Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to want to express support for women who were assaulted at a political conference?

386 replies

Warmlight1 · 08/09/2026 21:41

To want to send out support to the two women visibly assaulted at a political conference.
I am concerned about the other protesters too and actually anyone who was hurt. But having to listen to jeering from the podium plus the crowd chanting in live TV at the same time must have been so traumatic and the publicity will die down and coverage move on but that can't be easy. Just want to send love and support.

OP posts:
emuloc · 09/09/2026 10:53

The Reform supporters who violently attacked the Women, were not acting in self defence, which is a completely different scenario.

BackToLurk · 09/09/2026 10:45

marlboro · 09/09/2026 10:41

They’re probably paid farage bots. I wouldn’t put it past him

I hope he's asked for his money back.

BackToLurk · 09/09/2026 10:45

Clavinova · 09/09/2026 10:41

I also think that if you have to resort to examining an incident that happened 25 years ago

To be fair, it was the op who referred to the past;
I wonder do young people realise how unusual this is...

My John Prescott link was dated November 2024, published by a left-wing newspaper.

I have to go out for the day - happy to revisit this thread tonight.

How unusual what is?

Politicians punching people? Well yes, you had to go back 25 years.

Reform members beating up women? Only need to go back a few days.

marlboro · 09/09/2026 10:41

CreativeGreen · 09/09/2026 10:38

Minor point, but why is the spacing around punctuation so haphazard with the defenders of this woman's assault? Like , ok you . don't like Reform , so I guess you love fascism , then?

They’re probably paid farage bots. I wouldn’t put it past him

Clavinova · 09/09/2026 10:41

BackToLurk · 09/09/2026 10:31

I don't think anyone should be 'allowed' to assault anyone - a position that seems alien to Reform supporters. I do think it is much easier to understand an instinctive immediate response to a direct physical assault than it is to understand why a mob of people beat a woman. I also think that if you have to resort to examining an incident that happened 25 years ago, you've probably already realised that Reform members have shown themselves up, and you're having to grasp at a range of increasingly irrelevant straws.

I also think that if you have to resort to examining an incident that happened 25 years ago

To be fair, it was the op who referred to the past;
I wonder do young people realise how unusual this is...

My John Prescott link was dated November 2024, published by a left-wing newspaper.

I have to go out for the day - happy to revisit this thread tonight.

CreativeGreen · 09/09/2026 10:38

Minor point, but why is the spacing around punctuation so haphazard with the defenders of this woman's assault? Like , ok you . don't like Reform , so I guess you love fascism , then?

Clavinova · 09/09/2026 10:35

marlboro · 09/09/2026 10:24

You’ve been bringing up other parties which are completely different situations to women being violently assaulted by a mob.
you were absolutely using darvo and now you’ve been caught out you’re rewriting history

I wasn't the one who referred to the milkshake incidents first. Milkshake doesn't seem very different to egg.

BackToLurk · 09/09/2026 10:31

Clavinova · 09/09/2026 10:19

OK, that was my subsequent question to the op - she has yet to answer.

I think that we would be having a very different conversation if it were about one man punching another who had assaulted him at point blank range

Not substantially different if Nigel Farage had punched a protester in the face after being assaulted with an egg. The op also states; 'the reaction of elected MPs - is everyone's problem.' Do you think elected MPs should be able to punch protesters in the face after being assaulted or provoked?

I don't think anyone should be 'allowed' to assault anyone - a position that seems alien to Reform supporters. I do think it is much easier to understand an instinctive immediate response to a direct physical assault than it is to understand why a mob of people beat a woman. I also think that if you have to resort to examining an incident that happened 25 years ago, you've probably already realised that Reform members have shown themselves up, and you're having to grasp at a range of increasingly irrelevant straws.

soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 10:29

Clavinova · 09/09/2026 10:22

So you do support a mob attacking a woman exercising free speech?

I didn't say that.

Reform always deflect

I'm not Reform - I vote Conservative.

You deflected to refer to a different incident. Do you support a mob attacking a woman exercising free speech? Yes or no?

LlynTegid · 09/09/2026 10:24

Show your support by voting at every election for someone other than Reform.

marlboro · 09/09/2026 10:24

Clavinova · 09/09/2026 10:22

So you do support a mob attacking a woman exercising free speech?

I didn't say that.

Reform always deflect

I'm not Reform - I vote Conservative.

You’ve been bringing up other parties which are completely different situations to women being violently assaulted by a mob.
you were absolutely using darvo and now you’ve been caught out you’re rewriting history

Hoppinggreen · 09/09/2026 10:23

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 07:32

She's a self-confessed party hijacker. Wonder is she's being paid to agitate and by whom.

Unlike most other people there NOT by Russia

Clavinova · 09/09/2026 10:22

soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 10:09

So you do support a mob attacking a woman exercising free speech? Your whataboutery is irrelevant. Reform always deflect, attack and reverse victim and offender. Classic abusive man syndrome.

