Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to dislike parents using children in social media content?

56 replies

Hakunatomato · 30/08/2026 12:34

Frances Haugen and Stuart Armfield. They are all over social media. I try blocking their pages, but they pop up everywhere. It is nothing to do with them being two gay dads. It’s just the nauseating constant attention seeking, and using the children in content to make money. There was another content creator a bug life or something, where the kid was quite cute, but is it wrong to put your kids all over the internet when they have no say in it, just to make a fast buck? By the time they decide they don’t want their younger years documented and shown all over the world it will be too late. A clip came up this morning and one of the two dads was posing in his underpants, quite provocatively, for attention, and the next scene showed the kids. Yeuch….. What do you think?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
OverpricedCupcake · 31/08/2026 19:25

It absolutely is.
I've not watched the podcast, but from the tagline used I'm guessing it's lapping it up.
Eurgh.
That poor boy.

ChopSueyCharcuterieBoard · 31/08/2026 19:23

OverpricedCupcake · 31/08/2026 19:04

I've literally just seen that his wife has been on a podcast I watch, talking about their trans child.
Won't be watching that anymore.

I saw them probably about a year before their child 'became trans' and I spotted what was going to happen a mile off. That whole situation is grooming right in front of the world.

OverpricedCupcake · 31/08/2026 19:04

ChopSueyCharcuterieBoard · 30/08/2026 12:48

The sooner they bring in laws to stop "family influencers" the better.

I hate them all.

Especially that Jonathan Joly one, I've had him blocked for years and years.

I've literally just seen that his wife has been on a podcast I watch, talking about their trans child.
Won't be watching that anymore.

Backedoffhackedoff · 31/08/2026 19:02

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 31/08/2026 17:10

Whether I think it's okay or not is irrelevant really - because employers do use social media to make decisions about employment.

But do you seriously think that use of social media includes concern about tantrums 15 years previously posted on their mothers account?

or do you think they’re more likely to be checking for, I dunno, racism, sexism, drug use etc on the applicants own social media account?!

Lomonald · 31/08/2026 17:15

Hakunatomato · 30/08/2026 12:34

Frances Haugen and Stuart Armfield. They are all over social media. I try blocking their pages, but they pop up everywhere. It is nothing to do with them being two gay dads. It’s just the nauseating constant attention seeking, and using the children in content to make money. There was another content creator a bug life or something, where the kid was quite cute, but is it wrong to put your kids all over the internet when they have no say in it, just to make a fast buck? By the time they decide they don’t want their younger years documented and shown all over the world it will be too late. A clip came up this morning and one of the two dads was posing in his underpants, quite provocatively, for attention, and the next scene showed the kids. Yeuch….. What do you think?

You have given the Internet their full names so you will get them popping up again, I don't really know who they are but they seemed to have specifically annoy you, they will be a part of your algorithm.

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 31/08/2026 17:10

Backedoffhackedoff · 30/08/2026 16:32

Do you think it’s ok for an employer to make employment decisions based on seeing an 18 year olds toddler tantrum posted by their mum? Wouldn’t you think it was the employer who was weird as hell for caring about that?!

yes talking about periods and medical issues (which is extreme) is highly embarrassing but I would hope other adults would be mature enough not to punish the child for their parents actions.

Whether I think it's okay or not is irrelevant really - because employers do use social media to make decisions about employment.

SmolkedSamon · 31/08/2026 17:06

I completely agree - monetising children on social media is disgusting.

There was an influencer recently who did a post about their teenage child’s suicide attempt. Even wrote an article about it on their Substack (or similar) which people had to pay for to read!! I had followed them up until that point but so fundamentally disagreed with that, that I had to unfollow. Not that they will give a shit

Backedoffhackedoff · 30/08/2026 16:32

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 30/08/2026 13:06

How would you feel if you were 18 and looking for your first job, and your employer could google your name and see all your toddler tantrums or teenage strops?

Or do you honestly think it's okay that these things are broadcast online, including autistic meltdowns or other medical issues?

Do you think it’s ok for an employer to make employment decisions based on seeing an 18 year olds toddler tantrum posted by their mum? Wouldn’t you think it was the employer who was weird as hell for caring about that?!

yes talking about periods and medical issues (which is extreme) is highly embarrassing but I would hope other adults would be mature enough not to punish the child for their parents actions.

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 30/08/2026 15:41

Raquelos · 30/08/2026 15:38

Perhaps the next generation of kids will feel the need to legislate having been deeply traumatised by their parents sharing content about them, but honestly, I doubt it. The only way I could see this happening is by some huge media campaign whipped up by a well-publicised tragedy that is laid at the door of evil social media parents, which is hardly an edifying prospect and not a way to make good laws imo.

Well, I hope the laws do change.

There are more and more stories coming out about families whose kids have been blasted all over social media, after all.

stillavid · 30/08/2026 15:40

There was a good advert by I think the Irish government high lighting how much information people were putting online about their children.

Here it is

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVzz8gTe7jM

Raquelos · 30/08/2026 15:38

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 30/08/2026 14:50

It may not qualify now but that's only because our laws haven't caught up with technology and life.

Children cannot consent to having their lives broadcast on the internet. We're not just talking the odd family photo or cute baby video of them trying a lemon - we're talking children who have their medical issues blasted online, their potty training - even videos of them in the bath or naked at the beach.

