Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think if "Prince" Harry wants 5m a year of taxpayer money he needs to start twerking for pennies as a working royal again

145 replies

CurdinHenry · 22/08/2026 19:40

Otherwise he can fund it himself or stay in the US?

OP posts:
nomas · 25/08/2026 14:23

Benjithedog · 25/08/2026 14:21

Unless you’ve seen her passport you don’t know she’s British

Wiki says she has dual citizenship, so she is British.

Gloriia · 25/08/2026 14:21

I am most certainly not a fan but he will be a target because of who he is not if he is a so-called working royal or not. He would be a target for any crazy kidnappers as his dad is obviously loaded.

That said there is not a chance it should be publicly funded, his df should pay out of his pocket imo.

Benjithedog · 25/08/2026 14:21

nomas · 25/08/2026 14:09

So? She’s still British. The Queen’s husband was in Greece.

Unless you’ve seen her passport you don’t know she’s British

nomas · 25/08/2026 14:09

caringcarer · 25/08/2026 13:13

Lilibet wasn't even born in the UK. Her parents need to continue to pay for their own security as not working royals. When Eugenie and Beatrice had paid for security Andrew was a working royal.

So? She’s still British. The Queen’s husband was in Greece.

Benjithedog · 25/08/2026 13:57

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 25/08/2026 13:43

Like or need? Because many people get secure when it’s a need. As others have said, former PMs, authors who have chosen to write books that upset others have had small fortunes spent on them.

If there’s a credible reason for it, then of course this is why we have these trained people and only the security deemed essential not what he wants.

It can’t be on a deserving or undeserving decision process, but need. He shouldn’t have to do certain levels of duties or not, just is this needed.

Too much emotion on all harry related issues, from both his supporters and haters!

Actually the 90 million need and deserve the security as well but they don’t have the funds to pay for it. I want my children to be able to walk down a street safely. Are their lives less important than the Sussexes? No they are not and if Harry wants the armed protection he should stay where he is where he gets it, all paid for by himself.

AnonyMumAuDHD · 25/08/2026 13:51

I don’t subscribe to the Megan/Harry hate. I think there is a lot going on behind closed doors that we are not privy to and all families are complicated, royal or not. I adore the Princess of Wales’ style, poise and quiet dignity - Wills traded up IMHO - but I think the whole family is a bit fucked on the whole.

That said, if Harry is returning to the Uk and expecting tax-payer funded security etc (ie if his dad is NOT paying for it out his own private funds, or Harry himself paying), then yes, he needs to work for the Firm and earn his keep.

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 25/08/2026 13:43

Benjithedog · 25/08/2026 13:26

You do realise there are about 90 million UK citizens who also would like security too.

Like or need? Because many people get secure when it’s a need. As others have said, former PMs, authors who have chosen to write books that upset others have had small fortunes spent on them.

If there’s a credible reason for it, then of course this is why we have these trained people and only the security deemed essential not what he wants.

It can’t be on a deserving or undeserving decision process, but need. He shouldn’t have to do certain levels of duties or not, just is this needed.

Too much emotion on all harry related issues, from both his supporters and haters!

MaturingCheeseball · 25/08/2026 13:36

People like Liz Truss don’t get protection because they “deserve” it after being PM, or as some kind of perk. It’s because they will have had access to highly-secure information and protocols etc. No one wants to assassinate Luz Truss but they might want to torture her for valuable information.

Though of course as time goes on I expect people’s worth and consequently their security is downgraded.

Benjithedog · 25/08/2026 13:26

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 25/08/2026 13:21

hes a British citizen. If he needs security, he should have it. He shouldn’t have it just because he wants it and there’s no credible threat.

the working royal vs non-working royal is a distraction, the “work” is just charitable work and made up duties, William has shown that what the previous generation felt were important duties can be dumped for a different approach to “royal work” so it’s sort of irrelevant.

The fact they want to keep their dcs as private as possible is a good thing, it lessens the risk to the children for their security and as such should mean they aren’t targets that need protection.

You do realise there are about 90 million UK citizens who also would like security too.

IonianNerveGrip · 25/08/2026 13:25

Benjithedog · 25/08/2026 13:08

She shouldn’t get it either

She should get the security part. Anyone who's been PM potentially has access to valuable information that we don't want tortured out of them. It's better for us all that anyone in that position is protected.

But we need to think about putting a minimum service requirement on the office supplies and other staff grant.

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 25/08/2026 13:21

hes a British citizen. If he needs security, he should have it. He shouldn’t have it just because he wants it and there’s no credible threat.

the working royal vs non-working royal is a distraction, the “work” is just charitable work and made up duties, William has shown that what the previous generation felt were important duties can be dumped for a different approach to “royal work” so it’s sort of irrelevant.

The fact they want to keep their dcs as private as possible is a good thing, it lessens the risk to the children for their security and as such should mean they aren’t targets that need protection.