So you do support a mob attacking a woman exercising free speech?

I didn't say that.

Reform always deflect

I'm not Reform - I vote Conservative.

Clavinova · 09/09/2026 10:19

BackToLurk · 09/09/2026 09:58

You were responding to "I would have no part in any political party where the leadership conducted themselves in that manner" (which came directly after "I would be reacting the same way had this occurred at any party conference")* *You even quoted it in your reply.

I think that we would be having a very different conversation if it were about one man punching another who had assaulted him at point blank range (Obviously if that happened we might also wonder what exactly Nige did spend the £5 million security money on). But that isn't what happened and so is irrelevant.

OK, that was my subsequent question to the op - she has yet to answer.

I think that we would be having a very different conversation if it were about one man punching another who had assaulted him at point blank range

Not substantially different if Nigel Farage had punched a protester in the face after being assaulted with an egg. The op also states; 'the reaction of elected MPs - is everyone's problem.' Do you think elected MPs should be able to punch protesters in the face after being assaulted or provoked?

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 10:19

BackToLurk · 09/09/2026 10:17

Sorry to say I've learned nothing

Colour me surprised.

I didn't realise I was obliged to change my opinion because you say so. Having a mind of one's own should hardly surprise a fellow adult.

marlboro · 09/09/2026 10:18

YourWatermelonship · 09/09/2026 09:41

The police say they are investigating and have identified suspects

I hope they go to prison for it

Hoppinggreen · 09/09/2026 10:18

hattie43 · 09/09/2026 06:06

Well here’s the thing . Don’t disrupt and enrage people and the chances are you won’t get your hair pulled .

Fucking awful victim blaming

BackToLurk · 09/09/2026 10:17

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 10:12

Sorry to say I've learned nothing from your posts. Nothing that's changed my stance on this matter.

Sorry to say I've learned nothing

Colour me surprised.

marlboro · 09/09/2026 10:17

hattie43 · 09/09/2026 06:16

It’s so tedious . She didn’t even need to be there . No-one in that room would have had any interest in what she had to say . You and your ilk don’t like Reform , so what , plenty of others do so get over it . We live in a democracy, everyone can choose who they support and no amount of unwanted disruption will change that .

So it’s ok to violently assault people who don’t agree with you? So we all have license to go and assault reform supporters according to you? I think you need to seriously read the British laws considering you have such strong opinions!!

Cheeks4970 · 09/09/2026 10:12

hattie43 · 09/09/2026 06:06

Well here’s the thing . Don’t disrupt and enrage people and the chances are you won’t get your hair pulled .

I cannot imagine trying to justify the abhorrent violence we saw. So basically you're saying "she was asking for it"?

LuckyHazelFox · 09/09/2026 10:12

BackToLurk · 09/09/2026 08:47

Glad I’ve been able to educate you about the difference between people not contributing to a thread (maybe they didn’t see it, maybe they aren’t interested in celebrities, maybe the title didn’t grab their attention) and spending time on a thread repeatedly making excuses for assault. Every day is a school day.

Sorry to say I've learned nothing from your posts. Nothing that's changed my stance on this matter.

soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 10:09

Clavinova · 09/09/2026 09:46

I was clearly responding to the 'milkshake' reference. Do you think Nigel Farage (who is exactly the same age now as John Prescott was at the time) should be able to punch protesters in the face if they throw milkshake at him? As for the 'older man' comment, John Prescott was an ex-boxer.

Deflection.

soddingspiderseason · 09/09/2026 10:09

Clavinova · 09/09/2026 09:21

Milkshake anyone?

As an aside, that reminds me - back in 2001 when Labour's then-Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, punched a protester in the face after he threw an egg. Prescott wasn't sacked or prosecuted and Labour won the election;

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/inside-john-prescotts-famous-punch-34155196

So you do support a mob attacking a woman exercising free speech? Your whataboutery is irrelevant. Reform always deflect, attack and reverse victim and offender. Classic abusive man syndrome.

BackToLurk · 09/09/2026 09:58

Clavinova · 09/09/2026 09:46

I was clearly responding to the 'milkshake' reference. Do you think Nigel Farage (who is exactly the same age now as John Prescott was at the time) should be able to punch protesters in the face if they throw milkshake at him? As for the 'older man' comment, John Prescott was an ex-boxer.

You were responding to "I would have no part in any political party where the leadership conducted themselves in that manner" (which came directly after "I would be reacting the same way had this occurred at any party conference")* *You even quoted it in your reply.

I think that we would be having a very different conversation if it were about one man punching another who had assaulted him at point blank range (Obviously if that happened we might also wonder what exactly Nige did spend the £5 million security money on). But that isn't what happened and so is irrelevant.

Shakeoffyourchains · 09/09/2026 09:56

Unfortunately we're going to see more and more of this type of behaviour, violence, abuse and assault are just part of their culture.