You clearly haven’t read my comments, as you admit, otherwise you wouldn’t have written such a ridiculous response. I responded clearly earlier regarding the posts about haemophilia which are not relevant to the main topic of discussion in the thread about genetic compounding over generations while the parents (cousins) having these children believe they are “fine”, even despite being the children of cousins themselves, then go on to have children with with another similarly lucky cousin who also happened not to inherit double copies of the defective genes, and then apparently such people are shocked that their children are more likely to have genetic disabilities and pretend they don’t understand why, or it’s “the will of God”, or “the doctors made the children sick”, when it is clearly evidenced exactly why this is happening and it’s because they’re having children with close relatives and compounding genetic mutations and the likelihood of descendants inheriting double copies of multiple defective genes over each generation.
This has been explained multiple times very clearly, but as you admit, you haven’t bothered to read it.
Haemophillia is a red herring in this discussion because, unlike most genetic conditions, both parents can’t be unsymptomatic carriers and therefore completely unaware of the genes which they have a 1/8 chance of giving any child a double copy and therefore a disability that manifests, because the father would ALREADY be manifesting the condition. That is NOT the case for the vast, vast majority of genetic disorders which manifest not just in one sex but in BOTH sexes ONLY when the child inherits a defective gene from BOTH parents.
This is yet another a derailment that is irrelevant to the issue under discussion which is that two seemingly healthy parents can be carriers of unknown genetic disorders of which they’d only become aware once a child is born with it because they inherit faulty copies of genes from BOTH parents who were carriers, and that this is orders of magnitude more likely to occur if you marry a close relative. I have explained the maths and genetic outcomes multiple times.
You admit you haven’t read the thread before commenting, hence me having to repeat the basic facts that you should understand even based on GCSE biology but that I’ve also set out in multiple posts in this thread, as have other posters.
As for your pathetic personal attacks on me, why don’t you try complying with the Talk Guidelines rather than insulting people, if you actually have anything useful to contribute to the discussion rather than insulting other posters or misrepresenting their comments having even admitted that you’re too lazy to have bothered to read them first.