Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think people are less sociable and friendly nowadays?

294 replies

HotPatoot · 29/08/2026 09:44

I’ve always been a very sociable person and this worked well for me as a child through to university. I made friends everywhere I went as a child, invaluable on family holidays, starting new hobbies etc.
as I’ve got older I’m finding it near on impossible to communicate with people, everyone is so closed in their own world.

a few examples - I started a new job just after Christmas. On my break on first day I went into staff room and saw a colleague sat there on her phone so I walked over all cheerful and said “hi, I’m Patoot, it’s my first day!”. She glanced up from her phone, gave a fake smile and said “ok, hi?” ??? I followed up with “what’s your name?” So she said “Sheila”. I asked how long she’d worked there at which point she looked visibly annoyed and said “sorry i need to reply to this message” and started typing away on her phone. I made myself a cuppa and then went to sit again at her table at which point she gathered her stuff and left!!

another example - I joined a new fitness class. Before the class started I saw a woman sat on her own and went across to say hello. She smiled and told me her name so I asked if she’d done this class before and she said she had. I asked what it was like and she looked annoyed and said “it’s a fitness class?” And shrugged. I asked if she does any other classes and she got her phone out and just ignored me from then on.

example from this morning! I got on the bus, there was a woman sitting alone so I sat next to her and cheerfully commented on the traffic. She smiled, nodded and then fixed her eyes on the window away from me.

what is wrong with people these days?? AIBU to think the UK has got much less friendly or do people just become less sociable as they age??

OP posts:
Anarchy99 · 31/08/2026 10:13

I happily give directions, help people at self checkouts etc. l am capable of kindness.

But perhaps the decline in social contact has stemmed from the lack of ability of many extrovert people to understand the way it works.

If someone is clearly not distracted by phone, book etc then by all means smile and say something casual about the weather or whatever. If they smile, agree and look away, that is your cue to stop interacting.

If the other person continues the interaction, then they clearly are amenable to a general chat.

There are however a lot of people like the OP who don’t understand that part, This makes those of us who don’t want to be saddled with someone very wary of any interactions

MrsToothyBitch · 31/08/2026 10:10

Sorry OP, I think your interactions were shut down a little abruptly but you were also quite full on.

Example 1- "Sheila" should could have been slightly politer in saying "please excuse me but I must..." - which I would have done- but then you butted in on her and also ignored her cues that she considered the interaction over. Also if there are lots of empty tables and you choose to sit with someone who has clearly been briefly polite but brushed you off to go back to what they are doing - which might have been important- then I can see why that person might move in case you keep on at them. It is the same as sitting right next to someone on an empty bus or train to me.

Example 2 - this one was rude of the other lady. She could have said something less sarky and excused herself. However, you have no idea why she didn't want a chat and if she was in position and ready to start, why should she move. She clearly headed you off at the pass so to ask another question of her ignored her cue to you. I think I would have said something less sarky but quite non committal and closed and answered that way again to hope you'd stop. Eventually I might have reached for my phone, too.

Example 3- ignoring empty seats to cosy up to strangers on public transport is a huge no no. Most people don't talk on public transport and the person you boxed in was clearly already looking out the window. She politely replied to you and then went back to it - plenty of people would've ignored you outright - and you then ignored her cue to be left alone which is rude.

I absolutely hate being sat next to on otherwise empty busses and trains. It is extremely presumptuous and I wonder what point the people who do it are trying to make. Particularly if they then proceed to chat - they seem to think they're some sort of star attraction. I had to change a regular commute train carriage once because I went back to the office after the pandemic and realised a chatter had started commuting on it, too. She ignored all cues that I didn't want to talk whenever I ended up near her as I simply didn't find her that engaging and I wanted to read in peace- my preferred commute past time. So I started getting in a different carriage instead, and having to then hop off the train at a point where it did not line up with the platform v well with a huge gap. I always choose aisle seats, too - so people insisting on being let in to sit next to me in an otherwise empty carriage, I find very weird.

I've had colleagues introduce themselves to me in the kitchen on my breaks before and I think it's nice and that they're very socially adept and confident. That said, no one has proceeded to then follow me about when I've said "it's nice to have met you, lmk if I can help you with x or y" and headed off to my desk with my food.

I am pretty chatty overall. I just don't assume everyone wants to talk or that one comment = a conversation that must be kept going. I don't think society shifting to be less accommodating to people like OP is particularly bad or sad. People are busier now. No surprise they guard their down time more fiercely. Maybe they value their alone time with whatever they do on their phones, maybe they try and knock through personal admin as it's their only time to do so. Maybe an hour at boxercise is their only escape. No one owes OP an explanation, including perma-drained commuters!

cheeseomelette · 31/08/2026 10:08

@Thepeopleversuswork I totally agree with you. I see a huge shift which I just don’t think is entirely positive. I don’t think Covid helped by framing social contact as being dangerous for so long.

I think the concept of having “social skills” or appreciation of their value in society has really diminished. My parents really modelled it all to me and I think I’ve done the same with the dcs. They are friendly, polite and will hold a basic conversation with strangers with ease when required. it’s served them well at work too.

I am not talking about being harassed here or having conversation repeatedly forced on them when it’s clearly not welcome - nobody wants that nor should ever need to put up with it.

Bus chatters have always existed and are generally a harmless, if irritating, quirk of public transport.

RaraRachael · 31/08/2026 09:54

My mother used to chat to random strangers so what should have been a one hour shopping trip took all morning. So annoying.

There's a woman on our local Tesco checkout who will start telling you stuff completely ouf of thjn air. On Friday it was "I got my new glasses yesterday". No reaction from me as I kept packing. The she wittered on about her appointments and the different kinds she could have chosen, each time stopping putting items through.

I hope the people behind could see I wasn't encouraging her.
Just ring my shopping through.

arethereanyleftatall · 31/08/2026 09:41

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 31/08/2026 09:24

@Thepeopleversusworkbut lots of people aren’t interested in random social contact - it might make your day nicer or more pleasant but it’s not true for everyone.

One person’s need to chat and make small talk is not more important than another’s’ desire to just be left alone.

OP has shown with her example that she’s not great at reading the room - she’s also started a thread to moan about people’s lack of friendliness and has then proceeded to fuck off and ignore all the answers! Not exactly polite or supportive of social contact…

I actually assumed when I read the op that that person must be joking for the way they went on and on after the clear no, a made up thread to wind people up. But it doesn’t matter, interesting topic regardless of the intent of the opener.

arethereanyleftatall · 31/08/2026 09:38

Thepeopleversuswork · 31/08/2026 09:01

Look I completely get that some of the OP's behaviour is a bit full on for a lot of people. I would have been highly irritated in the bus example.

My point is broader than this: it's that we seem to have undergone a societal shift in the past ten or so years where what used to be seen as normal "friendliness" is now regarded as antisocial behaviour.

You're right that there's always been a significant proportion of people who found social chit-chat difficult and hard to navigate but in the past they were expected to just crack on. I don't think it's a wholly bad thing that we are now more aware of what a burden this is on people. I don't, for example, think people should have to tolerate someone boring on at them for hours under the "be kind" justification. I don't think its one person's job to manage someone else's neediness in social situations.

But I think the pendulum has swung so far in the other direction that we have drawn the line about acceptable behaviour too far. I don't think, for example, that its unreasonable to pass comment on the weather with strangers in public, or that its rude to start chatting to someone in the queue for an exercise class, providing you are alert to the signs changing. People are usually big enough to take care of themselves and the idea that you "intrude" on someone by passing a handful of words with them in public is ridiculous, in my view.

I think the groundrules have shifted to accommodate a loose group of people who are now called "introverts" (but who mostly are not properly introverts) too much, at the expense of normal basic social interaction and it's allowed a lot of people to let their fairly normal social anxieties rule the roost. Its not healthy to go through life believing you have an inalienable right to never talk to other people.

And, while being respectful of people's boundaries, I think we ought to remain open to the benefits of spontaneous social contact, as we lose a lot if we make it taboo.

I broadly agree with this now it’s a bit more balanced. For me it was only ever the ‘providing you are alert to the signs changing’ that was the problem from the op, who wasn’t at all and carried on after the message was clear. If we are to talk of tolerance and accepting of others, then that needs to include the people who really don’t want to interact.

