Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think Bonnie Blue should be arrested?

284 replies

BellesAndGraces · 11/09/2026 10:40

Bonnie Blue’s latest stunt is to post a video holding her newborn, surrounded by masked men while talking about getting back to making sexual content after having a c-section. Her baby’s onesie matches the colour of the mask worn by the men.

How this is not using a baby to promote sexual content, I do not know. It’s sickening.

I know all she wants is publicity but I sincerely hope this time she gets all the attention she deserves and her baby is taken away from her and placed with a family that can give the child the love, care and protection a child needs. The Tories have reported her to the NSPCC but why has she not been reported to the police??

OP posts:
Dappy777 · 11/09/2026 12:39

She is utterly disgusting. In the Victorian period, sex was looked upon as either shameful or sacred. In the early 20th century, there was a rebellion against that. People began to open up, to celebrate sex, to talk about orgasms and "sexual satisfaction" and so on. D. H. Lawrence is a good example. He argued that we should stop treating sex as a dirty secret and instead see it as a vital part of life. But he would have despised Bonnie Blue. So would a lot of the pioneering feminists.

What makes it so awful is that it isn't even about sex (not for her). She poses as a feminist hero who is enjoying her body, but in reality she's 100% focussed on money. The entire thing is a publicity stunt. Like Jordan (another waste of space), she has great PR who keep her in the public eye. I don't want young girls to look up to her. I want them to look up to Iris Murdoch and Sylvia Plath and Virginia Woolf.

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 12:38

Sartre · 11/09/2026 12:05

Incredibly realistic bumps exist now, including ones with navel piercings as she posted. I’m pretty certain it’s all some elaborate fucked up hoax and there’s no baby at all. No idea why St Mary’s wouldn’t say anything about it though, they really ought to.

What. She had a baby at st marys ?

SparklingTurquoiseOcean · 11/09/2026 12:37

Even if it's a doll it's wildly inappropriate and she has gone way to far

Jasmin71 · 11/09/2026 12:36

That poor baby.

She is a vile excuse for a mother.

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 12:35

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 11:45

I agree and I mentioned the men on my post every disgusing man who "likes" and "shares" her video should be looked at.

It would be good to out these men to their employers. And people could vote with their feet. Show them that vile activity has consequences. If someone was identified and worked in a certain place, dont use their services etc etc.

Jane143 · 11/09/2026 12:31

She’s doing it for publicity and to get people talking about her. It’s working! Poor child when the find out what a mum they have

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 11/09/2026 12:30

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 11:28

Why aren't her parents stepping in? It's said her mum supports what she does online though.

IIRC at one point her mum was her manager (or pimp).
That says a lot about her morals too.

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 12:29

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 12:15

Anyone can make a report about any child they feel is in danger.

Sorry i meant actually the Op because she had seen the video, not the general you.

malloryknox123 · 11/09/2026 12:27

She’s best ignored. I doubt that’s a real baby and I wonder if she’s actually had one at all.

ExtraOnions · 11/09/2026 12:26

Men (some not all I know) are such dogs. Lining up to have sex, along with hundreds of others, posing in a picture with a baby and being seemingly happy to do it, and then others paying to watch it.
I was watching a documentary the other day, and they were talking to a sex worker, drug addled, black teeth, covered in bruises, and men were paying her for sex .. repulsive.

Limehawkmoth · 11/09/2026 12:26

Remember ..all publicity is good publicity
why give this air time?

ThatCyanCat · 11/09/2026 12:25

teaandtoastwithmarmite · 11/09/2026 10:48

I think it’s rage bait. I don’t think she’s had a baby

I thought she said in an interview that she couldn't have children for some reason? I thought that possibly explained what she started doing, if she had wanted them... a trauma response. Also seems strange to me, if she could have kids, that she never got pregnant sooner. No way everyone used a condom and used it properly and even if combined with the rhythm method, that's an excessive lifestyle... pregnancy would still be likelier than not in a healthy, fertile young woman.

MrsSlocombesCat · 11/09/2026 12:23

I don't think she had a baby either.

Limehawkmoth · 11/09/2026 12:22

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 10:50

I contacted the NSPCC last week about this. The video is repugnant. And she's not just talking about sexual contact. She says explicitly that she doesn't have to heed the 'no sexual intercourse for six weeks' rule because she had a C-section ie 'here I am guys. My vagina's ready for you'. Having intercourse would put her at risk because her body is recovering from surgery. If she were injured, she may not be able to look after the baby.

To be reported to the police, she would need to have committed an offense. Has she? I don't know.

