at how many are left to complain to the LGO.
Look at how many are forced to pursue a pre-action letter.
Look at the number who feel they have to deregister and EHE.
Look at the number left picking up the pieces because the education system has broken their DC.
Look at the number of parents whose caring role has taken a physical &/or psychological toll on them. Sometimes to the point they reach parent carer burnout.
Look at the number of families with disabled DC who are living in poverty.

Araminta1004 · 14/09/2026 13:55

If there are sufficient state run special schools and state run hubs all regulated by the state and properly so, to a decent standard, I fail to see the problem.

Some of the for profit run specialist schools by private equity/foreign wealth funds are not sustainable for all children with SEND. The pie has to be shared out more fairly between all children with needs.

Kirbert2 · 14/09/2026 13:50

Araminta1004 · 14/09/2026 13:08

Also EOTAS or specialist will work for some and hubs will work for others. Providing more choice for all is surely a good thing, in principle at least. I do get that people who are traumatised by it all are suspicious, but we do need to find a way forward for MORE children. What is currently there is just not working for enough children. And this whole fad of independent specialist schools costing an absolute bomb and shareholders making huge profits is unacceptable. At least if it is kept in the state system, then hopefully also the communication between NHS and social worker and education will improve and the data will all be accessible more readily to the professionals to actually implement things that do work for the children in question, and in a long term manner.
[I do know there are issues with data sharing as well, but ultimtately most of us have no choice but to trust in the system at large to some extent].

If it includes plans in the white paper where parents have less legal rights to advocate for their children, won't be allowed to appeal decisions etc then there will actually be less choices. It seems like the LA will decide and that will be that.

It's very concerning.

Ablondiebutagoody · 14/09/2026 13:45

Kirbert2 · 13/09/2026 13:04

It isn't always the schools fault but it isn't always the parents fault either. I'm sure OP would feel awful if her son hurt another child but she can't magically make the system work any faster than schools can.

It is always the class teacher who is left to deal with the shit show. Not the LA, the school or the parents. It's why I quit the profession.

roaringdragon · 14/09/2026 13:33

our la have no way for children not on roll at all school to sit exams.

@PensionPTake this is your LA fobbing you off. DC with EOTAS/EOTIS/C can and do sit exams. It is a line too often used, but it isn’t true.

@Araminta1004 hubs work for some DC. They don’t work for others. That applies whoever the child’s parents are or what they can do. For those DC who hubs don’t work for, they shouldn’t be resigned to being placed there when it isn’t suitable just because their parents struggle to advocate for them. All parents should be supported to advocate for their DC. Alternatively, the system should work as it should so parents don’t have to fight for a suitable placement.

To blame parental concerns about the SEND reforms, hubs and otherwise, on trauma is very dismissive.

Araminta1004 · 14/09/2026 13:08

Also EOTAS or specialist will work for some and hubs will work for others. Providing more choice for all is surely a good thing, in principle at least. I do get that people who are traumatised by it all are suspicious, but we do need to find a way forward for MORE children. What is currently there is just not working for enough children. And this whole fad of independent specialist schools costing an absolute bomb and shareholders making huge profits is unacceptable. At least if it is kept in the state system, then hopefully also the communication between NHS and social worker and education will improve and the data will all be accessible more readily to the professionals to actually implement things that do work for the children in question, and in a long term manner.
[I do know there are issues with data sharing as well, but ultimtately most of us have no choice but to trust in the system at large to some extent].

Araminta1004 · 14/09/2026 13:03

Hubs do have their purpose including for children with parents who cannot or will not fight the system like some of you seem able to, surely that much can be admitted!

Phineyj · 14/09/2026 12:45

It doesn't much matter either if some best practice version of something exists somewhere, if it's not accessible to your child!

Phineyj · 14/09/2026 12:44

ThereIsNo · 14/09/2026 09:12

I don't think the hubs are going to be staffed by a qualified teacher, are they

I was correcting the sweeping statement made, which gives a negative connotation that is not necessarily true.

The factual information I gave earlier was ignored in the same statement too.

I think I can definitely state that no students in a mainstream school hub will be receiving teaching from an Economics teacher (my subject) because there aren't enough teachers to teach classes as it is.

Now you could argue that doesn't matter, but the fact is most students wouldn't get a "broad and balanced curriculum" in a hub, which does matter if it continues for any significant time.

Ikeepforgettingmykeys · 14/09/2026 12:39

'This school is not supporting his needs and you would be within your rights as a parent to contact the governors and put in a formal complaint.'

Not sure this works for all schools e.g. academies.

Binnyforthewin · 14/09/2026 11:34

ThereIsNo · 14/09/2026 10:00

Great, thanks for agreeing with the inaccuracy and qualifying that some hubs are/will be staffed by qualified teachers.

