Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to keep reporting my sister over concerns for her children?

159 replies

Pipiscoming2023 · 21/08/2026 13:26

I live the other side of the country to my brother and sister, but keep in touch regularly with my brother and his family. My sister, however, doesn’t reply to any of my texts, won’t see me whenever I’m that way visiting etc.

The issue is she’s an alcoholic and she’s constantly in trouble. Shes 28 and has 4 kids, one of which is a new baby, and she’s back on the drink (and my brother thinks drugs too).

I get screenshots sent to me by one of my cousins who also lives near them, of things my sister is saying, videos of her drunk and fighting, just all the worst things.

My biggest worry is for those children. Both our parents were addicts and ended up dead before we were teenagers. I know how this goes. But my sister is refusing any kind of support from me (I’ve offered to take her to meetings, drs, just sit and have a cup of tea and a chat, everything).

It all came to a head earlier this year when I’d heard she was blind drunk the day after taking her new baby home and I decided to anonymously report her via crime stoppers. I felt awful but social services came over and by the sounds of it nothing was done.

She has since been out almost every weekend, keeps dropping the baby off at random peoples houses (according to my brother - she won’t let him have her because he’s so judgy she said), and last weekend ended up in a fight in front of her kids that led to a split lip and black eye.

Would IBU to keep reporting her? I know I’m not the only one that has but nothing seems to be happening. There must be a huge case spanning years, so why aren’t social protecting those children? And what can I do?

OP posts:
Beachbeach · 21/08/2026 20:50

I think you need to report and continue to report. Also ideally your brother and your cousins tooo. The more people who are concerned the better.

she will end up like your parents

Arran2024 · 21/08/2026 20:50

TrudytheCat · 21/08/2026 19:26

Didn't thresholds for neglect get raised recently? I may be wrong, but I thought neglect needed to reach proper safety issues above general neglect to reach CIN levels now. Below CIN, everything is only with parental agreement and Family First. I could well be wrong though, as this is just what I heard from an upset DSL who'd been pushing for involvement for a family we work with. She could have explained poorly. I know it's been harder and harder to get support for very obviously neglected children.

I've worked with lots of very chaotic families and came from one too. There never seems to be formal involvement before a child is deliberately hurt and even then, I've known beating with objects being signed of from social services after a couple of months and parenting advice (very recently too). That's not to say you should stop reporting, because without all the background and history social services definitely won't step in, just that you shouldn't expect that much either. It'll help having the prior reports if it gets worse for them though.

I used to wonder how I was left in the position I was as a child, then I started working in schools and saw the thresholds for state intervention. I was occasionally beaten (knocked out and bleeding beaten, not hit), emotionally neglected, surrounded by drugs, forgotten and not fed. In my 20s looking back that felt like it had warranted social services help! I was upset I'd not been worth helping. Now, I've known a fair few kids in exactly that same position in work, with SS stepping down involvement or not taking it up initially at all when we're already very worried. It makes sense to me now, my own childhood and lack of support. There's just not enough social workers and support workers for all the neglected kids.

My experience as an adopter is that reports from concerned individuals are added to the file - until something utterly catastrophic happens. Then the children are removed as an emergency. Then the reports are taken into consideration when deciding what to do next.

Arran2024 · 21/08/2026 20:48

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/08/2026 18:43

That’s up to them isn’t it? I can’t answer!

It was a rhetorical question. It is sad when parents lose their children to the care system but as an adopter, my experience and that of other adopters I know is of neglectful parents being given chance after chance after chance - and the children continuing to suffer. If you are a baby, you can't go back and redo those early months when you should be in a cycle of a primary care giver responding to you, regulating you, mirroring you. You end up like my adopted daughter with an insecure attachment style and a hyper sensitive anxiety/distress response.

balzamico · 21/08/2026 20:10

I’d think about contacting her local MP, tell them that many reports have been made by various people but that no/ not enough action seem to be taken - this should hopefully trigger some kind of overview and get all the agencies communicating properly.

TrudytheCat · 21/08/2026 19:26

Didn't thresholds for neglect get raised recently? I may be wrong, but I thought neglect needed to reach proper safety issues above general neglect to reach CIN levels now. Below CIN, everything is only with parental agreement and Family First. I could well be wrong though, as this is just what I heard from an upset DSL who'd been pushing for involvement for a family we work with. She could have explained poorly. I know it's been harder and harder to get support for very obviously neglected children.

