Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reporting someone to NSPCC

95 replies

abouttodropthebomb · 05/09/2026 22:51

Posting for traffic but desperately need advice!

im about to report someone very close to me to the NSPCC as I believe their children might be at risk of emotional abuse.

Does anyone have experience with this? How anonymous are the reports? If we give specific examples they will immediately know it was us, which we obviously don’t want them to… so how do the NSPCC deal with this?

any tips or experiences welcome

OP posts:
bluebirdssing · 06/09/2026 21:16

I reported a safeguarding concern to a school once. Totally blew up in my face.

PensionPTake · 06/09/2026 21:13

Starburst360 · 06/09/2026 20:46

😂 but without this information what are you expecting them to do?
just phone the police to do a welfare check next time

I gave them the address. Why do they need the names and school?

emmetgirl · 06/09/2026 21:12

I wish someone had reported my M for emotional abuse.
Nobody did though. And there were a lot of adults around that knew exactly what was going on.

Pumpkindice · 06/09/2026 21:07

NameChange12346 · 06/09/2026 20:51

you absolutely can ask questions and raise concerns without the entire copy of the report being read. Without the person having a copy.

and one person saying something to the nspcc is not evidence, it’s just a report to be investigated.

“we’ve had a report your harming your child”
what did they say
“I can’t tell you specifics, there are concerns your emotionally neglecting x by not meeting their needs. That you perhaps didn’t bond with them and could do with some extra support”

doesnt have to be “here’s a copy of the report so you can now blow up the family”

The point you're missing is that if you can't discuss specifics, it's extremely easy for the parent to refute any of the vague claims. In the example you gave, if the parent is upset and defensive, as most parents are when someone has made an anonymous report about their ability as a parent, they're not going to be grateful that you're there and volunteer that yes they are struggling and yes they want to work with you and sign up for support. That's not how people react, in reality.
If the allegations shared are vague and general, it's very easy for a parent to say it's not true and must be malicious. And if as a worker you can't share anything further to show that it is likely to be true, then you have no authority to do anything. If that's your only evidence, you have nothing.
Anyone taking, or acknowledging a referral should be clear with the person referring about how the information will be used. The priority should be on safeguarding the child, and if there are genuine fears about repercussions, that should be discussed and a plan put in place. But a social worker can't and won't do a poor investigation solely to protect the feelings of the person referring, which is usually 'i don't want to affect my relationship with X/I don't want to fall out with them'.

notnorman · 06/09/2026 20:52

I wish someone would have cared about me enough to report when I was younger. Please report.

NameChange12346 · 06/09/2026 20:51

Pumpkindice · 06/09/2026 20:39

Not if they are doing a meaningful, effective, safeguarding investigation. I'm guessing you haven't done one, I have done many, and without discussing details of the report it would go something like this:

'we've had a report that you're harming your children'
'in what way?'
'i can't tell you any specifics. Someone said you're not looking after them properly'
'What's your evidence?'
'i can't tell you that either'
'What's been said?'
'i can't tell you'
'Ok, well I'm not. Come back when you've got some evidence'
'ok'

you absolutely can ask questions and raise concerns without the entire copy of the report being read. Without the person having a copy.

and one person saying something to the nspcc is not evidence, it’s just a report to be investigated.

“we’ve had a report your harming your child”
what did they say
“I can’t tell you specifics, there are concerns your emotionally neglecting x by not meeting their needs. That you perhaps didn’t bond with them and could do with some extra support”

doesnt have to be “here’s a copy of the report so you can now blow up the family”

Starburst360 · 06/09/2026 20:46

PensionPTake · 06/09/2026 16:51

I reported a child screaming and crying very late at night outside in their back garden. Then nspcc refused to do anything with it because I didnt know their names or what school they went too. Utterly useless.

😂 but without this information what are you expecting them to do?
just phone the police to do a welfare check next time

Pumpkindice · 06/09/2026 20:41

If vague anonymous reports are made at the same time as clear evidence - eg a police report after being called out to a disturbance, and 2 anonymous reports from neighbours were about shouting, for example, it could corroborate on balance of probabilities it was the same thing. Wouldn't stand up in court though.

Pumpkindice · 06/09/2026 20:39

NameChange12346 · 06/09/2026 20:32

They can share concerns without quoting the reporter.

Not if they are doing a meaningful, effective, safeguarding investigation. I'm guessing you haven't done one, I have done many, and without discussing details of the report it would go something like this:

'we've had a report that you're harming your children'
'in what way?'
'i can't tell you any specifics. Someone said you're not looking after them properly'
'What's your evidence?'
'i can't tell you that either'
'What's been said?'
'i can't tell you'
'Ok, well I'm not. Come back when you've got some evidence'
'ok'

NameChange12346 · 06/09/2026 20:34

so mine was emotional neglect against one child over the others, it was corroborated by an outside party.
there’s ways of asking those questions without giving the person the copy of the report. There’s ways of ensuring it’s investigated and the parents supported without the person knowing the entire report.

NameChange12346 · 06/09/2026 20:32

Pumpkindice · 06/09/2026 20:31

Anonymous means that they don't share the identity of the person who made the report. They can't investigate the concern without sharing information about what was reported. Can you imagine the reaction if someone posted on here that they were being investigated by social services because someone made a report that they were harming their children but the social worker wouldn't tell them what the accusation was?

They can share concerns without quoting the reporter.

Pumpkindice · 06/09/2026 20:31

NameChange12346 · 06/09/2026 20:27

they can raise concerns without quoting it, they can ask questions without stating every part of it.
if I’d known it wouldn’t be anonymous, I wouldn’t have reported it.

Anonymous means that they don't share the identity of the person who made the report. They can't investigate the concern without sharing information about what was reported. Can you imagine the reaction if someone posted on here that they were being investigated by social services because someone made a report that they were harming their children but the social worker wouldn't tell them what the accusation was?

NameChange12346 · 06/09/2026 20:27

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 06/09/2026 20:16

How do you think a social worker can address concerns raised in a referral without discussing the details of the referral? Discretion would make the information incoherent.

they can raise concerns without quoting it, they can ask questions without stating every part of it.
if I’d known it wouldn’t be anonymous, I wouldn’t have reported it.

Casualuser · 06/09/2026 20:21

Talk it through with the nspcc as you dont have much evidence.

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 06/09/2026 20:16

NameChange12346 · 06/09/2026 20:09

i didn’t give my name to the nspcc but social services gave the report word for word so they knew it was me. I expected some sort of discretion.
this was also emotional neglect, they got put on the at risk register (it’s not called that anymore).
unsure what happened after that, mum was livid and angry at me and seemed more concerned with that than the kids even though she acknowledged there was an issue (to me) so I don’t expect a whole load was done.

How do you think a social worker can address concerns raised in a referral without discussing the details of the referral? Discretion would make the information incoherent.

Muchtoomuchtodo · 06/09/2026 20:14

I tried to report concerns to the NSPCC once. I filled in the online form and waited for them to ring me back.
That took a few days. They rang me when I was at work and was unable to take their call. They left messages saying they’d try once more before closing my report. They called back 10 minutes later. I was still in the sane meeting, still unable to take their call and hadn’t had any opportunity to listen to their message.
Complete waste of time imo.
I go straight to the local authority now.

NameChange12346 · 06/09/2026 20:09

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 06/09/2026 18:06

They shouldn't provide the names of the referrer in a SAR, that is third-party data

i didn’t give my name to the nspcc but social services gave the report word for word so they knew it was me. I expected some sort of discretion.
this was also emotional neglect, they got put on the at risk register (it’s not called that anymore).
unsure what happened after that, mum was livid and angry at me and seemed more concerned with that than the kids even though she acknowledged there was an issue (to me) so I don’t expect a whole load was done.

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 06/09/2026 20:03

LauraNorda · 06/09/2026 18:33

Do you know what anonymous means?

I don't understand your question. Of course I do. But you said that the LA can't refuse to provide a SAR. That's true, but the referrer should be redacted from any SAR.

LauraNorda · 06/09/2026 18:33

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 06/09/2026 18:06

They shouldn't provide the names of the referrer in a SAR, that is third-party data

Do you know what anonymous means?

StrugglingAlong75 · 06/09/2026 18:19

NSPCC will simply report on to social services.

They may provide info about the concerns if asked by the parents. In our case (1× SS referral, 1 x NSPCC passed to SS,) they passed it on almost verbatim and we could work out who made it from what was said & the specific language they used.

I'd still report a genuine concern.

Cheese55 · 06/09/2026 18:19

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 06/09/2026 18:18

Yes that's what I said

Yes sorry, saw that afterwards :)

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 06/09/2026 18:18

Cheese55 · 06/09/2026 18:10

Anything statutory goes straight to children's services. Nspcc is a charity and will not get involved.

Yes that's what I said

Cheese55 · 06/09/2026 18:10

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 06/09/2026 16:43

NSPCC send referrals straight to social services so it's much easier if you report directly to them. Anonymous reports are very difficult to act on anyway, and if there is no corroborating evidence it's unlikely that an anonymous report of emotional harm will result in any significant intervention. HOWEVER that doesn't mean don't report. You don't know what other concerns might have been reported now or in the future and your referral will definitely go towards building a picture. But don't expect miracles to happen.

Anything statutory goes straight to children's services. Nspcc is a charity and will not get involved.

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 06/09/2026 18:08

PensionPTake · 06/09/2026 16:51

I reported a child screaming and crying very late at night outside in their back garden. Then nspcc refused to do anything with it because I didnt know their names or what school they went too. Utterly useless.

What did you expect anyone to do without a name??

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 06/09/2026 18:06

LauraNorda · 06/09/2026 16:44

Someone reported us anonymously and maliciously to the SS.

The social workers were that incompetent that they let us know all the details that instantly identified who had done the reporting on the one and only visit they made.

The people getting reported are free to make a subject access request the LA, which they cannot refuse to provide.

If the people you intend to report find out it's you, are they the type to just laugh it off, or could there be some blowback?

They shouldn't provide the names of the referrer in a SAR, that is third-party data