Anarchy99 · 31/08/2026 09:36

Firefly1987 · 30/08/2026 19:25

Just because she was struggling doesn't actually mean she wanted my help? How would I know? You'd probably hate a stranger in your personal space trying to help you.

Just like not wanting to be bothered by a randomer is the same as hating everyone.

It was more this idea that "I don't have to give a crap about randomers, no one cares about them" don't know if it was you who said it or another PP. Nothing wrong with not wanting to do small talk (I'm sure OP can soon find someone who does) it's the idea that no one cares about the people around them and how dare they deem themselves worthy to try and engage in small talk with some of you 😆news flash-if you're out in the world you're going to encounter other people. I mean I don't particularly like them either, hell is other people-but unfortunately I don't live on a desert island.

Has anyone claimed someone trying to engage them with small talk affects their mental health yet?

You would know by reading social cues and being able to work out who could potentially be open to it, The same way humans have navigated social contact forever.

Ironically the ones who love chatting and getting to know others are often the worst at reading the room. It never used to be this bad. Someone could remark on the weather, I could smile and reply and then get on with my book or whatever and we would both get on with our day.

I think part of the issue is that people used to understand when further chat was welcome or not so would act accordingly. Now we get behaviour like the OP’s so people are more hostile about it.

I would of course chat at a social function or work thing. That’s what you have to do and that’s why you are there.

There’s also a decent chance you have something in common already.

But people assume that even with headphones, dark glasses, not looking at people, reading my book, resting bitch face and giving monosyllabic answers, their attentions are welcome.

Mummypie21 · 31/08/2026 09:29

I'm quite a sociable person. The first two scenarios, I would have been friendly and chatted for a bit especially. I would have reacted the same as the woman on the bus in the third situation. If I'm traveling alone, it's my time to unwind and think. I wouldn't want to make small-talk with a stranger.

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 31/08/2026 09:24

@Thepeopleversusworkbut lots of people aren’t interested in random social contact - it might make your day nicer or more pleasant but it’s not true for everyone.

One person’s need to chat and make small talk is not more important than another’s’ desire to just be left alone.

OP has shown with her example that she’s not great at reading the room - she’s also started a thread to moan about people’s lack of friendliness and has then proceeded to fuck off and ignore all the answers! Not exactly polite or supportive of social contact…

Anarchy99 · 31/08/2026 09:15

Thepeopleversuswork · 31/08/2026 09:01

Look I completely get that some of the OP's behaviour is a bit full on for a lot of people. I would have been highly irritated in the bus example.

My point is broader than this: it's that we seem to have undergone a societal shift in the past ten or so years where what used to be seen as normal "friendliness" is now regarded as antisocial behaviour.

You're right that there's always been a significant proportion of people who found social chit-chat difficult and hard to navigate but in the past they were expected to just crack on. I don't think it's a wholly bad thing that we are now more aware of what a burden this is on people. I don't, for example, think people should have to tolerate someone boring on at them for hours under the "be kind" justification. I don't think its one person's job to manage someone else's neediness in social situations.

But I think the pendulum has swung so far in the other direction that we have drawn the line about acceptable behaviour too far. I don't think, for example, that its unreasonable to pass comment on the weather with strangers in public, or that its rude to start chatting to someone in the queue for an exercise class, providing you are alert to the signs changing. People are usually big enough to take care of themselves and the idea that you "intrude" on someone by passing a handful of words with them in public is ridiculous, in my view.

I think the groundrules have shifted to accommodate a loose group of people who are now called "introverts" (but who mostly are not properly introverts) too much, at the expense of normal basic social interaction and it's allowed a lot of people to let their fairly normal social anxieties rule the roost. Its not healthy to go through life believing you have an inalienable right to never talk to other people.

And, while being respectful of people's boundaries, I think we ought to remain open to the benefits of spontaneous social contact, as we lose a lot if we make it taboo.

You can have as much spontaneous social contact with others as you like provided you are sure it is welcome. It’s not a difficult concept. Yet people assume it’s all or nothing.

I’m not sure why I should be expected to indulge a stranger’s inability to read the room. It couldn’t be clearer that I’m not interested. The people in the OP couldn’t have made it clearer (even in her own telling of the story) yet she carried on.

If someone makes a comment about the weather or whatever, and you reply, that is never the end of it. The chatty people have become less socially aware of cues. That is also something that has happened at the same time as people not wanting to chat so it’s hardly surprising we have seen a societal shift.

Thepeopleversuswork · 31/08/2026 09:01

arethereanyleftatall · 30/08/2026 17:51

What you’re saying @Thepeopleversusworkdoesn’t match with what the op did.

in one of your comments you said something like ‘if you can’t say 5 words to someone then don’t leave the house.’ Fair enough.

but that isn’t what the op did.

the op started a conversation.
the other person politely responded but making it clear they weren’t interested. (The 5 words you spoke of)

but then the op ignored the nonverbal communication of ‘I don’t want to talk’ and kept on. Both in the work example and the fitness class. That is the where the op is rude and intrusive.

Look I completely get that some of the OP's behaviour is a bit full on for a lot of people. I would have been highly irritated in the bus example.

My point is broader than this: it's that we seem to have undergone a societal shift in the past ten or so years where what used to be seen as normal "friendliness" is now regarded as antisocial behaviour.

You're right that there's always been a significant proportion of people who found social chit-chat difficult and hard to navigate but in the past they were expected to just crack on. I don't think it's a wholly bad thing that we are now more aware of what a burden this is on people. I don't, for example, think people should have to tolerate someone boring on at them for hours under the "be kind" justification. I don't think its one person's job to manage someone else's neediness in social situations.

But I think the pendulum has swung so far in the other direction that we have drawn the line about acceptable behaviour too far. I don't think, for example, that its unreasonable to pass comment on the weather with strangers in public, or that its rude to start chatting to someone in the queue for an exercise class, providing you are alert to the signs changing. People are usually big enough to take care of themselves and the idea that you "intrude" on someone by passing a handful of words with them in public is ridiculous, in my view.

I think the groundrules have shifted to accommodate a loose group of people who are now called "introverts" (but who mostly are not properly introverts) too much, at the expense of normal basic social interaction and it's allowed a lot of people to let their fairly normal social anxieties rule the roost. Its not healthy to go through life believing you have an inalienable right to never talk to other people.

And, while being respectful of people's boundaries, I think we ought to remain open to the benefits of spontaneous social contact, as we lose a lot if we make it taboo.

Thingsthatgo · 31/08/2026 08:37

You might enjoy chitchatting, but lots of people don’t. In the examples you have given it would have been better to back off when you noticed the other person wasn’t keen to engage rather than keep pushing. They might have been more open to chatting another time, but will probably try to avoid you now.

NoisyHiker · 31/08/2026 08:32

Oh god, this is why I stopped using public transport.

It's my face, I've been told I look very friendly and approachable (sort of the opposite of resting bitch face).

I tried the headphones/book/looking away trick. I also tried looking annoyed, but would still end up uncomfortable and forced into a 20 minute conversation to meet a stranger's needs. Sometimes that was the only peace I got in a day and I'd end up pointlessly learning someone elses entire life story.

I stick to going out in the car or with DH now (he has a very haughty bitch face which people avoid, depsite being lovely!).

BunkBedsArePeopleShelves · 31/08/2026 08:23

HauntedBungalow · 29/08/2026 10:33

It's phones. People interact virtually instead of talking.

Bullshit. We interact perfectly normally in the correct context.

It's just that nobody likes a Bus Nutter

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 31/08/2026 08:17

Firefly1987 · 30/08/2026 19:39

@PleaseDontAsk my point still stands because that's how it started. You're on here now because women wanted to share with other women way back when. Probably because they weren't getting it in real life from the new mums they were meeting. Wonder why reading these posts...

But this is a choice. I can step away from here whenever I fancy, ignore posters that don’t interest me or who rub me up the way - it’s not remotely comparable to a conversation in person where you have no choice other than to keep responding else you have to find a way to extract yourself without looking like a total cow.

