Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to wonder why many posters find it harder to make friends than find a life partner?

590 replies

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 08:04

I'm baffled at the number of people on Mumsnet who struggle with the most basic social interactions and find making friends to be traumatic, but have found a life partner to settle down and have kids with.

A significant number of posters on here struggle with friendship or social interaction to various degrees, manifested in the extreme in the declarations that they "hate people", "don't want new friends", find friends to be too much "drama" and only want to spend time with their families. There is a classic of the genre running at the moment in which an OP has taken umbrage at a coworker making fairly mild friendly overtures to her as a gross invasion of her privacy. (But admits that she met her partner at work?) Or just at the milder end of the spectrum the huge amount of anxiety which making new friends seems to generate.

I genuinely don't understand why people who have managed to find an intimate relationship in which to have children can find the prospect of exchanging words outside the school gate or sending a text to a coworker so traumatic.

I found attracting a partner and building a relationship to be a far more fraught and involved process than making friends: there's so much more to lose, so much more vulnerability needed and the prospect of loss of face and self-esteem in the process of dating is far greater than in making friends. But texting someone (platonically) to ask if they want to have a coffee seems to spiral posters into paroxysms of self-doubt. The "school mum" threads are a whole sub-genre in their own right, where the paranoia and suspicion is often seriously irrational.

Why do people find it relatively easy to find a partner but finding friends so difficult? From my perspective it should be the other way around.

OP posts:
StandingDeskDisco · 11/09/2026 10:53

DancingLions · 11/09/2026 10:30

I'm single and planning on staying that way now. But when I was looking for a partner/with a partner, the fact is it was a worthwhile investment (at the time at least). I'm nearly 60 and a lot of friends have come and gone for various reasons. But partners are the ones who are there when you go home at night. They share the load of life (or they should!). You're intimate with them. Friends can only fulfil your needs, and you theirs, to a certain extent.

I've been invested enough with a partner to overlook certain things, that maybe I shouldn't have done, but I did it to try and make it work. I don't expect my friends to be "work". Because the pay off from each is different. If a friendship becomes too much work then yes I bail, because I don't need the hassle. Also, why I've now written off romantic relationships!

I have plenty of what I would call acquaintances. To meet for a meal, drink whatever. But really no proper friends. No one that really shares my interests, or that I would go to if I needed help. I don't want friends for the sake of it, same as I don't want a partner for the sake of it. I will be friendly towards people but if they're not on my wavelength, I'm not looking for it to really go further than that. I would rather be alone doing things I enjoy, than spending time with people not having fun.

In my mind if you have got to the stage of going for a meal, they are friends.

An acquaintance is someone whose name you know and to whom you would nod in the street, and maybe say 'hi', or even chat for two minutes, but whom definitely don't know well enough to suggest meeting up with.

But if I went for a meal with someone and thought they were my friend, but found out (somehow) they only thought of me as an acquaintance, I would just die of embarrassment.

OtterlyAstounding · 11/09/2026 10:52

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 10:44

@OtterlyAstounding

This really strikes a chord with me. I think that's a big factor. Friendships are so much more ambiguous and complicated.

I don't agree with this at all.

I have found historically romantic relationships far more ambiguous than friendships. In the past I've had loads of quasi-romantic relationships (looking back I was often being used, to be blunt) with blokes who didn't really want to commit or didn't know what they wanted, but enjoyed the attention/sex or just wanted friendship that went slightly beyond.

Because the whole point of a romantic relationship is it should be defined. Whereas I don't think a friendship has to be.

I don't understand why friendship should be subject to rules about status in the same way? People seem very dogmatic about how they categorise friends: ie they're not a proper friend unless you can call them at 3am and they have to return calls within an hour etc etc.

Like most people I have concentric circles of friendship: I have three or four proper ride-or-die friends: people I could call in the middle of the night if I was having a meltdown. Then another layer people who I cherish a lot and message but maybe don't see very often but I know they have my back. Then a wider circle of colleagues and friends-of-friends who I like a lot and socialise with sometimes but I wouldn't expect them to come to my funeral. And finally an outer layer of acquaintances with whom I have a friendly relationship but wouldn't expect to see again if they moved house.

I'm very relaxed about the idea that the borders between these circles are porous and some people move in and out, and that sometimes this is ambiguous. People move away, they get married, they change jobs and have kids and sometimes this changes the frequency of contact and that's OK with me. I don't take it personally and think they like me less. And I don't understand why people feel the need to name and pigeonhole people and have to be so inflexible about the definitions.

Fair enough, you don't find it resonates with you. But I do. And plenty of posters on this thread have said they find romantic relationships easier to navigate than platonic. So perhaps that's just differences in personality?

