Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To find the use of the word ‘fiancé’ irritating?

364 replies

Sparklesbigtoe · 31/08/2026 09:06

Do people still use the word fiancé to describe the person they’re engaged to on a regular basis (eg. every time they mention them to someone who doesn’t know their name they’ll say fiancé rather than partner or bf/gf)? Or is this becoming kind of outdated? There’s a woman at work who keeps saying ‘my fiancé and I this, my fiancé and I that, yesterday I said to my fiancé blah, blah’. It’s really starting to grate on me because she could easily say his name then start referring to him by it, just like everyone else does. It also struck me that other people I know who’ve been engaged recently carried on saying ‘partner’, or they might say fiancé once or twice but generally they use partner. I’m sure I’m BU to find it annoying but it feels like they’re trying to boast that someone’s asked them to marry them everytime I hear it!

OP posts:
Superscientist · 31/08/2026 15:04

My partner and I deliberately made the decision to get a civil partnership rather than a marriage as we wanted to be partners and not husband and wife. We had been together for 15+ year by the time we go out civil partnership as we were waiting for it to be an option for heterosexual couples.

I do find it irksome when it's included repeatedly in a conversation.

How was your weekend?

My fiance and I were away at the weekend. We did X and Y. I got to do Z whilst Dave did B.

Is different to

My fiance and I were away at the weekend, my fiance wanted to do X and Y. I did Z whilst my fiancé we to do B.

OtterlyAstounding · 31/08/2026 15:01

Thepeopleversuswork · 31/08/2026 14:54

I don’t love any of them and don’t see the point of them at all to be honest. I don’t understand why people feel the need to state this “interim” marital status.

I just find “fiancé” particularly twee. Like I said, it’s subjective and irrational. But it makes me cringe.

I suppose the term came about because it's a major change in a couple's relationship, that often feels symbolic, and can frequently involve shifting into a different stage of life. In the past, of course, it generally meant they were imminently going to live together, have sex, and procreate - big changes!

And then people use the term now simply because it's in existence, and in use, and is the correct term to use. It's fine to dislike a word, but it's strange to project your own feelings about that word onto others, and attribute motivations to them that may well not even exist.

YouHaveAnArse · 31/08/2026 14:59

OtterlyAstounding · 31/08/2026 14:53

Technically, as soon as you agreed to marry you were in fact engaged, up until the point that you married.

Yeah. I get that. Thanks.

My point is that we did not have ~~An Engagement~~, which would have led to people referring to my fionnnssay.

WearyAuldWumman · 31/08/2026 14:59

CurlewKate · 31/08/2026 09:18

No it’s not. A partner is very different from a girl/boyfriend.

It used to be reserved for people who were in a relationship and lived together. I do see more and more people using it instead of ‘boyfriend’ or ‘girlfriend’.

BCBird · 31/08/2026 14:57

If I was loved up and engaged at the grand age of 56 I would proudly do the same

YouHaveAnArse · 31/08/2026 14:56

LifetimesAgo · 31/08/2026 12:49

Ha! A “yuppie word”, used in every Italian family in rural/ poor villages. Perfect example of the inverted snobbery people are referring to and even funnier because he was so wrong about a basic cooking instruction of a basic food staple being somehow pretentious. You must have had a good giggle at that one.

He also used to say "it's tortiLLA" whenever I mentioned tortilla chips.

I am a Spanish speaker. He was not.

He lives in Germany now, presumably on multiple blood pressure medications.

Ohbabypinkpanties · 31/08/2026 14:55

PurplebudsWhitebuds · 31/08/2026 09:30

I think the fact this annoys you so much says more about you than about her. He is her fiancé so what is wrong with her referring to him as such?

What really annoys me is when someone who is talking to me keeps mentioning various names and I have absolutely no idea who they are in their lives and yet I'm expected to somehow know and be able to follow their story. At least with this colleague of yours she is being very clear about who she is talking about and the relevance of him in her life.

Getting engaged IS a big thing in people's lives. Why be so unpleasant about someone actually enjoying having a fiancé to talk about?

On the contrary, it is cringeworthy ( in my opinion !)
..it’s utterly desperate. Once you’re married you can bore us all day with husband/wife ! It smacks of desperation.
We get it, your engaged!!!!

GinWizard · 31/08/2026 14:55

Totally agree. It's so irrational but I just find it a really cringey word. I always used "partner" when we were engaged. However I do know it's a stupid and nonsensical thing to get irritated by!

Thepeopleversuswork · 31/08/2026 14:54

OtterlyAstounding · 31/08/2026 14:52

Would 'betrothed' or 'intended' be more acceptable to you than 'fiancé', or is it the affianced part that bothers you?

I don’t love any of them and don’t see the point of them at all to be honest. I don’t understand why people feel the need to state this “interim” marital status.

I just find “fiancé” particularly twee. Like I said, it’s subjective and irrational. But it makes me cringe.

OtterlyAstounding · 31/08/2026 14:53

YouHaveAnArse · 31/08/2026 14:52

We didn't invite anyone, we just went on holiday and did it.

Technically, as soon as you agreed to marry you were in fact engaged, up until the point that you married.

Thepeopleversuswork · 31/08/2026 14:52

LifetimesAgo · 31/08/2026 14:46

“Not that long” being the best part of 200 years?

About 100 years at best. Not routinely used until after WW1 apparently.

Who knows, maybe “holibobs” will be in the next Oxford English Dictionary. 🤣

YouHaveAnArse · 31/08/2026 14:52

Youhadrambledonfor18pages · 31/08/2026 12:49

Surely you told the people who were invited at some point, rather than “surprise!” on the morning of the ceremony, when they may have had other plans for the day.

We didn't invite anyone, we just went on holiday and did it.