The statement would have been more accurate if it had been
I don't think the (all) hubs are going to be staffed by a qualified teacher, are they
Or more positive some/many hubs will be staffed by qualified teachers.
IME the lead and teacher for the hub is a member of the Senior Leadership Team and the SENCO.

You write just like Chatgpt does!

PensionPTake · 14/09/2026 11:14

roaringdragon · 14/09/2026 09:05

@Phineyj I think the pp is meaning enforcement of an EHCP (not always possible since too many are poorly written) where LAs are in breach of the s42 duty. That can be done via JR if necessary. No, it isn’t instant, but it is a route that works. A lot of the time, a pre-action letter works so people don’t need to move on to JR proceedings. Although, sadly, not as often as it used to because LAs know finding someone with a legal aid contract to take things further isn’t as easy as it once was because demand is high.

@ThereIsNo that may be the case in your LA, but sadly it isn’t the case in many. Even where they are staffed by teachers with QTS, at secondary level, it is very unusual for the hubs to have subjects specialists.

Mine attended a unit. They had one teacher (English) and no proper specialist subject teaching, so their GCSE grades were all over the shop. When my next child went through they couldn't even do GCSEs in the hub. They'd have been better off in a specialist provision where they could access GCSEs (not that were any of those!). They're now post 16 and still don't have any GCSEs because there's no settings to take them and our la have no way for children not on roll at all school to sit exams.

Greypanda86 · 14/09/2026 11:12

How come both kids are at the same school when one is 12 and one is 9? Is he happy to go home when you arrive? I wonder if this in itself is making the incidents more frequent as he knows he can go home. I don’t really know about the legalities around him being sent home but I’m sure it’s not doing him any favours. What does he say about why he behaves in this way? I understand he has additional needs but do you tell him it’s unacceptable and are there any consequences or does he have a great time with you when he gets home

JoB1kenobi · 14/09/2026 10:51

Jacobator · 11/09/2026 15:38

I have looked at some of them but honestly its all a bit confusing and there isnt loads near us. DH keeps saying we should just apply and see what happens but i dont think he realises how long everything takes and that there arent just places sitting there waiting.

Someone said about private education, yes we have thought about it. Thats partly what the £2k is about really although not all of it is education. Some is therapy and assessments and things weve been told to get privately. I dont have another £2k spare on top of that though. We have a mortgage and normal bills and everything else, its not like we are choosing between a holiday and paying for DS.

I also dont think private school automatically means they can meet his needs. We would need somewhere that actually understands him and can deal with him when hes overwhelmed, not just somewhere with smaller classes.

I do understand that the chair and table being thrown is frightening for other people. Im not saying it isnt. I just dont think DS is sitting there deciding to make everyone scared. He gets completely overwhelmed and then loses control. Thats why i want them to look at what is happening before it gets to that point.

And yes DH does help with things, but if im being honest i do most of the phone calls and emails because im the one who is usually available when school ring. He has looked at some specialist schools but i dont think we have got as far as qualifications and travel and all that yet. At the moment its more a case of trying to work out what options there actually are.

DS does know something has changed. He keeps saying the new teacher doesnt like him and that she tells him off more than his old teacher did. He also says the classroom is louder and there is more work he doesnt understand. I asked him why he thinks hes getting upset and he basically said because he cant make it stop when everyone is talking and he gets angry.

I dont know how much of that is him explaining it properly though because obviously hes 9 and when he is upset everything becomes “because she hates me” or “everyone is being horrible”.

Im not against specialist school, i just dont want to jump straight to it without knowing what has actually changed since July. If another mainstream school could give him the right support then that might be better, but i dont know how you even work that out when hes currently struggling so much.

The wait is only going to get longer the longer you put it off. Imagine at high school if this is what he’s like in primary. Get the ball rolling and stop making excuses.

roaringdragon · 14/09/2026 10:15

Many hubs/units/provisions/whatever you want to call them aren’t and won’t be though. Even when they are, many don’t have subject specialists. In even more, while there is an overall teacher in charge of the hub a fair amount of the day to day teaching is not delivered by them or other teachers. Some are properly staffed by teachers, although, personally, I wouldn’t say it was many.

ThereIsNo · 14/09/2026 10:00

roaringdragon · 14/09/2026 09:16

And I was merely pointing out many aren’t, even if they are in your LA.

Great, thanks for agreeing with the inaccuracy and qualifying that some hubs are/will be staffed by qualified teachers.

The statement would have been more accurate if it had been
I don't think the (all) hubs are going to be staffed by a qualified teacher, are they
Or more positive some/many hubs will be staffed by qualified teachers.
IME the lead and teacher for the hub is a member of the Senior Leadership Team and the SENCO.

roaringdragon · 14/09/2026 09:16

ThereIsNo · 14/09/2026 09:12

I don't think the hubs are going to be staffed by a qualified teacher, are they

I was correcting the sweeping statement made, which gives a negative connotation that is not necessarily true.

