Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to wonder why many posters find it harder to make friends than find a life partner?

590 replies

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 08:04

I'm baffled at the number of people on Mumsnet who struggle with the most basic social interactions and find making friends to be traumatic, but have found a life partner to settle down and have kids with.

A significant number of posters on here struggle with friendship or social interaction to various degrees, manifested in the extreme in the declarations that they "hate people", "don't want new friends", find friends to be too much "drama" and only want to spend time with their families. There is a classic of the genre running at the moment in which an OP has taken umbrage at a coworker making fairly mild friendly overtures to her as a gross invasion of her privacy. (But admits that she met her partner at work?) Or just at the milder end of the spectrum the huge amount of anxiety which making new friends seems to generate.

I genuinely don't understand why people who have managed to find an intimate relationship in which to have children can find the prospect of exchanging words outside the school gate or sending a text to a coworker so traumatic.

I found attracting a partner and building a relationship to be a far more fraught and involved process than making friends: there's so much more to lose, so much more vulnerability needed and the prospect of loss of face and self-esteem in the process of dating is far greater than in making friends. But texting someone (platonically) to ask if they want to have a coffee seems to spiral posters into paroxysms of self-doubt. The "school mum" threads are a whole sub-genre in their own right, where the paranoia and suspicion is often seriously irrational.

Why do people find it relatively easy to find a partner but finding friends so difficult? From my perspective it should be the other way around.

OP posts:
Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 14:01

Anarchy99 · 11/09/2026 13:47

A ‘romantic’ relationship can be based purely on sex. You can be with someone for years where the only connection is that you like to fuck each other. It can still be a good relationship without friendship

I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on this. That intense period of sexual attraction rarely lasts more than 18 months to 2 years, tops. It can be a lot of fun while it lasts but once that wears off, if you don't have friendship (or some other kind of bond such as shared children) you don't have much left.

OP posts:
Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 13:59

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 11/09/2026 13:41

It's stuff like this

I just completely disagree with this, sorry. You can't have a good romantic relationship without an underpinning friendship.

Thats such an absolute statement, like you're treating it as a fact, when it's not. You couldn't have a romantic relationship that didn't include friendship. To be honest neither could I. But people can and do. People on this thread have told you that they do.

My Grandparents had a wonderful relationship. They were together 60 years, they loved the bones off each other. They were so affectionate with each other, raised 5 kids successfully, had what I presume was a healthy sex life given the fact my Aunt accidentally walked in on them at it on the sofa when they were in their 70's.

But I never once saw them have a conversation with each other that wasn't logistical. They were both good conversationalists, could happily chat to others for hours, but they just had absolutely no interests in common with each other. No friendship would have survived that, to be friends with someone you need to have something to talk to them about. Apparently, thats not actually required in a romantic relationship. They didn't do chatting, they danced. They met while dancing, and so thats what they kept doing.

Sorry if I've come across as strident but if I strongly disagree with something I will say so. I don't think I've been rude, just definitive: I'm not going to pretend to agree with a position if I strongly disagree with it.

I'm not trying to make judgements about what people's romantic relationships should be like, that's obviously a very personal thing.

I'm trying to make the point that the fear, anxiety and vulnerability of putting yourself forward for a relationship, whether that be a romantic relationship or a friendship, are (in my view) pretty well matched.

A PP asked this question but if you're at the point of meeting someone new, whether that be a potential romantic partner or a potential friend, maybe you're in the pub, maybe a cafe, whatever, you're going to get the nerves of meeting someone new and the fear of rejection and vulnerability.

A lot of people have said romantic relationships follow a "script" but even if they do (and I don't think they do) there's still an element of chance, risk, fear to putting yourself out there like that. Plus the additional element of sexual attraction (or lack of it), which no one can control.

I feel like I've said this until I'm blue in the face and maybe I'm not going to convince anyone but I don't understand why this should be less daunting than having a very open ended coffee with another woman with no fixed outcome.