OtterlyAstounding · 31/08/2026 14:52

Thepeopleversuswork · 31/08/2026 14:47

Sure. But there’s no unbiased objective standard that dictates that “holibobs” and “hubs” are offensive. There are plenty of words and phrases in the English language which are in common usage which aren’t technically correct and which aren’t even English but which have passed into the lexicon.

I don’t like holibobs or hubs and I don’t use them but I have never really understood why they make half the population of Mumsnet froth at the mouth.

I don’t expect everyone to agree with my dislike of the word fiancé either.

But I don’t there’s an objective truth that dictates one is completely beyond the pale and the other is fine.

Would 'betrothed' or 'intended' be more acceptable to you than 'fiancé', or is it the affianced part that bothers you?

YouHaveAnArse · 31/08/2026 14:51

MaryBeardsShoes · 31/08/2026 12:48

Yes and in the UK don’t you have to give notice, legally, so you were officially engaged for at least as long as that.

I didn't marry in the UK, we secretly eloped 😀

Thepeopleversuswork · 31/08/2026 14:47

Youhadrambledonfor18pages · 31/08/2026 14:15

No, it’s not subjective.

Fiancé is a whole, correct, unadulterated word.

Holibobs and hubs are adaptations of whole, correct words which many (subjectively) find twee or annoying.

Sure. But there’s no unbiased objective standard that dictates that “holibobs” and “hubs” are offensive. There are plenty of words and phrases in the English language which are in common usage which aren’t technically correct and which aren’t even English but which have passed into the lexicon.

I don’t like holibobs or hubs and I don’t use them but I have never really understood why they make half the population of Mumsnet froth at the mouth.

I don’t expect everyone to agree with my dislike of the word fiancé either.

But I don’t there’s an objective truth that dictates one is completely beyond the pale and the other is fine.

LifetimesAgo · 31/08/2026 14:46

Thepeopleversuswork · 31/08/2026 14:04

But that’s a totally subjective opinion. “Fiancé” hasn’t been in common use in English that long.

“Not that long” being the best part of 200 years?

Hoodle · 31/08/2026 14:46

Absolutelynot2 · 31/08/2026 14:00

Um, no. I'm absolutely right.

YW.

But again, you should stick to more simplistic terms. You're more comfortable with them, and you won't be too much danger of using them incorrectly.

Edited

To use some simple language, you’re having a laugh.

I do see that plain English isn’t your thing. But I genuinely recommend the texts I mentioned. They’re useful for us little people who want to write well and for those like you who are already on a literary par with Rebecca West.

OtterlyAstounding · 31/08/2026 14:44

Illegally18 · 31/08/2026 14:42

Oh, sweetheart! You shouldn't!

I must confess, I am curious as to how using the correct relationship title to refer to someone is 'teenage'.

Illegally18 · 31/08/2026 14:42

Absolutelynot2 · 31/08/2026 14:07

Oh, I see, I didn't realise you have no comprehension skills.

Never mind pet, this is not the thread for you.

YW. HTH.

Oh, sweetheart! You shouldn't!

KilkennyCats · 31/08/2026 14:37

Illegally18 · 31/08/2026 14:04

What are you on about?
HTH, btw.

You poor thing…
”HTH” 🤣

Ponderingwindow · 31/08/2026 14:35

FourSevenFive · 31/08/2026 13:31

It is not about objecting to the existence of the word as such.

It is about language pragmatics - choosing which information you communicate in each conversation.
Using the word fiance is choosing to communicate a specific relationship status - which is absolutely irrelevant to the listener in many cases.

The society is moving away from automatically sharing one's legal relationship status in everyday interaction, with the Ms title being around for decades. It is only logical, that ways of talking about the significant others are evolving as well.

At this moment "partner" seems to be the leading way to express the concept of "stable relationship" without specifying details, even though some people don't like that word at all business connotation) and some would use it only for non-husband.

Partner used to mean serious life partner with the absence of marriage by choice or prohibition. Now the common use is so broad that it is meaningless. People who aren’t married are going to need a new word.

Youhadrambledonfor18pages · 31/08/2026 14:15

Thepeopleversuswork · 31/08/2026 14:04

But that’s a totally subjective opinion. “Fiancé” hasn’t been in common use in English that long.

No, it’s not subjective.

Fiancé is a whole, correct, unadulterated word.

Holibobs and hubs are adaptations of whole, correct words which many (subjectively) find twee or annoying.

MNLurker1345 · 31/08/2026 14:14

Hoodle · 31/08/2026 13:42

People can gloat quietly and unboastfully. People can express Schadenfreude openly and unpleasantly.

It’s all about the context.

“I had a sense of Schadenfreude when my boss got fired” is no different to “I gloated when my boss got fired”.

I’d say that ‘gloat’ is the more adaptable and useful word.

I do think they can overlap, but don’t think they are interchangeable.

Even if I gloat inwardly there is a sense that I am laughing at you, or celebrating your misfortune and feeling that it serves you right.

Schadenfreude as an inner sense is more like well, that’s unfortunate, I won’t deny the sense of satisfaction I feel at your misfortune but I am glad it’s not me.

Absolutelynot2 · 31/08/2026 14:07

Illegally18 · 31/08/2026 14:04

What are you on about?
HTH, btw.

Oh, I see, I didn't realise you have no comprehension skills.

Never mind pet, this is not the thread for you.

YW. HTH.

Illegally18 · 31/08/2026 14:04

Absolutelynot2 · 31/08/2026 14:00

You tried to claim that it's a teenage affectation to use the correct term husband. Which, of course, it's not, and your stance is a very odd one.

The person you are replying to was pointing out that you must move in interesting circles if you actually believe this to be true.

HTH.

What are you on about?
HTH, btw.