I struggle with social subtleties, and was badly ostracised and bullied growing up, so I don't have a lot of confidence around knowing whether a friend wants to see me, or whether I'm being a bore, or too intense, or too distant. I also find that when I get stressed I turn into a hermit - not great for maintaining a friendship, but not something that affects my romantic relationship.

Anyway, perhaps you just need to accept that while some people don't mind a lack of definition and clarity, other people require that to thrive in relationships.

Also, as Vimes said up-thread - he doesn't need to edit himself with his DP, but does with everyone else, and that's something I feel too. I'm just me with DH, but with everyone else in the world I'm being a curated, limited, self-conscious version of me. Trying to navigate friendships holds little appeal, compared to that freedom and total acceptance.

OsfameronTanamoril · 11/09/2026 10:52

RosaNovella · 11/09/2026 10:50

I really do think that many of the vile cliquey school mums posters are either ND or living out their view of life under an immature emotional filter where they are always the victim of others

They simply cannot understand that people choose their own friends and have this raging entitlement and have to make a perfectly normal mum going for a walk or seeing her mates all about them

There was a bonkers thread on here where a mum ran across the playground/ school field to join her friends and the poster who had met this person once 2 years previously raged that she was vile, ignoring her etc
Batshit

Agree. The " cliques' are just friends who have bothered to put in effort.
Misogynist term.
A lot of closeted misogyny on this thread.

RosaNovella · 11/09/2026 10:50

ShitFacedShakespeare · 11/09/2026 09:01

I'm sure there's a proportion of people who have genuine social anxiety, but it's very striking on the "bitchy school gate mums" threads that people seem to expect to be provided with a full roster of new friends as one of the perks of having kids at school. And then get upset when they realise other people have kept up their friendships.

This is so true.

It often reads as a sense of sheer entitlement, that all these friendship groups are going to immediately open up to them without them putting in any effort at all.

And if they don't, they're 'bitchy queen bee cliquey types'.

I really do think that many of the vile cliquey school mums posters are either ND or living out their view of life under an immature emotional filter where they are always the victim of others

They simply cannot understand that people choose their own friends and have this raging entitlement and have to make a perfectly normal mum going for a walk or seeing her mates all about them

There was a bonkers thread on here where a mum ran across the playground/ school field to join her friends and the poster who had met this person once 2 years previously raged that she was vile, ignoring her etc
Batshit

BeigeCardiganOfDoom · 11/09/2026 10:50

Strawberrryfields · 11/09/2026 10:32

Maybe he just wants a chat, a hug or a rest sometimes?! 😂 Surely there’s other ways to show your husband that you care. If sex became difficult for some reason would everything just crumble?

This reminded me of those breastfeeding memes - baby is tired? Boob. Baby is overstimulated? Boob. Baby is fussy? Boob.

I suppose it is similar to the boob memes.Blush

There have been times where we’ve not been able to be physically intimate, it’s not been a problem as it’s sex isn’t always about the physical.

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 10:48

JJkate · 11/09/2026 10:01

Maybe it's partly what you had modelled by your parents/family too? Mine both always had friends and interests the whole way through my childhood that wasn't about the kids so it feels natural for me to do that too and seek others who are similar. Those I know who are more insular tend to have parents that were the same.

I think this is a factor too. My parents were also very sociable and for all their other faults I am grateful that they instilled in me the importance of having a network external to the family.

OP posts:
OsfameronTanamoril · 11/09/2026 10:46

As always @Thepeopleversuswork speaks for me!

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 10:44

@OtterlyAstounding

This really strikes a chord with me. I think that's a big factor. Friendships are so much more ambiguous and complicated.

I don't agree with this at all.

I have found historically romantic relationships far more ambiguous than friendships. In the past I've had loads of quasi-romantic relationships (looking back I was often being used, to be blunt) with blokes who didn't really want to commit or didn't know what they wanted, but enjoyed the attention/sex or just wanted friendship that went slightly beyond.

Because the whole point of a romantic relationship is it should be defined. Whereas I don't think a friendship has to be.

I don't understand why friendship should be subject to rules about status in the same way? People seem very dogmatic about how they categorise friends: ie they're not a proper friend unless you can call them at 3am and they have to return calls within an hour etc etc.

Like most people I have concentric circles of friendship: I have three or four proper ride-or-die friends: people I could call in the middle of the night if I was having a meltdown. Then another layer people who I cherish a lot and message but maybe don't see very often but I know they have my back. Then a wider circle of colleagues and friends-of-friends who I like a lot and socialise with sometimes but I wouldn't expect them to come to my funeral. And finally an outer layer of acquaintances with whom I have a friendly relationship but wouldn't expect to see again if they moved house.

I'm very relaxed about the idea that the borders between these circles are porous and some people move in and out, and that sometimes this is ambiguous. People move away, they get married, they change jobs and have kids and sometimes this changes the frequency of contact and that's OK with me. I don't take it personally and think they like me less. And I don't understand why people feel the need to name and pigeonhole people and have to be so inflexible about the definitions.

OP posts:
OtterlyAstounding · 11/09/2026 10:43

OsfameronTanamoril · 11/09/2026 10:22

Also, those who have no friends except their husbands and DC and never want any, what happens when your children leave or your husband leaves/ dies/ you leave? Eggs in one basket seems unwise

That seems like a rather cold reason to have friends - as insurance in case your entire family dies or leaves you. But I imagine I'd be quite happy alone. Or perhaps I'd join a knitting group and try to make some friends.

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 11/09/2026 10:43

I have friends. I force myself to, but I do find it hard work.

DP is the one person who gets the real version of me. Everyone else gets an edited version. And I find being that edited version hard work.

I'm not an interesting man. A lot of my interests bore other people to tears. My sense of humour can be quite odd. I'm crap at small talk and general chit chat, so I'm quite quiet and need drawing out of my shell.

Most people, if they get the full unvarnished me, end up drifting away. They get a bored look in their eyes, start to glaze over. Even my best friends get a slight edit, and they're nearly as weird as me. DD gets one as well.

DP, and one previous girlfriend are the only ones who don't. The more of me I revealed, the more DP got drawn in, and the easier it became to be in her company.

Being in a room with people is effort. That effort varies based on the person, how much I have to edit myself in their company.

Being in a room with DP is always effortless.

As I said, I have friends, I get on with my colleagues. People like me. That's because I'm willing to put in the effort, I think the end result is worth it.

I'd imagine there are people out there who either aren't capable of maintaining that edited version of them, or just don't see the point of it. So they have no friends. They've still managed to find that person who's effortless though.

3luckystars · 11/09/2026 10:41

Boobs still fix everything.

JJkate · 11/09/2026 10:41

3luckystars · 11/09/2026 10:33

Totally agree.

I think also some women when they get married, really think that they are sorted, and put the feet up a bit with making an effort or wearing a mask as it’s a signed contract, there is a definite smugness, and it’s not really that great of an achievement anymore.

Then they end up doing lots of drudgery jobs, so are happy with a boring and sexless marriage, with little time for friends, and then are genuinely shocked when their husbands have an affair.

Edited

Yes. There's so many who have nothing outside the marriage in terms of social support etc and are blindsided when it turns out not to be what they thought.

OtterlyAstounding · 11/09/2026 10:40

Strawberrryfields · 11/09/2026 10:32

Maybe he just wants a chat, a hug or a rest sometimes?! 😂 Surely there’s other ways to show your husband that you care. If sex became difficult for some reason would everything just crumble?

This reminded me of those breastfeeding memes - baby is tired? Boob. Baby is overstimulated? Boob. Baby is fussy? Boob.

But it's true. Boob did fix everything 🤣 I miss those days! It was so much easier 🙈

Whyohwhy99 · 11/09/2026 10:39

I don't think there's an answer. People have different things go on in their life's. Things change People can be complicated. Life isn't always logic.

I have had relationships but I find them extremely hard i pressured myself into relationships because that's whats expected especially if you want children. I have never had a long term stable relationship.

I don't have any friends the thought of it scares me.

MyrtlethePurpleTurtle · 11/09/2026 10:39

ShannonMacFarland · 11/09/2026 09:26

Male centred-ness. Some women are very, very forgiving of their male partners' transgressions while holding other women - (potential) friends - up to much higher expectations socially.

Interesting comment! I guess there's also an element of being invested in a romantic relationship - possessions, children, finances - making it more challenging to disentangle than a friendship without these complicating factors. Meaning standards drop with existing partners and you tolegate behaviour in a way you wouldn't with friends

OtterlyAstounding · 11/09/2026 10:39

BeigeCardiganOfDoom · 11/09/2026 10:32

Why?

Sex is a panacea for husbands, in my limited experience, and a very fun one at that! I've no idea why that poster would find it alarming, and I'm also curious.

3luckystars · 11/09/2026 10:33

Tobacco · 11/09/2026 09:13

You can get a man by being pretty, even if your personality isn't great. Not so with friends.

Totally agree.

I think also some women when they get married, really think that they are sorted, and put the feet up a bit with making an effort or wearing a mask as it’s a signed contract, there is a definite smugness, and it’s not really that great of an achievement anymore.

Then they end up doing lots of drudgery jobs, so are happy with a boring and sexless marriage, with little time for friends, and then are genuinely shocked when their husbands have an affair.

Strawberrryfields · 11/09/2026 10:32

BeigeCardiganOfDoom · 11/09/2026 10:18

Sex is what makes having a DH easier than having a friendship for me.
If DH is sad, stressed, bored etc I can respond and show my love, comfort etc via having sex.