OP posts:
RosaNovella · 11/09/2026 13:57

Anarchy99 · 11/09/2026 12:07

Respectfully, this is a generalisation :

the cost to you of opting out of social interactions altogether is going to be much much higher in the long-term than the occasional cost of keeping them ticking along.

It may be for you and it may be for some people but don’t speak for others. Opting out of social interactions can be a positive thing for someone.

Agree
Also some social interactions can be negative, so avoiding them is self preservation
@Thepeopleversuswork
You are making an awful lot of assumptions on this thread
Online groups are a lifesaver for some people

Anarchy99 · 11/09/2026 13:47

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 11/09/2026 13:41

It's stuff like this

I just completely disagree with this, sorry. You can't have a good romantic relationship without an underpinning friendship.

Thats such an absolute statement, like you're treating it as a fact, when it's not. You couldn't have a romantic relationship that didn't include friendship. To be honest neither could I. But people can and do. People on this thread have told you that they do.

My Grandparents had a wonderful relationship. They were together 60 years, they loved the bones off each other. They were so affectionate with each other, raised 5 kids successfully, had what I presume was a healthy sex life given the fact my Aunt accidentally walked in on them at it on the sofa when they were in their 70's.

But I never once saw them have a conversation with each other that wasn't logistical. They were both good conversationalists, could happily chat to others for hours, but they just had absolutely no interests in common with each other. No friendship would have survived that, to be friends with someone you need to have something to talk to them about. Apparently, thats not actually required in a romantic relationship. They didn't do chatting, they danced. They met while dancing, and so thats what they kept doing.

A ‘romantic’ relationship can be based purely on sex. You can be with someone for years where the only connection is that you like to fuck each other. It can still be a good relationship without friendship

Lentilcakes · 11/09/2026 13:47

I was 22 when I met DH and have always kept up with my friends. I made my closest friends in my teens and we’ve stuck around. I’m always open to new friendships as like spending time with people I get on with.

i had two DC and the school mums were a great source of social life although im not in touch with many now from primary days (11 years hence), but at the time it was good to have the network and I went to some great 40ths!!!

Agree meeting a partner was much harder - you need to really put yourself out there, someone has to fancy you and vice versa, the timing need to be right.

The only time I was lonely was when I first had DD / I had friends as I said, but only two had children, my NCT class wasn’t that bonded and DD wasn’t a chilled baby so I had to go out to save my sanity. There wasn’t Whstsapp groups so harder to arrange too. Unf the two mums I really clicked with moved

queenofsky · 11/09/2026 13:45

BlueSherbet · 11/09/2026 08:34

Its an interesting question and I would agree with OP that you would think it would be easier to make friends.

From my (male) perspective, I think women treat one another horribly and I think this is perhaps something to do with why friends can actually be tricky.

My jaw frequently drops reading about how women treat each other one here.

There was a hen night thread recently where the accommodation fell through and people were out of pocket. Instead of coming to some adult resolution together, about reimbursing people or whatever, the last I heard was that the bride and MOH had secretly bought the silence of one guest with a partial refund, but the other guests were to get nothing and were to be kept in the dark over this secret payment.

Apparently the bride didn't want any ill feeling before the wedding and seemingly the best way she thought this could be ensured was by screwing over her friends who had given time and money to come to her hen night.

Just absolutely jaw dropping stuff. I can well imagine men being angry over losing money in an accommodation mix up, but they would "have it out" and then forget it by the time the first round of drinks arrived.

Men can sometimes 'lose touch' with friends, but very rarely fall out. If they don't like each other, they simply don't take anything to do with one another. In contrast, women seem to delight in being 'faux friends' with people they don't like, purely so they can make each others life a misery. Go figure. You often see threads where women wake up one morning to discover their friendship group is suddenly treating them like a pariah, for no apparent reason. I mean, WTF?

