Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Free school breakfast for every child

268 replies

greyingunderneath · 31/08/2026 21:22

Is this a good use of funding? I am not very well off financially but I don’t mind providing a slice of toast for my child and can’t say it will make any difference to me financially if they provide it instead.
I don’t know how much this is costing the government but it seems like a waste of resources to me.

OP posts:
Sirzy · 05/09/2026 19:12

Valeriekat · 05/09/2026 19:06

Isn't that the parents job?

In an ideal world yes. But we don’t live in an ideal world so if something simple like offering a universal free slice of toast means no child is starting the day hungry then brilliant.

If it means the mum who would have otherwise gone hungry can then go home and have a slice of toast herself even better!

Valeriekat · 05/09/2026 19:06

Mcdhotchoc · 31/08/2026 21:24

Disagree. Ensuring that kids have some food in them before the start of the school day sets them up to learn and also helps ensure that kids get in on time to learn. It's levelling up the playing field.

Isn't that the parents job?

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 05/09/2026 11:03

@PurpleThistle7 People did NOT starve pre food banks. Yes, pre First World War but that’s well over a century ago and no benefits! I’m talking about the last 25/30 years and we do not have starving dc. They now get dc benefits for all dc so spend it on food!

PurpleThistle7 · 05/09/2026 10:12

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 05/09/2026 09:45

@HollyhocksandPeons There are only 635 MPs and yes they do need help with a second home on their relatively low salaries that are not enough for living in London and their constituencies! It’s hardly the same as free breakfast for dc! Parents do need to take responsibility for dc. When we hear about all these issues with feeding dc, what are parents prioritising? Phone ? Tv satellite ? It’s easy to rock up and say you don’t have money with another dc on the way. No one ever looks at where their money is being spent. Ever. Whets the child allowance used for? Could be spent on food. Or clothes but it’s easier to get free food and hand outs. No one starved in the uk before food banks.

Huh? Of course people starved. A lack of able bodied soldiers available from the working class is one of the many reasons the UK looked at widening the welfare policies. Plenty starved in the workhouses too.

Obviously some parents are useless but I still have no idea why the children should pay. Creating a whole new generation of poorly educated people with vitamin deficiencies doesn’t help anyone.

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 05/09/2026 09:45

@HollyhocksandPeons There are only 635 MPs and yes they do need help with a second home on their relatively low salaries that are not enough for living in London and their constituencies! It’s hardly the same as free breakfast for dc! Parents do need to take responsibility for dc. When we hear about all these issues with feeding dc, what are parents prioritising? Phone ? Tv satellite ? It’s easy to rock up and say you don’t have money with another dc on the way. No one ever looks at where their money is being spent. Ever. Whets the child allowance used for? Could be spent on food. Or clothes but it’s easier to get free food and hand outs. No one starved in the uk before food banks.

sashh · 05/09/2026 05:16

PurpleThistle7 · 01/09/2026 12:38

I have never heard of a school providing fruit and veggies to kids and I have friends with kids in about 20 different schools across my city. How lovely! I am sure that makes a huge difference to the children and I’d fully support that sort of initiative.

I think it’s horrifying that people want to punish the children for their parents’ life situation. Loads of people end up in bad situation due to bad luck or ill health or lack of education or opportunities. Some are lazy, sure, but that still has nothing to do with the children. Kids are innocents and I will never be sorry to spend my time feeding them. I volunteer at the food bank in my area once a month and it’s terribly, terribly sad.

Our school is a ‘mixed catchment’ so the breakfast club is both sides - children whose parents are off to work as well as children on free school meals who are refugees or foster children or any sort of other situation. They all play together before school and eat some toast and it’s all fine. My kids aren’t too good for a piece of white bread in the mornings and I’m glad that the inclusivity means that no one needs to think about if the kids are there because of logistics or need.

Would love to see them add a piece of fruit at snack time but not judging them for not being able to - we have kids in too small shoes and no winter coat, kids with terrible home lives, kids who don’t speak a word of English and just moved here from a war zone… there are a million priorities and I have no idea how I’d make those decisions if I was the head teacher.

I volunteer on the PTA and our entire ethos is about equity - all our fundraising is for the uniform bank or school supplies or paying for the kids to all go on a trip as so many parents can’t afford the £8 to go to the science centre or whatever. I almost never judge the parents and I absolutely never judge the kids. Am sure they’d rather be in a safe home with lots of food in the cupboards.

Could you, on the PTA, suggest a fruit / vegi snack?

It might not cost as much as you think or anything at all. Large companies often have charitable trusts.

Supermarkets often have excess stock. It might be worth asking whether they would supply fruit / veg, in exchange you give them a bit of free advertising as in "Daily fruit supplied by X supermarket"

If it were me I would start with the Co op.

As well as providing nutrition you are providing a service to those who have come to the UK from places were the food available is very different. People who cannot afford to buy some fruit, just to try. A child coming home and saying they had a pear, or some berries means the parent knows their child will eat it.

www.coopfoundation.org.uk/

Apacketofbiscuitsaday · 04/09/2026 17:49

We have been trialling it in my school where I work. Children can come free from 8.30am. If it's before then think it's about £2.50 or something per session.

happybug1234 · 04/09/2026 16:02

Is this happening anytime soon? Currently paying £8 a day for breakfast club.

concertinacornflake · 04/09/2026 15:27

mixing kids every morning, not allowing them to sit together in their friendship groups, but really mixing this would be awful! Part of navigating school is avoiding the kids who are unkind, kids shouldn't be forced to mix if they don't want to, it's not speed dating.

Newname26 · 04/09/2026 14:51

Yes lots of money is being spent needlessly.

I'd rather see money going to schools for stuff than into bags for every child.
What teacher wants 25 identical P1 bags for kids that can hardly read their name? Lots of fun figuring out who's is who's on a daily basis. Most parents can afford a bag for their kid, and most kids want a bag of their choosing, not a government issue number.

HollyhocksandPeons · 04/09/2026 14:01

Billions for illegals and Ukraine is not a good use of funding, second homes with furniture for MPs is not a good use of funding, but breakfasts for everyone is a wonderful idea, it is a great bonding experience - children would be breaking bread together, and if teachers or classroom assistants organise it wonderfully - like mixing kids every morning, not allowing them to sit together in their friendship groups, but really mixing - this is wonderful!

Newname26 · 04/09/2026 13:53

HarshbutTrue2 · 04/09/2026 13:31

Toast and water sounds like something out of Oliver Twist.

How does this fit in with the government's healthy eating plan? Doesn't sound very nutritious to me.

Our local schools had the lunchbox stasi. If food wasnt nutritious it was confiscated and they had to do without. No white bread. No crisps. No treats. Croissants wouldn't be allowed either.

Yet, school meals often included pizza.

Mine had cooked breakfast at home in winter. They also expected something warm for lunch. At one stage I tried sending tomato soup in a flask to school. It wasnt very successful. One mother tried sending a warm pasty for lunch. That was frowned on too.

Honest its Toast to Go, is the service they offer. Which you'll realise it's toast the kids take outside into the playground.
Government requirements don't enter the equation

Pre covid they did a proper breakfast club, but that never resumed, social distancing and budget it restarted as Toast to Go

HarshbutTrue2 · 04/09/2026 13:31

Toast and water sounds like something out of Oliver Twist.

How does this fit in with the government's healthy eating plan? Doesn't sound very nutritious to me.

Our local schools had the lunchbox stasi. If food wasnt nutritious it was confiscated and they had to do without. No white bread. No crisps. No treats. Croissants wouldn't be allowed either.

Yet, school meals often included pizza.

Mine had cooked breakfast at home in winter. They also expected something warm for lunch. At one stage I tried sending tomato soup in a flask to school. It wasnt very successful. One mother tried sending a warm pasty for lunch. That was frowned on too.

Newname26 · 04/09/2026 08:23

Velumental · 04/09/2026 07:50

£2 per day and they have toast, cereal, fruit and milk. However in some areas of Glasgow they are piloting it for free and it's the same deal. We actually rarely use it because my husband WFH the days I'm in the office and vice versa but for some families it's the only reason they can all get to work on time.

£2 is ok, and excellent if it starts at 8.00,
I'm South Lanarkshire its free toast and water but only from 8.40.

£10 week would be great if it meant I could start work earlier and in turn finish earlier

Binnyforthewin · 04/09/2026 08:18

Rubydobydo · 04/09/2026 08:01

From first hand observation - kids would go hungry if the expected handout from the local charity not received. BUT parents smoke and have a full Sky subscription and haven’t worked for years.
Tell me that’s right.

Anyone who can afford to smoke doesn't need state handouts!

Boomer55 · 04/09/2026 08:15

Binnyforthewin · 01/09/2026 08:08

Child Benefit should be reduced to fund it. We already give people child benefit to help feed their children. This feels like double dipping.

This. How many times do taxpayers have to feed a child?

Tamtim · 04/09/2026 08:11

I think that providing a healthy breakfast and lunch for every school child is a great way to spend public money. My kids get good breakfasts and packed lunches but so many don’t. It’s also a really good social learning experience eating together. Having children brush their teeth after a meal at school would also be a positive thing. But we all know public money is wasted by our governments and often not funnelled into the right resources.

Rubydobydo · 04/09/2026 08:01

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 02/09/2026 13:22

@zingally Rhere are actually very few reasons why a parent cannot feed a child. Usually chaotic lifestyle and not enough money because they have too many dc. There’s no need to offer every child breakfast! It’s way too expensive.

It’s rarely the case that a parent managing perfectly well suddenly doesn’t. Other than new dc coming along that they patently cannot afford.

From first hand observation - kids would go hungry if the expected handout from the local charity not received. BUT parents smoke and have a full Sky subscription and haven’t worked for years.
Tell me that’s right.

Velumental · 04/09/2026 07:50

Newname26 · 04/09/2026 07:46

The must be a paid service?
Our freebie toast to go is at 8.40 so just 20mins before school starts.

£2 per day and they have toast, cereal, fruit and milk. However in some areas of Glasgow they are piloting it for free and it's the same deal. We actually rarely use it because my husband WFH the days I'm in the office and vice versa but for some families it's the only reason they can all get to work on time.

Newname26 · 04/09/2026 07:46

Velumental · 04/09/2026 02:35

Our school does breakfast club and opens at 8

The must be a paid service?
Our freebie toast to go is at 8.40 so just 20mins before school starts.

Girasoli · 04/09/2026 07:06

I work pretty near school so I only actually need breakfast club for 20mins (get there at 8.15-8.20) We sometimes get there earlier though as the DC like playing with their friends before school.
The DC usually eat breakfast at home but occasionally have double breakfast which I don't mind - sometimes I have breakfast at home and then have another coffee and a banana as soon as I get to my desk!

OfficiallyOnVacation · 04/09/2026 04:19

Just because it is offered, doesn’t mean you have to take it. I doubt most of the wealthier families would bother to send their child to school for poor quality toast and think “yippee”.

On the other hand - many wealthier parents would drop their kids off for free at 8.25am and think “yippee now I can get to work on time.” I would do that and feed ds first - a few extra cornflakes wouldn’t then be a problem if he consumed them.

Velumental · 04/09/2026 02:37

MorganKitten · 03/09/2026 22:24

It was the way it was said and if they need the wrap around care it needs to be paid for

She very clearly said they need the breakfast club and pay for it. Not wraparound

Velumental · 04/09/2026 02:35

Newname26 · 03/09/2026 20:29

Even if schools do breakfast its unlikely they'd be open much before 8.30 for a 9am start.
Which is OK if you work locally anyone with any travel really is still going to need a Childminder

Our school does breakfast club and opens at 8

Newname26 · 03/09/2026 23:55

PurpleThistle7 · 03/09/2026 23:38

Well they do that at a school mentioned on this post - have breakfast available at dropoff. So depends on what is meant by breakfast club I suppose. I’d imagine it will be hideously expensive if they need enough staff for the entire school roll.

It must be supervised to some extent.
Ours is toast to go, ie take into the playground.
But if breakfast club works for a family and let's parents get to work why would they continue to pay for childcare.
Is is what i was really trying to point out to the poster I replied to