I've worked with lots of very chaotic families and came from one too. There never seems to be formal involvement before a child is deliberately hurt and even then, I've known beating with objects being signed of from social services after a couple of months and parenting advice (very recently too). That's not to say you should stop reporting, because without all the background and history social services definitely won't step in, just that you shouldn't expect that much either. It'll help having the prior reports if it gets worse for them though.

I used to wonder how I was left in the position I was as a child, then I started working in schools and saw the thresholds for state intervention. I was occasionally beaten (knocked out and bleeding beaten, not hit), emotionally neglected, surrounded by drugs, forgotten and not fed. In my 20s looking back that felt like it had warranted social services help! I was upset I'd not been worth helping. Now, I've known a fair few kids in exactly that same position in work, with SS stepping down involvement or not taking it up initially at all when we're already very worried. It makes sense to me now, my own childhood and lack of support. There's just not enough social workers and support workers for all the neglected kids.

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/08/2026 18:43

Arran2024 · 21/08/2026 18:03

How much longer does she get though, while the children are suffering?

That’s up to them isn’t it? I can’t answer!

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/08/2026 18:42

Foolish1984 · 21/08/2026 18:06

You can’t take that attitude with child protection unfortunately. It absolutely SHOULD work like how you’ve described, but sadly not as demonstrated so many times with these tragic events reported in the media. As many reports as possible are sadly required these days for them to do much of anything - and I’ve been in almost the exact same scenario as OP with my nephew’s mother. My entire family and FIVE neighbours were all reporting every month, yet SS were lapping up everything she told them, during their BOOKED visits to her….. You know, when she’d tidy the house, light scented candles and put on a face full of make up & her nicest outfit, whilst practicing her story all about how her ex-friend has turned everyone against her and is making malicious reports…….. Nothing was ever done until she nearly killed my nephew by throwing him down the stairs and he was admitted to hospital. I think myself and my family alone, made 64 reports in 18 months - zero action.
So yeah, aware they may well be, but it doesn’t mean they’ll act!

To be fair, it’s a constant theme that people are so, so, worried about the children… that they’ll only report anonymously through some non direct route.
I’m sure that feels “safer” than facing to up to the consequences of reporting but I do wonder why that matters if you’re that worried about children.

Saladnow · 21/08/2026 18:21

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ.

ThePieceHall · 21/08/2026 18:10

@Pipiscoming2023

What practical help have you offered to your sister and to your nieces and nephews?

Foolish1984 · 21/08/2026 18:06

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/08/2026 17:40

From what you describe I don’t think it matters whether you report what you hear or not. She’s known to social services and the police constantly go out to her- they know all
About her and likely more/ faster than you.

she’s got involvement, but that’s not the same as you seeing her children removed. That might happen in the future but for now she’s being given the chance

You can’t take that attitude with child protection unfortunately. It absolutely SHOULD work like how you’ve described, but sadly not as demonstrated so many times with these tragic events reported in the media. As many reports as possible are sadly required these days for them to do much of anything - and I’ve been in almost the exact same scenario as OP with my nephew’s mother. My entire family and FIVE neighbours were all reporting every month, yet SS were lapping up everything she told them, during their BOOKED visits to her….. You know, when she’d tidy the house, light scented candles and put on a face full of make up & her nicest outfit, whilst practicing her story all about how her ex-friend has turned everyone against her and is making malicious reports…….. Nothing was ever done until she nearly killed my nephew by throwing him down the stairs and he was admitted to hospital. I think myself and my family alone, made 64 reports in 18 months - zero action.
So yeah, aware they may well be, but it doesn’t mean they’ll act!

Arran2024 · 21/08/2026 18:03

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/08/2026 17:40

From what you describe I don’t think it matters whether you report what you hear or not. She’s known to social services and the police constantly go out to her- they know all
About her and likely more/ faster than you.

she’s got involvement, but that’s not the same as you seeing her children removed. That might happen in the future but for now she’s being given the chance

How much longer does she get though, while the children are suffering?

Foolish1984 · 21/08/2026 17:57

Social services will take your report farrrrrrrrrrrrr more seriously if you tell them you’re her sister! Not least because if it’s anonymous, your sister can just claim there’s a friend who’s being malicious! They get malicious reports all the time about people, so they’ll likely just disregard a lot of anonymous reports.