As to why this is? Feminism has tried to mould modern women to be extremely self centred. The idea of putting others first, or even considering them at all, just doesn't seem to figure, many women seem to just think of themselves and only themselves. In contrast, women were traditionally seen as considerate and selfless. This change is surely connected with the friends issue. (Of course you get selfish men too, but it seems this mostly affects their partners rather than their friends).

@BlueSherbet just wow. Look at all the women on Mumsnet that have useless male partners who do sweet FA to help with their kids, don't change a nappy, don't pay child maintenance, swan off to play golf / cycling, think parenting and cleaning is above them, and on top of that there are a huge amount who leech off the woman financially as well, refusing to even get a job. Your assertions are so wrong it's insane.

If ever there was a self-centred sex, however...

Anarchy99 · 11/09/2026 13:45

RosaNovella · 11/09/2026 13:42

I think you are misunderstanding the type of interaction the researchers mean
It doesnt only refer to friendships but also the nod/ wave to a neighbour, morning to the shopkeeper, a smile to the dog walker you see daily
People who are truly isolated dont have this not people who arent leaping to make friends with everyone

What worries me is the people who keep headphones on all the time

Why does it worry you? It keeps the dickheads away!

Well it doesn’t, but it’s a start. People still think it’s okay to speak to you but at least with earphones on, you don’t have to be so polite in response.

Idontpostmuch · 11/09/2026 13:43

YankSplaining · 11/09/2026 13:42

Finding a partner has a relatively clear “social script.” If you’re interested in someone, you ask them out. Dating sites have even clearer procedures for identifying and contacting potential partners. It’s considered normal to talk with someone you’re dating about the status of the relationship, and there are definable stages. You’re dating, or dating exclusively, or living together, or engaged, or married.

Friendship is so much more ambiguous. Is someone really your friend, or are they just being nice? There’s no point at which you establish that you are in fact friends with someone. Seeking out friends when you don’t have any can make you look weird and desperate; in contrast, seeking out a potential partner when you don’t have one just makes you look single.

Very well put.

YankSplaining · 11/09/2026 13:42

Finding a partner has a relatively clear “social script.” If you’re interested in someone, you ask them out. Dating sites have even clearer procedures for identifying and contacting potential partners. It’s considered normal to talk with someone you’re dating about the status of the relationship, and there are definable stages. You’re dating, or dating exclusively, or living together, or engaged, or married.

Friendship is so much more ambiguous. Is someone really your friend, or are they just being nice? There’s no point at which you establish that you are in fact friends with someone. Seeking out friends when you don’t have any can make you look weird and desperate; in contrast, seeking out a potential partner when you don’t have one just makes you look single.

Idontpostmuch · 11/09/2026 13:42

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 13:27

That’s not my intention and I apologise if that’s what is coming across.

Well, there are posters who agree with you, but they're useless to you. The only responses helpful to you come from those who have partners but not friends. You've been told that these can be completely different experiences, but you choose not to believe it. You have your answer but for some reason you don't like it. You just want to have your initial opinion verified. 'Yes Miss People. You're so right. I have a partner and therefore I can make friends. I'll just go off and do that now instead of wasting time on MN. Bye!!'

RosaNovella · 11/09/2026 13:42

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 11:56

@StandingDeskDisco

But it HAS cost me something (if I were in this hypothetical scenario). Apart from the time and money, it has cost me emotional energy. This is not to be taken lightly.
This is the fundamental difference between introverts and extroverts.
Extroverts gain 'energy' from social interactions. They come away from a social encounter feeling refreshed and vitalised.
Introverts lose 'energy' in social interactions. No matter how much they enjoy the encounter and value the person, they come away feeling tired and a bit drained and needing some time alone to recharge.
So for an introvert, every casual coffee with a potential friend has a cost. And that is before you add any social anxiety or masking or emotional investment.

Respectfully, I disagree with the introverts v extroverts framing of this. I understand that introverts find this more socially draining, I have introvert tendencies. But it's part of life. It's no more draining than it would be to listen to a boring relative to keep the peace.