The factual information I gave earlier was ignored in the same statement too.

And I was merely pointing out many aren’t, even if they are in your LA.

ThereIsNo · 14/09/2026 09:12

roaringdragon · 14/09/2026 09:05

@Phineyj I think the pp is meaning enforcement of an EHCP (not always possible since too many are poorly written) where LAs are in breach of the s42 duty. That can be done via JR if necessary. No, it isn’t instant, but it is a route that works. A lot of the time, a pre-action letter works so people don’t need to move on to JR proceedings. Although, sadly, not as often as it used to because LAs know finding someone with a legal aid contract to take things further isn’t as easy as it once was because demand is high.

@ThereIsNo that may be the case in your LA, but sadly it isn’t the case in many. Even where they are staffed by teachers with QTS, at secondary level, it is very unusual for the hubs to have subjects specialists.

I don't think the hubs are going to be staffed by a qualified teacher, are they

I was correcting the sweeping statement made, which gives a negative connotation that is not necessarily true.

The factual information I gave earlier was ignored in the same statement too.

roaringdragon · 14/09/2026 09:05

@Phineyj I think the pp is meaning enforcement of an EHCP (not always possible since too many are poorly written) where LAs are in breach of the s42 duty. That can be done via JR if necessary. No, it isn’t instant, but it is a route that works. A lot of the time, a pre-action letter works so people don’t need to move on to JR proceedings. Although, sadly, not as often as it used to because LAs know finding someone with a legal aid contract to take things further isn’t as easy as it once was because demand is high.

@ThereIsNo that may be the case in your LA, but sadly it isn’t the case in many. Even where they are staffed by teachers with QTS, at secondary level, it is very unusual for the hubs to have subjects specialists.

ThereIsNo · 14/09/2026 08:47

Phineyj · 13/09/2026 19:53

I don't think the hubs are going to be staffed by a qualified teacher, are they? So it's likely to only be a posher version of a TA taking the child out to work with them.

Certainly at secondary, I cannot see how there could be subject teaching in the hubs, apart from maybe a bit of Maths and English.

Yes, in my LA, they are all staffed by qualified teachers. I have already added information, in this thread, as well as other positives of the hubs.

Phineyj · 14/09/2026 07:09

Cardisncocktails · 13/09/2026 22:32

If it's a legal obligation & the school aren't able to deliver it... where next?? Simply saying the school is responsible legally as some posters on this thread are doing is not a magic wand. Many posters on this thread say 'it's a legal responsibility' as if that's a magic spell which will somehow put the OPs child at the front of the resources queue.
Therefore, if a school can't deliver the EHCP, and OP (and others) are saying they MUST deliver it immediately... what happens next???🤷🏼‍♀️ The only way to FORCE it to happen is legal process. (Which takes time. Kicking the can down the road...)
Realism seems to go out of the window when some people claim that their legal 'rights' are to be met with immediate effect. People in England don't want to pay more income tax/Council tax. SOMETHING has to give.....🤷🏼‍♀️

The process (which has been explained several times already) is:

The school SENCO asks the LA to hold an emergency review of the EHCP (yes all schools have a SENCO).
The LA decides whether to amend the EHCP (provision or placement).

It would help everyone if the school were doing things legally by excluding not just sending home.

No lawyers are likely to be involved, although LAs do sometimes retain lawyers (at taxpayers' expense) to prevent children getting EHCPs in the first place.

Kirbert2 · 14/09/2026 07:07

Cardisncocktails · 13/09/2026 22:32

If it's a legal obligation & the school aren't able to deliver it... where next?? Simply saying the school is responsible legally as some posters on this thread are doing is not a magic wand. Many posters on this thread say 'it's a legal responsibility' as if that's a magic spell which will somehow put the OPs child at the front of the resources queue.
Therefore, if a school can't deliver the EHCP, and OP (and others) are saying they MUST deliver it immediately... what happens next???🤷🏼‍♀️ The only way to FORCE it to happen is legal process. (Which takes time. Kicking the can down the road...)
Realism seems to go out of the window when some people claim that their legal 'rights' are to be met with immediate effect. People in England don't want to pay more income tax/Council tax. SOMETHING has to give.....🤷🏼‍♀️

I'd expect the school to tell me if they can't deliver the EHCP, I'd then call an emergency EHCP review to see if anything can be done about it and if not, tell both me and the LA that his needs can't be met at school and begin to collect evidence to show the LA needs can't be met.

If he needs to be collected, I'd expect the school to do the correct paperwork and not act unlawfully.