Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Made safeguarding referral to SS. What to expect re: anonymity?

30 replies

concernedconfusedcautious · 09/09/2026 07:47

Posting here for traffic. Name changed.

Recently I made a safeguarding referral through the NSPCC who then forwarded my referral to the relevant Local Authority. I emphasised strongly that I wanted to remain anonymous. I used a burner email with a generic, common user name. I did not provide any other contact details but said that I was happy to follow up by email.

Both the NSPCC and LA are extremely interested in following up as they have a long ongoing case against the individual in my referral (I’ll refer to them as X), and my information is shedding more light on their case against X.

I’ve been careful to throw in some incidents that are untraceable to me (but I know to have happened as they have been witnessed and corroborated by several others) to make it harder to identify me. Reason being that the LA once shared a previous report IN FULL to X. Although that reporter’s email and name were redacted, the information in that report was enough to identity them. X went batshit and then embarked on a nuclear, year-long harassment campaign against the reporter.

NSPCC now want to follow up with me via phone call. They’ve emphasised that I am welcome to hide my phone number and remain anonymous. I am happy to speak to them but first, are there any other steps I need to take to preserve my anonymity? Has anyone been in a similar situation and can you tell me what to expect?

YABU: don’t make the call or follow up, it’s too risky

YANBU: go ahead and make the call, you’ve got your bases covered

Thanks in advance.

OP posts:
PressTheSwitch · 09/09/2026 08:32

@concernedconfusedcautious you probably could disguise your voice - apply a certain App on your phone etc.. - have no idea how to do this myself though. However, may be useful should they play your testimony in court etc..

concernedconfusedcautious · 09/09/2026 08:00

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I know the information in the report was added to the ongoing investigation/case against X.

OP posts:
concernedconfusedcautious · 09/09/2026 07:57

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I didn’t explicitly say that these incidents were second-hand information, I kept my wording vague along the lines of “On this occasion X has been known to/witnessed to…”

OP posts:
Quotemenot · 09/09/2026 07:55

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Quotemenot · 09/09/2026 07:54

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.