Also you have to think of the big picture: the cost to you of opting out of social interactions altogether is going to be much much higher in the long-term than the occasional cost of keeping them ticking along.

I think you are misunderstanding the type of interaction the researchers mean
It doesnt only refer to friendships but also the nod/ wave to a neighbour, morning to the shopkeeper, a smile to the dog walker you see daily
People who are truly isolated dont have this not people who arent leaping to make friends with everyone

What worries me is the people who keep headphones on all the time

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 11/09/2026 13:41

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 13:27

That’s not my intention and I apologise if that’s what is coming across.

It's stuff like this

I just completely disagree with this, sorry. You can't have a good romantic relationship without an underpinning friendship.

Thats such an absolute statement, like you're treating it as a fact, when it's not. You couldn't have a romantic relationship that didn't include friendship. To be honest neither could I. But people can and do. People on this thread have told you that they do.

My Grandparents had a wonderful relationship. They were together 60 years, they loved the bones off each other. They were so affectionate with each other, raised 5 kids successfully, had what I presume was a healthy sex life given the fact my Aunt accidentally walked in on them at it on the sofa when they were in their 70's.

But I never once saw them have a conversation with each other that wasn't logistical. They were both good conversationalists, could happily chat to others for hours, but they just had absolutely no interests in common with each other. No friendship would have survived that, to be friends with someone you need to have something to talk to them about. Apparently, thats not actually required in a romantic relationship. They didn't do chatting, they danced. They met while dancing, and so thats what they kept doing.

Anarchy99 · 11/09/2026 13:39

MustUseAName · 11/09/2026 12:42

I’m one of those women who you’re targeting in this post. I use “targeting”, as it does feel like that.

I’ve always had trouble making lasting friendships. I’m friendly with people but it’s situation specific and when the situation changes, I find those friendships difficult to maintain.

My husband made the effort at the beginning and we clicked. Fortunately, it’s stuck. I don’t know why that worked and friends haven’t lasted.

I try to make friends. I do invite people for coffee. I try to speak to people at work, and at groups. I accept invitations. It very rarely develops past an awkward few minutes of chat. I don’t know what to say to people. I show interest, ask questions and get no return. I’m fairly certain that I’m must be unlikeable, beyond surface interaction. I don’t know why.

It has always seemed like everyone else has the key to this magical world of friends and I don’t. Fortunately, my husband seems to like me.

Perhaps consider being kinder to those you see on the outside of the group. Those of us who are awkwardly hanging there, trying to join in. (Although I must say that you don’t come over as being very nice or kind in this post so perhaps I wouldn’t want to be friends with you anyway.)

Perhaps it’s the paradox that trying to make friends can push people away.

As for being people being kinder to those on the outside of the group, whereas that is a nice theory, adults shouldn’t be obligated to include everyone regardless of their feelings. I personally don’t think children should be obligated either.

When I meet someone new, I click on some level or I don’t. If I click with them then things will generally develop into a friendship. If I don’t then I discount them.

Maybe it’s an ND thing.

OsfameronTanamoril · 11/09/2026 13:33

saraclara · 11/09/2026 13:20

Absolutely that. People like you, OP, clearly have some natural ability that enables you to know what to say, when. To know when your friendship overtures are welcome and when they're not. To know where you fit and and and where you are in a new friend or acquaintance's priorities. To not come across as needy, or standoffish, because you just have that knack that people like me do not.

You don't have to sit and overthink whether you should ask if someone wants a coffee, or how to do it the right way, or if that's going to be welcome or whether the other party is inwardly rolling their eyes.

I totally understand that you're asking this question for good reasons, @Thepeopleversuswork , but because it comes so naturally to you, you seem to not be able to understand (and occasionally you don't respect) our posts. Saying 'but why don't/can't you be like me?' isn't particularly empathetic.

