AIBU to want to express support for women who were assaulted at a political conference?

Strong undercurrents of satisfaction at gobby women being "put in their place" as well. Although probably the same might have happened to a man. I'm not sure though whether if it had been a big burly (but peaceful) bloke the pensioners would have gone for them with the same enthusiasm. I guess it's a hypothetical.

You have every right to post on Mumsnet as often as you wish.
Sometimes your posts come across as combative/disruptive and even, dare I say it, like heckling? You have every right to do this of course. There is just a strong irony that this thread is about whether or not it is acceptable to hit a woman with a stick and grab her by the throat for being combative and heckling. And here you are being quite combative/repetitive on the thread. Not attacking you. I just think it's ironic.

It is disappointment because I agree with their policies, but can't vote for thugs.

My posting habits are totally irrelevant. I type quickly. I learned to touch type aged 18. I think quickly so I respond immediately. I'm semi retired, spend quite a bit of time at home so have time on my hands. I post on many threads, relationships, weight loss, and offer my opinion/device. You don't own the forum but you seem to think you've got a right to try and embarrass me into suggesting I'm up to something. Do you do the same to other posters. Once and for all, I am NOT am a troll, a Reform party member, Katie Hopkins! You can try and be clever and throw something out there and then deny it. I'm not going to be bullied by a group of posters into stopping posting because my views are unpopular.

First, I said joined / name changed as I don't know if you joined the forum in May or changed username in May.

Second, I've not attacked you once. I've merely stated factual information about your posting habits.

Third, from what I can see any attempt to challenge your posts or ask questions of you is met with deflection, whataboutery, silence or accusations of personal attacks.

Lastly, and to borrow from you, who are you to tell me how, where and when I can post?

In fact @Shakeoffyourchains I am getting tired of your accusations. You don't ever reply to my posts, you make comments about how many times I post. Are you a mod? Lay off and attack the post not the poster.

Reform supporters will use any excuse to hit a women. Wrong politics, wrong colour, wrong look.

Heckling is not a crime and every party conference has at least one heckler. No other party apart from reform has seen hecklers attacked and the leadership agreed with the attack.

What do you mean name changed?

Is heckling a crime? I agree that the thugs who attacked the heckler should be held to account most definitely.

Indeed, I'm most active on political threads and I'm pretty consistent in my views. It's not that I don't like that you won't join in, it's more that I'm perplexed by how far you'll go to avoid criticising them.

But of course you're free and welcome to post when and where you want. Just as I'm free to look at the data and highlight it.

For example I've posted around 640 times in 2 and bit years, while you've posted over 4600 times since you joined / name changed in May. That's like 40 posts a day on average, quite the effort really.

Was I right when I said you was Katie Hopkins then? MN deleted it. My other guess was Julie Birchall. You said you were a “Tory” I thought that was odd. Tories don’t call themselves “Tories”.

I could say that I notice you only show up on certain threads, normally with the same theme. Shall I AS and calculate or shall I carry on having a life? Oh, I know, I think I will post when and where I want and if you don't like the fact I don't join in on the tedious Reform witch hunt, I can't help that.

Outing yourself as the very active poster I was initially talking about.

Quite easily really. There's, at the time if writing this, 265 posts on this thread, 49 of them by you. So roughly one in five posts is a deflection, derailment, whataboutery post from you, and that's how you warp a thread.

But then why am I telling the master how to work?

Its no secret who I am either, regardless of the bizarre speculation.

Encourage it. Laughing as a woman is assaulted.

Can't shake?! They cultivate it.

So deflection as the thread is about the violence towards a woman at the Reform conference. Something you appear to be able to justify with your whataboutery.

You’ve always known who I am. It’s no secret.

How can you defend this when even the Torygraph are questioning their credibility, the article headline, "The violence against anti-Reform voters should worry us all". This from a paper that employs Isabel Oakeshott, isn't she Richard Tice's girlfriend?

Bloody hell. I know what you mean!

I was talking about attention seekers when I mentioned the Prescott incident.