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/08/2026 17:40

From what you describe I don’t think it matters whether you report what you hear or not. She’s known to social services and the police constantly go out to her- they know all
About her and likely more/ faster than you.

she’s got involvement, but that’s not the same as you seeing her children removed. That might happen in the future but for now she’s being given the chance

Bigskiesandsunsets · 21/08/2026 17:36

Please report directly to social services and not anonymously. Be clear about who you are, why you are concerned and who are the direct witnesses to this behaviour. Keep reporting each time you have new information or ensure it is reported by the witnesses.
If you pass onto the school, it may confirm other information they already have and can support them in any referral they make, but sometimes if school then try to pass information on other then directly from the children, it can then be dismissed as school passing on hearsay.
Just remember without your sister’s consent and your consent, you are unlikely to get any feedback. This doesn’t mean social workers are not working with the family. Unless it reaches a point where they are actively looking to remove children and place with family or elsewhere (section 20 or PLO), it is easy for family members to be none the wiser about the extent of social care involvement. Equally, if the threshold for Child Protection (section 47) is not reached then your sister can refuse to engage with support at Early Help or Child in Need (section 17) level.

Jennick · 21/08/2026 17:18

Report ,write email.the children eed protection,she needs help .Is it worth contacting you MP and ask why. nothing is done or perhaps it is behind the scenes,keep trying the children are very vulnerable

FreddoEspresso · 21/08/2026 17:11

Those poor children. Given she is living like this and only 28, I imagine there will be another pregnancy next year. I wonder if she stays sober during these pregnancies.. Grim, so grim for these innocent little ones.

OP, keep reporting. She sounds like someone who shouldn't have possession of a cat, let alone 4 under 10.

I know I must not say things like this, but if she isn't a case for state forced sterilisation, I don't know what is.

Nobg · 21/08/2026 17:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Pipiscoming2023 · 21/08/2026 17:00

Thank you all. I’m going to sit down tonight and write out a timeline, gather all the evidence and then send a long email to her children’s school and social services detailing everything.

OP posts:
Warmlight1 · 21/08/2026 17:00

RoseField1 · 21/08/2026 14:43

I wish people wouldn't give such wrong advice. NSPCC just pass concerns on to social services via the means of confusing forms - just report to social services please! And the LADO is nothing to do with reporting concerns about children.

Social services is where it all ends up agree- report to children services- but you can do both. There are occasions where information is summarised and can loose it's impact- in my experience NSPCC give very full accounts. Either way you can be anonymous but no one can guarantee she won't figure it out. It's worth being prepared for that.

Therewegothen · 21/08/2026 16:57

RoseField1 · 21/08/2026 13:35

Report is directly to social services and don't do it anonymously. Reporting to crime stoppers is a strange route and the school will just send the information to social services - it will be much more useful to them if you speak to them directly yourself and share your concerns - all of them.

This.

Report directly to social services. It's much more effective and they'll be able to act more directly on the concerns.

Pistachiocake · 21/08/2026 16:52

I don't know about children's SS, but with adults, when there was a safeguarding concern about my mum in hospital, the woman who rang me about it said they get so many busybody calls, strangers reporting something and nothing, that they're absolutely overwhelmed (her words). Family obviously know what's going on, and reporting serious concerns like yours is important.

Italiangreyhound · 21/08/2026 16:23

You are right to report her.

Bananacrepewithnuts · 21/08/2026 16:20

deedeemegadoodoo · 21/08/2026 13:30

Keep reporting to Social Care. How old are the children? If at school, report there too.

Yes this.
Please make the school aware.

They will follow up with social care too.

X

RoseField1 · 21/08/2026 16:14

Imdunfer · 21/08/2026 15:59

I'd be sending it to the head of Social Services and the Council member who has the portfolio for Social Services and my MP. Redacted of names in the first instance if I felt that was necessary.

Edited

You think if something bad happened to a child in their area they wouldn't be aware!?

Arran2024 · 21/08/2026 16:09

Bigpaintinglittlepainting · 21/08/2026 13:37

I think that as bad as she is she’s still acting as a somewhat responsible adult by trying to palm off the kids on someone else and the social see worse.

I’m not disputing its bad but there are such severe ramifications from taking children from the mother, and the social will ignore lots to keep the kids in the family home.

Especially if there are supportive family members. Care is bad, I worked with young offenders, most come from care or severe neglect like no parent at home.

If it was me I’d be looking at other family members to form a support group around her for the kids, take them one weekend out of four. Are there other family members who would do that ?

I adopted two children. The younger one was constantly handed over to family members, friends, neighbours. It left her with a super-friendliness to strangers, which has been incredibly difficult to shift. In her case, social services were involved - birth mum would hastily get baby back just before meetings. This went on for 6 months, but by then social services were being inundated with concerns from family, neighbours etc. Still they didn't act until there was a separate, catastrophic incident.

Anyway, I just wanted to say that handing her child to relative strangers is not ok and will probably have an impact longer term. But also it probably won't be enough to cause social services to act.

Swipe left for the next trending thread