AIBU to think Bonnie Blue should be arrested?

Incredibly realistic bumps exist now, including ones with navel piercings as she posted. I’m pretty certain it’s all some elaborate fucked up hoax and there’s no baby at all. No idea why St Mary’s wouldn’t say anything about it though, they really ought to.

I did wonder about the pregnancy actually to, I have no idea if she really had a baby or not but as someone that does what she does I would be very surprised if she wasnt shit hot with contraception

This may be an offence under s127 of the Communications Act 2003
”(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or
(b)causes any such message or matter to be so sent.”

I think it is the legislation around online communications that is likely to be the only route.

Outraging public decency will not apply because that relates to a physical public place not online.

It looks like a doll but if she does actually have a real baby she is still indirectly involving her child in porn promotion by making the porn consumers think it is an image of that child.
The only way she isn't guilty of harm to a child is if she completely lied about having a baby in the first place. Even then she has moved into an extreme dark area of porn where she is trying to encourage men who are interested in children. That in itself deserves punishment

I believe it's a doll. That said, if a man was posting suggestive/sexual content with a doll, I would hope he would at least be investigated. I genuinely hope the whole pregnancy was a fake. The photo of her "new born" also looks like a doll. I have yet to see a convincing pic of said baby.

There is something very seriously wrong with that woman and absolutely I would have major concerns over her being responsible for a child. Plenty of sick men will believe (or want to believe) that it is her baby in these photos and they will be indulging their sick fantasies about that. It turns my stomach.

She needs to be locked up for the good of society and everyone.

I think Bonnie will have a legal team around her advising her on what she can and cannot get away with legally.
I can't think what offence this would be covered by under The Sexual Offences Act.
Also if it is a doll, as I suspect then there isn't a victim. The CPS are hardly likely to take on a victimless case where no indictable offence has been committed.
Having said the above, I think she is sick and needs help.

The photograph must be of an actual child.

Just to add to my last post, some may consider that the law is a bit odd in this area. When dealing with an indecent pseudo photograph, the image only has to give the impression that it shows a child, and it can do so even if the child in the image has some adult characteristics. However, when dealing with an actual photograph, it is only an offence if it shows an actual child.

She is a content creator. AI is used. It is just to create internet "clicks" (also known as revenue). She has just managed to get some time on Mumsnet- next she will be quoted on X or Fb with the responses here added.

She’s done literal porn videos that annyone can find online, fully naked presumably. And she’s shown her bump on YouTube in a bikini. There’s something seriously wrong with you if you’re still in denial at this point.

I don’t know about the imagery legislation people are mentioning, but child protection don’t involve themselves if there isn't an actual child. If it's ragebait, and I'm inclined to agree, there would be nothing for them to do.

Male poster for clarity.

She is doing very well financially (for some mad reason), why in the hell anyone has any interest at all in her or anything she "creates" blows my mind.

But unfortunately a large group of men do enjoy it.

Anyway, short version being that she very likely has a legal team employed who know exactly what she can and cant get away with posting to stay just the right side of the law.

As disgusting as the post sounds (I have not seen it and have zero interest in looking) I suspect she has made sure it is legal and there is nothing that can be done to stop her.

I can’t see how the baby can be real, if it was surely she would have had some time off. She’s rich she could have had a lovely maternity leave so on that point I feel like perhaps it’s not true.

If she’s did have a baby then I just wonder why if she’s more interested in her content. Seems a bit of a pointless life decision.

I think she plays a character and a lot of her stuff is staged. But it should not be allowed to be out there at all, it’s just sick and disgusting. __

When you consider all the things she has done - (not an exhaustive list , I'm sure theres more)
the students "come and shag BB and consent to be filmed"
the "Barely Legal" young virgin boys have their first sexual experience with a porn star who doesn't say no
to "Barely Breathing" she's not phase by the upper age level
"Father and Son"
"Bonnie Blue Petting Zoo"
The 1000 Men in 12 hours
The 100 Male Porn Stars
The Golden Shower and "Food Mixed with Semen"
The Semen Bath
The Breeding Event - 400 blokes one would get her pregnant , they took details and DNA . Obviously its the bloke who equajulates plastic jizz
The filming in a set like a classroom with porn actors who all dressed as school pupils . They looked younger than they were .
And don't forget ladies if you a menstruating , you don't need to turn your fella down , you have two other orifices

So now , she wants to have the opputunity to let men have sex with a post partum woman while declaring her delight that "everything is fine down there"

Baby Blue was meant to be due end Oct. So her delivery date is 32 weeks . That is not a 32 week baby . Look how it holds itself , arms and legs stiff and flexed . Any new baby especially premature will curl itself up .
It would be small.

That is not a baby , that is a vile publicity stunt that she can push the next frontier on.
She has done many vile things . But she has a limited time to be current .
She needs to find the next shock value

She'll be crowing jubilant about her great trick then might go offand have a real baby once she's bored or her fans are bored of her .

I think if she was a man she would have 100% been arrested by now.

She has sexualised her pregnancy and now bringing the baby into her sexual videos.

I think its a massive safeguarding red flag.

Not sure if its an actual crime or not.

Child abuse.

The private wing at st Mary’s is a business surely they wouldn’t not want their name dragged into all this ?

Then by process of elimination it would be confirmed . If they cannot comment she was/is a patient. If she’s not they can say so and they aren’t breaking any confidentiality.

In the longer term, she must be damaging herself, both physically or mentally.

They probably can't either way because of patient confidentiality or something,

I think you are unreasonable to give her this publicity

Several people wanting her arrested but unclear as to what law she has broken.

There is no specific offence of using a child to promote sexual content.

The image is not pornographic under the current definition. It may be indecent, but I'm not convinced it passes the test. If she is actually holding a doll as some have suggested, it is definitely not an indecent image of a child.

I'm sure she thinks she's clever using a doll but I wonder if that might be considered making a pseudo-image of a child?

No. The offence of making an indecent image covers pseudo photographs, i.e. an image made by CGI or similar that appears to be a photograph. However, as the law stands, a genuine photograph using a doll cannot be an indecent image of a child, no matter how realistic the doll. The photograph must be of an actual child.

Any man responding to her post should also be reported for viewing some sort of indecency law.

Viewing and responding to her post is not an offence.

If that is really a baby in the photo, it raises safeguarding concerns. But for anyone to be arrested, there has to be an actual crime. I think what she's done is disgusting, but I'm not convinced it is a crime as the law stands. Maybe the law should change so that this is a crime, but that won't result in her being arrested as criminal laws are not retrospective.

Morally it certainly feels wrong, but legally I think it falls into loopholes. It will almost certainly be a baby doll, it is a promotion video rather than sexual content, it feels icky but I suspect reports will all come back NFA.

Love her or hate her she is very clever, she knows exactly how to make money and has a whole team behind her ensuring she stays on the right side of the law while flirting right with that line.