Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To compare and contrast coverage and outcome of the Jason Arday scandal with that of Cambridge plagiarist William O'Reilly

727 replies

OneArtfulUmberSquid · 10/08/2026 15:03

Partly due to being an academic, the slow news season and the sensationalism, like many people I've been following the Jason Arday story and have been appalled by the scale of the fabulation and the abysmal lack of due diligence by Cambridge when they appointed him - I've also been appalled by how he was presented by the University when he was hired in terms of the emphasis on his back story and what he represented rather than his scholarship.

It's interesting to compare/contrast with the case of William O'Reilly - who was caught plagiarising his own undergrad students' essays and was then found to have plagiarised other scholars' work a number of times before...see https://www.varsity.co.uk/news/27433

He also threatened to sue student journalists for exposing him - not as bad as Arday calling the police, but still pretty risible
https://www.varsity.co.uk/news/26105

A further issue relates to his witness for the accused in a rape case despite being involved in the investigation.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/feb/22/cambridge-university-sexual-misconduct-cases
https://www.varsity.co.uk/news/18747

I'd be interested to know what anyone else thinks of the two cases in terms of academic misconduct and outcomes, particularly anyone who works in Cambridge. O'Reilly claimed that the scrutinising of his work was due to homophobia.

More here but behind a paywall
https://www.ft.com/content/ae7f16ae-95ab-4aae-a676-0748e3e61b6d?shareType=nongift&syn-25a6b1a6=1

Copycat don caught again

William O'Reilly claims the allegations form part of a homophobic bullying campaign

https://www.varsity.co.uk/news/27433

OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
OneArtfulUmberSquid · 10/08/2026 15:46

AllJoyAndNoFun
thanks, yes I guess that's it, although I don't think Professor mainstream is much less 'guilty' of academic fraud - Arday did have qualifications, publications and research projects (although his PhD was obviously a bit plagiarised), and his back story was so compelling...hope Cambridge put their house in order over all this, it will be exploited to the hilt.

OP posts:
AllJoyAndNoFun · 10/08/2026 15:21

So firstly, is there an element of racism? Yes, almost certainly, but I think there’s more to it.

I think one key factor is the fabrication of the personal story which is of much more interest to the man in the street than some academic copying someone elses’s homework. I think if it was just the academic plagerism in Jason’s case it would have died down.Most of the internet discussion has focussed on the other stuff ( the runs, the pigs head, the knife man etc). That’s what people are most incredulous about- ie that no one questioned this stuff. If you think how popular all those “scammer”
documentaries are on Netflix then this is along the same lines.

There’s also the fact that he was better known at the time than the other guy, whose name I’ve already forgotten and who is just another middle aged/ old don, fairly indistinguishable from all the others. Jason is more interesting precisely because of his atypical background/ striking appearance etc. I’m not saying either was “well known” but I’d say if you showed a picture of each to a sample of reasonably well read people, a far few would be able to identify Jason ) if not by name) where literally none would be able to identify William.

Swipe left for the next trending thread