Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think many people of the UK lack confidence in the current government?

273 replies

CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 10:45

AIBU to think that the majority of people in the UK don't have any confidence in the current government, with an unelected Prime Minister at its' helm?

Would people be willing to vote on a petition to have a parliamentary debate on this matter, to encourage this government to have a snap General Election? This would give the people - the tax payers - as say in who is running the country. Democracy in action, if you will.

AIBU - people are happy with Labour and the unelected PM

YANBU - people have a democratic right to vote for who they want to run the country and right now, the majority don't have confidence in the current government.

OP posts:
CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 19:20

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 18:40

@CoventryCity are people struggling with the term "current"?

They're definitely struggling, they can't handle people not fake fawning on the left

OP posts:
CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 19:18

soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 18:37

What question?!

the post you responded to said 'Why did Starmer have to go? He was a much better man than the grinning chancer you've got now. It's all relative of course.'

OP posts:
LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 19:13

5128gap · 09/09/2026 19:11

You know I'm well up for that. I'd not spend so much time on here and chat to you like i do if that bothered me. We should never be afraid of hearing things that don't fit our own world view. It's how we grow. Also how we get a sense of what our fellow citizens feel, because whether we agree or not, they have as much say over our destinies as we do given we all get a vote, so its good to know.

Couldn't agree more.

HandPulledNoodles · 09/09/2026 19:12

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 19:08

The OP mentioned having a democratic choice. I can see why that confused you.

You critiqued someone for "mentioning Tories in a Labour thread" i think you're confusing yourself.

5128gap · 09/09/2026 19:11

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 19:03

To turn that on its head, it can be argued it's now the government supporters' turn to hear things they don't like.

You know I'm well up for that. I'd not spend so much time on here and chat to you like i do if that bothered me. We should never be afraid of hearing things that don't fit our own world view. It's how we grow. Also how we get a sense of what our fellow citizens feel, because whether we agree or not, they have as much say over our destinies as we do given we all get a vote, so its good to know.

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 19:08

HandPulledNoodles · 09/09/2026 19:06

The OP mention voting for Tories. Keep up.

The OP mentioned having a democratic choice. I can see why that confused you.

HandPulledNoodles · 09/09/2026 19:06

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 18:39

Says the person mentioning the Tories on a Labour thread.

The OP mention voting for Tories. Keep up.

Llttledrummergirl · 09/09/2026 19:05

I'll be generous and assume you don't luve in the UK which is why you don't understand our electoral process.

We elect a local MP to represent our area.
MPs choose a leader of their group or party.
The biggest party/coalition forms a government and the leader becomes PM.

It's actually quite simple.

It's easy to understand your confusion when the likes of Reform announce that they are putting unelected people into ministerial jobs.

Like or dislike Burnham being leader, he was elected and to suggest otherwise is disingenuous.

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 19:03

5128gap · 09/09/2026 19:00

Because we wanted Burnham instead. And at the moment it's the turn of some people who aren't you to be getting what they want. Nothing you can do about that at the moment so you might as well relax and stop winding yourself up.

To turn that on its head, it can be argued it's now the government supporters' turn to hear things they don't like.

5128gap · 09/09/2026 19:00

CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:30

Why did Starmer have to go? He was a much better man than the grinning chancer you've got now. It's all relative of course.

Because we wanted Burnham instead. And at the moment it's the turn of some people who aren't you to be getting what they want. Nothing you can do about that at the moment so you might as well relax and stop winding yourself up.

pointythings · 09/09/2026 18:50

CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:35

No they are not. Boat numbers are reducing. But boat sizes are increasing. numbers on each boat has increased. Lab lying with stats. Shame they won't publish the immigrant sex crime stats.

Edited

The data measures the number of people, not the number of boats. Don't lie.

You can choose not to believe the data, but that's conspiracy theory territory.

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 18:40

@CoventryCity are people struggling with the term "current"?

soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 18:39

pointythings · 09/09/2026 18:33

Why would anyone want Labour in power?

Because they're actually reducing the number of people coming in on small boats, dealing with the backlog of asylum processing, reducing immigration overall and oh, doing some sterling work standing up to Donald Trump and the Israeli government, on workers' rights, on renters' rights - the list is long. Now you may not like those things, but they are real and happening and many people do like tht#em.

I don’t think there’s much point trying facts with this one. They’re just too far gone. I’m out as its getting boring.

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 18:39

Says the person mentioning the Tories on a Labour thread.

soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 18:37

CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:33

You didn't answer my question.

What question?!

soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 18:37

CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:35

No they are not. Boat numbers are reducing. But boat sizes are increasing. numbers on each boat has increased. Lab lying with stats. Shame they won't publish the immigrant sex crime stats.

Edited

That’s simply not true.

soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 18:36

CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:26

Ha ha yes, always

With respect, both you and the other poster have been deflecting and using whataboutery on this and other threads. Its tedious and symptomatic of people on the right. No depth or substance to your arguments.

CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:35

pointythings · 09/09/2026 18:33

Why would anyone want Labour in power?

Because they're actually reducing the number of people coming in on small boats, dealing with the backlog of asylum processing, reducing immigration overall and oh, doing some sterling work standing up to Donald Trump and the Israeli government, on workers' rights, on renters' rights - the list is long. Now you may not like those things, but they are real and happening and many people do like tht#em.

No they are not. Boat numbers are reducing. But boat sizes are increasing. numbers on each boat has increased. Lab lying with stats. Shame they won't publish the immigrant sex crime stats.

OP posts:
CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:33

soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 18:32

It was done entirely democratically. Not sure what your issue is? You may not like Burnham, but many do.

You didn't answer my question.

OP posts:
pointythings · 09/09/2026 18:33

Why would anyone want Labour in power?

Because they're actually reducing the number of people coming in on small boats, dealing with the backlog of asylum processing, reducing immigration overall and oh, doing some sterling work standing up to Donald Trump and the Israeli government, on workers' rights, on renters' rights - the list is long. Now you may not like those things, but they are real and happening and many people do like tht#em.

CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:33

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 18:30

Yes it's about time I started doing the same when the sarky Reform bot shit gets trotted out. We can't possibly just be disillusioned with the government, we must be bots or such like.

Laughable isn't it. Like aligning my post with whatever reform are doing. I have no idea what reform are doing, unlike the labour folk who are obsessed with reform.

OP posts:
soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 18:32

CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:30

Why did Starmer have to go? He was a much better man than the grinning chancer you've got now. It's all relative of course.

It was done entirely democratically. Not sure what your issue is? You may not like Burnham, but many do.

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 18:30

CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:28

Some randoms have been doing that yes. I ignored.

Yes it's about time I started doing the same when the sarky Reform bot shit gets trotted out. We can't possibly just be disillusioned with the government, we must be bots or such like.

CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:30

pointythings · 09/09/2026 18:26

It clearly is democratic, because under UK democratic processes it is a legitimate thing to do. You don't have to like it - I don't much like it either. But Starmer had to go.

ETA intra party backstabbing and shenanigans have always been part of British politics. Why does it only bother you when the party you don't like does it? I'd call that hypocrisy.

Other than that I have to commend the ingenuity of the purveyors of these faux-naif posts about how awful Labour is. It's telling that there are so many more of them now that Labour have overtaken Reform in the polls, but the variety of angles seems neverending.

Edited

Why did Starmer have to go? He was a much better man than the grinning chancer you've got now. It's all relative of course.

OP posts:
CoventryCity · 09/09/2026 18:28

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 18:27

I didn't realise the Tories were in power at the minute. Have you been accused of being Kemi yet?

Some randoms have been doing that yes. I ignored.

OP posts: