What has JK Rowling said or done that’s transphobic

right

I wonder why

Weirdly the ‘male brains’ of transmen don’t appear to be compelling them to commit violent and sexual crimes at the same rate as the old-fashioned type of men.

I think that is exactly the problem. Some of us believe she is being factual and not at all transphobic whilst others disagree.

Men screech too.

I have no idea what sex you are either so... shrug

Oh and with regards to the sexual offences, if you want to say that the only reason the rates appear so high is because it's men claiming they are trans to try and be moved to a women's prison doesn't that kind of prove JKR's entire viewpoint?

Screeches? Wee bit misogynistic no?

Screeches
But it's not about that! I am discussing brains!!

Sure buddy. Sure it was.

Ok. So genuine question, considering the high rate of sexual offences commited by TW do you think that is a good enough reason for people like JKR to want them to be excluded from women-only spaces?

Yes! A woman is nothing to do with anatomy but trans-identified men know that their anatomy is not a woman’s anatomy but that doesn’t matter because their brain knows they’re women and their brain is material reality and therefore the material reality is that they’re a woman. Or something.

I didn't say she should have immediately deleted anything. I said that if that were all the evidence I had of her views on the matter I wouldn't be drawing any conclusions about them.

Saying that transwomen are men. Is that transphobic? Saying transwomen are not women. Is that transphobic? Because if they are, you are absolutely saying we must offer unquestioning affirmation.

I think you may have missed the subtlety again. The original meme was a self-aware, tongue-in-cheek joke about femininity and presentation - not a literal attempt by a trans woman to "prove" how ladylike she is lol.

Nope. Just said it’s not to do with biology 🙄🙄🙄. Apparently it is the feelz in someone’s head but not really because it might not be yadda yadda yadda.

No.
Just keeps banging on about brains.

Has @Lacksie defined ‘woman’?

And the funny thing is that you even think she should have “immediately deleted” her woomud, woman tweet and then she could have redeemed herself. As if it was terrible and shouldn’t have been said. Why?

Male sexual offending is in no way irrelevant to why it’s unreasonable for JKR to point out that “trans women” are men and shouldn’t be in women’s spaces.

I’m sorry mate, but I’ve just re-read the post I quoted where you are talking about whether it can be argued that trans people have a mental health issue because they have a “different sense of sex” to their sexual anatomy. The fact that you are using so much slippery word salad to try and say that makes can be female if they feel that they are keeps coming back to the same blunt fact - sex is a material reality. A male cannot “feel” their way into being female.

Wasn’t that said by a TIM to try to prove how er…. Ladylike he was 😂😂😂😂😂😂.

But you were the one saying the brain was telling someone they were something they are not. You’ve spent hours repeating it. You said TIM brains were telling them they were female when they are not. Are you saying that is not true now?

Pretty sure every cell in that super special lady brain is XY

Apart from the inevitable exceedingly rare DSDs that really don't come into it no matter how hard they try. See also clownfish.

Cute analogy, but it only works if you first assume that trans identity is equivalent to falsely believing a person is an inanimate object. That is the very point under dispute. So the vignette doesn’t prove anything; it just rather unsubtly hides the conclusion inside the joke.

Very smug reductio though. Very demure, very mindful. 😘

But “trans women” are really men, putting trans to one side?