Yes I agree!! You will find many new places are like this. The gaps are disappearing in toilet design which is what my campaign is about! It’s why I keep going on about toilets! I really wish I didn’t have to.
When it’s been ambiguous who is allowed in the washroom, the first thing that happens design-wise is that the doors and partitions become floor to ceiling in privacy.
Brace yourself for full on toilet safety nerdiness:
The Building Safety Regulator which were part of the Health and Safety Executive have written to me and said that the only designs that are allowed to have door gaps are single sex designs in a single sex environment.
In Approved Document T (2024) is doesn’t show them on the cross sectional diagrams for types C and D as they said they wanted the document to be as succinct as possible. However I have analysed the consultation and responses leading up to ADT, and there was no mention of why door gaps were advantageous (despite the health and safety advantages being listed in BS6465). In particular for the millions of people with heart conditions, risk of stroke, endometriosis, neurological conditions such as epilepsy, and diabetes….
The government did commission a private company to look at designs for people with long term health conditions. This commission didn’t look at any of the conditions I listed above either, except stroke in terms of a handrail. Instead they recommended enclosing certain designs for people with long term health conditions. I investigated the evidence they had for this. The literature source was wrong on multiple levels - it was an opinion article by two Americans (this is relevant as their designs are different to British designs) who weren’t looking at long term health conditions. The relevant sentence was: ‘A better solution, supported by many transactivists, and increasingly found in trendy nightclubs and
restaurants, is to eliminate gender-segregated facilities entirely and treat the public restroom as one single open space with fully enclosed stalls’.
This is the typical design known as ‘inclusive’ toilet design. It’s unregulated, and least bad for healthy men.
As far as I am aware, no one looked at the affect of enclosing toilet design on women either. I can find no evidence of this happening.
Again, I can give you links to the above evidence if you really wanted. I am aware this is very niche, but by focusing on the vital importance of door gaps and investigating why the designs have changed, it has unearthed a lot of other stuff too!
What I am campaigning for is for the advantages of door gaps to be listed in ADT, ADM (in the section about separate sex toilet-washrooms for disabilities and conditions such as epilepsy and diabetes).