This isn't a case of disagreeing with someone's parenting. It's a case of knowing these children cannot consent to what's happening to them. Hopefully if enough people complain, the laws will change and these parents will no longer be able to make money off their kids in this way.

Perhaps the next generation of kids will feel the need to legislate having been deeply traumatised by their parents sharing content about them, but honestly, I doubt it. The only way I could see this happening is by some huge media campaign whipped up by a well-publicised tragedy that is laid at the door of evil social media parents, which is hardly an edifying prospect and not a way to make good laws imo.

stillavid · 30/08/2026 14:55

My issue is very much with the monetising of children on social media. I also think times have changed, years ago many of my 'friends' on Facebook would put photos of their children on there but now no one does as we have all got a lot more informed about the dangers of doing so and respectful of our children's right to privacy.

I don't attend exercise classes for example where they will post photos on line as I don't want to be seen hot and sweaty on instagram to promote a gym's business and so feel very strongly that we shouldn't do similar to children.

jumpinthecoolpool · 30/08/2026 14:52

I’m kind of somewhere between the two stances on this. Agree that things like potty training, tantrums, even photos that are slightly private or personal (like children asleep or similar) need to be kept off large public followings. Photos of children just … you know, there, I have no issue with at all. I do think it all gets a bit silly. My DC goes to an art class and someone took a photo of her own daughter painting last week and the reaction was ridiculous, tbh.

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 30/08/2026 14:50

Raquelos · 30/08/2026 14:38

You're making my point for me: when there are genuine underlying issues, we already have mechanisms in place for social services to get involved. Bog-standard social media content that people on here get so worked up about doesn't qualify; simply disapproving of someone's parenting decisions doesn't give us the right to decide that it shouldn't be allowed.

It may not qualify now but that's only because our laws haven't caught up with technology and life.

Children cannot consent to having their lives broadcast on the internet. We're not just talking the odd family photo or cute baby video of them trying a lemon - we're talking children who have their medical issues blasted online, their potty training - even videos of them in the bath or naked at the beach.

This isn't a case of disagreeing with someone's parenting. It's a case of knowing these children cannot consent to what's happening to them. Hopefully if enough people complain, the laws will change and these parents will no longer be able to make money off their kids in this way.

TheBlueKoala · 30/08/2026 14:45

Thinking about the Beckhams?

Thepeopleversuswork · 30/08/2026 14:45

I think the odd shot of your child as part of a family group in a holiday snap or a "back to school" shot once in a while is harmless enough tbh. I think sometimes people take the paranoia about children on social media to absurd extremes.

I think people who plaster their children all over their Insta or Facebook feed are just daft. Very obviously the children don't have consent and very obviously it's opening them up to many risks.

goldenpanda · 30/08/2026 14:42

I agree it should be illegal.

The law protects children from their parents in many ways, this should be another way that it does. It is very easy to exploit children, and this is one way that creates a public record that can never be truly deleted. People should be lobbying the government.

But I suppose it will take 18 years since it started being popular for the kids to grow up and start telling their stories of how it has affected them.

Raquelos · 30/08/2026 14:38

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 30/08/2026 14:29

It absolutely is our business when children are having their most vulnerable moments exposed on the internet for the world to see.

People do report extreme religious cults, by the way, and dance moms get one equal amounts of criticism.

Many of these families have been reported to social services, btw.

You're making my point for me: when there are genuine underlying issues, we already have mechanisms in place for social services to get involved. Bog-standard social media content that people on here get so worked up about doesn't qualify; simply disapproving of someone's parenting decisions doesn't give us the right to decide that it shouldn't be allowed.

PinkNailPolish2026 · 30/08/2026 14:29

There’s a few “influencers” and I that word loosely because they’re only TikTok famous who roll their children out for views and engagement. One in particular springs to mind from Aberdeen who insists on posting her child in his most vulnerable moments to her 700,000 followers. The amount of saves on her content with her child in it is horrific.

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 30/08/2026 14:29

Raquelos · 30/08/2026 13:17

It's simply none of our business how people choose to parent as long as children are safe and adequately provided for. If anyone is in doubt about that, then they should be calling social services.

I could say the same things about people choosing to bring their children up with a highly religious background, or superfocused "dance moms" or any variation thereof. Anything might have an impact on a child, but it is just not my business at all or anyone else's.

It absolutely is our business when children are having their most vulnerable moments exposed on the internet for the world to see.

People do report extreme religious cults, by the way, and dance moms get one equal amounts of criticism.

Many of these families have been reported to social services, btw.

JabbaTheBeachHut · 30/08/2026 14:25

Mooselander · 30/08/2026 13:03

I think YABU. It’s not something I have any interest in, but I don’t see a problem with others doing it.

Mumsnet seems to particularly overreact on this topic 😂

I think you'd see a problem if someone plastered photos and videos of you all over the internet without your permission.

It's no different for the children.

leavesinthebreeze · 30/08/2026 14:20

Totally agree op. See also the Cole’s on instagram. Totally exploiting their children. Despite me saying I am not interested in them and not following them they still pop up on my feed.

Ihateboris · 30/08/2026 14:09

Completely agree with you. See also reality TV! Absolutely disgusting trying to monetize off children

stillavid · 30/08/2026 14:06

I have seen stuff about how many times videos of children on line are saved and shared - vvvv creepy but that is why the parents keep doing it as videos with children have 'high engagement' which equals more cash.

OliveMyLove · 30/08/2026 14:06

I agree and think we need laws.