I would love to have your skills

So yes, finding a partner means you only have to go through the sussing out what to do and say, and where you sit in their lives thing, once. Negotiating multiple potential and established friendship stuff needs your skills pretty much every day

Edited

See, I also overthink and worry about being needy. I just push on if I can.

I met a woman I quite like-after several years-at a talk. We used to move in similar circles She said " Don't be a stranger" when we left. Not sure what she means. Does she mean she fancies a coffee? Or just being polite.

What I will do is reach out to her the next time there is a talk on that subject or if I am in her neighbourhood. If she says no, that's fine. No big deal. I won't push her further.

Anarchy99 · 11/09/2026 13:32

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 12:28

Because living without people is not beneficial either to the health of the individual or to wider society.

I'm sure someone will be along shortly (possibly you) to tell me you'd prefer not to have to deal with people.

But there is a huge amount of evidence that this is bad for your health. It also doesn't work as a model for the whole of society. You may not think you care about society (as per your other post), but if everyone opts out of society, the social contract breaks down.

There has to be some give and take in the fabric of society, whether you like it or not: some social interaction is built into this. You can choose to opt out of this if you want to, that's your right. But you can't seriously tell me it's beneficial for people to be constantly seeking to minimise social interaction.

On the anxiety point: no one is saying people should force themselves to be 'always on' or to go to social events which make their blood run cold. Not everyone has to be an extrovert. But the longer you opt out of social interaction, the more anxious you will become. Minimising friction in your social environment won't cure your anxiety, it will make it worse.

And what if it isn’t anxiety. What if it is reluctance to do something because there is no benefit to it.

We all have to do things like that for eg work but isn’t social interaction supposed to be pleasant?

Anarchy99 · 11/09/2026 13:30

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 12:28

Because living without people is not beneficial either to the health of the individual or to wider society.

I'm sure someone will be along shortly (possibly you) to tell me you'd prefer not to have to deal with people.

But there is a huge amount of evidence that this is bad for your health. It also doesn't work as a model for the whole of society. You may not think you care about society (as per your other post), but if everyone opts out of society, the social contract breaks down.

There has to be some give and take in the fabric of society, whether you like it or not: some social interaction is built into this. You can choose to opt out of this if you want to, that's your right. But you can't seriously tell me it's beneficial for people to be constantly seeking to minimise social interaction.

On the anxiety point: no one is saying people should force themselves to be 'always on' or to go to social events which make their blood run cold. Not everyone has to be an extrovert. But the longer you opt out of social interaction, the more anxious you will become. Minimising friction in your social environment won't cure your anxiety, it will make it worse.

Presumably then the only way to maintain the social contract is to fall in and obey the unwritten rules of society so that others benefit?

That sounds miserable as hell.

Social interaction should be mutually beneficial. I speak to those few people I like but I don’t see what there is to gain by forcing myself through discomfort for something that will not benefit me in any way.

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 13:27

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 11/09/2026 13:26

Thats not whats happening in this thread though. People are telling you they experience these types of relationship differently, and you're basically going "Nope, thats a load of bollocks, I don't experience them differently so no-one else does either"

That may not be what you're going for, but its certainly how you're coming across.

That’s not my intention and I apologise if that’s what is coming across.

OP posts:
Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 13:26

Idontpostmuch · 11/09/2026 13:24

In that case are you an Academic? I can't fathom your level of interest.

Not an academic either. Just interested.

OP posts:
VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 11/09/2026 13:26

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 13:01

Of course I get that. But a lot of Mumsnet threads are about people interrogating the differences between different people and trying to figure out what is behind them and what makes people tick. I'm interested in this topic, partly for social reasons, partly because of my own experience.

It's a discussion board: that's literally the purpose of it. I can understand that you and I are different people without different views without having to agree with you or come around to your way of thinking.

Thats not whats happening in this thread though. People are telling you they experience these types of relationship differently, and you're basically going "Nope, thats a load of bollocks, I don't experience them differently so no-one else does either"

That may not be what you're going for, but its certainly how you're coming across.