I’m actually more than happy to chat to people in real life (like, in a queue or when I’m walking my dog) but if I have my head in my phone or I’m staring out of the window, those should (to me anyway) be fairly obvious clues that I want to be left in peace.

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 31/08/2026 08:14

@cheeseomelette you talk about a lack of tolerance towards people who might be neurodivergent but a lot of neurodivergent people just want to be left alone and couldn’t think of anything worse than being approached by a stranger and forced into making small talk.

AceStar1994 · 31/08/2026 02:15

My God. You sound absolutely insufferable.

pinck · 31/08/2026 01:09

HotPatoot · 29/08/2026 09:44

I’ve always been a very sociable person and this worked well for me as a child through to university. I made friends everywhere I went as a child, invaluable on family holidays, starting new hobbies etc.
as I’ve got older I’m finding it near on impossible to communicate with people, everyone is so closed in their own world.

a few examples - I started a new job just after Christmas. On my break on first day I went into staff room and saw a colleague sat there on her phone so I walked over all cheerful and said “hi, I’m Patoot, it’s my first day!”. She glanced up from her phone, gave a fake smile and said “ok, hi?” ??? I followed up with “what’s your name?” So she said “Sheila”. I asked how long she’d worked there at which point she looked visibly annoyed and said “sorry i need to reply to this message” and started typing away on her phone. I made myself a cuppa and then went to sit again at her table at which point she gathered her stuff and left!!

another example - I joined a new fitness class. Before the class started I saw a woman sat on her own and went across to say hello. She smiled and told me her name so I asked if she’d done this class before and she said she had. I asked what it was like and she looked annoyed and said “it’s a fitness class?” And shrugged. I asked if she does any other classes and she got her phone out and just ignored me from then on.

example from this morning! I got on the bus, there was a woman sitting alone so I sat next to her and cheerfully commented on the traffic. She smiled, nodded and then fixed her eyes on the window away from me.

what is wrong with people these days?? AIBU to think the UK has got much less friendly or do people just become less sociable as they age??

If someone sat next to me on the bus/train when there were other seats available and then started trying to make conversation, I’d be pissed. Don’t do that, weirdo. Sitting alone and staring out the window is practically the universal sign for “ leave me the fuck alone.”

Firefly1987 · 31/08/2026 00:54

@cheeseomelette yeah it's sad. I don't have OPs confidence and the last thing I'd ever want is to illicit some of these responses which means I don't bother with anyone. I'd hate to think people like OP are no longer going to be friendly just because of a minority of people who find it too much effort to "mask" by saying a few kind words to someone. I'll bet the only time some of them speak to a stranger is to shout at them for being in their way in the supermarket.

Reminds me of this vid though which always gives me a laugh-

Wiseplumnet · 31/08/2026 00:08

My idea of hell is having to interact, especially with random strangers. I would rather doom scroll or have my own thoughts. The bus was particularly unwarranted. Are you an extroverted person?

cheeseomelette · 30/08/2026 23:49

I’m always so glad that my experience of people in real life is nothing like the prevailing attitudes on here where there seems no tolerance to people who may be neurodivergent or lonely or heaven forbid, just friendly. I live in a friendly area and people readily chat in queues, in shops, in the street and anywhere else. You’d look odd or plain rude if you didn’t respond. My dcs do the same and we all feel part of a community through these small interactions.

There’s rarely anything so important I have to do on a phone which doesn’t mean I can’t acknowledge someone or respond to a question . If I need to extricate myself from a protracted or awkward conversation I will do - it’s entirely possible to do so politely.

It’s so odd to me that some people seem to pull up the drawbridge to social interaction with “randoms” once they have established their circle of people. Some radiate such hostility that I’m always fascinated as to how they made any friends in the first place.

phoenixrosehere · 30/08/2026 21:28

SouthLondonMum22 · 30/08/2026 20:07

Joining and engaging on Mumsnet is a choice though. It isn't the same as a random person approaching you and trying to force conversation.

Agree. It is about choice. Strangers should be allowed to choose how much they want to say or not without being accused or considered anti-social or rude.

Nothing wrong with wanting to engage in small talk but surely it should be reciprocal and you need to accept and understand that some people are not in the mood for it.