With friendships I have no clue what to say if someone is sad or going through a hard time. I have a few stock phrases I have learnt but beyond those I’m useless at comforting, I don’t hug people.

Maybe he just wants a chat, a hug or a rest sometimes?! 😂 Surely there’s other ways to show your husband that you care. If sex became difficult for some reason would everything just crumble?

This reminded me of those breastfeeding memes - baby is tired? Boob. Baby is overstimulated? Boob. Baby is fussy? Boob.

BeigeCardiganOfDoom · 11/09/2026 10:32

OsfameronTanamoril · 11/09/2026 10:20

I find this a bit alarming.

Why?

DancingLions · 11/09/2026 10:30

I'm single and planning on staying that way now. But when I was looking for a partner/with a partner, the fact is it was a worthwhile investment (at the time at least). I'm nearly 60 and a lot of friends have come and gone for various reasons. But partners are the ones who are there when you go home at night. They share the load of life (or they should!). You're intimate with them. Friends can only fulfil your needs, and you theirs, to a certain extent.

I've been invested enough with a partner to overlook certain things, that maybe I shouldn't have done, but I did it to try and make it work. I don't expect my friends to be "work". Because the pay off from each is different. If a friendship becomes too much work then yes I bail, because I don't need the hassle. Also, why I've now written off romantic relationships!

I have plenty of what I would call acquaintances. To meet for a meal, drink whatever. But really no proper friends. No one that really shares my interests, or that I would go to if I needed help. I don't want friends for the sake of it, same as I don't want a partner for the sake of it. I will be friendly towards people but if they're not on my wavelength, I'm not looking for it to really go further than that. I would rather be alone doing things I enjoy, than spending time with people not having fun.

HairyToity · 11/09/2026 10:30

I struggle to make friends, I'm socially awkward and scared of rejection. I met my DH whilst still at school, and he's been in my life since I was 17. I have a few friends but whilst for them I'm one of many friends, to me they are the my only friends. I've tried to make new friends over the years but never achieved any new ones since University. It's okay I work four days a week, have two children, a DH and an adorable dog, and my days are filled. I've made peace with not having many friends.

MyrtlethePurpleTurtle · 11/09/2026 10:29

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 08:26

Absolutely.

I agree that it's changing... there's been more positive representations of female friendship in our culture in recent decades. But a lot of girls are still raised to see this as secondary to finding a partner and it tends to take a back seat once they are married and have children.

I had also wondered if there might be an element of online forums attracting more people who are socially maladjusted (sorry, not quite the right way of phrasing) or introvert tend to or online more due to lack of real life interactions (and so over represented on forums). This isn't a comment specifically on Mumsnet but online life generally

Mindboggl · 11/09/2026 10:29

Olive123456 · 11/09/2026 10:20

That must be why you see so many middle aged men sat in the bars/pubs by themselves.

To be fair, DH has plenty of friends but does sometimes sit in a bar or pub alone. He even goes to the odd gig alone too (quite niche taste in music).

OtterlyAstounding · 11/09/2026 10:28

AllJoyAndNoFun · 11/09/2026 09:09

I have actually thought about this quite a lot, so ND/ social anxiety etc aside...

I think they are really different things even though on the surface they are similar. The "rules" around developing a romantic relationship are somewhat clearer - there's an accepted progression and to an extent we are driven by a subconscious desire to procreate. Friendships are much more fluid/varied in their intensity and hard to define. A romantic partnership is also typically a 1-1 interaction/ exclusive/ primary relationship where you don't have to navigate the dynamics of a wider group/ that person's other relationships and priorities.

I think some of it can also be circumstance - some people end up in places where they find it difficult to find their tribe or find that friendship groups are already very established/ long standing. Some people are just not really open to new friendships, especially at life stages where they are overwhelmed with young kids and work so if you move geographically at that life stage and have to start again, that's tough. Part of the answer to "how can they find a partner but not make friends? " is likely to be timing - they probably met their partner some time ago when they also had friends, but now life has moved on to a stage where it's harder to meet new people and make friends.

Overall though, women are still better than making and maintaining friendships than men - more men have no friends than women and particularly in middle to later age. I think also how men define friends is looser so the gap is likely wider than published.

The "rules" around developing a romantic relationship are somewhat clearer - there's an accepted progression and to an extent we are driven by a subconscious desire to procreate. Friendships are much more fluid/varied in their intensity and hard to define. A romantic partnership is also typically a 1-1 interaction/ exclusive/ primary relationship where you don't have to navigate the dynamics of a wider group/ that person's other relationships and priorities.

This really strikes a chord with me. I think that's a big factor. Friendships are so much more ambiguous and complicated.

NewGoldFox · 11/09/2026 10:28

It’s almost like people aren’t all the same 🤔

Swipe left for the next trending thread