CloudBuster66 · 11/09/2026 13:25

I was always very uncomfortable making new friends because I'd been quiet and unpopular at school but I think I finally got over that in my 50s! I've some lifelong friends but still making new ones. Also fortunate to be married. The loneliest i ever felt was on maternity leave with small babies because I wasn't used to socialising with people outside work at that time. I'm also lucky that extended family double up as friends. I hold onto all this and look to the positives because our children ended up moving 1000s of miles away. So no big family Sunday dinners or looking after the grandchildren.

Idontpostmuch · 11/09/2026 13:24

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 13:21

No not single (well not married, I am in a live in LTR).

In that case are you an Academic? I can't fathom your level of interest.

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 13:21

Idontpostmuch · 11/09/2026 13:12

I think you mean different people WITH different views?
You say you're interested partly due to your own experience? Are you by any chance single but not through choice? Do you feel you ought to have a partner because you're good at making friends?

No not single (well not married, I am in a live in LTR).

OP posts:
Anarchy99 · 11/09/2026 13:21

Mindboggl · 11/09/2026 12:39

It seems to me there’s a lot of pre-empting of rejection, and people who don’t want to try to make friends because they assume no-one will want to be friends with them. Easier to cut to the chase and not bother.

Rejection is unavoidable. Some people will reject you, for a variety of reasons. Others might surprise you.

It took me two years to make “mum” friends and even now we’re not best mates; we’re just friendly, have a chat if we cross paths, and have a group night out occasionally (that all mums are invited to). I really had to put myself out of my comfort zone to do it.

Edited

But, for people who can’t read others, that is the way to do things if the only alternative is to assume others want to be friends and risk being too ‘full on’.

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/09/2026 13:20

ArabellaScott · 11/09/2026 13:10

I've been told endlessly on here that they are two completely different beasts but at heart I think they are (or should be) the same. I'm clearly not going to win some people over though.

How are they the same?

Friendships can be many things, but they don't usually involve living together, legally binding agreements to share bringing up children, tax breaks, or a sexual relationship.

Obviously they aren’t structured in the same way. You don’t marry your friends or commit to sharing assets with them.

But the bit that seems to scare people about building a friendship: breaking the ice, moving the relationship forward, the anxiety about rejection etc, seems similar to me.

As a PP mentioned they involve the same process of getting to know one another and the nervousness that goes with that. The worry that you might not be “enough” for someone.

In both cases its a situation which involves risk and vulnerability. And when the other person has the potential to really hurt you.

OP posts:
saraclara · 11/09/2026 13:20

TheSmallAssassin · 11/09/2026 11:45

I think my relationship with my partner is so much easier to navigate, we love each other, we are committed to each other, we are each other's priorities along with our children and I know exactly how he feels about me.

I value my friendships and am open to making more, but it's much more complex to work out where I fit in, my friends have their own families and partnerships and other friends and friendship groups.

Absolutely that. People like you, OP, clearly have some natural ability that enables you to know what to say, when. To know when your friendship overtures are welcome and when they're not. To know where you fit and and and where you are in a new friend or acquaintance's priorities. To not come across as needy, or standoffish, because you just have that knack that people like me do not.

You don't have to sit and overthink whether you should ask if someone wants a coffee, or how to do it the right way, or if that's going to be welcome or whether the other party is inwardly rolling their eyes.

I totally understand that you're asking this question for good reasons, @Thepeopleversuswork , but because it comes so naturally to you, you seem to not be able to understand (and occasionally you don't respect) our posts. Saying 'but why don't/can't you be like me?' isn't particularly empathetic.

I would love to have your skills

So yes, finding a partner means you only have to go through the sussing out what to do and say, and where you sit in their lives thing, once. Negotiating multiple potential and established friendship stuff needs your skills pretty much every day

Swipe left for the next trending thread