It was a woman sitting alone on her phone during her lunch break. No idea why anyone would think that is the person they should sit with and proceed to talk at. Surely, if the person wanted to engage they would have put their phone down or simply said “just a moment, I’m in the middle of something… writing this thing.. xyz and once I finish I can talk to you properly.”

The woman in the gym class had returned OP’s greeting, gave OP her name which she didn’t have to so somewhere in their interaction something made her decide she no longer wanted to engage with OP which is her choice.

A woman on a bus sitting by herself looking out the window. The woman smiled at OP so acknowledged them and I’m unsure why OP thinks they should want to have a conversation.

None of these women gave any indication that they wanted to chat nor should they have to simply engaged further with OP because OP wanted a conversation. At least for the first two women, it is a possibility they thought OP was the type who would make a beeline for them and not everyone is up for or looking for that type of interaction at work or at the gym on a regular basis.

I’m wondering how OP decides who they should talk to and I sincerely hope they don’t assume that people sitting/ standing by themselves are just looking for someone to chat to them.

I also wonder why they’re choosing to make out everyone is less social because they chose people who didn’t match their expectations. Three instances in places that are pretty time restrictive doesn’t suggest to me that people are less social.

People who don’t mind small talk will usually show they don’t mind small talk.

Firefly1987 · 30/08/2026 20:53

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 30/08/2026 12:45

There's nothing wrong with friendly conversation but you have to read the room.

If someone is sat on their phone, minding their own business, they're clearly not open to having a full-blown chat. Similarly the lady at the gym made it pretty obvious she wasn't up for a chat, yet OP carried on regardless.

It's not friendly to intrude on someone's space and private time and force them into a conversation.

I think OP did misread the phone lady, but then she was just letting her know it's her first day-most people would be like "oh, hi welcome! I'm super busy right now but nice to meet you" but that's just far too much to expect now.

At least OP knows to avoid mindless phone-zombie lady going forward, so it's a win-win for both of them.

Tuggb · 30/08/2026 20:30

I get very few moments in a day where I can totally switch my brain off. I wouldn't have been rude, in fact I would probably have been very friendly, but underneath it I'd have been gutted that you disrupted one of my precious moments with small talk.

I don't agree with being rude but I think if someone politely lets you know that they don't want to engage in small talk then you should respect that.

Firefly1987 · 30/08/2026 20:18

Thepeopleversuswork · 30/08/2026 11:11

I agree. And its all now covered by the blanket justification that everyone is an “introvert” and their right to sit on their own with their phone takes precedence over anything else.

FWIW I do think making conversation with a random on the bus is a bit much and I would have preferred to be left alone but in the other cases OP did nothing wrong. I do think our perception of benign and light social contact with others as intrusive is symptomatic of a wider malaise in society.

We have become incredibly atomised and this leads people to believe they have some inalienable right to never have to interact with others outside their immediate family.

Actually small acts of daily friendliness are part of the glue that binds society together. If we lose this we lose all sense of others as people with their own lives and needs. And we make the alienation worse. Social interaction is a muscle and if we lose it it’s hard to get it back.

OP’s behaviour may have been mildly irritating but the sense of horror at having to interact with others is far worse.

Great post. Totally agree. It bugs me when they try and use introversion as an excuse because I'm one and I'm not stuck up and unable to reply a few kind words to someone who is new at a job/fitness class to make them feel welcome.

Actually small acts of daily friendliness are part of the glue that binds society together. If we lose this we lose all sense of others as people with their own lives and needs. And we make the alienation worse. Social interaction is a muscle and if we lose it it’s hard to get it back.

Yes this is exactly what I was trying to get at-everyone has a right not to want to chat to strangers, it's the way they're talking about the horror of it and how OP has committed some cardinal sin. She's after all just a "randomer" these superior people don't have to care about as a person. They actually relish being rude-and I'm sure they've committed far more social faux pas than the OP ever has they're probably just too self-absorbed to have noticed.

OP’s behaviour may have been mildly irritating but the sense of horror at having to interact with others is far worse.

Most of the real world isn't like this, these types of threads always bring out the socially awkward people who see other people as enemies.

Swipe left for the next trending thread