The 6 week rule is around the gaping wound left by the plancenta in uterus mostly, and fact cervix is open even slightly so can let infection through and blood loss as it heals…that still happens with c-section…even with a planned section the uterus is still highly prone to infection

the c section wound itself is a different equally silly risk, bit in truth that doesn’t heal properly in terms of muscles wall for months, so probably after a month it’s going to be sore for ages anyway if too adventurous sex! as would be her having sex if she’d had stitches from tearing given birth vaginally

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 12:20

BellesAndGraces · 11/09/2026 10:40

Bonnie Blue’s latest stunt is to post a video holding her newborn, surrounded by masked men while talking about getting back to making sexual content after having a c-section. Her baby’s onesie matches the colour of the mask worn by the men.

How this is not using a baby to promote sexual content, I do not know. It’s sickening.

I know all she wants is publicity but I sincerely hope this time she gets all the attention she deserves and her baby is taken away from her and placed with a family that can give the child the love, care and protection a child needs. The Tories have reported her to the NSPCC but why has she not been reported to the police??

It shouldnt be that difficult.to find out if she really had a child. Someone must know if she did.

DinoDoughnut81 · 11/09/2026 12:19

The baby she's holding might not be real but I believe she was definitely pregnant and gave birth a while ago. She was doing full on "pregnant porn" videos with a very visible belly. You can't fake that. Unfortunately pregnant porn is a popular genre. And not illegal. She's been spotted out and about near where she lives with a baby strapped to her as well. I think she gave birth earlier than she has let on so the timeline is off but there is a baby. She is a sicko no doubt.

ArtesianWater · 11/09/2026 12:17

teaandtoastwithmarmite · 11/09/2026 10:48

I think it’s rage bait. I don’t think she’s had a baby

You may well be right. In which case she is prompting well-meaning members of the public to contact social services and the police, thus taking up precious public resources needed by real children and adults in actual need or and / or danger.

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 12:17

Lifeomars · 11/09/2026 11:35

She is truly repellent. I'm assuming that if that is (hopefully) a doll she is still promoting sex using an image or representation of a child and that in itself is illegal. She's also promoting the dangerous idea that women who have had c sections are cleared for sex which given that they will still be bleeding, healing internally and externally, is a dangerous precedent and gives no consideration to how they are feeling emotionally. Imagine all the vile blokes seeing this and thinking that all women are up for it as soon as the placenta is delivered.

Yeah. Vile clown

Goatsarebest · 11/09/2026 12:16

She wants and needs publicity and, guess what OP, that's exactly what you've done.

user1464187087 · 11/09/2026 12:15

OonaStubbs · 11/09/2026 12:02

She needs to be locked up for the good of society and everyone.

But under what section of The Police And Criminal Evidence Act?
You can't just lock people up because you don't like them or disagree with what they do.
I also think she is vile, but have some understanding on how the police and CPS work

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 12:15

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 10:50

Can you report her personally? Ive said this elsewhere like most posters if that baby is real it is not safe ! Any man responding to her post should also be reported for viewing some sort of indecency law.

Edited

Anyone can make a report about any child they feel is in danger.

Somethinggg · 11/09/2026 12:13

ibsUniversalcredit · 11/09/2026 12:09

But if she hasn’t been treated there surely they wouldn’t just allow their name to be used as part of some kind of fake birth fraud?

I don't think there's any 'surely' there, no. She could've had other treatment there anyway. But even if she hasn't, I think it's plausible that a place with such high profile clientele might have policies that emphasise discretion and privacy.

At the very least, them not coming out and saying she didn't give birth there can't be assumed to mean she did.

ibsUniversalcredit · 11/09/2026 12:09

Somethinggg · 11/09/2026 12:07

I don't think this can be assumed.

It's possible they have a policy of never commenting anyway. Which would be sensible enough. But even assuming they'd say if she was never a patient, St Mary's is a big hospital and the private Lindo bit does more than just births. She could've gone there sometime for a non obstetric gynaecology matter, for example. Any kind of comment would be opening a potential can of worms.

But if she hasn’t been treated there surely they wouldn’t just allow their name to be used as part of some kind of fake birth fraud?

Somethinggg · 11/09/2026 12:07

ibsUniversalcredit · 11/09/2026 11:52

Then by process of elimination it would be confirmed . If they cannot comment she was/is a patient. If she’s not they can say so and they aren’t breaking any confidentiality.

I don't think this can be assumed.

It's possible they have a policy of never commenting anyway. Which would be sensible enough. But even assuming they'd say if she was never a patient, St Mary's is a big hospital and the private Lindo bit does more than just births. She could've gone there sometime for a non obstetric gynaecology matter, for example. Any kind of comment would be opening a potential can of worms.

AtIusvue · 11/09/2026 12:06

She’s using child imagery to promote her sex work. At the very least SS should be involved with her if she hasn’t committed a crime, but I’m sure there must be something she can be arrested for. Public decency laws?

Swipe left for the next trending thread