Benjithedog · 25/08/2026 13:20

Well here’s a new idea if he wants armed guards providing their security why don’t they stay in America where they get just that.

MaturingCheeseball · 25/08/2026 13:17

Prince Harry wants armed security. That can only be provided by the government (state). No one can pay for their own armed security in this country, and that includes the King paying for Harry. He couldn’t even if he wanted to.

So Harry is very welcome to pay for 100 heavies - but not ones with guns, which is what he wants - full-time for all four of them, no matter what they are doing from charity work to just hanging out with oafish pals for Harry or celebs for Meghan.

Highly-trained protection officers round-the-clock for four people (two of whom do not seem keen on keeping out of public view) will cost ££££££££££.

caringcarer · 25/08/2026 13:15

dustabsorber · 25/08/2026 13:12

He boasted about killing Taliban, or whoever. What a fool.

Yes, he put a target on his own back and on Meghan and his DC. What an idiot.

caringcarer · 25/08/2026 13:13

Viviennemary · 25/08/2026 12:53

The meaning is Lilibet and Archie will drop down and become unimportant with no duties or royal funding in years to come and will be in the same position as Beatrice and Eugenie are now. So their position is no different to the position of the York girls when they were children. They were also the grandchildren of the monarch and children of the monarchs second son

Lilibet wasn't even born in the UK. Her parents need to continue to pay for their own security as not working royals. When Eugenie and Beatrice had paid for security Andrew was a working royal.

Benjithedog · 25/08/2026 13:12

nomas · 25/08/2026 12:20

You can’t compare Harry to Beatrice and Eugenie. Harry is fifth in line to the throne.

If something happens to Wills and Co, Harry will be the King. And Meghan our Queen.

You can because they are non serving royals as well

dustabsorber · 25/08/2026 13:12

He boasted about killing Taliban, or whoever. What a fool.

EasternStandard · 25/08/2026 13:09

caringcarer · 23/08/2026 15:09

He's not going to be a working royal so does not qualify for tax funded security. Princess Beatrice, Princess Eugenie, Zara Tindall or her DC Lady Louise or her brother James don't get it so no reason for Harry, Meghan, Archie or Lilibet to get it. If Harry and Meghan want security they will have to pay for it as they did in the US.

Is this the case? He did get security when visiting, he just had to give four weeks (iirc) notice.

dustabsorber · 25/08/2026 13:08

H/M aren't wanted.

Benjithedog · 25/08/2026 13:08

TimeFlysWhenYoureHavingRum · 22/08/2026 22:56

Liz Truss gets police security for life and entitlement to £ 115 000 a year for office supplies and staff. Again - for life.

She shouldn’t get it either

Benjithedog · 25/08/2026 13:03

youngestisapsycho · 22/08/2026 22:52

I don’t get what him being a working royal has to do with it? He is still a royal, he’s the Kings son, his children are the Kings grandchildren… I’d rather my taxes were used to keep those children safe then being spent on the fake benefit and Pip receivers.
Also the Royal family have enough money of their own to cover those costs surely?

Edited

I would rather my taxes went to protect ordinary women from assault and making streets safer for them to walk down. He’s allegedly rich enough he can pay for it as he has been in America.

Viviennemary · 25/08/2026 12:53

caringcarer · 25/08/2026 12:42

I'm sure I read King Charles pays for Andrews security himself. Very unlikely something would happen to Prince William and all his 3 DC because they fly and often travel separately for that very reason. The to bought of Harry as king would be a nightmare and probably the point we turned to a republic because the public would not stand for it. Look at his popularity ratings and Meghan's is even worse.

The meaning is Lilibet and Archie will drop down and become unimportant with no duties or royal funding in years to come and will be in the same position as Beatrice and Eugenie are now. So their position is no different to the position of the York girls when they were children. They were also the grandchildren of the monarch and children of the monarchs second son

Theunamedcat · 25/08/2026 12:49

caringcarer · 25/08/2026 12:42

I'm sure I read King Charles pays for Andrews security himself. Very unlikely something would happen to Prince William and all his 3 DC because they fly and often travel separately for that very reason. The to bought of Harry as king would be a nightmare and probably the point we turned to a republic because the public would not stand for it. Look at his popularity ratings and Meghan's is even worse.

Used too now he is confined to the estate there is no need for extra security unless he leaves

Theunamedcat · 25/08/2026 12:47

CaspersMum24 · 23/08/2026 21:58

Thank you so much. See, it's not really that difficult to provide the sources for your opinions is it?

No idea who pissed on your chips but google is free and I have a life im not at the back and call of random strangers on the Internet

nomas · 25/08/2026 12:42

Viviennemary · 25/08/2026 12:27

Of course you can. In 2010 Andrew was 4th in line, Beatrice 5th and Eugenie 6th. So they were actually a place higher.

But now Archie and Lilibet are sixth and Seventh in line.

And they are the King’s actual grandchildren. Comparing Harry to Euge and Bea is ridiculous.